Fix truncation warnings in conjunction/disjunction
#4846
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
barcharcraz
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2024
|
I'm mirroring this to the MSVC-internal repo - please notify me if any further changes are pushed. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #4845.
I'm testing
negationto be comprehensive; it was already correct:STL/stl/inc/type_traits
Lines 54 to 55 in ecbc1ef
libcxx's
conjunction.compile.pass.cppanddisjunction.compile.pass.cppnow pass for Clang (i.e. we would have noticed this bug if we had analyzed the failures earlier). I've verified that they would pass for MSVC too, except for VSO-2170500 "C1XX's type trait optimization mishandles conjunction/disjunction with non-bool types", so mark them as FAIL for:0(MSVC plain) and:1(MSVC ASAN) in the "C1XX COMPILER BUGS" section.