chore: bump all (dev) deps #119
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: cfbf9eb The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
WalkthroughThis update introduces several configuration and dependency changes. The continuous integration workflow is modified to allow the Codacy coverage reporter step to fail without stopping the workflow. The Yarn version is upgraded from 4.8.1 to 4.9.1 in both the configuration file and package.json. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant CI Workflow
participant Codacy Coverage Reporter
Developer->>CI Workflow: Push code / open PR
CI Workflow->>Codacy Coverage Reporter: Run coverage report (continue-on-error)
Codacy Coverage Reporter-->>CI Workflow: Success/Failure
CI Workflow->>CI Workflow: Continue workflow regardless of Codacy step result
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR bumps various development dependencies and updates related configuration files. Key changes include:
- An update to the sponsors section in README.md for clearer sponsor and backers information.
- Bumping Yarn’s version in .yarnrc.yml and adding a new nano-staged configuration file.
- Removing the lint-staged configuration and modifying the Codacy coverage step in the CI workflow.
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 8 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| README.md | Updated sponsor section layout and link corrections. |
| .yarnrc.yml | Upgraded Yarn version from 4.8.1 to 4.9.1. |
| .nano-staged.js | Added a new export for nano-staged. |
| .lintstagedrc.js | Removed the lint-staged configuration file. |
| .github/workflows/ci.yml | Modified Codacy action settings to continue on error. |
Files not reviewed (1)
- package.json: Language not supported
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)
.lintstagedrc.js:1
- Removing the lint-staged configuration file may affect linting of staged files. Please confirm that linting is still handled appropriately elsewhere.
export { default } from '@1stg/lint-staged/tsc'
.github/workflows/ci.yml:56
- [nitpick] Using 'continue-on-error: true' for the Codacy coverage reporter might hide critical errors in coverage reporting. Verify that this behavior is intentional and that alternative error monitoring is in place.
continue-on-error: true
size-limit report 📦
|
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed everything up to 47a6050 in 2 minutes and 0 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
136lines of code in6files - Skipped
3files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
13draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:56
- Draft comment:
Document rationale for using 'continue-on-error' for the codacy step. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. .nano-staged.js:1
- Draft comment:
Verify that replacing lint-staged with nano-staged matches all expected configurations. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
3. README.md:151
- Draft comment:
Fix URL casing for GitHub link to JounQin. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It simply states what was done without offering any guidance or questions for the PR author.
4. package.json:84
- Draft comment:
Ensure all internal references to lint-staged are updated since it's been replaced by nano-staged. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to ensure that all internal references tolint-stagedare updated tonano-staged. This is a request for confirmation or verification, which violates the rule against asking the author to ensure something is done. The comment does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue, so it should be removed.
5. .github/workflows/ci.yml:56
- Draft comment:
Confirm that using 'continue-on-error: true' for the Codacy reporter is intended—as it may hide real errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This is a coverage reporting step, not core functionality. The comment asks for confirmation of intention, which violates our rules. Coverage reporting is typically non-critical - if it fails, it shouldn't block the build. The author has clearly made a deliberate choice here, and there's a documented issue linked explaining problems with this action. Maybe failing coverage reporting could indicate serious problems that should be fixed rather than ignored. The author might not realize the implications. Coverage reporting is a supplementary quality check. If there were serious problems, they would be caught by the actual test runs and Codecov reporting which are separate steps that don't have continue-on-error set. Delete the comment. It violates our rule about asking for confirmation of intention, and the change appears to be a reasonable way to handle a known flaky third-party action.
6. .nano-staged.js:1
- Draft comment:
Ensure that switching to nano-staged fully replaces lint-staged functionality. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to ensure that a change fully replaces existing functionality, which is a form of asking for confirmation or verification. This violates the rule against asking the PR author to ensure behavior is intended or to double-check things.
7. .yarnrc.yml:10
- Draft comment:
Bumped yarnPath to 4.9.1; verify that plugins like 'plugin-prepare-lifecycle' remain compatible. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
8. README.md:129
- Draft comment:
The updated Sponsors/Backers section looks clearer; ensure images and links render well across devices. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
9. package.json:49
- Draft comment:
Using 'sudo' in the benchmark script may cause permission issues; confirm it’s truly needed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
10. package.json:68
- Draft comment:
Ensure that @1stg/common-config v13.0.1 is backward compatible; review any breaking changes. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is asking the PR author to ensure backward compatibility and review for breaking changes, which falls under the rule of not asking the author to double-check or ensure behavior. It does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue.
