FIRST NOTICE OF COMMERCIAL LIEN
FOR EELK 1700 WEST 14TH STREET
DOWN HOME, TEXAS 751 11
Kathy G. Fowler d/b/a KATHY G FOULER, CCUE, CFSP, CUCE
EELK 1700 WEST 14 TH STREET
P.O. BOX 88788 Registered Mail RB 352 089 103 US
DOWN HOME, TEXAS 751 11
July 2, 2003
Dear Kathy G Fouler et al,
EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW IS PARAMOUNT AND MANDATORY BY LAW. I, Jack Rabbit
Patriot a Titled sovereign am Competent for handling my own affairs. I, Jack Rabbit Patriot, have Power
of Attorney for representing and a Copyright on the fiction Jack R Patriot© or JACK R PATRIOT©. A
sovereign cannot be sued in his own court.
On or about May 7, 2003, Kathy G Fouler et al, unlawfully and illegally stole my property in the amount
of $17,332.01, from me at the direction of a Third Party Debt Collector.
The proper protocol and Lawful/Legal method for taking my property is to file suit in the proper court, have
a hearing and receive a judgment from the court and by abstract the judgment is final. You have not
followed proper protocol.
I do not have a CONTRACT with you, signed by me that gives permission for taking my property,
$17,332.01. You do not have my permission for making a legal determination for me in this matter,
commonly called "Practicing Law Without a License", a commercial crime. Kathy G. Fowler et al, you
have stolen my property, $17,332.01 worth and this is your FIRST NOTICE of GRACE going to a LIEN,
for allowing you to return my property that you have stolen.
To correct the theft that Kathy G Fouler et al has committed, by practicing law without a license, a
Commercial Crime, and to release EELK, from this FIRST NOTICE OF LIEN, you must return to me all
of my property, $17,332.01 worth, that you have stolen.
Absent your compliance with my offer of FIRST NOTICE OF GRACE for Kathy G Fouler, et al and
EELK, a Commercial Lien will be placed on all of EELK property and the personal and private property of
Kathy G Fouler et al. Also Involuntary Bankruptcy win be placed on all EELK property and Kathy G
Fouler et al, for the Commercial Crime of practicing Law without a License and all property will be
forfeited to me.
THIS MY FIRST offer by NOTICE OF GRACE dated July 2, 2003, offered to Kathy G Fouler et al and
EECU for correcting his/their theft of my property. Mike Bruins et al and EELK have twenty-one (21)
days for compliance.
____________________________
Jack Rabbit Patriot
657 Silver Spur Drice
Weatherford, Texas
Copy: Annabelle T. Edwards - Operations Manager, Collections INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19255 - 0030
Jack Rabbit Patriot
SECOND NOTICE OF COMMERCIAL LIEN
FOR EEBU 1617 WEST 7TH STREET
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 761042-2503
July 16, 2003
Kate C. Chicken d/b/a KATE C CHICKEN, CCUE, CFSP, CUCE
EEBU 1617 WEST 7th STREET -PO BOX 8888
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76104 Registered Mail RB 444 737 777 US
Dear Kate C Chicken et al,
EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW IS PARAMOUNT AND MANDATORY BY LAW. 1, Jack Rabbit Patriot, a Titled
Sovereign, am Competent for handling my own affairs. 1, Jack Rabbit Patriot, have Power of Attorney for
representing and a Copyright on the fiction Jack R Patriot© or JACK R PATRIOT©. A Titled sovereign must give
her permission in all of my affairs.
On or about May 7, 2003, Kate C Chicken et al, unlawfully and illegally stole my property in the amount of
$7,332.01, from me at the direction of a Third Party Debt Collector.
On June 26, 2003 1 sent Notice to Kate C Chicken et al and as of this date July 16, 2003 there has been no response.
Kate C Chicken et al has committed a Fault and has Defaulted .
The proper protocol and Lawful/Legal method for taking my property is to file suit in the proper court, have a hearing
and receive a judgment from the court and by abstract the judgment is final. You have not followed proper protocol.
I do not have a CONTRACT with you, signed by me that gives permission for taking my property, $7,332.01. You do
not have my permission for making a legal determination for me in this matter, commonly called "Practicing Law
Without a License", a commercial crime. Kathy et al, you have stolen my property, $7,332.01 worth and this is your
SECOND NOTICE of GRACE going to a LIEN, for allowing you to return my stolen property.
To correct the theft that Kate C Chicken et al has committed, by practicing law without a license, a Commercial
Crime, and to release EEBU, from this FIRST NOTICE OF LIEN, you must return to me all of my property,
$7,332.01 worth, that you have stolen.
