KEMBAR78
create event form lib by santoshyadavdev · Pull Request #8 · devs-who-run/devswhomove · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@santoshyadavdev
Copy link
Collaborator

@santoshyadavdev santoshyadavdev commented Jun 8, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new event creation form, allowing users to add events with details such as name, banners, event type, and location.
    • Added navigation to the event creation page via a new route.
  • Bug Fixes
    • No user-facing bug fixes included.
  • Documentation
    • Added a README with instructions for the new event creation library.
  • Chores
    • Updated workspace and project configurations to support the new event creation feature and improve build, test, and linting workflows.
    • Recommended new development tools and extensions for improved testing and AI-assisted rule generation.
  • Tests
    • Added unit tests for the event creation component to ensure reliability.
  • Style
    • Updated linting rules to treat certain Angular style violations as warnings instead of errors.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 8, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new Angular library for event creation within the frontend application, complete with routing, component, configuration, and testing setup. Supporting changes include workspace configuration updates for TypeScript, Jest, ESLint, Nx, and VS Code, as well as the integration of the new library's routes into the main application.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.vscode/extensions.json, .vscode/settings.json Added VS Code extension recommendation and enabled an Nx Console AI feature.
apps/frontend/eslint.config.mjs Downgraded Angular component selector lint rule from error to warning.
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/** (README.md, eslint.config.mjs, jest.config.ts, etc.) Added new Angular library for event creation: source, component, routing, configs, tests, and documentation.
apps/frontend/src/app/app.routes.ts Integrated new event creation routes from the library into the main app routes.
jest.config.ts, jest.preset.js Introduced root Jest configuration and preset files for testing.
nx.json Updated Nx configuration: production exclusions, target defaults, and generator defaults for Angular/Jest.
tsconfig.base.json Added TypeScript path mapping for the new event creation library alias.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Router
    participant CreateEventComponent

    User->>Router: Navigate to /event/create
    Router->>CreateEventComponent: Instantiate component
    CreateEventComponent->>CreateEventComponent: Initialize eventForm
    User->>CreateEventComponent: Fill out form fields
    User->>CreateEventComponent: Submit form
    CreateEventComponent-->>User: (Future) Process submission
Loading

Poem

A library sprouts where events are made,
With forms and routes in Angular arrayed.
Jest tests are ready, configs align,
ESLint and Nx all working fine.
The rabbit hops with coding delight—
New features bloom in the garden tonight!
🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

npm warn EBADENGINE Unsupported engine {
npm warn EBADENGINE package: 'nx@21.0.0',
npm warn EBADENGINE required: { node: '^20.19.0 || ^22.12.0' },
npm warn EBADENGINE current: { node: 'v24.2.0', npm: '11.3.0' }
npm warn EBADENGINE }
npm error Exit handler never called!
npm error This is an error with npm itself. Please report this error at:
npm error https://github.com/npm/cli/issues
npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /.npm/_logs/2025-06-15T12_35_53_879Z-debug-0.log


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9966022 and 087e103.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/project.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/project.json
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/eslint.config.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch santoshyadavdev/feat/add-new-event
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/README.md (1)

1-7: Consider enhancing documentation for better library context.

The README provides basic information but could benefit from additional details about the event form library's purpose, usage, and API.

Consider adding sections for:

+## Purpose
+
+This library provides components and utilities for creating event forms.
+
+## Usage
+
+Import the library in your Angular application:
+```typescript
+import { CreateEventComponent } from '@devswhorun/create-event';
+```
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/package.json (1)

1-9: Add essential package metadata.

The package.json defines name, version, peerDependencies, and sideEffects, but is missing fields like description, repository, and license which are important for package publishing and discoverability.

apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/lib.routes.ts (1)

5-5: Consider simplifying the route path.

Since this routing configuration is already within an event creation library, the path 'event/create' appears redundant. Consider using just 'create' or '' for the library's root route to follow Angular library routing conventions.

-  { path: 'event/create', component: CreateEventComponent },
+  { path: '', component: CreateEventComponent },
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.spec.ts (1)

18-20: Consider adding comprehensive tests for form functionality.

