-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
create event form lib #8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new Angular library for event creation within the frontend application, complete with routing, component, configuration, and testing setup. Supporting changes include workspace configuration updates for TypeScript, Jest, ESLint, Nx, and VS Code, as well as the integration of the new library's routes into the main application. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Router
participant CreateEventComponent
User->>Router: Navigate to /event/create
Router->>CreateEventComponent: Instantiate component
CreateEventComponent->>CreateEventComponent: Initialize eventForm
User->>CreateEventComponent: Fill out form fields
User->>CreateEventComponent: Submit form
CreateEventComponent-->>User: (Future) Process submission
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
npm warn EBADENGINE Unsupported engine { 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/README.md (1)
1-7: Consider enhancing documentation for better library context.The README provides basic information but could benefit from additional details about the event form library's purpose, usage, and API.
Consider adding sections for:
+## Purpose + +This library provides components and utilities for creating event forms. + +## Usage + +Import the library in your Angular application: +```typescript +import { CreateEventComponent } from '@devswhorun/create-event'; +```apps/frontend/libs/event/create/package.json (1)
1-9: Add essential package metadata.The
package.jsondefines name, version, peerDependencies, andsideEffects, but is missing fields likedescription,repository, andlicensewhich are important for package publishing and discoverability.apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/lib.routes.ts (1)
5-5: Consider simplifying the route path.Since this routing configuration is already within an event creation library, the path
'event/create'appears redundant. Consider using just'create'or''for the library's root route to follow Angular library routing conventions.- { path: 'event/create', component: CreateEventComponent }, + { path: '', component: CreateEventComponent },apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.spec.ts (1)
18-20: Consider adding comprehensive tests for form functionality.The basic "should create" test is good for initial setup, but since this component reportedly contains a reactive form for event creation, consider adding tests for:
- Form validation
- User input handling
- Form submission behavior
- Error states
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.html (2)
1-1: Wrap JSON preview in<pre>for readability
Rendering{{ eventForm.value | json }}inside a<pre>tag preserves formatting.
7-47: Improve accessibility by adding labels
Each<input>needs an associated<label>oraria-labelfor screen readers.
Example:<label for="event-name" class="sr-only">Event Name</label> <input id="event-name" formControlName="name" placeholder="Name" … />apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.ts (1)
7-7: Remove unused import.
FormControlis imported but not used in the component implementation.- FormControl,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
.vscode/extensions.json(1 hunks).vscode/settings.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend/eslint.config.mjs(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/README.md(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/eslint.config.mjs(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/jest.config.ts(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/ng-package.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/package.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/project.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/index.ts(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.html(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.spec.ts(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.ts(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/lib.routes.ts(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/test-setup.ts(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.lib.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.lib.prod.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.spec.json(1 hunks)apps/frontend/src/app/app.routes.ts(1 hunks)jest.config.ts(1 hunks)jest.preset.js(1 hunks)nx.json(3 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)tsconfig.base.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
apps/frontend/src/app/app.routes.ts (1)
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/lib.routes.ts (1)
createEventRoutes(4-6)
🔇 Additional comments (24)
.vscode/settings.json (1)
1-3: LGTM! Valid VS Code workspace configuration.The Nx Console AI agent rules setting is properly configured and aligns with the development workflow enhancements in this PR.
.vscode/extensions.json (1)
6-7: LGTM! Jest extension recommendation supports testing workflow.The addition of the Jest runner extension aligns well with the Jest testing infrastructure being introduced in this PR.
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.lib.prod.json (1)
1-7: Production config disables declaration maps.Explicitly setting
"declarationMap": falsein the production TS config aligns with reducing bundle size. Ensure this matches the expectations inng-package.jsonand does not impact sourcemap requirements for downstream consumers.apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/test-setup.ts (1)
1-6: Verify Angular test environment flags.Enabling
errorOnUnknownElementsanderrorOnUnknownPropertieswill surface any mismatches in component templates during tests, which is beneficial for strict testing. Confirm that all existing component tests handle these settings appropriately to avoid unexpected test failures.jest.preset.js (1)
1-3: Re-export NX Jest preset correctly.Spreading
nxPresetensures consistency across Jest configs. Make sure this preset file is referenced innx.jsontargets (@nx/jest:jest) to enable caching and CI optimizations.tsconfig.base.json (1)
17-21: Add TS path mapping for the new library.The alias
"@devswhorun/create-event"now points to the library’s entry. Verify that your IDE, build tooling, and Jest resolve this path correctly (e.g., ensuretsconfigPathsplugin is active in Jest).apps/frontend/src/app/app.routes.ts (2)
4-4: Good route integration pattern.Spreading the imported routes at the beginning of the array ensures proper route precedence before the fallback routes. This is a correct implementation pattern for integrating library routes.
2-2:✅ Verification successful
Verify TypeScript path mapping configuration.
Ensure that the
@devswhorun/create-eventimport alias is properly configured intsconfig.base.jsonto point to the library's index file.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the TypeScript path mapping for @devswhorun/create-event is configured # Expected: Path mapping should exist in tsconfig.base.json cat tsconfig.base.json | jq '.compilerOptions.paths["@devswhorun/create-event"]'Length of output: 135
Integration Approved – TypeScript Path Mapping Verified
I’ve confirmed that
tsconfig.base.jsonincludes the correct alias:
@devswhorun/create-event→apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/index.tsThe import is properly configured and the routes can be safely merged.
jest.config.ts (1)
1-6: Excellent Jest configuration setup.This configuration follows Nx best practices by using
getJestProjectsAsync()for dynamic project discovery. The async function pattern and proper TypeScript typing make this a solid foundation for the workspace's testing setup.apps/frontend/libs/event/create/ng-package.json (1)
1-7: Standard Angular library packaging configuration.The configuration correctly follows Angular library packaging conventions with appropriate schema reference, destination path, and entry file specification. The deep relative paths are correctly structured for the library's location within the workspace.
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/index.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Standard Angular library entry point.The barrel exports follow the standard pattern for Angular libraries, properly exposing routes and the main component for consumers.
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.lib.json (1)
1-17: LGTM! Well-configured TypeScript library setup.The configuration properly:
- Enables declaration files and source maps for library consumers
- Excludes test files from the build output
- Uses appropriate output directory for Nx workspace structure
- Clears global types for better library isolation
package.json (3)
42-42: Good addition of Jest testing support.Adding @nx/jest package provides proper Jest integration for the new Angular library testing setup.
67-69: Jest testing dependencies properly added.The Jest ecosystem packages (jest, jest-environment-jsdom, jest-preset-angular) provide comprehensive testing support for the new Angular library.
73-73: ng-packagr added for Angular library packaging.This is the standard tool for building and packaging Angular libraries, essential for the new create-event library.
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.spec.json (2)
4-7: Confirm outDir resolves correctly
Please verify that"outDir": "../../../../../dist/out-tsc"maps to the intended test output folder in the workspace.
2-8: Test-specific TypeScript configuration looks good
Extending the base config and targetinges2016withcommonjsmodules and Jest/Node types is appropriate for your unit tests.apps/frontend/libs/event/create/jest.config.ts (1)
1-21: Jest configuration is correctly set up
The displayName, preset path, coverage directory, transforms, and serializers align with the library’s structure andjest-preset-angularrequirements.apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.json (2)
1-10: Core TypeScript project reference config is valid
Using references totsconfig.lib.jsonandtsconfig.spec.jsonwith strict compiler options ensures proper project builds.
22-27: Angular strict template checks are enabled
strictInjectionParameters,strictInputAccessModifiers, andstrictTemplateswill catch subtle bugs early. Great setup.apps/frontend/libs/event/create/eslint.config.mjs (1)
1-48: LGTM! Well-structured ESLint configuration for the Angular library.The configuration follows best practices with proper base config extension, appropriate library prefixes ("lib"), and comprehensive rule coverage for TypeScript, JSON, and HTML files.
nx.json (3)
11-13: LGTM! Proper exclusion of Jest-related files from production builds.The addition of Jest configuration and test setup files to the production exclusions is appropriate and follows best practices.
68-84: LGTM! Well-configured target defaults for Angular library and Jest testing.The target defaults for
@nx/angular:ng-packagr-liteand@nx/jest:jestare properly configured with appropriate caching, dependencies, and CI options that align with the new library setup.
94-100: LGTM! Consistent generator defaults for Angular development.The generator defaults for Angular libraries and components are well-configured, using ESLint for linting, Jest for unit testing libraries, and CSS for styling, which aligns with the new library structure.
| '@angular-eslint/component-selector': [ | ||
| 'error', | ||
| 'warn', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the rationale for downgrading component selector rule severity.
Changing the component selector rule from 'error' to 'warn' reduces enforcement of Angular naming conventions. Please confirm this is intentional and not a workaround for existing non-compliant code.