Absent your compliance with my offer of SECOND NOTICE OF GRACE for Kate C Chicken, et al and EEBU, a
Commercial Lien will be placed on all of EEBU property and the personal and private property of Kate C Chicken et
al. Also Involuntary Bankruptcy will be placed on all EEBU property and Kate C Chicken et al, for the
Commercial Crime of practicing Law without a License and all property will be forfeited to me.
THIS MY SECOND offer by NOTICE OF GRACE dated July 16, 2003, offered to Kate C Chicken et al and
EEBU for correcting his/their theft of my property. Mike Bruns et al and EECU have fifteen (15) days for
compliance.
_____________________________________________
Jack Rabbit Patriot
688 Gold Shin Drice Wanna Be, Texas
Copy: Anna T. Maim - Operations Manager, Junk Yard Dog Inc., anywhere USA or TEXAS.
Jack Rabbit Patriot
THIRD NOTICE OF COMMERCIAL LIEN
FOR EEBU 1617 WEST 7"' STREET
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 761042-2503
August 1, 2003
Kate C. Chicken d/b/a KATE C CHICKEN, CCUE, CFSP, CUCE
EEBU 1617 WEST 7th STREET - PO BOX 8888
FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76104 Registered Mail RB 444 737 777 US
Dear Kate C Chicken et al,
EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW IS PARAMOUNT AND MANDATORY BY LAW. 1, Jack Rabbit Patriot, a Titled Sovereign,
am Competent for handling my own affairs. 1, Jack Rabbit Patriot, have Power of Attorney for representing and a Copyright on
the fiction Jack R Patriot© or JACK R PATRIOT©. A Titled sovereign must give her permission in all of my affairs.
On or about (date 1st Notice), Kate C Chicken et al, unlawfully and illegally stole my property in the amount of $7,332.01,
from me at the direction of a Third Party Debt Collector. She was noticed and as of this date (21) days she has not
responded. She has committed a fault and defaulted.
On (date 2nd Notice) I sent Notice to Kate C Chicken et al and as of this date (I 5 days) there has been no response. Kate C
Chicken et al has committed a Fault and has Defaulted.
The proper protocol and Lawful/Legal method for taking my property is to file suit in the proper court, have a hearing and
receive a judgment from the court and by abstract the judgment is final. You have not followed proper protocol.
I do not have a CONTRACT with you, signed by me that, gives permission for taking my property, $7,332.01. You do not have
my permission for making a legal determination for me in this matter, commonly called "Practicing Law Without a License", a
commercial crime. Kathy G. Fowler et al, you have stolen my property, $7,332.01 worth and this is your 3rd NOTICE of
GRACE going to a LIEN, for allowing you to return my stolen property.
To correct the theft that Kate C Chicken et al has committed, by practicing law without a license, a Commercial Crime, and to
release EEBU, from this NOTICE OF LIEN, you must return to me all of my property, $7,332.01 worth, that you have stolen.
Absent your compliance with my offer of 3RD NOTICE OF GRACE for Kate C Chicken, et al and EEBU, a Commercial Lien
will be placed on all of EEBU property and the personal and private property of Kate C Chicken et al. Also Involuntary
Bankruptcy will be placed on all EEBU property and Kate C Chicken et al, for the Commercial Crime of practicing Law
without a License and all property will be forfeited to me.
THIS MY THIRD offer by NOTICE OF GRACE dated July 31, 2003, offered to Kate C Chicken et al and EEBU for
correcting his/their theft of my property. Mike Bruns et al and EECU have five (5) days for compliance.
_________________________________________
Jack Rabbit Patriot
688 Gold Shin Drice Wanna Be, Texas
Copy: Anna T. Maim - Operations Manager, Junk Yard Dog Inc., anywhere USA or TEXAS.
Jack Rabbit Patriot
True Bill Private Security Agreement
STATE OF THE FORUM COMMON LAW UCC 1-505 (N. I. L.)
UCC-4 PRIVATE SECURITY AGREEMENT NON-NEGOTIABLE TRUE BILL
MEANS BARGAIN OF THE PARTY IN FACT
CRAIG V. MISSOURI 29 US (IV Pet.) 433-36 (1830)
We, BANK UNITED in concert with all named Respondents, individually, jointly and severally, attest to these facts in this non-negotiable True Bill UCC-
4 PRIVATE Security Agreement under the principle of "ignorance of the law is no excuse", and therefore, by these due PRESENTMENTS for acceptance without
dishonor under UCC 3-504 and UCC 3-505, through principles of UCC 1-103 of principal and agent, misrepresentations, "barratry", fraud, undue influence,
duress, coercion, mistake, threat, law of contracts, bankruptcy and other validating and invalidating clauses and in this state of the forum common law under UCC
1-105 (N.I.L.) herein contained agree as follows:
on or about the fifteenth day of September, 2000, and in prior times, we, BANK UNITED and all named Respondents, and other cohorts, did willfully,
knowingly, and voluntarily by my/our own acts, by commissions and acts and omissions by and through the aforesaid conspiracy, in direct relation to the free
sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum, cause a breach of trust and a breach of the peace in strict violation of the specific performance of our bond, to
conduct all activities in relation to Demandant with honesty, good faith and absent of fraud, which acts violate our bonds, and the Texas Deceptive Trade
Practices Acts.
We, BANK UNITED in concert with all named Respondents, did in fact solicit a collection firm, Barrett, Burke, Wilson, Castle, Daffin & Frappier
L.L.P. to initiate threats on Demandant on or about September 15, 2000 which resulted in threatened foreclosure and violation of constitutionally protected rights
of the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum, on or about November 7, 2000. We, Respondents, admit there was no contract which allowed our
unlawful intrusion and interference on Demandant.
We, BANK UNITED in concert with all named Respondents, knew that the mailing of the threat of foreclosure was wrongful and was made with intent
in bad faith and would violate the substantive rights of the free sovereign state, Ed: Brannum, but we chose to do so anyway, knowing that we would rely on
influencing the court for our protection if necessary.
Additionally, we, BANK UNITED in concert with all named Respondents, knew that the solicitation of the collection agency, without a binding contract, to
threaten
foreclosure of the free sovereign inhabitant, Ed: Brannum, would violate Demandant's constitutionally protected rights, but would be sufficient for us to file a
fraudulent and frivolous foreclosure against the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum, and was intentional to cause the wrongful, malicious threat and
malicious deprivations of the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum, in an attempt by coercion and threat of foreclosure to seduce PRIVATE party by
immoral commerce into submission of theft of PRIVATE property through our willful, knowing and intentional deprivation of natural law unalienable rights of
PRIVATE ownership and rights of PRIVATE possession to the inheritance from Almighty God and beyond the judicial power and judicial authority possessed
by us,
BANK UNITED and all named Respondents. We knew that the above stated acts were wrongful and would cause irreparable damage, mental anguish and
humiliation by the fraudulent allegations and deprivations of the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum, and could be very expensive to us if challenged,
but
we chose to violate the sovereign free state, Ed: Brannum, anyway and suffer the consequence, and for said acts we now take full responsibility.
Additionally, we, BANK UNITED in concert with all named Respondents, did cause the fraudulent mailing and threats and the use of the
wire telephonically in the unlawful attempt of extortion, designed with the specific intent to cause damages and mental anguish knowing
that the free sovereign state, Ed: Brannum, had never contracted any business dealings with the Respondents, BANK UNITED or Law Firm
herein named, nor did PRIVATE party, Ed: Brannum, have knowledge of the existence of said alleged violations for which act we, BANK
UNITED and its cohorts, take full responsibility for our acts by the willful, knowing and intentional violations of the Deceptive Trade
Practices Act which are forbidden in the Texas State, under the secured protections for the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum,
through the National Constitution at Article 1, Section 10, Clause 2, and we, BANK UNITED and all the Respondents so named, are
subject to prosecution by the Texas State Attorney General for deceptive trade practices violation and conspiracy to commit Federal
Racketeering Statute violations, prosecutable in Federal Court, for mail fraud.
We, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, now admit that we were unable to contract with the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum,
on the fraudulent allegations wherein PRIVATE party, Ed: Brannum, committed no crime or offense, for which we, the Respondents, take
full responsibility for the malicious threats and deprivation of property and of the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum.
our only real concern at this point in time is whether or whether not the PRIVATE party, Ed: Brannum, will serve upon us a Common Law
Affidavit of criminal Conversion of PRIVATE property should we, the above described racketeering enterprise, fail to agree to this simple
contract concept in law by this one PRESENTMENT in the common law form of PRIVATE security agreement by this tender offer, and
given under the courtesy of time limit of ten (10) days for which we, BANK UNITED and our cohorts in conspiracy, should have ample
time to reconsider our position, and make restitution for our past alter ego unjust enrichments and violations, and restore the PRIVATE
party to as good a position as he would have been had said PRIVATE party not been maliciously harassed and maliciously threatened with
unlawful foreclosure and deprived of PRIVATE property through an ongoing pattern of racketeering and Deceptive Trade Practices Act
violations in the year of Two Thousand, for which acts we, the Respondents, take responsibility, both financially and criminally.
We, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, admit the false and fictitious allegations which we, Respondents, solicited to be mailed and
conveyed over the wires to threaten the extortion from Demandant on or about the Fifteenth day of September, Two Thousand (09/15/2000)
is another direct and proximate cause of damage to the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum, by causing by fraud and barratry the
denial of PRIVATE party, Ed: Brannum's use and enjoyment of Demandant's PRIVATE property, based entirely on the unfounded
fraudulent actions
of Respondents.
We, Respondents, admit that we knew our actions would cause mental anguish, pain and suffering, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of
business and would deprive the free sovereign state, Ed: Brannum, the personal use and enjoyment of his PRIVATE property, but we
conspired to do so anyway and we now take full responsibility.
Furthermore, we, the Respondents, were aware that our actions would constitute barratry by the mailing of false and fictitious writings,
designed with specific intent to mislead and cause damage. We were also fully aware that the mailing of a document known to contain
fraud would constitute mail fraud in violation of Title 18, § 1962, § 1341 and § 1343, but we, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, chose to
violate the barratry and fraud statutes to give aid and comfort to our cohorts in our racketeering enterprise, knowing said act would cause
irreparable
damage to the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum, to which we, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, are now liable for the said
damages of Four Billion, Nine Hundred Ninety Five Million ($4,995,000,000.00) US Dollars plus interest at one percent (1%) per month
from the time of default Nihil Dicit, until paid in full amount and we, BANK UNITED in concert with our cohorts, take full responsibility for
the damages caused by our fraud upon the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum, Demandant, Lien Claimant, for all damages
suffered.
We, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, further agree that the Biblical principal (Proverbs 6:30-31) mandating that the thief must pay back
seven fold for all that he stole is a fair and equitable amount and said amount is Four Billion, Nine Hundred Ninety Five Million
($4,995,000,000.00) Dollars in specie, minted coin of silver substance, and we agree to pay PRIVATE party, Ed: Brannum, this token
amount for all the pains, suffering, and damages we have cause him to bear by our commissions of fraud, mail fraud and barratry over the
past several years.
We, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, either knew or should have known the Erie Railroad v. Tompkins case opinions and the later
Clearfield Doctrine did effectively deceive even the most astute non-corporate native born freeman inhabiting in their jus soli in Texas, but
for our limited time to hold corrupt power under non-existent authority and in direct violation of the Texas Constitution and the Federal
RICO Statutes as they relate to conspiracy, we, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, have enjoyed our feast upon the select, thereby
diminishing their abilities and functions to obey Almighty God, whom we all fear, even though some of us have felt we have not yet been
judged by Him, and that is why our law school professors indelibly implanted into our double mindset the Latin phrase, "judici satis poena
est, quod deum habet ultorem".
We, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, either knew or should have known the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum, now has a
mindset far and away more comprehensive and keener that the brethren above described, and for this reason in law, we, BANK UNITED
and our cohorts, have now had our due notice and knowledge with this due PRIVATE non-negotiable presentment for specific performance,
but after becoming more fully appraised of this contractual specific performance for any consideration sufficient to support a simple
contract and by our own non-judicial rules of conduct by the law merchant under color, we, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, now know
and understand the meaning of UCC 9-501, Self-Help, coupled with UCC 1-105, Conflict of Laws by the PRIVATE parties' power to
choose applicable law, and in the sovereign's curiae Regis through the aid and assistance of the jure coronae, and this explicitly does not
include us, BANK UNITED or our cohorts, whether or whether not clothed in darkness under the official black robe satanic dress by our
willful, knowing and voluntary accomplices hearing officers who are members of the ABA.
We, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, having relied upon ABA misrepresentations, undue influence, and fraud, induced upon me/us by co-
conspirators, the ABA, now realize my/our mistake, but under the colorable codes, the legal ease terms used by the deceivers, my cohorts,
non-licensed attorneys, engaged full time in Deceptive Trade Practices violations in the Freemen's Texas State, we, Respondents, and our
cohorts, are now liable by the term constructive fraud even without the proof of scienter as a condition to hold us individually, jointly and
severally liable to the rightful PRIVATE party, the free sovereign state, Ed: Brannum, under simple contract law, since we, UNITED
BANK and our cohorts either knew or should have known by the common usage the Uniform Commercial Code is being used against us for
our willful, knowing and intentional alter ego ignorance in law under the PRESUMPTION rule of our own colorable Uniform Commercial
Code as adopted by our co-conspirator, the ABA.
