debit Credit
assets increase decrease
liabilities decrease increase
equity decrease increase
expense increase decrease
income/revenue decrease increase
AUDITING THEORY
CHAPTER 1:
❖ Auditing Defined:
- An audit is a systematic process of objectively obtaining and evaluating evidence regarding assertions about economic acti
correspondence between these assertions and established criteria and communicating the results to interested users.
The definition conveys the following thoughts.
1. Auditing is a systematic process
2. An audit involves obtaining and evaluating evidence about assertions regarding economic actions and events
3. An audit is conducted objectively
4. Auditors ascertain the degree of correspondence between assertions and established criteria 5. Auditors communicate
Comparison among the different types of audit
Assertions made by the
auditee
Content of the auditor's
Auditors who generally
⮚ Responsibility for the financial statements
o The management is responsible for preparing and presenting the financial statements in accordance w
o The auditor’s responsibility is to form and express an opinion on these financial statements based on h
⮚ Assurance provided by the auditor
o Reasonable assurance
In every audit, there are always inherent limitations that affect the auditor’s ability to detect material misstatements. These limi
1. The use of testing / Sampling risk
2. Error in application of judgment / Non-sampling risk
3. Reliance on management’s representation
4. Inherent limitations of the client’s accounting and internal control systems.
5. Nature of evidence
⮚ Need for an independent financial statement audit
o Conflict of interest between management and users of financial statements.
o Expertise
o Remoteness
o Financial consequences
CHAPTER 2: THE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS)
General
Standards
∙ Technical
Training and
Proficiency
∙ Independence
∙ Professional
care
⮚ Elements of a System of Quality Control
Standards of
Fieldwork
∙ Planning
∙ Internal
Control
Consideration ∙ Evidential matter
Standards of
Reporting
∙ Generally Accepted
Accounting
Principles
∙ Inconsistency ∙ Disclosure ∙ Opinion
- PSA 220 states that audit firm should implement policies and procedures designed to ensure that all au
o Leadership Responsibilities for Quality on Audits
o Ethical Requirements
a. Integrity
b. Objectivity
c. Professional competence and due care
d. Confidentiality
e. Professional behavior
o Threats to Independence
a. Self Interest Threat – financials
b. Self Review Threat – former employee
c. Advocacy Threat – goodwill
d. Familiarity
e. Intimidation Threat
o Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationship
a. Competence
b. Ethical Requirements
c. Integrity of client
o Human Resources and Assignment
a. Recruitment
b. Performance evaluation, compensation and promotion
c. Capabilities and competence
d. Career development
e. Assignment of engagement teams
o Engagement Performance
- the firm should establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable a
∙ That engagement are performed in accordance with professional standards and oth
∙ That the audit report issued is appropriate in the circumstances.
▪ Direction – assistants should be informed of their responsibilities, the nature of the entity’s business, potential problems tha
the performance of the engagement.
▪ Supervision – this involves monitoring the progress of the audit, resolving accounting and audit issues, and considering th
engagement.
▪ Review – work performed by assistants should be reviewed to consider whether the audit procedures, evidence and docu
conclusion reached.
▪ Consultation – the firm should establish policies and procedures that encourage firm personnel to seek assistance from aut
the firm.
▪ Engagement Quality Control Review – the firm should establish policies and procedures requiring an engagement quality
evaluation of the significant judgments made and conclusions reached in formulating the auditor’s report. This requires the en
a. To determine that an engagement quality control reviewer has been appointed;
c. Not to issue the auditor’s report until completion of the engagement quality con
▪ Differences of Opinion – the engagement team should follow the firm’s policies and procedures for dealing with and resolvi
the engagement team, with those consulted and, where applicable, between the engagement partner and the engagement qu
o Monitoring – the continued adequacy and operational effectiveness of quality control policies and procedures is to be mo
adopted to provide reasonable assurance that the system of quality control are relevant. Adequate and operating effectively.
erested users
Financial Audit Compliance Audit Operational Audit
That the Financial That the organization has That the organization's activities
complied with laws, regulations are conducted effectively and
or contracts efficiently.
statements are fairly presented
Financial reporting standards or Objectives set by the
other financial reporting Laws, regulations and contracts.
framework
board of directors.
