KEMBAR78
F1 driver slams Carlos Sainz for 'mouthing off' as official FIA protest looms - The Mirror


Skip to main content
Daily Mirror

F1 driver slams Carlos Sainz for 'mouthing off' as official FIA protest looms

Carlos Sainz was furious with the F1 stewards at the Dutch Grand Prix over the penalty he was given and also criticised Liam Lawson for his role in that punishment

Carlos Sainz has been accused of "mouthing off" by rival Liam Lawson. The Kiwi was taken aback by the Spaniard's criticism of him following their collision in last Sunday's Dutch Grand Prix and, in the few days since, has clearly continued to be irked by what the Williams driver said.


Their argument came as a result of one of the many on-track incidents that happened during the action-packed Zandvoort race. It happened after a safety car restart when Sainz tried to overtake Lawson around the outside of turn one.


However, they collided and both picked up punctures which required visits to the pit lane. It ruined both their chances of scoring points, though Sainz was the one who was penalised when the stewards found him to have been at fault for the contact.


The Spaniard was furious about it, both over the radio when told about his punishment and then afterwards when he took aim not only at the stewards, demanding an explanation for their verdict, but also at Lawson.

Regarding the Kiwi, Sainz said: "It's a corner that allows to go two cars to race each other without really having to have any unnecessary contact. But with Liam, it always seems to be very difficult to make that happen. He always seems to prefer to have a bit of contact and risk a DNF or a puncture like we did, than to actually accept having two cars side-by-side."


In response, Lawson questioned why Sainz had chosen to criticise him in the media rather than speaking to him directly. "I wish he'd just come and talk to me about it rather than telling everybody else," the Racing Bulls driver said.

READ MORE: Lewis Hamilton left shocked as 'hardcore' Italian GP penalty confirmed before Monza F1 raceREAD MORE: Isack Hadjar says there's 'no point' as talks over Red Bull F1 promotion to begin

And on Thursday, ahead of this weekend's Italian Grand Prix, Lawson said he was still "surprised" by how critical Sainz had been of him when he was unaware that there was any issue between them.

He said at Monza: "On a restart we have cold tyres, hard tyres. We're all on new tyres after the safety car. It's a naturally difficult corner. We're all coming in there on lap one. He's the car going for the overtake around the outside, and he didn't get his axle where he needed to get it. And somehow I'm deemed as being aggressive? I don't really understand it.


"It ruined my race. We were in a position to potentially have two cars in the top five, but I didn't go on the radio and mouth off to everybody about it or to the media.

"So, yeah, it's his approach after that race but I don't know why he was so upset, honestly. If I was overtaking him, I would understand that he's more frustrated, but he was the car overtaking, and he got a penalty for it."

Article continues below
Sky Sports launches discounted Formula 1 package
This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more

Formula 1 fans can watch every practice, qualifying and race live with Sky's new Essential TV and Sky Sports bundle in a new deal that saves £192.

As well as Sky Sports access, this includes more than 100 TV channels and free subscriptions to Netflix and Discovery+.

Meanwhile, Sainz remains furious with the stewards' decision to penalise him and said he is gathering the proof he needs for an official protest. "We are trying to see if we can come up with enough evidence and enough stuff to realise if we can change the outcome of the penalty," he said.

"Because I still firmly believe it was a very poor penalty that I received and a bad judgment, which can happen as long as you have the capacity to revisit it. And if there's been a misunderstanding or a lack of evidence or a lack of analysis, then there is still time to reanalyse it, to reopen it, and change it."

Follow Daily Mirror:



reach logo

At Reach and across our entities we and our partners use information collected through cookies and other identifiers from your device to improve experience on our site, analyse how it is used and to show personalised advertising. You can opt out of the sale or sharing of your data, at any time clicking the "Do Not Sell or Share my Data" button at the bottom of the webpage. Please note that your preferences are browser specific. Use of our website and any of our services represents your acceptance of the use of cookies and consent to the practices described in our Privacy Notice and Terms and Conditions.