It appearing to us, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, by these known facts in this PRIVATE due presentment security agreement True Bill,
we, BANK UNITED and other Respondents have ten (10) days by courtesy of the sovereign to make an answer for the theft of PRIVATE
property which by our willful, knowing and intentional acts of barratry and fraud have been unlawfully damaging to the free sovereign
independent state, Ed: Brannum, and sign bona fide this PRIVATE Security Agreement Non-Negotiable True Bill, or in the alternative, by
our right to default Nihil Dicit at the Common Law, allow the accommodation/surety/guarantor pay for honor PRIVATE signature under
UCC 3-415 and/or UCC 3-401 by enforcement at UCC 9-501 for any judicial process whatsoever in law under UCC 1-105 through
territorial protections for the PRIVATE party at UCC 1-207.7 as in Anderson's for reasons under Common Law simple contract to specific
performance at ucc I103, Conflict of Laws, hereinabove enumerated.
Wherefore, to settle this PRIVATE account receivable quickly under our own Rule 16 pre-trial, we, BANK UNITED and our cohorts,
individually, jointly and severally, agree to sign bona fide this PRIVATE security agreement, or to forever remain silent, caused by our
estoppel in law (equitable estoppel and collateral estoppel) under UCC 1-103 by Nihil Dicit for rights and remedies UCC 1-201 (34) with or
without resort to a tribunal for the PRIVATE party, since we, BANK UNITED and our cohorts, full well know and understand the term
consideration, as under UCC 1-201 (44)(d), especially under our willful, knowing and intentional participation in colorable jurisdictions,
whether or whether not unduly influenced upon my by my own co-conspirators, ABA non-regulated foreign agent members.
We, UNITED BANK and our cohorts, and our American Bar Association dues paying members, know and understand the Common Law
ninety-nine (99) year limit for Common Law liens duly filed and duly recorded at the office of the Clerk and Recorder, ex officio county -
court's as entered by the free sovereign independent state, Ed: Brannum, with or without resort to a tribunal, especially upon this prior
courtesy graciously extended to us by the sovereign by ten (10) days final notice and enforceable under the full faith and credit of the
United States of America under the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act at Ru e 9 (e) , 4 4. 1, Rules 902 (3) (A) (B) , (8) and
(9) , and UCC 9-501 by Self -Help, even using Common Law Replevin of necessity, in this state of the Forum Common Law under the
conflicts of law provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted into this political corporate non-registered non-bonded compact
party state of Texas and executable in the foreign country of Texas self-governing sole and exclusive right of the sovereigns in America.
Private Seal, BANK UNITED, BARRETT, BURKE, WILSON, CASTLE, DAFFTN & FRAPPIER, L.L.P., Attestation "Judici satis poena
est, quod deum habet ultorem"
PRIVATE signature under UCC 3-401 AND UCC 3-415
BANK UNITED and All Above Named Respondents of the State of Texas, jointly and
severally teste this day of January, in the year of our Almighty
God, in Jesus' Name, two thousand one, A.D.
Private Seal of suit of the sovereign: without prejudice and without recourse with special, express and explicit reservation of all
natural law unalienable rights of inheritance from God, waiving none ever in this free sovereign independent state.
Acknowledgment:
Honorable Ed: Brannum
jus soli, Sui juris.
Teste meipso this ________ day of January, in the year of our Almighty God, through our Redeemer, Jesus, two thousand one, A.D.
Commercial Lien Process
Start with LETTER/INVOICE
Registered mailed (use REG. # as your account optionab
STEPS after 72 hours of invoice received and no
response by the crook you're after.
1. First Default& Notice/Statement
< Give 10 days to respond >
2. Second Default Notice
< 10 days >
3. Third and final. Notify them you will be placing them into involuntary Bankruptcy.
< 10 days >
4. Send a True Bill- as though they are writing it.
< 21 days >
5. Place all of the proceedings up until this point on an UCC-l or UCC-3 (optional).
Mail copies to your crook.
6. Record affidavit into a County Records listing all of the previous steps 1-5 with a
certified copy of the original invoice you started with.
< Un-refuted for 31 days this becomes your law >
7. Record Abstract Judgment to include all properties of individual you are placing into
involuntary Bankruptcy with previous affidavit attached. Record into the County
Records where the individual crook's property is located. Mail copies to bonding
companies, banks, credit bureaus etc.
Note: You now own the crook!