Reports on the degree of
An opinion about
compliance with
whether the financial
statements are fairly presented applicable laws, Recommendations or
in suggestions on how to improve
operations.
conformity with an identified
regulations and
financial reporting framework.
contracts.
External auditors Government auditors Internal auditors
ce with PSAs.
rs arising during the audit engagement, including those identified during the quality control review, with the engagement quality control rev
gement quality control reviewer; and
Types of Audit
1. FS Audit - To determine if the given Financial Statements is in accordance to the Accounting Standard
External Auditor (may independence)
2. Operational Audit
To determine if the organization's
activities are conducted
effectively and efficiently.
Internal Auditor (walang independence - Employee)
3. Compliance Audit - if the organization
has complied with laws,
regulations or contracts
Government Auditor
Key word
Assurance - Reliability
Audit Reasonable Assurance Opinion
Absolute Assurance
Audit 3 Party Relationship
1. Client management
2. Users of FS
3. Auditor
Professional Skepticism hindi agad nag a assume / hindi nag dududa
Standard of Fieldwork
1. Audit Planning - Overall Strategy in Audit
a. Materiality - capability of a given information to influence a decision
b. Audit Risk - risk of incorrect opinion
Material Error?
Record
Cash P 10,000,000
Cash 10,000,000
2. Internal Control Consideration
a. Authorization PCF
b. Custodianship remaining
c. Recording replenish
Cashier
Accountant
CFO
3. Evidential Matter
Source Document Sales / Service Invoice
Official Receipt
Collection Receipt
Acknowledgement Receipt
Vouchers
Checks
Financial Records F/S
Standard of Reporting
1. GAAP
2. Inconsistency
Balance Sheet (3years) 2019
2020
Current yr 2021
Income Statement (2 years) 2020
Current yr 2021
3. Disclosure
Notes to Financial Statements
Date of Reporting as of December 31, 2020
sunog sa warehouse Feb 14, 2021
Users of F/S Date of Issuance March 15, 2021
4. Audit Opinion Meaning
1. Unmodified / Unqualified OpinOverall FS is presented fairly
b. Disclaimer of Opinion Cannot determine
c. Adverse Opinion Overall FS is not presented fairly
(not in accordance to acctg standard)
Elements of a System of Quality Control
1. Leadership Responsibilities for Quality on Audits
Engagement Partner - may overall responsibility
Associate
2. Ethical Requirements
a. Integrity
b. Objectivity unbiased
c. Professional competence and due care
d. Confidentiality
e. Professional behavior
3. Independence
Threats to Independence
a. Self Interest Threat – financials
b. Self Review Threat – former employee
c. Advocacy Threat – goodwill
d. Familiarity threat - auditor dati kaya familiar na, tapos auditor ulit kaya kampante na ok ung FS
e. Intimidation Threat - pananakot
4. Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationship
a. Competence
b. Ethical Requirements
c. Integrity of client
5. Human Resources and Assignment
a. Recruitment
b. Performance evaluation, compensation and promotion
c. Capabilities and competence
d. Career development
e. Assignment of engagement teams
audit process - step by step procedure
1. Accepting an Engagement
Assessment: Issue:
Audit Firm engagement letter (contract)
Client Management
A. responsibility of author
form an opinion
B. Responsibility of client management
prepare FS
establish internal control
naguumpisa ang audit if may nakuha na sya engagement letter
2. Audit Planning
Overall Audit Strategy
materiality
estimation for audit risk
3. Consideration of Internal control
Basic Internal Control
1. Authorization
2. Recording
3. Custodianship
4. Substantive testiing
1. compute
2. collection of source document
3. sampling
5. completing the audit
Subsequent events
this are transacntion na nangyayari after dec. 31
requiring adjustment pagnagalaw mo yung amount
requiring disclosure subsequent event na hindi magagalwa yung amount
6. Issuing a Report
Audit Opinion
1. unwualified '
2. qualified
3. disclaimer
4. adverse