The basic "should create" test is good for initial setup, but since this component reportedly contains a reactive form for event creation, consider adding tests for:

  • Form validation
  • User input handling
  • Form submission behavior
  • Error states
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.html (2)

1-1: Wrap JSON preview in <pre> for readability
Rendering {{ eventForm.value | json }} inside a <pre> tag preserves formatting.


7-47: Improve accessibility by adding labels
Each <input> needs an associated <label> or aria-label for screen readers.
Example:

<label for="event-name" class="sr-only">Event Name</label>
<input id="event-name" formControlName="name" placeholder="Name"  />
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.ts (1)

7-7: Remove unused import.

FormControl is imported but not used in the component implementation.

-  FormControl,
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f1ebb99 and 9966022.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
  • .vscode/extensions.json (1 hunks)
  • .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/README.md (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/jest.config.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/ng-package.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/package.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/project.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.html (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/lib.routes.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/test-setup.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.lib.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.lib.prod.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.spec.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/frontend/src/app/app.routes.ts (1 hunks)
  • jest.config.ts (1 hunks)
  • jest.preset.js (1 hunks)
  • nx.json (3 hunks)
  • package.json (3 hunks)
  • tsconfig.base.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
apps/frontend/src/app/app.routes.ts (1)
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/lib.routes.ts (1)
  • createEventRoutes (4-6)
🔇 Additional comments (24)
.vscode/settings.json (1)

1-3: LGTM! Valid VS Code workspace configuration.

The Nx Console AI agent rules setting is properly configured and aligns with the development workflow enhancements in this PR.

.vscode/extensions.json (1)

6-7: LGTM! Jest extension recommendation supports testing workflow.

The addition of the Jest runner extension aligns well with the Jest testing infrastructure being introduced in this PR.

apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.lib.prod.json (1)

1-7: Production config disables declaration maps.

Explicitly setting "declarationMap": false in the production TS config aligns with reducing bundle size. Ensure this matches the expectations in ng-package.json and does not impact sourcemap requirements for downstream consumers.

apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/test-setup.ts (1)

1-6: Verify Angular test environment flags.

Enabling errorOnUnknownElements and errorOnUnknownProperties will surface any mismatches in component templates during tests, which is beneficial for strict testing. Confirm that all existing component tests handle these settings appropriately to avoid unexpected test failures.

jest.preset.js (1)

1-3: Re-export NX Jest preset correctly.

Spreading nxPreset ensures consistency across Jest configs. Make sure this preset file is referenced in nx.json targets (@nx/jest:jest) to enable caching and CI optimizations.

tsconfig.base.json (1)

17-21: Add TS path mapping for the new library.

The alias "@devswhorun/create-event" now points to the library’s entry. Verify that your IDE, build tooling, and Jest resolve this path correctly (e.g., ensure tsconfigPaths plugin is active in Jest).

apps/frontend/src/app/app.routes.ts (2)

4-4: Good route integration pattern.

Spreading the imported routes at the beginning of the array ensures proper route precedence before the fallback routes. This is a correct implementation pattern for integrating library routes.


2-2:

✅ Verification successful

Verify TypeScript path mapping configuration.

Ensure that the @devswhorun/create-event import alias is properly configured in tsconfig.base.json to point to the library's index file.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the TypeScript path mapping for @devswhorun/create-event is configured
# Expected: Path mapping should exist in tsconfig.base.json

cat tsconfig.base.json | jq '.compilerOptions.paths["@devswhorun/create-event"]'

Length of output: 135


Integration Approved – TypeScript Path Mapping Verified

I’ve confirmed that tsconfig.base.json includes the correct alias:

  • @devswhorun/create-eventapps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/index.ts

The import is properly configured and the routes can be safely merged.

jest.config.ts (1)

1-6: Excellent Jest configuration setup.

This configuration follows Nx best practices by using getJestProjectsAsync() for dynamic project discovery. The async function pattern and proper TypeScript typing make this a solid foundation for the workspace's testing setup.

apps/frontend/libs/event/create/ng-package.json (1)

1-7: Standard Angular library packaging configuration.