Consider whether maintaining 'error' level would be better for code quality:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are existing component selector violations that might have prompted this change
# Expected: Find components that don't follow the 'app' prefix convention
rg -A 3 -B 1 "selector:\s*['\"](?!app-)" --type tsLength of output: 298
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Re-run the search with PCRE2 to support lookahead and find any selectors not prefixed with 'app-'
rg --pcre2 -n "selector:\s*['\"](?!app-)" --type tsLength of output: 169
Confirm intentional downgrade due to existing non-“app-” selectors
Our search uncovered at least one component using a lib- prefix instead of app-:
- apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.ts:11 (
selector: 'lib-create-event')
If this downgrade to “warn” was meant to accommodate legacy or library code, please ensure there’s a plan to:
-
Refactor all components to use the standard
app-prefix and restore the rule to “error” -
—or—
-
Explicitly allow the
lib-prefix in the ESLint rule, e.g.:└─ in eslint.config.mjs (
@angular-eslint/component-selector):- '@angular-eslint/component-selector': ['warn', { type: 'element', prefix: ['app'], style: 'kebab-case' }] + '@angular-eslint/component-selector': ['warn', { type: 'element', prefix: ['app','lib'], style: 'kebab-case' }]
Please confirm the intended approach.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/frontend/eslint.config.mjs around lines 19 to 20, the severity of the
'@angular-eslint/component-selector' rule was downgraded from 'error' to 'warn',
likely to accommodate components using non-standard prefixes like 'lib-'.
Confirm if this downgrade is intentional due to legacy code. If so, either plan
to refactor all components to use the 'app-' prefix and revert the rule to
'error', or explicitly allow the 'lib-' prefix in the ESLint rule configuration
to maintain enforcement while accommodating existing code.
package.json
Outdated
| "@angular/platform-browser-dynamic": "~19.2.0", | ||
| "@angular/router": "~19.2.0", | ||
| "@nx/nest": "^21.1.1", | ||
| "@nx/nest": "21.1.2", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify Nx package version consistency.
The @nx/nest package is updated to 21.1.2 to match other Nx packages. Ensure all Nx packages are consistently updated.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify all Nx packages are at version 21.1.2
echo "Checking Nx package versions for consistency..."
jq -r '.devDependencies | to_entries | map(select(.key | startswith("@nx/"))) | .[] | "\(.key): \(.value)"' package.jsonLength of output: 468
Align @nx/angular-rspack with other Nx packages
All other @nx/* packages have been updated to 21.1.2, but @nx/angular-rspack remains at ^21.0.1. To avoid mismatched peer dependencies and ensure consistency, please bump it to 21.1.2.
• File: package.json
– Change the @nx/angular-rspack entry under devDependencies from:
- "@nx/angular-rspack": "^21.0.1",
+ "@nx/angular-rspack": "21.1.2",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "@nx/nest": "21.1.2", | |
| "devDependencies": { | |
| // … other dependencies … | |
| - "@nx/angular-rspack": "^21.0.1", | |
| + "@nx/angular-rspack": "21.1.2", | |
| // … other dependencies … | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json at line 17, the @nx/angular-rspack package version is
inconsistent with other @nx packages. Update the version of @nx/angular-rspack
under devDependencies from ^21.0.1 to 21.1.2 to ensure all @nx packages have the
same version.
| <form | ||
| [formGroup]="eventForm" | ||
| class="max-w-md mx-auto mt-8 p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-md" | ||
| > |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add form submission binding and explicit button type
Without an (ngSubmit) handler on <form> and type="submit" on the button, the form’s submit logic won’t invoke your component method.
Apply this diff:
-<form
- [formGroup]="eventForm"
+<form
+ [formGroup]="eventForm"
+ (ngSubmit)="onSubmit()"
class="max-w-md mx-auto mt-8 p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-md"
>
...
- <button
+ <button
+ type="submit"
class="w-full bg-blue-500 hover:bg-blue-600 text-white py-2 px-4 rounded-md focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-blue-500 focus:ring-offset-2 transition-colors"
>
Add Event
</button>Also applies to: 51-55
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.html
at lines 2 to 5 and also lines 51 to 55, the form element lacks an (ngSubmit)
event binding and the submit button is missing an explicit type="submit". Add
(ngSubmit)="onSubmit()" to the form tag to bind the form submission to the
component method, and ensure the button inside the form has type="submit" to
trigger the form submission properly.
| "lint": { | ||
| "executor": "@nx/eslint:lint" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing lintFilePatterns for the lint target
The ESLint executor requires options.lintFilePatterns to know which files to lint. Add it like so:
"lint": {
- "executor": "@nx/eslint:lint"
+ "executor": "@nx/eslint:lint",
+ "options": {
+ "lintFilePatterns": ["apps/frontend/libs/event/create/**/*.ts", "apps/frontend/libs/event/create/**/*.html"]
+ }
}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/frontend/libs/event/create/project.json around lines 32 to 34, the lint
target configuration is missing the required options.lintFilePatterns property.