11. package.json:80
- Draft comment:
Lint-staged has been removed; verify that nano-staged now covers all required pre-commit checks. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to verify that nano-staged covers all required pre-commit checks after the removal of lint-staged. This falls under asking the author to ensure behavior is intended or to double-check things, which is against the rules.
12. package.json:97
- Draft comment:
The 'es5-ext' resolution was removed; confirm that dependency resolution still works as expected. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is asking the PR author to confirm that the dependency resolution still works as expected after the removal of 'es5-ext'. This falls under the rule of not asking the author to confirm or ensure behavior, which is not allowed.
13. package.json:65
- Draft comment:
Multiple dev dependency updates (e.g., @changesets/cli, @pkgr/rollup, eslint, synckit)—ensure regression tests catch any issues. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_5NQUfij6AdnhmqP8
You can customize 
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
139-143: Insert Backers table
Consistent structure with the Sponsors table. You may want to add analtattribute to badges for accessibility if you ever switch to raw HTML.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~143-~143: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 13 exclamation marks for a text that’s 3786 characters long)
Context: ...----------------------------------- | ||
| [
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
.yarn/releases/yarn-4.8.1.cjsis excluded by!**/.yarn/**.yarn/releases/yarn-4.9.1.cjsis excluded by!**/.yarn/**yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks).lintstagedrc.js(0 hunks).nano-staged.js(1 hunks).yarnrc.yml(1 hunks)README.md(2 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .lintstagedrc.js
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
package.json (1)
Learnt from: JounQin
PR: un-ts/sh-syntax#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-07T09:49:34.678Z
Learning: The sh-syntax project uses Yarn v4.8.1 for package management, and dependency warnings related to the package structure should be ignored as false positives.
🪛 GitHub Actions: Package Size Report
package.json
[error] 1-1: Failed to run build command: npm run build
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 20 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 18 on windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (9)
.yarnrc.yml (1)
10-10:✅ Verification successful
Verify Yarn binary path update
Ensure that the newyarnPathpoints to a committed file so CI and local workflows won’t break.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check that the Yarn 4.9.1 binary exists in the repo if [[ -f .yarn/releases/yarn-4.9.1.cjs ]]; then echo "✅ Found .yarn/releases/yarn-4.9.1.cjs" else echo "❌ .yarn/releases/yarn-4.9.1.cjs is missing" >&2 exit 1 fiLength of output: 125
Yarn binary path confirmed
The file.yarn/releases/yarn-4.9.1.cjsexists in the repository, so the updatedyarnPathis valid and no further action is needed. ✅.nano-staged.js (1)
1-1: Confirm replacement of lint‑staged with nano‑staged
This proxy file correctly re-exports the new staging tool. Ensure that any references to the old.lintstagedrc.jshave been removed and that your CI/lint scripts invoke this file.README.md (3)
129-132: Add combined "Sponsors and Backers" section
Nicely groups sponsorship badges under a single heading. Consider adding an HTML comment explaining why this section was restructured for future maintainers.
133-138: Insert Sponsors table
The three‑column table is clear. Verify that all Open Collective links render correctly and that badge URLs aren’t broken by capitalization.
154-154: Fix attribution link casing
Good catch updatingGitHub.com→github.comfor consistency. This ensures markdown link resolution remains case‑insensitive across platforms.package.json (3)
10-10: Bump packageManager to Yarn 4.9.1
Aligns with.yarnrc.yml. This helps contributors use the correct Yarn binary version.
49-49: Adjust benchmark script to run with elevated privileges
Introducingsudomay have unexpected effects on CI or local environments (e.g., password prompts, path changes). Please verify it works as intended in GitHub Actions and on contributor machines.
68-96:❓ Verification inconclusive
Upgrade development dependencies
Multiple packages have been bumped, including removal oflint‑stagedin favor ofnano‑staged.
- Confirm no breaking changes for ESLint, TypeScript types, Synckit, etc.
