ASSIGNMENT # 1
Subject name : MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
Presented To: SIR NADIR
Presented By: IQRA RANI
Roll # 105
Class: BBA (Hons.)
Semester:6th
Department of Commerce & Business Administration
Government College University Faisalabad
Layyah Campus.
G.C University Faisalabad, Sub Campus
Assignment: ______ONE ______ Subject:
MANAGERIAL ECO
Class: BBA (Hons) Semester: 6th
Total Marks: 50 Time Allowed: 10 Days
Department of Commerce & Business Administration
TOPICS:
1. Why is perfect competition normally regarded as being "better"than
monoply?
2. Explain the problems for government policy if it tries to use supply- oriented
policies rather than demand-oriented ones in trying to discourage the consumption
of certain produts.
FORAMTING RULES:
1. Use only 12pt type in a standard 6. Use bold for heading and size will be
font. 14 just for heading.
2. Number your pages (maximum 30 7. Check it using the following list of
and minimum 15). rules before you submit it.
3. Always double-space(line spacing) 8. Plagiarism should be 30% similarity
indexing( conditionally)
4. Do not leave blank spaces between
paragraphs. 9. Additional format regulations may
vary from course to course,
5. Correct all common spelling and
especially practically subjects.
typographical errors (use spell-check).
SUBMITTION DATE: 1st assignment will 2020 and email to the concerned faculty
be submitted till 1st may after the dead line member.
assignment will not be concerned and
student considered zero mark. MARKS: 1st assignment have 50 marks that
will be part of your current semester result.
SUBMITTION: For submission every CR
collect the whole class assignment in single NOTE:All assignment will be cross check
folder having their class name till 1st may by the teachers if there found the copy paste
then assignment of the both student will be cancelled and given them zero marks.
Why is perfect competition normally regarded as being "better"than
monoply?
Perfect competition takes some assumptions into account, which will be described in the
following lines. However, it is important to note that it refers to a theoretical preposition and not
a reasonable, provable market configuration. Reality might approach it a few times, but only
scratching the shell.
As an Economics undergraduate, the closest I see from a perfectly competitive market in many
economies is agriculture.
A perfectly competitive market has 4 important elements:
1) Homogenuous product
2) Great number of intervenients
3) Perfect information
4) Free entry and exit
1. Homogenuous product refers to a non-differentiated product, which will commonly (but
not always) mean a commodity: how can you differentiate beans, rice, potatoes (in the farms, of
course)? You just can't.
2. There are so many suppliers and demanders in that market that one single agent - be it
buyer (demander) or seller (supplier) - will not affect the market significantly, be in terms of
pushing or restraining price or quantity.
3. All agents - buyers and sellers - have all the information about the product and the
market, so no one is actually in advantage at any possible aspect when negotiating (this usually
can be translated as 'every agent can be replaced easily').
4. There are no barriers to entry - nor exit. This is important, because only monopolies and
oligopolies present barriers. And why is that? That is because monopolies and oligopolies do
have economies of scale (besides other elements), which make it difficult or impossible for any
firm to join their markets; as, in our case, no agent detains any market power, it is perfectly
correct to assume there are no barriers for entry / exit.
Perfect competition is a market structure in which there are numerous sellers in the market,
selling similar goods that are produced/manufactured using a standard method and each firm has
all information regarding the market and price, which is known as a perfectly competitive
market. Monopolistic competition is a type of imperfect market structure. In a monopolistic
competition structure, a number of sellers sell similar products but not identical products.
Products or services offered by sellers are substitutes of each other with certain differences. A
market can be described as a place where buyers and sellers meet, directly or through a dealer for
transactions.
Following the flowchart shows market structure –
What is the Perfect Competition?
The entry and exit to such a market are free.
This is a theoretical situation of the market, where the competition is at its peak.
The firms don’t have price control, so they don’t have a pricing policy. The buyer or
seller doesn’t have control over prices. Therefore, a seller has to accept price determined
by market supply and demand forces.
The product offered by all sellers is the same in all respect so no firm can increase its
price and if a firm tries to increase the price then it will lose its all demand to the
competitors.
What is a Monopolistic Competition?
Monopolistic competition has features of both the market structures perfect competition
and monopoly. This kind of market structure is found in real life.
Firms are selling products with certain differences in quality, quantity, etc features, so
firms have pricing control and pricing policies of firms that are in place.
Entry and exit into the industry are easy because of fewer barriers.
Product differentiation is one of the features of monopolistic competition, where products
are differentiated from each other on the basis of quality or brand.
One of the differentiating parameters of the monopolistic competition is, it has a Highly
elastic demand curve.
Just a few examples of monopolistic competition include:
Bars/nightclubs
Coffee shops
Grocery stores
Pharmacies
Gas stations
Hotels
Hardware/home improvement stores
Furniture stores
Landscaping/lawn care services
Car washes
Automotive service companies
Dry cleaners
Monopolistic competition is a practical example of a market scenario, it can be seen around us.
Types of product or services provided by each market participants are differentiated. Products or
services can be differentiated in many ways such as brand recognition, product quality, value
addition to products or services or product placing etc. Head to Head ct
Below is the topmost Comparison between Perfect Competition vs
Monopolistic Competition are as follows –
Basic Comparison Perfect competition Monopolistic
between Perfect Competition
Competition vs
Monopolistic
Competition
Number of seller/buyers Many Many
Type of good/services Homogeneous Differentiated
offered
Does firm have pricing No – Price Takers Yes – some pricing power
control over their own
prices?
Is marketing/branding No Yes – Key non-price
important? competition
Are entry barriers zero, Zero entry Barrier Low entry Barrier
low or high?
Does this market Yes, Price = MC Not Quite (P>MC)
structure lead to
allocated efficiency in
the long run?
Does this market Yes No
structure lead to
productive efficiency in
the long run?
Situation Unrealistic Realistic
Demand curve slope Horizontal, perfectly Downward sloping,
elastic relatively elastic
A relation between Average Revenue = Average Revenue >
Average Revenue (AR) Marginal Revenue Marginal Revenue.
and Marginal Revenue
(MR)
CONCLUSION:
It is better for the consumers because they will have access to more quantities of the good for a
lower price.The price in perfect competition is always lower than the price in the monopoly and
any company will maximize its economic profit (π) when Marginal Revenue(MR) = Marginal
Cost (MC).
Explain the problems for government policy if it tries to use supply- oriented policies
rather than demand-oriented ones in trying to discourage the consumption of certain
products.
Introduction
Government policies to increase economic growth are focused on trying to increase aggregate
demand (demand side policies) or increase aggregate supply/productivity (supply side policies)
Demand side policies include:
Fiscal policy (cutting taxes/increasing government spending)
Monetary policy (cutting interest rates)
Fiscal policy - involves changing the levels of government expenditure and taxation to try to
influence economic activity. We shall later be looking in more detail at the types of tax charged,
i.e. direct and indirect taxes, the amounts of the different taxes charged and how the sums raised
are spent. We shall also be looking how government spending influences the economy and what
happens if the government runs a deficit or surplus as part of its budget strategy.
Monetary policy - this mainly focuses on the use of interest rates and how lowering or raising
them influences economic behaviour. We shall concentrate on how their movement influences
aggregate demand and the control of inflation. We shall also examine how monetary policy
might affect money supply and the exchange rate and the role of the central banks in
implementing monetary policy.
Supply-side policies –
These are policies that aim to improve the ability of an economy to produce - in other words
policies that increase the productive potential of the economy. It is mainly free-market (classical)
economists that advocate their use. They tend to mean less government intervention and focus on
improving efficiency and productivity. By improving the economy's ability to produce at
competitive prices it is hoped that high levels of employment and low levels of inflation will be
maintained.
Supply side policies include:
Privatization, deregulation, tax cuts, free trade agreements (free market supply
side policies)
Improved education and training, improved infrastructure. (interventionist supply
side policies)
Supply-side policies are designed to make aggregate supply (AS) more responsive to changes in
national income. When combined with other macro policies they are supposed to deliver a
competitive economy. They are normally focused on:
Removing market imperfections - barriers to the smooth operation of markets
Removing restrictive practices - rules that do not allow the free movement of factors
within an economy
Making work more attractive and workers more efficient
Problems for government policy if it tries to use supply- oriented policies rather than
demand-oriented ones in trying to discourage the consumption of certain products.
1. Sometimes the impacts of government policy are intentional. The
government might provide a subsidy to farmers to make their businesses
more profitable and encourage farm production. Conversely, the
government might put a tax on cigarettes and alcohol to discourage
behavior that it doesn't approve of.
2. Governments can also alter markets when they decide to spend money.
Any individuals or businesses that receive government funds receive, in
effect, a wealth transfer from every other taxpayer. If a business receives a
subsidy from the government, it produces at a higher cost curve than is
possible without the subsidy. All other actors that might have received
those funds (were it not for the taxation and subsidy) have
correspondingly less income or revenue.
3. In product markets, profits may suffer as a result of competition policy,
and in labor markets the interests of trade unions may be threatened by
labour market reforms. They can also help create real jobs and sustainable
growth through their positive effect on labor productivity and
competitiveness.
4. Lower taxes rates, reduced union power, and privatization have all
contributed to a widening of the gap between rich and poor.
5. Supply-side policy can take a long time to work its way through the
economy. For example, improving the quality of human capital, through
education and training, is unlikely to yield quick results. The benefits of
deregulation can only be seen after new firms have entered the market,
and this may also take a long time.