KEMBAR78
fix silly mapping issue with torch.Size by avikchaudhuri · Pull Request #137465 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

fix silly mapping issue with torch.Size #137465

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fix silly mapping issue with torch.Size #137465

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@avikchaudhuri
Copy link
Contributor

Test Plan: added test

Differential Revision: D64022949

@avikchaudhuri @facebook-github-bot
fix silly mapping issue with torch.Size
0b72237 
Test Plan: added test

Differential Revision: D64022949
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/137465

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 0b72237 with merge base 46525ab (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64022949

@tugsbayasgalan tugsbayasgalan requested a review from bdhirsh October 8, 2024 04:39
@yushangdi yushangdi self-requested a review October 8, 2024 15:54
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 8, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally'

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@angelayi angelayi angelayi approved these changes

@yushangdi yushangdi yushangdi approved these changes

@bdhirsh bdhirsh Awaiting requested review from bdhirsh bdhirsh is a code owner

@tugsbayasgalan tugsbayasgalan Awaiting requested review from tugsbayasgalan

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged release notes: AO frontend

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@avikchaudhuri @facebook-github-bot @pytorchmergebot @angelayi @yushangdi