Audit Process actrivities / procedure to gather audit evidence
1. inquiry
2. Observation
3. Inspection
4. Analytical Procedure
january feb
sales 1,500,000
tignan mo titignan if ano nangyari sa slaes bakit biglang tumaas
6. reperformance
if gust mo ba maalaman kung paano mag ouput and input ng data yung company
7. recalculation
8. confirmation
pagpositive confirmation maganatay ka ng confirmation pag negative kahit hindi sumagot its means yes
Audit Process actrivities / procedure to gather audit evidence
Risk Assessment Procedure
audit planning test of control
1. inquiring ; ;
2. obervation ; ;
3. Inspection ; ;
4. Analytical ;
5. Reperformce ;
6. Recalculation
7. Confirmation
ordance to the Accounting Standard
e - Employee)
me / hindi nag dududa
nfluence a decision
Audit
P 9,999,100 P 900
Immaterial error
8,000,000 P 2,000,000
20 % difference
Material error
P 50,000
5,000
45,000
Summary = expenses
P 45,000
record
Check
/
/
X
X
/
/
/
Correct Incorrect
Weighted Average FIFO
Weighted Average FIFO
Weighted Average Weighted Average
Weighted Average FIFO
Weighted Average Weighted Average
Notes to F/S
Hugot Term
napansin ko kasing totoo yung
pinakita mo, na realize ko mahal
din kita _x000D_
(in accordance to acctg
standard) _x000D_
_x000D_
2. Modified Opinion
_x000D_
a. Qualified Opinion
Material error (but overall FS is
presented fairly) napansin ko
kasing totoo yung pinakita mo,
mahal din kita peroooo"
hindi ko masabi kung mahal kita
sinungaling ka, hnd nmn totoo pinakita mo. Hindi kita mahal
acctg standard)
ner - may overall responsibility
ent management
march april
1,300,00 5,000,000
ot its means yes
substantive testing completing audit
; ;
; ;
; ;
optional ;
;
;
Case 1: Troop Company had budgeted 50,000 units of output using 50,000 units of raw materials at a total material c
Case 2: Information on Kenon Company’s direct material costs is as follows:
Standard unit price P3.60
Actual quantity purchased 1,600
Standard quantity allowed for actual production 1,450
Materials purchase price variance P240 favorable
What was the actual purchase price per unit, rounded to the nearest cent? __________________
Case 3: Information on Ex Company’s direct material costs for May 2014 is as follows:
Actual quantity of direct materials purchased and used 30,000 lbs. Actual cost of direct materials P
Unfavorable direct materials usage variance P3,000
00 lbs. For the month of May, what was Ex’s direct materials price variance? ________________________
Labor Variance
Case 1: Below are FXL Corporation’s standard costs to produce one concrete table:
Direct raw materials 2 kgs at P375 per kg.
Direct labor 30 minutes at P31.25 per hour
In September, FXL produced 250 concrete tables, 520 kgs of raw materials were used at a total costs of P193,440. A
1. What is the direct labor rate variance? ____________
2. What is the direct labor efficiency variance? __________
Case 2: The information on Barber Company’s direct labor costs for the month of January 2014 is as follows:
Actual direct labor hours 34,500
Standard direct labor hours 35,000
Total direct labor payroll P241,500
bor efficiency variance P3,200 favorable
What is Barber’s direct labor rate variance? ___________________________________ Case 3: Lion Company’s dir
Actual direct labor hours 20,000
Standard direct labor hours 21,000
Direct labor rate variance P3,000 unfavorable
Total payroll P126,000
What was direct labor efficiency variance? ____________________
Case 4: For the month of April, Thorp Co.’s records disclosed the following data relating to direct labor:
Actual Cost P10,000
Rate Variance 1,000 favorable
Efficiency Variance 1,500 unfavorable
Standard Cost P9,500
For the month of April, actual labor hours amounted to 2,000. In April, Thorp’s standard direct labor rate per hour wa
materials at a total material cost of P100,000. Actual output was 50,000 units of product requiring 45,000 units of raw materials
ual cost of direct materials P84,000
total costs of P193,440. A total of 128 direct labor hours were used at a cost of P4,096.