- Ensure
.lintstagedrc.jsis removed and all CI scripts referencenano-staged.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify lint-staged config was removed fd .lintstagedrc.js || echo "✅ No .lintstagedrc.js found" # List any remaining references to lint-staged in the codebase rg -l "lint-staged"Length of output: 41
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for hidden lint‑staged config file fd --hidden --glob ".lintstagedrc.js" || echo "✅ No .lintstagedrc.js found" # Search all files (including hidden) for references to lint‑staged rg --hidden -l "lint-staged" || echo "✅ No lint-staged references found"Length of output: 143
Confirm no breaking changes in updated dev‑dependencies and CI updates
All references tolint‑staged(including hidden configs) have been removed. Before merging, please:
- Verify updated versions of ESLint, TypeScript types (
@types/*), Synckit, etc., introduce no breaking changes.- Ensure your CI/workflow scripts invoke
nano‑staged(notlint‑staged)..github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
56-56: Allow Codacy coverage reporter failures
Addingcontinue-on-error: trueprevents transient reporter issues from blocking merges. Consider adding a comment pointing to this PR for context.
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. |
commit: |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #119 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 96.38% 100.00% +3.61%
===========================================
Files 4 4
Lines 83 76 -7
Branches 36 29 -7
===========================================
- Hits 80 76 -4
+ Misses 3 0 -3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
📊 Package size report 0.03%↑
Unchanged files
🤖 This report was automatically generated by pkg-size-action |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed cc89516 in 2 minutes and 18 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
533lines of code in11files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
16draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:56
- Draft comment:
Using 'continue-on-error' may hide underlying issues. Confirm if this behavior is intended. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The comment violates the rule about not asking authors to confirm their intentions. The context shows this is a coverage reporting step that's already being handled carefully (skipped on Windows, has a comment about known issues). Coverage reporting is typically non-critical - failing builds over coverage reporting issues would be overly aggressive. Maybe there could be serious issues that get hidden by continue-on-error that should be addressed rather than ignored? This is specifically for a coverage reporting tool, not core build functionality. Coverage reporting failures shouldn't block builds, and the team is already aware of issues as evidenced by the existing comment. Delete the comment. It violates the rule about asking for confirmation of intent, and the continue-on-error usage appears deliberate and reasonable for this non-critical step.
2. package.json:49
- Draft comment:
Benchmark script now uses 'sudo'. This may cause issues on systems without sudo or with different privilege setups. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
3. src/index.ts:11
- Draft comment:
Fallback for __dirname using import.meta.url may be redundant in ES modules; consider removing the unreachable __dirname branch. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% In ES modules, import.meta.url is always available, and __dirname is not defined by default. However, this could be a dual package (supporting both ESM and CJS). The change actually looks like it might be fixing a bug in the original code. Without knowing the full package setup, I can't be 100% certain the fallback is truly unreachable. I might be missing build configuration details that make __dirname available in some contexts. The package might need to support both ESM and CommonJS environments. While the comment raises a valid point about ES modules, keeping the fallback might be intentional for compatibility reasons. Given the uncertainty about the build environment and potential dual package nature, this comment should be removed as it requires more context to be certain.
4. src/processor.ts:150
- Draft comment:
The use of 'new Go()' assumes a global Go instance from the wasm environment. Ensure it's imported or available. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. .github/workflows/ci.yml:56
- Draft comment:
Good use of 'continue-on-error: true' to prevent CI failures from non-critical coverage errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
6. .nano-staged.js:1
- Draft comment:
Replacement of lint-staged with nano-staged looks correct and minimal. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
7. .yarnrc.yml:10
- Draft comment:
Yarn version bumped to 4.9.1; ensure all team and CI workflows are updated accordingly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
8. README.md:151
- Draft comment:
Sponsor section updated – the JounQin link is now corrected to use lowercase 'github.com'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
9. benchmark/index.js:46
- Draft comment:
The JSDoc type annotation for printSync appears to have an extra closing parenthesis. Consider verifying the syntax. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
10. src/index.ts:11
- Draft comment:
The _dirname fallback using __dirname may be redundant since import.meta.url is always available in ESM; consider simplifying. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50% While import.meta.url is generally available in ESM contexts, there could be edge cases or compatibility reasons for keeping the fallback. The comment makes an assumption about the codebase's environment and requirements. Without more context about why the fallback exists, suggesting its removal could be premature. The comment could be correct technically, but we don't have enough context about why the fallback exists. There might be specific build configurations or environments where this fallback is needed. Given our directive to only keep comments we're very confident about, and lacking clear evidence about why the fallback exists or doesn't exist, we should err on the side of not keeping this comment. While the comment raises an interesting point, we don't have strong enough evidence that removing the fallback would be safe in all cases.
