CESAR E.
VERGARA MEMORIAL HIGH
School SCHOOL Grade Level 12
Grade 1 to 12 Teacher MARK KEVIN A. VIDAR Learning Area Research in Daily Life 2
Daily Lesson Log
Teaching Dates & Time January 1-4, 2019 (Week 7) Quarter Second
SESSION 1 SESSION 2 SESSION 3 SESSION 4
I. OBJECTIVES
The learner demonstrates understanding of:
1. the criteria in selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature
A. Content Standards 2. the ethical standards in writing related literature
3. the formulation of conceptual framework
4. the research hypotheses (if appropriate)
5. the definition of terms as used in the study
The learner is able to:
1. select, cite, and synthesize judiciously related literature and use sources according to ethical standards
B. Performance Standards
2. use sources according to ethical standards
3. present written review of related literature
CS_RS12-If-j-3
C. Learning Competencies & synthesizes information from relevant literature
Objectives CS_RS12-If-j-4
writes coherent review of literature
II. CONTENT Learning from Others and Reviewing the Literature
III. LEARNING RESOURCES
A. Reference/s
1. Teacher’s Guide pages
2. Learner’s Materials pages
3. Textbook pages
4. Additional Materials from
Learning Resources (LR)
portal
B. Other Learning Resources
IV.PROCEDURES
A. Reviewing previous lesson or
presenting the new lesson Recalling proper ways of reviewing Recalling the previous topic of synthesizing
literatures. literature reviews.
B. Establishing a purpose for the The teacher shall assign different topics for
lesson each of the group assigned. At least four
groups shall be formed. They will be asked to The teacher presents a coherent literature
underline phrases, sentences, or paragraphs review sample.
which are appealing to them and can be used
in their study.
C. Presentation of examples or The teacher presents a sample task of what Through a powerpoint presentation, answer the
instances of the new lesson to do to guide the learners on the activity. question: What is a coherent literature review?
D. Discussing new concept and
practicing new skills #1 The groups present their works. The teacher Make a coherent literature review from a
E. Discussing new concepts and critiques their work and facilitate learning. minimum of five materials.
practicing new skills #2
Answering the following guide questions:
The teacher presents three titles. From the
1. Why do you consider your work is a
F. Developing Mastery (Leads to title of literatures, students shall choose
coherent one?
Formative Assessment) which is the best literature for the title. A sort
2. What makes the writing harder?
of matching type assessment.
3. What makes it easier?
G. Finding practical applications of
concepts and skills in daily living The teacher presents a video presentation
how literatures help one’s study.
H. Making generalizations and Steps in making a coherent literature review:
abstracts about the lesson 1. Review styles or guidelines.
To synthesize is to combine two or more
2. Decide on a topic.
elements to form a new whole. In the
3. Identify the literature that you will
literature review, the “elements” are the
review.
findings of the literature you gather and read;
4. Analyze.
the “new whole” is the conclusion you draw
5. Summarize in table ot concept map.
from those findings.
6. Synthesize prior to writing.
7. Write.
I. Evaluating Learning Individual synthesizing shall be done from A comprehensive rubric shall be utilized in order
their group work. The previous task shall be to assess the final output and be graded as a
forwarded to the next group. summative assessment.
J. Additional activities for Look for random literature review of your
application or remediation chosen topic from the first week. All the
No assignment day.
materials obtained from the previous
lesson shall be obtained.
None of the students attended the class due conflict schedule of resuming of class after a long
V.REMARKS Declared holiday Declared holiday vacation. The learning competency is nonetheless scattered to a weeklong days. The objectives
and competency will not be defeated if carried out next week.
VI.REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who earned 80%
in the evaluation.
B. No. of learners who require
additional activities for
remediation who scored below
80%.
C. Did the remedial lessons work?
No. of learners who have
caught up with the lesson.
D. No. of learners who continue to
require remediation
E. Which of my teaching strategies
worked well? Why did these
work?
F. What difficulties did I encounter
which my principal or supervisor
can help me solve?
G. What innovation or localized
materials did use/discover
which I wish to share with other
teachers?
Prepared: Reviewed: Checked: Noted:
MARK KEVIN A. VIDAR CECILIA J. MIGUEL, Ph.D. ROGELIO L. DOMINGO, JR. IMELDA D. SISON
SHS TEACHER OIC, Asst. SHS Principal Master Teacher I Principal I