The configuration correctly follows Angular library packaging conventions with appropriate schema reference, destination path, and entry file specification. The deep relative paths are correctly structured for the library's location within the workspace.

apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/index.ts (1)

1-3: LGTM! Standard Angular library entry point.

The barrel exports follow the standard pattern for Angular libraries, properly exposing routes and the main component for consumers.

apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.lib.json (1)

1-17: LGTM! Well-configured TypeScript library setup.

The configuration properly:

  • Enables declaration files and source maps for library consumers
  • Excludes test files from the build output
  • Uses appropriate output directory for Nx workspace structure
  • Clears global types for better library isolation
package.json (3)

42-42: Good addition of Jest testing support.

Adding @nx/jest package provides proper Jest integration for the new Angular library testing setup.


67-69: Jest testing dependencies properly added.

The Jest ecosystem packages (jest, jest-environment-jsdom, jest-preset-angular) provide comprehensive testing support for the new Angular library.


73-73: ng-packagr added for Angular library packaging.

This is the standard tool for building and packaging Angular libraries, essential for the new create-event library.

apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.spec.json (2)

4-7: Confirm outDir resolves correctly
Please verify that "outDir": "../../../../../dist/out-tsc" maps to the intended test output folder in the workspace.


2-8: Test-specific TypeScript configuration looks good
Extending the base config and targeting es2016 with commonjs modules and Jest/Node types is appropriate for your unit tests.

apps/frontend/libs/event/create/jest.config.ts (1)

1-21: Jest configuration is correctly set up
The displayName, preset path, coverage directory, transforms, and serializers align with the library’s structure and jest-preset-angular requirements.

apps/frontend/libs/event/create/tsconfig.json (2)

1-10: Core TypeScript project reference config is valid
Using references to tsconfig.lib.json and tsconfig.spec.json with strict compiler options ensures proper project builds.


22-27: Angular strict template checks are enabled
strictInjectionParameters, strictInputAccessModifiers, and strictTemplates will catch subtle bugs early. Great setup.

apps/frontend/libs/event/create/eslint.config.mjs (1)

1-48: LGTM! Well-structured ESLint configuration for the Angular library.

The configuration follows best practices with proper base config extension, appropriate library prefixes ("lib"), and comprehensive rule coverage for TypeScript, JSON, and HTML files.

nx.json (3)

11-13: LGTM! Proper exclusion of Jest-related files from production builds.

The addition of Jest configuration and test setup files to the production exclusions is appropriate and follows best practices.


68-84: LGTM! Well-configured target defaults for Angular library and Jest testing.

The target defaults for @nx/angular:ng-packagr-lite and @nx/jest:jest are properly configured with appropriate caching, dependencies, and CI options that align with the new library setup.


94-100: LGTM! Consistent generator defaults for Angular development.

The generator defaults for Angular libraries and components are well-configured, using ESLint for linting, Jest for unit testing libraries, and CSS for styling, which aligns with the new library structure.

Comment on lines 19 to +20
'@angular-eslint/component-selector': [
'error',
'warn',
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify the rationale for downgrading component selector rule severity.

Changing the component selector rule from 'error' to 'warn' reduces enforcement of Angular naming conventions. Please confirm this is intentional and not a workaround for existing non-compliant code.

Consider whether maintaining 'error' level would be better for code quality:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are existing component selector violations that might have prompted this change
# Expected: Find components that don't follow the 'app' prefix convention

rg -A 3 -B 1 "selector:\s*['\"](?!app-)" --type ts

Length of output: 298


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Re-run the search with PCRE2 to support lookahead and find any selectors not prefixed with 'app-'
rg --pcre2 -n "selector:\s*['\"](?!app-)" --type ts

Length of output: 169


Confirm intentional downgrade due to existing non-“app-” selectors

Our search uncovered at least one component using a lib- prefix instead of app-:

  • apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.ts:11 (selector: 'lib-create-event')

If this downgrade to “warn” was meant to accommodate legacy or library code, please ensure there’s a plan to:

  • Refactor all components to use the standard app- prefix and restore the rule to “error”

