Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)
for EIA
Learning Objective:
At the end of this lesson, students will be able to
understand the CBA tools for the analysis of EIA in
terms of costs (Environment, Economic).
Introduction
▪ Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is a set of practical
procedures for guiding public expenditure decisions.
▪ In EIA the CBA is a part of the justification for the project.
▪ CBA is undertaken to weigh the costs of project proceeding
with the benefits that would arise from it.
▪ CBA attempts to put a monetary value on project’s direct
costs, environment loss/damage, and benefits; expressed
in the same units.
We want our environment to be clean and safe.
But ‘how much’ clean and safe ?
How to measure environmental benefits and costs ?
Most Efficient
• Our aim is to
Resource
Total Cost
attain the
Distribution
‘most efficient’
Total Benefit
resource
distribution.
• We will select
the option
with the
‘maximum’ net
Maximum Net benefit
Benefit
M0 M1 M* M2
Figure 5.2 Total and marginal damage and benefit functions, and the efficient level of flow pollution emissions
D(M) D(M)
B(M)
B(M)
Maximised net
benefits
Emissions, M
dD
dM
* B
dB
Abatement/Miti- dM
gation Cost A
M* M̂ Emissions, M
Project costs
Project cost = cost of resources + cost on third parties
Include only incremental costs on developments
Do not include – interest payments, depreciation
Example: The costs of a road project would include the cost
of labor and materials used in construction, as well as other
costs such as the loss of parkland and homes, pollution,
disruption to neighborhoods or the loss of peace and quiet.
Project benefits
Use and Non-use values
Use values = all use benefits to man
Non-use values =
Direct or Indirect use benefits + option values
+ existence values
Example: The benefits include time/fuel saved to
road users, increased predictability of journey
times and increased accessibility to a location.
Environmental values
Secondary benefits
- Surprisingly rresults from primary benefits of the project
Not included in CBA
e.g. project > higher wages to employees > higher
expenditure > improve quality of life
- These are viewed as transfer between communities rather
than net addition to community income
Option values
Risk is attached to all decisions
Uncertainty about demand and supply in future
Pay more to insure demand or supply
Option value =
value that an individual is willing to pay in excess to
expected use value to preserve an asset
Uncertainty Adjustment
ENPV
P = 0.5
$ 2.5 M
$5M
$2M
Project A
P = 0.5
$-1M
$ - 0.5 M
//
Project B
P=1
$ 1.5 M $ 1.5 M
Steps in CBA
• Role: 1
Selction of Environmental components (Flora, Fauna, Air, Water, Soil)
• Role: 2
(i) Environmental mitigation
measures converted into monetary value
(ii) Management plans /costs
Environmental Impacts of a project and abatement/mitigation/subsidy cost
Role 3: Economic assesment of the environmental impacts of
the project.
Drawbacks of CBA
- Impacts are to be transformed and stated in clear
monetary terms; which is not always possible for various
terms i.e. indriect health problems, mortality, habitat loss
long-term irreversible impacts
- Identifying all the consequences of a particular project
or policy option is difficult
- Not possible to find economic value on resulted
environmental losses or gains i.e. Air/water quality,
land/soil degradation etc.