11. src/processor.ts:27
- Draft comment:
Extending GetWebAssemblySource to include Buffer improves flexibility; ensure downstream code correctly handles Buffer types. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
12. src/processor.ts:150
- Draft comment:
Usage of 'new Go()' assumes that the Go runtime is available (typically from wasm_exec.cjs). Confirm that this dependency is reliably loaded. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
13. src/processor.ts:255
- Draft comment:
The check for a valid JSON result by inspecting start and end characters is quite naive; consider more robust error handling around JSON parsing. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
14. benchmark/index.js:46
- Draft comment:
The JSDoc comment on line 46 has an extra closing parenthesis and brace. It currently reads: /** @type {(text: string, options?: ShOptions) => string} )} / It might be clearer if it was written as: /* @type {(text: string, options?: ShOptions) => string} */ This should be fixed to avoid confusion. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
15. src/processor.ts:145
- Draft comment:
Consider rephrasing the error message in the TypeError (line 145). The phrase "hope we will find better solution later" could be improved grammatically, for example to "... is required for now; we hope to find a better solution later." - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
16. src/processor.ts:254
- Draft comment:
In the comment on the JSON check (line 254), consider capitalizing 'JSON' consistently instead of using 'json' for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
Workflow ID: wflow_HwfJXANou8WQGxKv
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
.yarn/releases/yarn-4.8.1.cjsis excluded by!**/.yarn/**.yarn/releases/yarn-4.9.1.cjsis excluded by!**/.yarn/**yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks).lintstagedrc.js(0 hunks).nano-staged.js(1 hunks).yarnrc.yml(1 hunks)README.md(2 hunks)benchmark/index.js(3 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)src/index.ts(1 hunks)src/processor.ts(4 hunks)src/types.ts(6 hunks)test/processor.spec.ts(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .lintstagedrc.js
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/types.ts
- benchmark/index.js
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- .yarnrc.yml
- .github/workflows/ci.yml
- .nano-staged.js
- package.json
- README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
test/processor.spec.ts (1)
src/processor.ts (1)
GetWebAssemblyInstance(33-35)
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/index.ts
[warning] 13-13: src/index.ts#L13
Added line #L13 was not covered by tests
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 20 on ubuntu-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 on macos-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 20 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 18 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 20 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 on windows-latest
- GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 18 on windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tsconfig.json (1)
6-6: Path mapping refinement enhances module resolution precision.The change from pointing to a directory
./srcto specifically targeting./src/index.tsfile ensures more precise and consistent resolution when importing from thesh-syntaxalias.test/processor.spec.ts (2)
16-17: Documentation formatting improvement.Comment formatting improved for better readability while maintaining the same information about Vitest compatibility issue.
20-22: Enhanced type safety for WebAssembly buffer handling.The changes improve type safety by explicitly casting the read file buffer to
BufferSource, which ensures proper type compatibility with the WebAssembly API.src/processor.ts (4)
28-30: Enhanced type definitions for WebAssembly source handling.The type alias
GetWebAssemblySourcenow explicitly includesBufferand a more comprehensive Promise type, which better accommodates Node.js environments whereBufferis commonly used.
43-44: Updated variable types for broader compatibility.The variable types have been updated to align with the enhanced type definitions, allowing for
Buffertypes alongsideBufferSource, which improves compatibility with Node.js APIs.
64-102: Improved JSDoc documentation formatting.The JSDoc comments have been reformatted for better readability with consistent indentation and backtick formatting around parameter names. The content remains semantically unchanged but is now more accessible.
