KEMBAR78
docs: Create Samples for transfer manager by sydney-munro · Pull Request #2492 · googleapis/java-storage · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@sydney-munro
Copy link
Contributor

@sydney-munro sydney-munro commented Apr 8, 2024

Samples for the upload many operations only. Will do chunked once Parallel Composite Upload is complete.

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the size: l Pull request size is large. label Apr 8, 2024
@snippet-bot
Copy link

snippet-bot bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Here is the summary of changes.

You are about to add 4 region tags.

This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
If you find problems with this result, please file an issue at:
https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/issues.
To update this comment, add snippet-bot:force-run label or use the checkbox below:

  • Refresh this comment

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/java-storage API. label Apr 8, 2024
@sydney-munro sydney-munro requested review from a team as code owners April 8, 2024 17:54
@sydney-munro sydney-munro added the owlbot:ignore instruct owl-bot to ignore a PR label Apr 8, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@BenWhitehead BenWhitehead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm from java side, probably want to get andrew to review for the general review.

Copy link

@andrewsg andrewsg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sydney-munro sydney-munro merged commit e2030b2 into main Apr 12, 2024
@sydney-munro sydney-munro deleted the tm-sample branch April 12, 2024 21:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/java-storage API. owlbot:ignore instruct owl-bot to ignore a PR size: l Pull request size is large.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants