District of TANAY IA

MARCIANA CATOLOS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

SBM VALIDATION FORM

TEMPLATE
TABLE 1

1 2 3 4
Thematic Rating and
Performance Indicators Data
Area Equivalent Points
Enrolment Rate (ER)
Access 45%

SY 2016 -2017 1,074 1-Marginal: At least 1% increase

SY 2017 - 2018 1,026 -4.47 2-Average: At least 3% increase
SY 2018 - 2019 1,054 2.73 3- High: At least 5% increase
Average % of Increase /Decrease -0.87
Rating 0
DROP OUT RATE (DR)
SY 2016 -2017 0.75 1-Marginal: At least 2% decrease
Total No. of Drop Outs 8 2-Average: At least 4% decrease
Total No. of Enrollment+Drop Out 1069 3- High: Has 0 DR or more than
SY 2017 - 2018 0.68 4% decrease
Total No. of Drop Outs 7
Total No. of Enrollment+Drop Out 1022
SY 2018 - 2019 1.33
Total No. of Drop Outs 14 -8.48
Total No. of Enrollment+Drop Out 1052 94.30
Average % of Increase /Decrease 42.91
Rating 0
COMPLETION OR GRADUATION RATE (CR)
SY 2016 -2017 76
No. of Graduates SY 2016 -2017 238
Grade I Enrolment SY 2011 - 2012 312 1-Marginal: At least 5% increase
SY 2017 - 2018 92
Efciency 25%

2-Average: At least 7% increase

No. of Graduates SY 2017 - 2018 262 3- High: At least 10% increase
Grade I Enrolment SY 2012- 2013 284 or at least 95% CR for the last 3 years

SY 2018 - 2019 79
No. of Graduates SY 2018 - 2019 246 20.94
Grade I Enrolment SY 2013 -2014 312 -14.53
Average % of Increase /Decrease 3.21
Rating 0
COHORT SURVIVAL RATE (CSR)
 District of TANAY IA
NA CATOLOS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

SBM VALIDATION FORM

TEMPLATE
TABLE 1

4 5 6
Rating and
Computation Result
Equivalent Points

1-Marginal: At least 1% increase

2-Average: At least 3% increase

0 X 0.45 0.00
3- High: At least 5% increase

1-Marginal: At least 2% decrease

2-Average: At least 4% decrease

3- High: Has 0 DR or more than

4% decrease

1-Marginal: At least 5% increase

2-Average: At least 7% increase

3- High: At least 10% increase

or at least 95% CR for the last 3 years 0.00 0.0 0.00

 Note: Kindly fill out all WHITE CELLS only

Name of School Head: NARCISA M CENINA

Position: Principal I
o. of Years in Present School: 1 year
ntact No. of the School Head: 9235390893
Source: 6966591
Contact No. of the School:
BEIS
BOSY E-Mail Address of the School: mpcmnhs.tanay@gmail.com

Source:
BEIS
EOSY

Source:
BEIS
EOSY
 SY 2016 -2017 76
No. of VI Enrollment SY 2016 -2017 238
Grade I Enrolment SY 2011 - 2012 312 1-Marginal: At least 5% increase
SY 2017 - 2018 94 2-Average: At least 7% increase
No. of VI Enrollment SY 2017 - 2018 268 3- High: At least 10% increase
Grade I Enrolment SY 2012- 2013 284 or at least 95% CSR for the last 3 years

SY 2018 - 2019 77
No. of VI Enrollment SY 2018 - 2019 240 23.71
Grade I Enrolment SY 2013 -2014 312 -18.48
Average % of Increase /Decrease 2.62
Rating 0
SUB-TOTAL(DR+CR+CSR)/3= 0.00
MPS
Quality 30%

SY 2016 - 2017 57.38 1 - Marginal: at least 2% increase

SY 2017 - 2018 57.66 0.49 2 - Average: at least 5% increase

SY 2018 - 2019 60.87 5.57 3 - High: at least 7% increase

Average % of Increase /Decrease 3.03 or at least 75% MPS

Rating 1

Table 2

Accountability and
Curriculum and
Leadership and Governance Continuous
Learning
Improvement
Item No. Score Item No. Score Item No.
1 3 1 3 1
2 2 2 3 2
3 3 3 2 3
4 3 4 3 4
5 3 5 3 5
6 3
7 3
TOTAL 14 TOTAL 20 TOTAL
AVERAGE 2.80 AVERAGE 2.86 AVERAGE