154-157: Added explicit type casting for WebAssembly instantiation.The explicit cast of
wasmBufferSourcetoBufferSourcebefore passing it toWebAssembly.instantiateenhances type safety and aligns with the type handling changes elsewhere in the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 5cfd2d4 in 1 minute and 12 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
564lines of code in11files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
14draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:56
- Draft comment:
Good use of 'continue-on-error' for the Codacy step; ensure this behavior is acceptable for reporting purposes. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. .nano-staged.js:1
- Draft comment:
Switching to nano-staged looks correct; verify that its configuration meets your linting needs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. package.json:49
- Draft comment:
Benchmark script now uses 'sudo'; be cautious with elevated privileges as it may affect portability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is purely informative, warning about the use ofsudoand its potential impact on portability. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or ask for a specific action to be taken.
4. src/processor.ts:152
- Draft comment:
The instantiation of 'new Go()' assumes a global Go; consider importing or documenting this dependency explicitly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. .github/workflows/ci.yml:56
- Draft comment:
Adding 'continue-on-error: true' to the Codacy reporter step helps avoid CI failures due to coverage reporting, but be sure this is acceptable since it may hide underlying issues. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
6. .nano-staged.js:1
- Draft comment:
Switching to nano-staged from lint-staged is straightforward. Verify that your workflow and documentation reflect this change. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to verify their workflow and documentation, which is against the rules. It doesn't provide a specific code suggestion or point out a specific issue with the code.
7. .yarnrc.yml:10
- Draft comment:
The yarnPath has been bumped from 4.8.1 to 4.9.1. Ensure that the plugin 'plugin-prepare-lifecycle' remains fully compatible with this update. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is related to a dependency change, specifically the version bump ofyarnPath. The comment asks the author to ensure compatibility with a plugin, which is against the rules as it asks for confirmation of behavior and testing. Therefore, this comment should be removed.
8. README.md:129
- Draft comment:
The Sponsors and Backers section has been restructured for clarity and now uses tables. The update to the GitHub URL for JounQin is also corrected. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is purely informative, as it only praises the restructuring of a section and the correction of a URL. It does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.
9. benchmark/index.js:12
- Draft comment:
Refactored type annotation to use an import directive for ShOptions instead of separate typedefs. Confirm that your build and IDE tooling correctly recognize the new JSDoc syntax. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to confirm that their build and IDE tooling recognize the new JSDoc syntax. This falls under the rule of not asking the author to confirm or ensure behavior, which is not allowed.
10. package.json:49
- Draft comment:
The benchmark script now invokes 'sudo env NO_COLOR=1 node benchmark > benchmark/benchmark.txt'. Ensure that requiring sudo for benchmarks won’t cause issues in environments where elevated privileges are problematic. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =20%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to ensure that requiring sudo won't cause issues, which is against the rules. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or ask for a specific test to be written. It is more of a cautionary note rather than a constructive comment.
11. src/index.ts:11
- Draft comment:
The _dirname calculation now relies on 'import.meta.url' with an istanbul ignore comment. In ESM, __dirname isn’t available so this change is valid, but consider using a dedicated helper for clarity in mixed module environments. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
12. src/processor.ts:43
- Draft comment:
The types for wasmBufferSource have been expanded to include Buffer, and explicit casts to BufferSource ensure compatibility with WebAssembly.instantiate. Also, istanbul ignore comments have been added to some branches. Verify that both Buffer and BufferSource are handled correctly and that these ignored branches are acceptable for your coverage goals. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to verify that the changes are correct and that the ignored branches are acceptable for coverage goals. This violates the rule against asking the author to confirm their intention or ensure behavior is intended. The comment does not provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a specific test to be written.
13. src/types.ts:3
- Draft comment:
This file shows formatting and comment improvements without any functional changes. No action needed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
14. test/processor.spec.ts:19
- Draft comment:
The test now explicitly casts the buffer to BufferSource when instantiating WebAssembly. This is fine, but ensure that any ESM-specific globals like 'import.meta.dirname' are handled correctly in your test environment. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to ensure that ESM-specific globals are handled correctly in the test environment. This is a general request for confirmation and does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue in the code. It violates the rule against asking the author to ensure something is tested or confirmed.
Workflow ID: wflow_6UooUnBu4TfjsgPZ
You can customize
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Important
Update dependencies, replace
lint-stagedwithnano-staged, and make minor CI and documentation improvements.package.jsonand.yarnrc.yml.lint-stagedwithnano-stagedinpackage.jsonand configuration files.package.json.ci.ymlto continue on error for coverage reporting.package.jsonto run with elevated privileges.README.mdfor clarity.This description was created by
for 5cfd2d4. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit