Responsibilities and Rights
Responsibilities and Rights
Communication skills, negotiation skills and the ability to see the whole picture are
necessary skills in conflict management. Listening skills and the ability to find solutions that
do not compromise any party's interest are also worth developing when handling conflict
management.
Steps in conflict management
Identify the problem.
Identify the limiting resource or constraint that is generally at the root cause of the
conflict.
Engage in participatory dialogue and find a range of solutions that will be acceptable
to all the parties concerned.
See which solutions clash with the organizational objectives and are not in keeping
with the company's culture.
Eliminate those that do not promote mutual understanding or acceptance.
Choose the best solution that satisfy most people most of the time and implement
this.
Conclusion
Conflicts are inevitable in one's personal life in organizations or even between nations.
It does have some noteworthy advantages if handled correctly as it brings problems out into
the open and compels interested parties to find solutions that are acceptable to all. However,
conflicts that escalate out of control are detrimental to everybody in the equation, so conflict
management becomes a necessity.
Some basic skills, some knowledge, and having the best interest of the organization at heart,
together with respect for its people, will go a long way in handling conflict admirably.
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
It is the bargain by the trade union for improving the economic interests of the worker
members. The process includes negotiation, threatening verbally, and declaration of ‘strike’.
It is impossible to endorse fully the collective bargaining of unions or to condemn. There
exist always conflicting views between the professionalism and unionism.
A. Faithful Agent or Trustee?
Professional societies such as NSPE and IEI refuse to accept the ‘collective coercive action’
of unionism, holding the principles of professional integrity as right, e.g., as per NSPE code
III, i.e., engineers shall not promote their own interest at the expense of the dignity and
integrity of the profession. The engineers are said to exhibit a higher standard than self-
interest; and they are expected to perform an ethical duty to their employer as faithful agent
or trustee. The actions of unions are usually against the interest of the employers and they use
coercion and force against the employers. These actions are interpreted as unprofessional and
disloyal. But in certain cases, the safety of the workers had been ignored for a long period or
the employees were under-paid for years. Can we still hold the action as unethical?
It can be concluded from this discussion, that
(a) The duty of the employee to one’s employer does not mean sacrifice of monetary self-
interests, and
(b) Trustee or faithful agent means executing the assigned tasks and safeguarding property.
It does not nullify the right to negotiate for safe and hygienic working conditions, and
economic benefits collectively.
(c) The codes insists that the paramount obligation is to the society, as compared to the
employers. The duty to the employers is also limited by considerations such as workers
safety, and the right to disobey illegal or unethical activities. After all the employees are
also parts of the society, and
(d) Can collective and coercive action be restored, when all other efforts have failed?
B Service to the public?
The service to the public is of foremost importance. But the unions promote the interests of a
few members only. The public welfare should not suffer because of their actions. Imagine a
situation when all the teachers, medical practitioners and ambulance drivers go on strike. Will
this not cause damage to the public safety and health?
Collective bargaining by engineers through union or association or forums may act within
limits set by the concern for the public welfare. Professional societies can play a great role in
the promotion and establishment of principles and practices towards fair employment and
exploitation. But they can cot function as collective bargaining agents.
The collective bargaining cannot be judged as unethical, unless we study the cases
individually and decide. The collective bargaining is acceptable per se, but the means should
be constructive, persuasive, firm based on mutual understanding, and not destructive,
disruptive and not harming the persons or property.
C. Assessment on Unionism
The moral assessment on Unions is a complex process. A careful consideration of all relevant
moral facts are to be inquired into and judged. It cannot be generalised, because of the
divergent views on unionism, as shown in Table 4.1.
Table. 4.1 Pro- and anti-views on unionism
For unionism Against unionism
1. Unions have been useful in improving the 1. Unions have lead to disturb the economy of
standard of living and economic benefits of state by salaries, and increase salaries and
the workers. Even non-union members leading expenses, leading to inflationary conditions.
to inflationary condition are able to get those
benefits
2. Unions have obtained greater participation in 2. Instead of being cooperative, they act in
organization, by participative management. negative and destructive ways, causing loss of
Union members are appointed as Directors in man-days. Opinions of the individual worker is
the Board and credited to act as bridge suppressed and used as pawns.
between the employers and employees.