Table 3

Categories Percentage
Leadership and Governance 30%
Curriculum and learning 30%
Accountability and Continuous improvement 25%
Management of Resources 15%
 1-Marginal: At least 5% increase

2-Average: At least 7% increase

3- High: At least 10% increase

or at least 95% CSR for the last 3 years

1 - Marginal: at least 2% increase

2 - Average: at least 5% increase

1 x 0.3 0.30
3 - High: at least 7% increase

or at least 75% MPS

SUB - TOTAL 0.30

Table 2

Accountability and
Management of
Continuous
Resources
Improvement
Score Item No. Score
3 1 3
3 2 3
1 3 3
1 4 3
3 5 3

11 TOTAL 15
2.20 AVERAGE 3.00

Table 3

Percentage Computations Sub Total

30% 2.80 x 0.30 0.84
30% 2.86 x 0.30 0.86
25% 2.20 x 0.25 0.55
15% 3.00 x 0.15 0.45
Sub Total 2.70
Source:
BEIS
BOSY

MOVs: LOA
LINK SY 2016-2017
LINK SY 2017-2018
LINK SY 2018-2019
 Table 4

Performance Improvement SBM Assessment Score Based on D

60% 40%
Sub-total Computation Result (A) Sub-total Computation
0.30 0.30 x 0.6 0.18 2.70 2.70

Evaluated by: Checked & Verified:

CYNTHIA D. BRAZAL.Ed.D EDEN S. MATAWARAN

*Note: For the School Validation (Evaluated by the SBM Coordinator, Checked & Verified by the School M&E Coord
For the District Validation (Evaluated by the District Validator, Checked & Verified by the District SBM Consultant, a
For the Division Validation (Evaluated by the Division Validator, Checked and Verified by the EPS II-SMME, Noted b
 Table 4

SBM Assessment Score Based on DOD

Total
40% Level
A+B
Computation Result (B)
x 0.4 1.08 1.26 I

Description Developing

Noted:

IMELDA M. ASUNCION

Coordinator, Checked & Verified by the School M&E Coordinator, Noted by the Sch
ator, Checked & Verified by the District SBM Consultant, and Noted by the PSDS)
dator, Checked and Verified by the EPS II-SMME, Noted by the Division SBM C
 SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT (SBM) PRACTICES ASSESSMENT T

School: MARCIANA CATOLOS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Name of School Head: NARCISA M. CENINA

Directions: Rate the SBM Practices per indicator based on the indicated artifacts (e.g. compliance to artifact
artifacts a-c, check 2, compliance to artifacts a-e, check 3).

Ratings:
0 No evidence
1 Evidences indicate that indicators/ artifacts were at least 25% met
2 Evidences indicate that indicators/ artifacts were at least 75% met
3 Evidences indicate practices and procedures satisfy quality standards (All or 100

PRINCIPLE I: LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE (30%, X 0.30)

STANDARD INDICATOR

A network of leadership and 1. In place is a development

governance guides the education plan developed collaboratively
system to achieve its shared by the stakeholders of the
vision, mission and goals making school and community
them responsive and relevant to
the context of diverse
environments.

INDICATOR
2. The development plan is
regularly reviewed by the school
community to keep it responsive
and relevant to emerging needs,
challenges and opportunities

INDICATOR

3. The school is organized by a

clear structure and work
arrangements that promote
shared leadership and
governance and define the roles
and responsibilities of the
stakeholders.

4. A leadership network
facilitates communication
between and among the school
and community leaders for
informed decision-making and
solving of School Community-
wide learning problems

5. A long-term program is in
operation that addresses the
training and development needs
of school and community
leaders.
 operation that addresses the
training and development needs
of school and community
leaders.

TOTAL
AVERAGE
RATING (AVERAGE x 30%)

PRINCIPLE II: CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION (30%, X 0.30)

STANDARD INDICATOR

The curriculum learning systems 1. The curriculum provides for

anchored on the community and the development needs of all
learners’ contexts and aspirations types of learners in the school
are collaborative ly developed and community
continuously improved.

INDICATOR

2. The implemented curriculum

is localized to make it more
meaningful to learners and
applicable in the community
 INDICATOR

3. A representative group of
school and community
stakeholders develop the
method and materials for
developing creative thinking and
problem solving.

INDICATOR

4. The learning systems are

regularly and collaboratively
monitored by the community
using appropriate tools to
ensure the holistic growth and
development of the learners and
the community.

