-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.7k
Allow specifiying inputs as GradientEdge in autograd APIs #110867
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/110867
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (2 Unrelated Failures)As of commit e89e513 with merge base a18b98f ( FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Super cool!!
|
Thanks Alban! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
This can be useful for advanced users (like AOTAutograd) who don't want to keep the corresponding Tensor alive (for memory reasons for example) or when inplace op will change the Tensor's grad_fn (but gradients wrt to the original value is needed).
I went minimal API change but open to suggestions.
cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @Xia-Weiwen @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @peterbell10 @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @aakhundov @ColinPeppler