KEMBAR78
Plaintiff-Appellee Vs Vs Defendant-Appellant Tancinco & Rosales Attorney-General Villa-Real | PDF | Public Sphere | Justice
Scribd
Upload
78 views1 page

Plaintiff-Appellee Vs Vs Defendant-Appellant Tancinco & Rosales Attorney-General Villa-Real

Felipe Delima, a policeman, was trying to arrest Lorenzo Napilon, a fugitive who had escaped from jail. When Delima found Napilon and demanded his surrender, Napilon attacked Delima with a pointed piece of bamboo. Delima fired his revolver but missed. Napilon fled with the weapon. Delima pursued Napilon and fired again, this time hitting and killing him. Delima was convicted of homicide but appealed. The court reversed the conviction, finding that the killing was done in the performance of Delima's duty as a policeman. As Napilon refused to surrender and attacked with a weapon, compelling Delima to use deadly force, Delima committed no crime and was acquitted.

Uploaded by

Leona Sanchez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
78 views1 page

Plaintiff-Appellee Vs Vs Defendant-Appellant Tancinco & Rosales Attorney-General Villa-Real

Felipe Delima, a policeman, was trying to arrest Lorenzo Napilon, a fugitive who had escaped from jail. When Delima found Napilon and demanded his surrender, Napilon attacked Delima with a pointed piece of bamboo. Delima fired his revolver but missed. Napilon fled with the weapon. Delima pursued Napilon and fired again, this time hitting and killing him. Delima was convicted of homicide but appealed. The court reversed the conviction, finding that the killing was done in the performance of Delima's duty as a policeman. As Napilon refused to surrender and attacked with a weapon, compelling Delima to use deadly force, Delima committed no crime and was acquitted.

Uploaded by

Leona Sanchez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-18660. December 22, 1922.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS , plaintiff-appellee, vs .


FELIPE DELIMA , defendant-appellant.

Tancinco & Rosales for the appellant.


Attorney-General Villa-Real for appellee.

SYLLABUS

1. CRIMINAL LAW; HOMICIDE; PERFORMANCE OF A DUTY. — A policeman


nds a fugitive from jail and demands his surrender. The latter, instead of doing so,
attacks the policeman with a piece of bamboo, pointed does not hit him. The criminal
runs away without parting with his weapon. The policeman goes after him and again
res against him, this time hitting and killing him. Held: That the policeman did not
commit any crime, that the killing was done in the performance of a duty, and, therefore,
under article 8, No. 11, of the Penal Code, he must be acquitted.

DECISION

ROMUALDEZ , J : p

Lorenzo Napilon had escapes from the jail where he was serving sentence.

Some days afterwards the policeman Felipe Delima, who was looking for him,
found him in the house of Jorge Alegria, armed with a pointed piece of bamboo in the
shape of a lance, and demanded his surrender. The fugitive answered with a stroke of
his lance. The policeman dodged it and to impose his authority red his revolver, but
the bullet did not hit him. The criminal ran away, without parting with his weapon. The
peace officer went after him and fired again his revolver, this time hitting and killing him.
The policeman was tried and convicted for homicide and sentenced to reclusion
temporal and the accessory penalties. He appeals from that judgment which must be
reversed.
That killing was done in the performance of a duty. The deceased was under the
obligation to surrender, and had no right, after evading service of his sentence, to
commit assault and disobedience with a weapon in the hand, which compelled the
policeman to resort to such an extreme means, which although it prove to be fatal, was
justified by the circumstances.
Article 8, No. 11, of the Penal code being considered, Felipe Delima committed
no crime, and he is hereby acquitted with the costs de oficio. So ordered.
Araullo, C.J., Street, Malcolm, Avanceña, Villamor, Ostrand, and Johns, JJ., concur.

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. © 2018 cdasiaonline.com

You might also like