  • —or—

  • Explicitly allow the lib- prefix in the ESLint rule, e.g.:

    └─ in eslint.config.mjs (@angular-eslint/component-selector):

    - '@angular-eslint/component-selector': ['warn', { type: 'element', prefix: ['app'], style: 'kebab-case' }]
    + '@angular-eslint/component-selector': ['warn', { type: 'element', prefix: ['app','lib'], style: 'kebab-case' }]

Please confirm the intended approach.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/frontend/eslint.config.mjs around lines 19 to 20, the severity of the
'@angular-eslint/component-selector' rule was downgraded from 'error' to 'warn',
likely to accommodate components using non-standard prefixes like 'lib-'.
Confirm if this downgrade is intentional due to legacy code. If so, either plan
to refactor all components to use the 'app-' prefix and revert the rule to
'error', or explicitly allow the 'lib-' prefix in the ESLint rule configuration
to maintain enforcement while accommodating existing code.

package.json Outdated
"@angular/platform-browser-dynamic": "~19.2.0",
"@angular/router": "~19.2.0",
"@nx/nest": "^21.1.1",
"@nx/nest": "21.1.2",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify Nx package version consistency.

The @nx/nest package is updated to 21.1.2 to match other Nx packages. Ensure all Nx packages are consistently updated.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify all Nx packages are at version 21.1.2
echo "Checking Nx package versions for consistency..."
jq -r '.devDependencies | to_entries | map(select(.key | startswith("@nx/"))) | .[] | "\(.key): \(.value)"' package.json

Length of output: 468


Align @nx/angular-rspack with other Nx packages

All other @nx/* packages have been updated to 21.1.2, but @nx/angular-rspack remains at ^21.0.1. To avoid mismatched peer dependencies and ensure consistency, please bump it to 21.1.2.

• File: package.json
– Change the @nx/angular-rspack entry under devDependencies from:

- "@nx/angular-rspack": "^21.0.1",
+ "@nx/angular-rspack": "21.1.2",
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
"@nx/nest": "21.1.2",
"devDependencies": {
// … other dependencies …
- "@nx/angular-rspack": "^21.0.1",
+ "@nx/angular-rspack": "21.1.2",
// … other dependencies …
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json at line 17, the @nx/angular-rspack package version is
inconsistent with other @nx packages. Update the version of @nx/angular-rspack
under devDependencies from ^21.0.1 to 21.1.2 to ensure all @nx packages have the
same version.

Comment on lines +2 to +5
<form
[formGroup]="eventForm"
class="max-w-md mx-auto mt-8 p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-md"
>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add form submission binding and explicit button type
Without an (ngSubmit) handler on <form> and type="submit" on the button, the form’s submit logic won’t invoke your component method.
Apply this diff:

-<form
-  [formGroup]="eventForm"
+<form
+  [formGroup]="eventForm"
+  (ngSubmit)="onSubmit()"
   class="max-w-md mx-auto mt-8 p-6 bg-white rounded-lg shadow-md"
>
...
-  <button
+  <button
+    type="submit"
     class="w-full bg-blue-500 hover:bg-blue-600 text-white py-2 px-4 rounded-md focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-blue-500 focus:ring-offset-2 transition-colors"
   >
     Add Event
   </button>

Also applies to: 51-55

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.html
at lines 2 to 5 and also lines 51 to 55, the form element lacks an (ngSubmit)
event binding and the submit button is missing an explicit type="submit". Add
(ngSubmit)="onSubmit()" to the form tag to bind the form submission to the
component method, and ensure the button inside the form has type="submit" to
trigger the form submission properly.

Comment on lines +32 to +34
"lint": {
"executor": "@nx/eslint:lint"
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Missing lintFilePatterns for the lint target
The ESLint executor requires options.lintFilePatterns to know which files to lint. Add it like so:

     "lint": {
-      "executor": "@nx/eslint:lint"
+      "executor": "@nx/eslint:lint",
+      "options": {
+        "lintFilePatterns": ["apps/frontend/libs/event/create/**/*.ts", "apps/frontend/libs/event/create/**/*.html"]
+      }
     }
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/frontend/libs/event/create/project.json around lines 32 to 34, the lint
target configuration is missing the required options.lintFilePatterns property.
Add an options object with a lintFilePatterns array specifying the file patterns
to lint, such as ["src/**/*.ts", "src/**/*.tsx"], to ensure ESLint knows which
files to process.