Add an options object with a lintFilePatterns array specifying the file patterns
to lint, such as ["src/**/*.ts", "src/**/*.tsx"], to ensure ESLint knows which
files to process.
| export interface Events { | ||
| name: string; | ||
| banners: string; | ||
| userDetails?: any; | ||
| eventType: string; | ||
| eventLocationDetails: { | ||
| city: string; | ||
| country: string; | ||
| maxAttendees: number; | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Address interface mismatch and consider moving to separate file.
The Events interface has several issues:
userDetailsproperty is not reflected in the form structure- Interface should be in a separate types file for better organization
- Consider if
bannersshould be an array for multiple banner support
Move the interface to a separate file (e.g., types/events.interface.ts) and update it to match the form structure:
export interface Events {
name: string;
banners: string; // or string[] for multiple banners
eventType: string;
eventLocationDetails: {
city: string;
country: string;
maxAttendees: number;
};
}If userDetails is needed, add it to the form or remove it from the interface to maintain consistency.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.ts
around lines 35 to 45, the Events interface has inconsistencies with the form
structure and should be moved to a separate file for better organization. Create
a new file named types/events.interface.ts and move the Events interface there.
Update the interface by either removing the userDetails property if it is not
used in the form or adding it to the form to keep consistency. Also, evaluate if
banners should be a string array to support multiple banners and update the type
accordingly.
| this.eventForm = this.fb.nonNullable.group({ | ||
| name: '', | ||
| banners: '', | ||
| eventType: '', | ||
| eventLocationDetails: this.fb.nonNullable.group({ | ||
| city: '', | ||
| country: '', | ||
| maxAttendees: 0, | ||
| }), | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add form validation for better user experience.
The form lacks validation which could lead to invalid data submission. Consider adding validators for required fields and business logic constraints.
ngOnInit(): void {
this.eventForm = this.fb.nonNullable.group({
- name: '',
- banners: '',
- eventType: '',
+ name: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(3)]],
+ banners: ['', Validators.required],
+ eventType: ['', Validators.required],
eventLocationDetails: this.fb.nonNullable.group({
- city: '',
- country: '',
- maxAttendees: 0,
+ city: ['', Validators.required],
+ country: ['', Validators.required],
+ maxAttendees: [0, [Validators.required, Validators.min(1)]],
}),
});
}Don't forget to import Validators from @angular/forms.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.eventForm = this.fb.nonNullable.group({ | |
| name: '', | |
| banners: '', | |
| eventType: '', | |
| eventLocationDetails: this.fb.nonNullable.group({ | |
| city: '', | |
| country: '', | |
| maxAttendees: 0, | |
| }), | |
| }); | |
| ngOnInit(): void { | |
| this.eventForm = this.fb.nonNullable.group({ | |
| - name: '', | |
| - banners: '', | |
| - eventType: '', | |
| + name: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(3)]], | |
| + banners: ['', Validators.required], | |
| + eventType: ['', Validators.required], | |
| eventLocationDetails: this.fb.nonNullable.group({ | |
| - city: '', | |
| - country: '', | |
| - maxAttendees: 0, | |
| + city: ['', Validators.required], | |
| + country: ['', Validators.required], | |
| + maxAttendees: [0, [Validators.required, Validators.min(1)]], | |
| }), | |
| }); | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.ts
around lines 22 to 31, the form controls lack validation, which can allow
invalid data submission. Add appropriate Validators such as Validators.required
for mandatory fields like name, eventType, and city, and add any relevant
constraints like Validators.min for maxAttendees. Import Validators from
@angular/forms and apply them to the form controls within the
fb.nonNullable.group definitions to enforce validation rules.
Deploying devswhomove with
|
| Latest commit: |
087e103
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://ac42cada.devswhomove.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://santoshyadavdev-feat-add-new.devswhomove.pages.dev |
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 087e103.
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
Summary by CodeRabbit