KEMBAR78
Fix context storage provider property name (#7318) by LaurentTreguier · Pull Request #7342 · open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@LaurentTreguier
Copy link
Contributor

This change makes error messages use the existing CONTEXT_STORAGE_PROVIDER_PROPERTY constant to fix the name of the system property being slightly different.
This solves issue #7318

@LaurentTreguier LaurentTreguier requested a review from a team as a code owner May 10, 2025 10:30
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented May 10, 2025

CLA Signed

  • ✅login: LaurentTreguier / (827ef63)

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.85%. Comparing base (acc64ee) to head (827ef63).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #7342      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     89.86%   89.85%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     6896     6895       -1     
============================================
  Files           786      786              
  Lines         20789    20789              
  Branches       2025     2025              
============================================
- Hits          18681    18680       -1     
  Misses         1466     1466              
- Partials        642      643       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@jkwatson jkwatson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@jkwatson jkwatson merged commit e419b5d into open-telemetry:main May 11, 2025
47 of 49 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants