KEMBAR78
Regent Univ. Student Teacher Evaluation | PDF | Differentiated Instruction | Educational Assessment
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views5 pages

Regent Univ. Student Teacher Evaluation

This evaluation summarizes the performance of student teacher Allison Seaburg during her internship from January to April 2021 at Red Mill Elementary School. The evaluator, Dr. Jenny Flannagan, rated Allison as proficient in most areas of teaching standards including professional knowledge, instructional planning and delivery, assessment, learning environment, and professionalism. Comments noted Allison conducted effective reading and writing lessons using technology and maintained an engaging classroom. Areas for growth included more detailed lesson plans. Overall, Allison was deemed to support student academic progress appropriately.

Uploaded by

api-538501615
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views5 pages

Regent Univ. Student Teacher Evaluation

This evaluation summarizes the performance of student teacher Allison Seaburg during her internship from January to April 2021 at Red Mill Elementary School. The evaluator, Dr. Jenny Flannagan, rated Allison as proficient in most areas of teaching standards including professional knowledge, instructional planning and delivery, assessment, learning environment, and professionalism. Comments noted Allison conducted effective reading and writing lessons using technology and maintained an engaging classroom. Areas for growth included more detailed lesson plans. Overall, Allison was deemed to support student academic progress appropriately.

Uploaded by

api-538501615
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation 

SurveyMonkey

#1,148
COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Friday, March 12, 2021 3:11:45 PM
Last Modified: Friday, March 12, 2021 3:14:59 PM
Time Spent: 00:03:14
IP Address: 108.39.42.57

Page 1: Placement Information

Q1
Student Teacher's Name

Allison Seaburg

Q2 Elementary Education, PreK-6

Student Teacher's Endorsement Area

Q3 First Grade

Grade Taught

Q4
Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

January 19, 2021

Q5
Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

April 23, 2021

Q6
School of Student Teaching Placement

Red MIll Elementary

Q7 Virginia Beach City Public Schools

School Division

1/5
Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation  SurveyMonkey

Q8
Evaluator's Name (First Last)

Dr. Jenny Sue Flannagan

Q9
Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.

Email Address: jennfla@regent.edu

Q10 University Supervisor

Evaluator's Position/Role

Q11 Mid-Term

What time period is this evaluation for?

Page 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12
Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject Proficient


area(s) taught.

Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the age Proficient


group.

Integrates key content elements and facilitates students’ use of Proficient


higher level thinking skills.

Links content with other subject areas and real world Proficient
applications.

Q13
Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.

Allison did a nice reading/writing lesson along with word study.

Page 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

2/5
Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation  SurveyMonkey

Q14
Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Aligns lesson objectives to the school’s curriculum and student Proficient


learning needs.

Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner needs; Developing


adapts plans as needed.

Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Proficient


transitions.

Plans for differentiated instruction. Proficient

Q15
Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.

Allison's lesson plan for the observation was developed well. We discussed having detailed plans for all other lessons.

Page 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

Q16
Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Engages and maintains students in active learning. Proficient

Differentiates instruction to meet the students’ needs. Proficient

Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Proficient

Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and Proficient


resources.

Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Proficient

Q17
Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.

Allison did a nice job of using the smart board to facilitate the lesson. She also moved the students through a variety of activities.

Page 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

3/5
Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation  SurveyMonkey

Q18
Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Proficient

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Proficient


instruments

Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Proficient


purposes.

Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Proficient

Q19 Respondent skipped this question

Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance


in the area of assessment of and for student learning.

Page 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20
Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Proficient


procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.

Uses available resources and knowledge of students to prevent, Proficient


redirect, or reinforce behaviors.

Respects students’ diversity, including language, culture, race, Proficient


gender, and special needs.

Actively listens and pays attention to students’ needs and Proficient


responses.

Q21
Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive to learning.

Allison used a variety of call/response to keep students on track. She managed the class well.

Page 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

4/5
Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation  SurveyMonkey

Q22
Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Modifies performance based on personal and professional Proficient


critiques.

Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Proficient


professional interactions.

Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration with Proficient


teachers and other school personnel.

Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and ethical Proficient
interactions.

Q23 Respondent skipped this question

Please comment on the teacher candidate's


professionalism throughout the period of observation.

Page 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24
Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Documents the progress of each student throughout the Proficient


placement.

Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Proficient

Uses available data to document/communicate student progress Proficient


and develop learning targets.

Q25 Respondent skipped this question

Please comment on the students academic progress


throughout the period of observation.

5/5

You might also like