3. Unions have contributed to the job security, 3. Unions encourage mediocrity, and act in
and protection against arbitrary treatment to favour of seniority-based promotion. Merit-
the employees. based promotion and awards for personal
achievement are disregarded
4. They are able to put resistance to unethical
orders and support to ethical actions 4. Unions thrive on prolonged unrest, dissatisfied,
and tense relations between workers and
5. They have provided for effective grievance management.
redressal mechanism for employees.
5. They cause pigeon-holing of employee in
6. They act to safeguard against the possible narrow job classifications to which the salary
political interference, exploitation, and scales are attached.
alienation in the company affairs.
CONFIDENTIALITY
Confidentiality means keeping the information on the employer and clients, as secrets. It is
one of the important aspects of team work.
Justification for Confidentiality
Confidentiality can be justified by various ethical theories. According to Rights-based theory,
rights of the stakeholders, right to the intellectual property of the company are protected by
this practice. Based on Duty theory, employees and employers have duty to keep up mutual
trust. The Utilitarian theory holds good, only when confidentiality produce most good to most
people. Act utilitarian theory focuses on each situation, when the employer decides on some
matters as confidential.
Further, the following moral principles also justify the concept of ‘confidentiality’:
1. Respect for Autonomy
It means respecting the freedom and self-determination of individuals and organizations to
identify their legitimate control over the personal information of themselves. In the absence
of this, they cannot keep their privacy and protect their self-interest.
2. Respect for promises
This means giving respect for the promises made between the employers and employees.
Employees should not disclose the promises given to the employers. This information may
be considered as sensitive by the employer. But promises do not establish complete
obligations
3. Trustworthiness
Maintaining confidentiality by lawyers accountants and attorneys are necessary to develop
confidence and welfare of the individuals and the organisations. It does not mean however
that these professional collude with them unethically.
4. Respect for public welfare
This moral consideration is important in identifying relationships in professional transactions,
for the benefit of public welfare, eg., if the medical practitioners keep confidentiality on the
problems of patients, patients develop confidence and trust in them, they feel free to reveal
their problems and personal information, without being shy. This is likely to increase their
chances of being cured. Similarly, a company keeping confidentiality about its products gets
economic benefits of competitiveness. Besides, the public are also benefited from a healthy
competition. An attorney keeping the data on clients confidential, provide safety and welfare
of the clients as well as the public.
Types of confidential information
On the basis of acquisition (possession), the confidential information are divided into two
types, as follows:
1. Privileged information
It is information that is available and accessed by virtue of a privilege, i,e., privilege of being
employed on that assignment. The security check is also insisted during exit from the work
place against the leakage of this type of information. An engineer working on defence project
may know that the missile he has developed is to be tested against the terrorists across the
border.
2. Proprietary information
It is the information owned by the organisation. It refers to the knowledge and procedures
established by and in the organisation. Some internal communication in an organisation is
marked as ‘proprietary’. It is protected legally by the organisation from use by others,
including the employees. The trade secret is proprietary information by common law, which
prevents employees from disclosing it to outsiders. The quality manual is another example for
proprietary information
On the basis of severity of risk from breach, the confidential information is divided as:
1. Obvious information: It refers to data, information, and test results on the products yet to be
released, or designs, formulae, and technical processes of the products. The risk or loss from
the breach is large and may threaten the survival.
2. Information of lesser confidentiality: this relates the business information such as the number
of employees working on projects, the identity of vendors or suppliers, customers, marketing
strategies, yield of manufacture, cost of manufacture, substitution of materials etc. The risk or
loss involved is relatively less. In competitive business situations, this information also plays
a vital role.
More on Confidentiality
A. Is Switching Job Ethical?
When persons change jobs (employers), what happens to their moral obligation? The
obligation to protect the information does not cease, when one shifts to another employee.
Otherwise, the former employee will reveal this information to the new employer or sell it to
a competitor of the former employer. The integrity of the employee, even upon switching the
employer demands that he maintains confidentiality and does not to divulge the information.
