-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
Closed
Labels
bugmypy got something wrongmypy got something wrongtopic-paramspecPEP 612, ParamSpec, ConcatenatePEP 612, ParamSpec, Concatenate
Description
Bug Report
The issues with ParamSpec inference for pytypest first appeared in mypy 1.6.0, see #16301. In 1.7.0, it was fixed for some cases but not all.
This specific issue happens when a function accepts multiple classes using ParamSpec and some of them pass an argument as keyword one and some pass the same argument as a positional one.
To Reproduce
from typing import Callable, Generic
from typing_extensions import ParamSpec
P = ParamSpec('P')
class Case(Generic[P]):
def __init__(self, *args: P.args, **kwargs: P.kwargs) -> None:
pass
def _test(a: int, b: int = 0) -> None:
assert a
def parametrize(
func: Callable[P, None],
*cases: Case[P],
**named_cases: Case[P],
) -> Callable[[], None]:
raise NotImplementedError
# this one works:
parametrize(_test, Case(1, 2), Case(3, 4))
# this one also works:
parametrize(_test, Case(1, b=2), Case(3, b=4))
# and this is also fine:
parametrize(_test, Case(1, 2), Case(3))
# but this one fails inference:
parametrize(_test, Case(1, 2), Case(3, b=4))Expected Behavior
It shouldn't matter how an argument is passed into ParamSpec. If it can be passed into the target function described by the ParamSpec, it should pass type checking.
Actual Behavior
For the last line of the code:
Cannot infer type argument 1 of "parametrize" [misc]
The same happens if instead of *cases: Case[P] the function accepts case1: Case[P], case2: Case[P].
Your Environment
- Mypy version used: 1.7.0
- Mypy command-line flags: none
- Mypy configuration options from
mypy.ini(and other config files): none - Python version used: 3.10
q0w
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
bugmypy got something wrongmypy got something wrongtopic-paramspecPEP 612, ParamSpec, ConcatenatePEP 612, ParamSpec, Concatenate