Comment on lines +35 to +45
export interface Events {
name: string;
banners: string;
userDetails?: any;
eventType: string;
eventLocationDetails: {
city: string;
country: string;
maxAttendees: number;
};
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Address interface mismatch and consider moving to separate file.

The Events interface has several issues:

  1. userDetails property is not reflected in the form structure
  2. Interface should be in a separate types file for better organization
  3. Consider if banners should be an array for multiple banner support

Move the interface to a separate file (e.g., types/events.interface.ts) and update it to match the form structure:

export interface Events {
  name: string;
  banners: string; // or string[] for multiple banners
  eventType: string;
  eventLocationDetails: {
    city: string;
    country: string;
    maxAttendees: number;
  };
}

If userDetails is needed, add it to the form or remove it from the interface to maintain consistency.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.ts
around lines 35 to 45, the Events interface has inconsistencies with the form
structure and should be moved to a separate file for better organization. Create
a new file named types/events.interface.ts and move the Events interface there.
Update the interface by either removing the userDetails property if it is not
used in the form or adding it to the form to keep consistency. Also, evaluate if
banners should be a string array to support multiple banners and update the type
accordingly.

Comment on lines +22 to +31
this.eventForm = this.fb.nonNullable.group({
name: '',
banners: '',
eventType: '',
eventLocationDetails: this.fb.nonNullable.group({
city: '',
country: '',
maxAttendees: 0,
}),
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add form validation for better user experience.

The form lacks validation which could lead to invalid data submission. Consider adding validators for required fields and business logic constraints.

  ngOnInit(): void {
    this.eventForm = this.fb.nonNullable.group({
-      name: '',
-      banners: '',
-      eventType: '',
+      name: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(3)]],
+      banners: ['', Validators.required],
+      eventType: ['', Validators.required],
      eventLocationDetails: this.fb.nonNullable.group({
-        city: '',
-        country: '',
-        maxAttendees: 0,
+        city: ['', Validators.required],
+        country: ['', Validators.required],
+        maxAttendees: [0, [Validators.required, Validators.min(1)]],
      }),
    });
  }

Don't forget to import Validators from @angular/forms.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
this.eventForm = this.fb.nonNullable.group({
name: '',
banners: '',
eventType: '',
eventLocationDetails: this.fb.nonNullable.group({
city: '',
country: '',
maxAttendees: 0,
}),
});
ngOnInit(): void {
this.eventForm = this.fb.nonNullable.group({
- name: '',
- banners: '',
- eventType: '',
+ name: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(3)]],
+ banners: ['', Validators.required],
+ eventType: ['', Validators.required],
eventLocationDetails: this.fb.nonNullable.group({
- city: '',
- country: '',
- maxAttendees: 0,
+ city: ['', Validators.required],
+ country: ['', Validators.required],
+ maxAttendees: [0, [Validators.required, Validators.min(1)]],
}),
});
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
apps/frontend/libs/event/create/src/lib/create-event/create-event.component.ts
around lines 22 to 31, the form controls lack validation, which can allow
invalid data submission. Add appropriate Validators such as Validators.required
for mandatory fields like name, eventType, and city, and add any relevant
constraints like Validators.min for maxAttendees. Import Validators from
@angular/forms and apply them to the form controls within the
fb.nonNullable.group definitions to enforce validation rules.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jun 15, 2025

Deploying devswhomove with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 087e103
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://ac42cada.devswhomove.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://santoshyadavdev-feat-add-new.devswhomove.pages.dev

View logs

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Jun 15, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 087e103.

Command Status Duration Result
nx affected -t lint test build ✅ Succeeded 15s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-06-15 12:35:09 UTC

@santoshyadavdev santoshyadavdev merged commit 9d22ba8 into main Jun 15, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant