Use the _Transparent concept and remove _Is_transparent
#5498
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
StephanTLavavej
approved these changes
May 12, 2025
|
I'm mirroring this to the MSVC-internal repo - please notify me if any further changes are pushed. |
🪟 👓 🧊 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#3736 added
_Is_transparentand_Transparentbut didn't use them.I think it's time to use the
_Transparentconcept for C++20-and-later-only code. And it seems less burdensome for compilers if_Is_transparent_vis changed to be implemented with a concept. After the changes,_Is_transparent_vwill be only necessary for<xtree>, so this PR moves_Is_transparent_vto that header.<flat_map>and<flat_set>will be changed in another PR.Theoretically,
_Is_transparentwould be useful in the cases whereconjunction(_v)ordisjunction(_v)is used. But I think there won't be such a case in MSVC STL - for new code it's probably better to use requires-clauses, and the uses of_Is_transparent_vin<xtree>seem stable enough. So I decide to remove it.