KEMBAR78
Debris flows and their toll on human life: a global analysis of debris-flow fatalities from 1950 to 2011 | Natural Hazards Skip to main content

Debris flows and their toll on human life: a global analysis of debris-flow fatalities from 1950 to 2011

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debris flows cause significant damage and fatalities throughout the world. This study addresses the overall impacts of debris flows on a global scale from 1950 to 2011. Two hundred and thirteen events with 77,779 fatalities have been recorded from academic publications, newspapers, and personal correspondence. Spatial, temporal, and physical characteristics have been documented and evaluated. In addition, multiple socioeconomic indicators have been reviewed and statistically analyzed to evaluate whether vulnerable populations are disproportionately affected by debris flows. This research provides evidence that higher levels of fatalities tend to occur in developing countries, characterized by significant poverty, more corrupt governments, and weaker healthcare systems. The median number of fatalities per recorded deadly debris flow in developing countries is 23, while in advanced countries, this value is only 6 fatalities per flow. The analysis also indicates that the most common trigger for fatal events is extreme precipitation, particularly in the form of large seasonal storms such as cyclones and monsoon storms. Rainfall caused or triggered 143 of the 213 fatal debris flows within the database. However, it is the more uncommon and catastrophic triggers, such as earthquakes and landslide dam bursts, that tend to create debris flows with the highest number of fatalities. These events have a median fatality count >500, while rainfall-induced debris flows have a median fatality rate of only 9 per event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barredo JL (2007) Major flood disasters in Europe: 1950–2005. Nat Hazards 42:125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, pp 64–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs S, Heiss K, Hübl J (2007) Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7:495–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Martinez R, Lopez JL (2005) Debris flows of December 1999 in Venezuela. In: Hungr O, Jakob M (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer-Praxis, Berlin, pp 519–538

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsh KS (2002) Expanded trade and GDP data. J Confl Resolut 46:712–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagno FM, Revellino P (2005) Debris avalanches and debris flows of the Campania Region (southern Italy). In: Hungr O, Jakob M (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer-Praxis, Berlin, pp 489–518

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guzetti F, Stark CP, Salvati P (2005) Evaluation of flood and landslide risk to the population of Italy. Environ Manag 36(1):15–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt K (1997) Regions of risk: a geographical approach to disasters. Addison Wesley Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Evans SG, Bovis MJ, Hutchinson JN (2000) A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type. Environ Eng Geosci 7(3):221–238

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2011) World economic outlook (WEO) tensions from the two-speed recovery: unemployment, commodities, and capital flows. International Monetary Fund, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (2005) Debris flow mechanics. In: Hungr O, Jakob M (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer-Praxis, Berlin, pp 105–134

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob M, Hungr O (2005) Introduction. In: Hungr O, Jakob M (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer-Praxis, Berlin, pp 1–7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob M, Stein D, Ulmi M (2011) Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact. Nat Hazards 52(1):241–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan CD, Chen CL (2005) Debris flows caused by Typhoon Herb in Taiwan. In: Hungr O, Jakob M (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer-Praxis, Berlin, pp 539–563

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kachigan SK (1991) Multivariate statistical analysis. Radius Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanji MA, Massad F, Cruz PT (2003) Debris flows in areas of residual soils: occurrence and characteristics. International workshop on occurrence and mechanisms of flows in natural slopes and Earthfills, Associacione Geotecnica Italiana, Sorrento, Italy

  • Petley DN (2012a) Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology 40(10):927–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petley DN (2012b) The landslide blog. American Geophysical Union. http://blogs.agu.org/landslideblog. Accessed 12 March 2012

  • Petley DN, Dunning SA, Rosser NJ (2005) The analysis of global landslide risk through the creation of a database of worldwide landslide fatalities. In: Hungr O, Fell R, Couture R, Eberhardt E (eds) Landslide risk management. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 367–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvati P, Bianchi C, Rossi M, Guzzetti F (2010) Societal landslide and flood risk in Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10(3):465–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez C, Lee TS, Young S, Batts D, Benjamin J, Malilay J (2009) Risk factors for mortality during the 2002 landslides. Disasters 33(4):705–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santi PM, Hewitt K, VanDine DF, Barillas EM (2010) Debris-flow impact, vulnerability, and response. Nat Hazards 56(1):371–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totschnig R, Sedlacek W, Fuchs S (2011) A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport. Nat Hazards 58(2):681–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Special report 176: landslides: analysis and control. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, pp 11–33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Samantha Jacob, Lauren Santi, and Tara Santi for initial literature review in assembling the database. We are grateful to Dr. David N. Petley of the Landslide Blog, the Association of Engineering and Environmental Geologists, and the Environmental and Engineering Geology Division of the Geological Society of America for soliciting professionals to provide information on debris-flow events.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Casey A. Dowling or Paul M. Santi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dowling, C.A., Santi, P.M. Debris flows and their toll on human life: a global analysis of debris-flow fatalities from 1950 to 2011. Nat Hazards 71, 203–227 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0907-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0907-4

Keywords