5. Appropriate assessment tools

for teaching and learning are
continuously reviewed and
improved, and assessment
results are contextualized to the
learner and local situation and
the attainment of relevant life
skills.
 INDICATOR

6. Learning managers and

facilitators nurture values and
environments that are protective
of all children and demonstrate
behaviors consistent to the
organization’s vision, mission
and goals.

INDICATOR

7. Methods and resources are

learner and community friendly,
enjoyable, safe, inclusive,
accessible and aimed at
developing self-directed
learners. Learners are equipped
TOTAL
AVERAGE
RATING (AVERAGE x 30%)

PRINCIPLE III: ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (25%, X 0.25

STANDARD INDICATOR

A clear, transparent, inclusive, and 1. Roles and responsibilities of

responsive accountability system accountable persons and
is in place, collaboratively collective bodies are clearly
developed by the school defined and agreed upon by the
community, which monitors community stakeholders.
performance and acts
appropriately on gaps and gains.
A clear, transparent, inclusive, and 1. Roles and responsibilities of
responsive accountability system accountable persons and
is in place, collaboratively collective bodies are clearly
developed by the school defined and agreed upon by the
community, which monitors community stakeholders.
performance and acts
appropriately on gaps and gains.

2. Achievement of goals is
recognized based on a
collaboratively developed
performance accountable
system; gaps are addressed
through appropriate action

3. The accountability system is

owned by the community and is
continuously enhanced to
ensure that management
structures and mechanisms are
responsive to the emerging
needs and demands of the
community.

4. Accountability assessment
criteria and tools, feedback
mechanisms, and information
collection and validation
techniques and processes are
inclusive and collaboratively
developed and agreed upon.
 5. Participatory assessment of
performance is done regularly
with the stakeholders.
Assessment results and lessons
learned serve as basis for
feedback, technical assistance,
recognition and plan adjustment.

TOTAL
AVERAGE
RATING (AVERAGE x 25%)

PRINCIPLE IV: MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES (15%, X 0.15)

STANDARD INDICATOR

Resources are collectively and 1. Regular resource inventory is

judiciously mobilized and managed collaboratively undertaken by
with transparency, effectiveness, learning managers, learning
and efficiency. facilitators, and community
stakeholders as basis for
resource allocation and
mobilization.

INDICATOR

2. A regular dialogue for

planning and resource
programming that is accessible
and inclusive, continuously
engage stakeholders, and
support implementation of
community education plans

3. In place is a community-
developed resource
management system that drives
appropriate behaviors of the
stakeholders to ensure
judicious, appropriate, and
effective use of resources.
 3. In place is a community-
developed resource
management system that drives
appropriate behaviors of the
stakeholders to ensure
judicious, appropriate, and
effective use of resources.

4. Regular monitoring,
evaluation, and reporting
processes of resource
management are developed and
implemented collaboratively by
the learning managers,
facilitators, and community
stakeholders

5. There is a system that

manages the network and
linkages which strengthen and
sustain partnerships for
improving resource
management.

TOTAL
AVERAGE
RATING (AVERAGE x 15%)

Evaluated by: Checked & Verified:

CYNTHIA D. BRAZAL, EdD EDEN S. MATAWARAN

*Note: For the School Validation (Evaluated by the SBM Coordinator, Checked & Verified by the School M&E Coordinator, Note
For the District Validation (Evaluated by the District Validator, Checked & Verified by the District SBM Consultant, and Noted by
For the Division Validation (Evaluated by the Division Validator, Checked and Verified by the EPS II-SMME, Noted by the Divisi
 D MANAGEMENT (SBM) PRACTICES ASSESSMENT TOOL

District: TANAY IA
School Year: 2018-2019

d on the indicated artifacts (e.g. compliance to artifacts a-b, <rating is 1> check 1, compliance to
ck 3).

at indicators/ artifacts were at least 25% met

at indicators/ artifacts were at least 75% met
actices and procedures satisfy quality standards (All or 100% of the indicators/artifacts were met)

ADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE (30%, X 0.30)

RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a-b 2 a-c 3 a-e

a. Original Enhanced School

Improvement Plan (ESIP) guided by
D.O. 36 s.2013

b. Organizational chart of School

Planning Team (SPT) with and School 3
Governing Council (SGC) with
roles/functions.

