Fix nondeterministic type checking caused by nonassociative of None joins #19158
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
According to mypy_primer, this change doesn't affect type check results on a corpus of open source code. ✅ |
JukkaL
approved these changes
May 28, 2025
| colors3: A[str] | B[str] | C[int] | D[None], | ||
| ) -> None: | ||
| for c1, c2, c3 in zip2(colors1, colors2, colors3): | ||
| # TODO: can't do reveal type because the union order is not deterministic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if there is a way to avoid non-deterministic union order altogether, e.g. by not putting types into sets?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nvm, you mention this in the issue description.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #19121 (xarray case)
See #19147 for context
The ordering of the union is still nondeterministic. We could solve this by change the solver to use
dict[Type, Noneinstead ofset[Type]since dicts are ordered. But doing so could paper over further bad solving from nonassociativity or noncommutativity