KEMBAR78
gh-111262: Make PyDict_Pop() public by scoder · Pull Request #111263 · python/cpython · GitHub
Skip to content

gh-111262: Make PyDict_Pop() public #111263

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

gh-111262: Make PyDict_Pop() public #111263

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@scoder
Copy link
Contributor

@scoder scoder commented Oct 24, 2023 •
edited by github-actions bot
Loading

See #108449

I kept the internal function since it saves the type check on the fast path and can thus still be used internally.

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--111263.org.readthedocs.build/

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2023
Closed
@scoder scoder force-pushed the py313_pydict_capi branch from 5674aa3 to 9c8539b Compare October 24, 2023 14:04
@scoder scoder force-pushed the py313_pydict_capi branch from 9c8539b to 16a95d4 Compare October 24, 2023 14:05
@scoder scoder mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2023
Merged
@scoder
Copy link
Contributor Author

scoder commented Oct 24, 2023

@vstinner

@brandtbucher brandtbucher added type-feature A feature request or enhancement interpreter-core (Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs) topic-C-API labels Oct 24, 2023
vstinner
vstinner reviewed Oct 24, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change lacks tests.

Doc/c-api/dict.rst
.. versionadded:: 3.4
.. c:function:: PyObject* PyDict_Pop(PyObject *p, PyObject *key, PyObject *defaultobj)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer to return -1 on error, 0 if the key doesn't exist, 1 if the key exists.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How would the caller know the popped value then?

pitrou
pitrou reviewed Nov 9, 2023
View reviewed changes
Objects/dictobject.c
{
if (!PyDict_Check(dict)) {
PyErr_BadInternalCall();
return -1;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should certainly be return NULL?

@vstinner vstinner mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2023
Closed
@vstinner
Copy link
Member

I created PR #111939 based on this PR: I changed the API and added tests.

@vstinner vstinner mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2023
Merged
@vstinner
Copy link
Member

I close this PR: #112028 was merged with a different API. Thanks @scoder, I wrote my PR based on yours ;-) And thanks for raising the need for such API.

@vstinner vstinner closed this Nov 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@vstinner vstinner vstinner left review comments

@pitrou pitrou pitrou left review comments

@methane methane Awaiting requested review from methane methane is a code owner

@markshannon markshannon Awaiting requested review from markshannon markshannon is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

awaiting core review interpreter-core (Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs) topic-C-API type-feature A feature request or enhancement

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@scoder @vstinner @pitrou @brandtbucher