c. Annual Implementation Plan (AIP) 3

d. School Operational Budget (SOB)

e. Minutes of the meeting and photos

showing the involvement of
stakeholders in the Annual
Implementation Plan (AIP)
RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a 2 a-b 3 a-c
a. Memorandum/Minutes of meetings
on the review and enhancement of
School Improvement Plan (SIP)

b. Letter of invitation and confirmation

2
c. Memorandum/ Minutes of meetings
on the regular review of SIP headed
by the School Planning Team (SPT) 2

RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a-b 2 a-c 3 a-d
a. School Planning Team (SPT) and
School Governing Council (SGC)
properly conformed
b. List of General Parent-Teacher
Association (GPTA) with Terms of
Reference (TOR)
c. Sample Minutes of meetings of SPT 3
3
or GPTA with attendance
d. Resolutions/ Memorandum on the
agreed organizational structure of the
roles and responsibilities of the
collaboration between the school and
community

a. Evidence showing a confirmation of

open communication between school
and community stakeholders (e.g. FB
Account, Group Chat, School Sites)

b. School Report Card (SRC)

c. State of the School Address
(SOSA)/ Summit / General Assembly
of Stakeholders (Memorandum, 3
Agenda, Attendance and 3
Accomplishment Report)

d. Pictures showing that there is an

exchange of network communication
regarding decisions and solving
learning and administrative problems

a. Individual Plan for Professional

Development (IPPD)
b. School Head Developmental Plan

c. School Action Plan and Targets

3
 3
d. School-Based Training Plan for
School and community leaders and
Training Design/Matrix of Capacity 3
building of school leadership and
governance

TOTAL 14
AVERAGE 2.8
RATING (AVERAGE x 30%) 0.84

RRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION (30%, X 0.30)

RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a-f 2 a-g 3 a-h
a. Phil-IRI result
b. SF1 generated from Learners
Information System (LIS)
c. Nutritional Status/ SF8
d. List of 4Ps Beneficiaries
e. Learner’s Anecdotal
Records/Guidance Notebook
f. List of School’s Programs, Projects,
and Activities (PPAs) concerning 3 3
school performance
g. List of Best Practices concerning
curriculum
h. Accomplishment Report of Schools’
Programs, Projects, and Activities
(PPAs) regarding school performance
in different types of learners

RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a-b 2 a-c 3 a-e
a. Enhanced School Improvement
Plan (ESIP) Project Matrix Plan
b. Result of the Monitoring Evaluation
on the use of the localized materials
(modules)
c. Evidences showing the Innovations
done by school for a meaningful
learning outcome (e.g. Localized Daily 2
Lesson Log, Instructional Materials

2
d. Report on the Orientation on the
developed localized curriculum
guidelines agreed by school
community and teachers.
 2

e. Implemented localized curriculum

was benchmarked by other schools
evidently shown by the visitors,
attendance, certificate issued by the
school to other school and feedback
form

RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a-b 2 a-c 3 a-d
a. Photos showing compilation of
Instructional Materials (IMs)
b. Sample of Strategic Intervention
Materials (SIM) concerning least
mastered skills
c. Learning Materials (LMs)/
Instructional Materials (IMs) with
identified various approaches 2
addressing deficiencies was 2
developed and tested by the school
community.

d. Accomplishment Report on the

Implementation of the developed
Instructional Materials (IMs)
RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a 2 a-b 3 a-c
a. Sample accomplished Class
Observation by the School
Head/HT/MT (COT)
b. Sample accomplished Class
Observation by the School
Head/HT/MT (COT) with agreement to 3
3
the teacher observed
c. Feedback from the stakeholders
(e.g. learners, parents, other external
stakeholders) on teaching-learning
process
a. Result of Quarter Assessment Mean
Percentile Score (MPS) in all learning
areas for the current school year

b. Minutes of the meeting and photos

on the conduct of review on the
Quarter Assessment Mean Percentile
Score (MPS) by the School 3
Community and shared to
stakeholders through SOSA / Summit 3
 3

c. Consultative meeting with the SGC

regarding the assessment tools for
teaching and learning (Memorandum,
Minutes of the meeting, Attendance,
Accomplishment report)

RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a-c 2 a-d 3 a-f
a. Documents showing a Child-
Friendly School (ESIP Annex 2A & B)

b. Signage related to a Child-Friendly

school
c. Photos showing posted composition
of School Child Protection Committee
(CPC) and SDRRM Committee with
Contact numbers

d. Narrative and Pictorial Report on

Orientation of various DepEd Orders 3
and DepEd Memoranda regarding 3
Child Protection Policy and DRRM

e. Implementation of the Localized

Guidelines on Child Protection and
Anti-Bullying noted by the GPTA or
SGC
f. Localized Guidelines on Child
Protection and Anti-Bullying adopted
by other school/district
RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a 2 a-b 3 a-c
a. List of intervention programs
b. Sample Learner’s Portfolio
c. Sample Self-Directed Materials (e,g. 3
localized / contextualized modules) 3

