KEMBAR78
fix: release "Allow URL class object as an argument for fetch()" #1696 by Maxim-Mazurok · Pull Request #1716 · node-fetch/node-fetch · GitHub
Skip to content

fix: release "Allow URL class object as an argument for fetch()" #1696 #1716

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2023
Merged

fix: release "Allow URL class object as an argument for fetch()" #1696 #1716

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2023

Conversation

@Maxim-Mazurok
Copy link
Contributor

@Maxim-Mazurok Maxim-Mazurok commented Feb 19, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Purpose

Dummy change with fix: commit to trigger the release of #1696

Changes

Swapped RequestInfo | URL around to URL | RequestInfo 🤷‍♂️

Additional information

CI fail is irrelevant, same as before

@Maxim-Mazurok Maxim-Mazurok mentioned this pull request Feb 19, 2023
Merged
1 task
@Maxim-Mazurok
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jimmywarting would be great to release this, thank you :)

@Maxim-Mazurok
Copy link
Contributor Author

Perhaps @LinusU could take a look, please?

@Maxim-Mazurok
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm sorry to ping, @jimmywarting but I have a weekly reminder to myself to check on the status of this PR, hope this small but important change can be released soon, thank you!

@jimmywarting jimmywarting merged commit 7b86e94 into node-fetch:main Mar 11, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.3.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@data-sync-user data-sync-user mentioned this pull request Oct 12, 2023
Closed
@ntnguyencse ntnguyencse mentioned this pull request May 19, 2024
Open
This was referenced May 19, 2024
Open
Open
Open
@snyk-io snyk-io bot mentioned this pull request May 22, 2024
Open
This was referenced May 22, 2024
Open
Open
@jhadev jhadev mentioned this pull request May 24, 2024
Open
@npulsipher4 npulsipher4 mentioned this pull request May 24, 2024
Open
@NOUIY NOUIY mentioned this pull request May 25, 2024
Open
@X-oss-byte X-oss-byte mentioned this pull request May 25, 2024
Open
This was referenced May 26, 2024
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
@Jkffff09 Jkffff09 mentioned this pull request May 30, 2024
Open
@ceconcarlsen ceconcarlsen mentioned this pull request May 31, 2024
Open
This was referenced May 31, 2024
Open
Open
@mshantanu mshantanu mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2024
Open
@NOUIY NOUIY mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2024
Open
This was referenced Sep 14, 2024
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
This was referenced Sep 21, 2024
Open
Open
Open
@snyk-io snyk-io bot mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2024
Open
This was referenced Sep 24, 2024
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
This was referenced Oct 1, 2024
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
@ReneMaetzschker ReneMaetzschker mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2024
Open
@snyk-io snyk-io bot mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2024
Open
@samueljochem samueljochem mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2024
Open
@mshantanu mshantanu mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jimmywarting jimmywarting jimmywarting approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

released

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Maxim-Mazurok @jimmywarting