KEMBAR78
[Profiler] Hide ProfilerStep Alignment behind Experimental Config by sraikund16 · Pull Request #137668 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@sraikund16
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: Aligning ProfilerStep# annotation can be useful for visual purposes but it affects downstream tools like HTA to misreport how long each step took. For this reason, lets give users the option to turn on this alignment manually but also turn it off by default

Test Plan:
Alignment off:

https://www.internalfb.com/intern/perfdoctor/trace_view?filepath=tree/traces/dynocli/devvm2185.cco0.facebook.com/rank-0.Oct_09_16_11_48.2543945.pt.trace.json.gz&bucket=gpu_traces

Alignment on:

https://www.internalfb.com/intern/perfdoctor/trace_view?filepath=tree/traces/dynocli/devvm2185.cco0.facebook.com/rank-0.Oct_09_16_08_27.2518391.pt.trace.json.gz&bucket=gpu_traces

Differential Revision: D64146115

Summary: Aligning ProfilerStep# annotation can be useful for visual purposes but it affects downstream tools like HTA to misreport how long each step took. For this reason, lets give users the option to turn on this alignment manually but also turn it off by default

Test Plan:
Alignment off:

https://www.internalfb.com/intern/perfdoctor/trace_view?filepath=tree/traces/dynocli/devvm2185.cco0.facebook.com/rank-0.Oct_09_16_11_48.2543945.pt.trace.json.gz&bucket=gpu_traces

Alignment on:

https://www.internalfb.com/intern/perfdoctor/trace_view?filepath=tree/traces/dynocli/devvm2185.cco0.facebook.com/rank-0.Oct_09_16_08_27.2518391.pt.trace.json.gz&bucket=gpu_traces

Differential Revision: D64146115
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 9, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/137668

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit f66076b with merge base 13cf836 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64146115

Copy link
Member

@aaronenyeshi aaronenyeshi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 11, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally'

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged release notes: profiler release notes category topic: new features topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants