EXPERT EVALUATION FORM FOR CLINICAL SCHOLAR PROGRAM
Date: 4-28-21
Session: CCU Provider Pick
Physician: Nick Brown
Observer: Mary McBride
Brief Description of Session:
This session described basic principles of cardiac physiology and offered cases for learners to apply this
physiology. Nick used the educational tactic of threshold concepts to present these basic principles to
learners and gave them opportunities to practice their application.
Please rate the following statements that represent your appraisal of the issue.
Fair
Outstanding
Excellent
Couldn't Tell
Good
this SituationNot Applicable to
Poor
Judge
Not Qualified to
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Presentation Skills O E G F P NA CT NQ
Identified objectives at the beginning of the session x
Demonstrated ability to communicate orally x
Answered questions clearly and in a helpful manner x
Used appropriate methods for the activities presented x
Used appropriate instructional materials x
Implemented activities and information in a logical x
sequence
Provided audience with opportunities to participate x
Communicated content/information that was x
technically accurate
Established rapport with audience x
Used the visual aids effectively x
The instructional materials/handouts were interesting and x
easy to understand
Personal Skills O E G F P NA CT NQ
Showed respect for all in the audience x
Developed by Kadriye O Lewis, Ed.D
Online Master’s Program for Healthcare Professionals
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Spoke clearly and enthusiastically x
Demonstrated professional/ethical behavior x
Demonstrated self-confidence x
Demonstrated a sense of humor x
Body Language (Maintained eye contact) x
Voice (Varied rate, pitch, volume for emphasis) x
Organizational Skills O E G F P NA CT NQ
The presenter was prepared to take charge. x
There was a clearly stated introduction. x
The sequencing of the subject material was logical. x
The presenter demonstrated ability to work with groups. x
The time was used effectively. x
Content O E G F P NA CT NQ
The topics covered were relevant to audience work. x
The topic was treated in sufficient depth. x
Terms were clearly explained. x
Facility/Equipment O E G F P NA CT NQ
The room was comfortable. x
The room was free from distractions. x
The computer equipment, including hardware, was set up x
correctly and worked correctly.
THINGS THAT WORKED QUESTIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
As we discussed, doing more “reps” of this
Spoke slowly with emphasis on appropriate words talk will make it even more polished.
You’ll adapt things you haven’t even
Made eye contact with people listening – looked for thought of yet
understanding As we discussed these “more reps” will
Used a couple different modalities – which I think is
result in a larger sample size for your write
great unless it overloads your learners (ie bouncing up.
back and forth too much) but they seemed good Let’s get this in MedEdPortal!
with it
Great examples – RPP, the train, the cath lab
The cases went over really well, they were very
engaged
Developed by Kadriye O Lewis, Ed.D
Online Master’s Program for Healthcare Professionals
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Great discussion and explanations
Other Comments:
This population of learners is hard in that you may not know what they know/don’t know (ie RNs)
You taught in a hybrid environment with some learners present in the room, some virtually and
some who will watch asynchronously. That is a real challenge and you seemed to handle it with
ease.
Developed by Kadriye O Lewis, Ed.D
Online Master’s Program for Healthcare Professionals
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