TOTAL 19
AVERAGE 2.71
RATING (AVERAGE x 30%) 0.81

BILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (25%, X 0.25)

RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a 2 a-b 3 a-c
a. School Memorandum on the
Composition and Terms of References
of
· Bids and Awards Committee (BAC)

· Teaching/Non-teaching personnel
· Different Coordinators and Ancillary

· School Governing Council (SGC)

3
· School Planning team (SPT) 3
b. School Memorandum, Minutes of
Meeting of BAC, SPT, SGC, and
Teaching & Non-Teaching personnel

c. Resolutions on determined terms of

reference of BAC, SPT, and SGC with
Designation Letter duly conformed

a. Gap Analysis (SIP Annex 3)

b. Project Work Plan for Priority
Improvement Areas (PIA) and Crises
Management/ Contingency Plan 3
collaboratively developed 3
c. Accomplishment Reports showing
the Target vs Output vs Gaps with
appropriate actions
a. School Work Plan addressing the
gaps for priority improvement area

b. Memorandum and Minutes of the

meeting in working School Work Plan
1
c. Memorandum and Minutes of the
meeting in accomplishing the School
Work Plan with the stakeholders (e.g. 1
GPTA, SGC, other external
stakeholders)

a. Feedback mechanism developed by

the school Governing Council (SGC)

b. Accomplishment Report showing

the collaborative work of the school
and its stakeholders in the 1
development of the feedback 1
mechanism

c. Resolutions regarding the

developed Feedback Mechanism is
approved by the School Governing
Council (SGC)
 a. Memorandum on the conduct of
School Monitoring Evaluation and
Assessment (SMEA)
b. Conduct of Quarterly SMEA with
printout CLC
c. Narrative and Pictorial Report 3
showing the involvement of the
stakeholders in the conduct of SMEA
reporting as basis for feedback, 3
technical assistance, and recognition

TOTAL 11
AVERAGE 2.2
RATING (AVERAGE x 25%) 0.55

ANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES (15%, X 0.15)

RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a-c 2 a-e 3 a-f
a. School Physical Plant, Property and
Equipment (PPE)
b. Resource Inventory of Semi-
Expandable Supplies, Consumable
Supplies
c. School Canteen Reports 3
3
d. Deeds of Donations
e. Brigada Eskwela (BE) Forms 1-7
f. Memorandum, Minutes of meeting,
Attendance showing stakeholders
collaboration on resource inventory

RATING
ARTIFACTS REMARKS
0 1 a-c 2 a-b 3 a-c
a. List of school resources
programmed for Access, Quality, and
Governance
b. Minutes of Meeting and photos on
the conduct of Focus Group 3
Discussion (FGD) 3
c. Memorandum, Minutes of Meeting,
Accomplishment Reports and
Resolutions on the Regular Dialogue
for Planning and Programming of
Resources

a. List of resources given to the school

by the stakeholders for the current
school year

3
 b. Photos of updated reports posted
on the Transparency Board with 3 3
signatures
c. Liquidation Report of MOOE,
School Canteen, GPTA, and
SSG/SPG
a. Accomplished School CLC
Monitoring & Evaluation Report
b. Minutes of meeting on the conduct
of SMEA reporting specifically on the
utilization of funds 3
3

c. Minutes of meeting on the reporting

of SMEA quarterly report to the
stakeholders
a. Process Flow Chart on School
Networking and Linkages for
Partnerships
b. Guidelines on the Process Flow
Chart on School Networking and 3
Linkages for Partnerships 3
c. Stakeholders collaboration on the
development of Guidelines on the
Process Flowchart on School
Networking and Linkages for
Partnerships

TOTAL 15
AVERAGE 3
RATING (AVERAGE x 15%) 0.45

cked & Verified: Noted:

EDEN S. MATAWARAN IMELDA M. ASUNCION

nator, Checked & Verified by the School M&E Coordinator, Noted by the School Head)
hecked & Verified by the District SBM Consultant, and Noted by the PSDS)
Checked and Verified by the EPS II-SMME, Noted by the Division SBM Coordinator/SEPS-SMME
3
3

1
2

2
3

3
3

3
3

3
3

3
3