Closing #229, #183 and #346 in favor of this new issue to simplify.

The following elements should map to generic, but we will either need a call out here, or in CORE AAM how AT should treat an 'inline' vs a 'block'/other display type generic (if not doing something with w3c/aria#996).

• area no href
• b
• i
• data
• samp
• kbd
• pre
• q
• s
• small
• u
• var (or maybe this is also role=code? )

the following need to be changed to 'no corresponding role' until their mappings can be finalized - covered in #376

• dd
• dt

questions on the following

• bdi / bdo (change to generic or leave as a 'no corresponding role'?)
• cite (change to generic or leave as a 'no corresponding role'?)
• abbr (change to generic or leave as a 'no corresponding role'?)
• address (change to generic or map to group?)
• figcaption still map to caption even though it won't provide the figure a name anymore? (i think it might be ok, but want others opinions)
• label, this stay as no corresponding role? We aren't moving forward with a label role, are we? Could this actually be another instance of caption? is this a generic if not?
• legend same as above?