y 2014 is as follows:
Case 3: Lion Company’s direct labor costs for the month of January 2014 were as follows:
to direct labor:
direct labor rate per hour was: _______________________
000 units of raw materials at a cost of P2.10 per unit. The direct material price variance and usage variance were: ___________
ariance were: ____________________________________
CASE 1
Given: Budget 50,000 output
50,000 raw materials at total cost of P100,000 Unit Cost = P2 (P100,000 / 50,000 raw materials)
Actual 50,000 output When the data do not contain quantity purchased
45,000 raw materials at unit cost of P2.10
Actual Standard Variance Status Multiplier Total VarianCost Variance Analysis
Materials Price Variance 2.1 2 0.1 UF 45,000.00 4,500.00 If the variance is positive it
Materials Usage Variance 45,000.00 50,000.00 -5,000.00 F 2 -10,000.00 higher than the standard, th
NET VARIANCE F -5,500.00 If the variance is negative it
lower than the standard, th
CASE 2
Actual Standard Variance Status Multiplier Total Variance
Materials Price Variance 3.45 3.6 -0.15 F 1,600.00 -240 (A-S-A)
Materials Usage Variance 1,450.00 3.6 (A-S-S)
MPV = (ACTUAL PRICE - STANDARD PRICE) X ACTUAL QUANTITY PURCHASE
-240 = (ACTUAL PRICE - 3.60) X 1600
(240)/1600 = (ACTUAL PRICE - 3.6)
(0.15) = (ACTUAL PRICE - 3.60) (0.15)+3.6 = ACTUAL PRICE; ACTUAL PRICE = 3.45
CASE 3
Actual Standard Variance Status Multiplier Total Variance
Materials Price Variance 2.8 3 -0.2 F 30,000.00 -6,000.00 (A-S-A)
Materials Usage Variance 30,000.00 29,000.00 1,000.00 UF 3 3,000.00 (A-S-S)
MPV = (ACTUAL PRICE - STANDARD PRICE) X ACTUAL QUANTITY PURCHASE
MUV = (ACTUAL USAGE - STANDARD USAGE) X STANDARD PRICE
FIRST MUV WILL BE USED SECOND SOLVE THE MISSING IN MPV
1. 3,000 = (30,000 - 29,000) X STANDARD PRICE 1. MPV = (2.80 - 3.00) X 30,000
2. 3,000 = 1,000 X STANDARD PRICE 2. MPV = (0.20) X 30,000
3. P3 = STANDARD PRICE 3. MPV = (P6,000)
Labor Variance
CASE 1
Standard: 1 product = 30 minutes; 2 products = 1 hour - P31.25 per hour
Total Standards Hours (250 product / 2 products per hour) = 125 hours
Actual Rate per Hour = P4,096 / 128 hours = P32 per hour
Labor Rate Variance - Human Resource Department
ACTUAL STANDARDVARIANCE MULTIPLIETOTAL VARSTATUS
32 31.25 0.75 128 96 UF
Labor Efficiency - Production Department
ACTUAL STANDARDVARIANCE MULTIPLIETOTAL VARSTATUS
128 125 3 31.25 93.75 UF
CASE 2
Labor Rate Variance - Human Resource Department
ACTUAL STANDARDVARIANCE MULTIPLIETOTAL VARSTATUS
7 6.4 0.6 34,500.00 20,700.00 UF
Labor Efficiency - Production Department
ACTUAL STANDARDVARIANCE MULTIPLIETOTAL VARSTATUS
34,500.00 35,000.00 -500 6.4 -3,200.00 F
LEV = (ACTUAL - STANDARD) X STANDARD RATE
(3,200) = (34,500 - 35,000) X STANDARD RATE
(3200) = (500) X STANDARD RATE
STANDARD RATE = (3200) / (500) = 6.40
CASE 4
Labor Rate Variance - Human Resource Department
ACTUAL STANDARDVARIANCE MULTIPLIETOTAL VARSTATUS
5 5.5 -0.5 2,000.00 -1,000.00 F
Labor Efficiency - Production Department
ACTUAL STANDARDVARIANCE MULTIPLIETOTAL VARSTATUS
2,000.00 1,727.00 273 5.5 1,500.00 UF
000 / 50,000 raw materials)
contain quantity purchased, use the quantity used.
Cost Variance Analysis
If the variance is positive it means that the actual is
higher than the standard, therefore unfavorable.
If the variance is negative it means that the actual is
lower than the standard, therefore favorable.