The professional integrity of engineers is more valuable than the loyalty to the current
employer. Many engineers value professional advancement than long-term tie and loyalty to
a single employer. The engineers involved in research and development and expert
contribution change jobs. Normally they are familiar with the innovative developments in the
parent organizations. For example, one manufacturing expert along with his colleagues as
well as with some secret documents left General Motors and joined Volkswagen. This
violation of trade secret, lead the V W to pay huge compensation to GM in cash and
compulsion to buy parts from GM for seven subsequent years. Employees, who change jobs,
will not able to withhold their knowledge and expertise. They are sought after only for their
expertise. They may not carry the papers and but their active brain always carry memories.
Although some organizations hold that this is unethical, the individuals can not be prevented
from divulging the facts to benefit the current employer. The courts have held a moral
verdict. Even though the previous employers had the right to maintain their trade secrets
confidential, the personal rights of the employees, who switched job in pursuit of career
advancement, had to be honored and balanced.
B. Management Policies
How can we protect the rights of the employers and at the same time recognize the genuine
personal rights and other rights of the engineers/employees? Some of the management
practices and their limitations are discussed hereunder: 1. One way is to restrict the future
employment of employees, by using employment contracts at the time of their exit. Details
such as the restriction on geographical location, time gap between the departure from one
place and engagement with the other employer, and on the type of jobs that one can perform
with future employer, are entered in to contracts. But such contracts have not been given
legal sanction. 2. An incentive instead of threatening their rights by the employment contract,
may offer some positive benefits in exchange for the restrictions listed. A lump sum post-
employment payment or compensation over a specific period may offered as incentive to
restrict him. 3. Another approach by the management is to effect tighter controls on internal
information flow on trade secrets and other vital features. But this is likely to create a mutual
distrust in the organization and to throttle the creativity of engineers involved in the research
and development. A better understanding between the ethical management and the
professional responsibility of the engineers will fulfill both professional concerns and
employee loyalty.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
A conflict of interest occurs when the employee has more than one interest. A professional
conflict of interest is the situation where the professional has an interest that, if pursued,
might prevent him from meeting his obligations to his employers or clients, e,g., an electrical
engineer working in the state electricity board may have a financial interest in a company
which supplies electrical instruments, a clear case of conflict of interest exists.
A ‘conflict of interest; is different from ‘conflicting interest’. A student has to clear four
arrears subjects in the supplementary examination. But he finds that the time available is
sufficient to study only three subjects. This is a situation of conflicting interests, where he has
two or more desires that cannot be fulfilled under the given circumstances. But there is a
possibly of pursuing all the conflicting interests, thereby inviting a moral problem.
Types of conflicts of interest
Several types of conflicts of interests exist depending on the ways and severity of outside
interests. A few common types are discussed here.
1. Actual conflict of interest
This refers to the situation where the objectivity is lost in decision making, and the inability
to discharge the duty to the employer. It is the result of weaker judgement and service. A civil
engineer working in the public works department has a financial interest in a contracting
company, which has submitted a bid for the construction of a bridge. There may be a variety
of outside interests. But the conflict arises when the outside interest influences or threatens
the professional judgement in serving the employer or clients.
2. Apparent conflict of interest
This is explained in the following example. An engineer is paid based on a percent of the cost
of the design and there is no incentive for him to cut the costs. In this situation, it appears that
the engineer makes the design more expensive in order to get larger commission for him.
This situation leads to doubting the engineer’s interest and ability for professional judgement.
3. Potential conflict of interest
There are situations where the interest of an employee extends beyond the current employer
and into the interest on one’s spouse, relative or friend. The interest changes into intimacy
and subsequent non moral judgements against the interest of the employer and in favour of
the outsider or even a potential competitor.
(a) Favourable contact
When an engineer’s spouse is working for a contractor or vendor, a conflict does not arise.
But if the engineer is to give a subcontract to the contractor or purchase order to the
supplier, the conflict arises. This happens even when the engineer has partial or substantial
stockholding in the business of that contractor or supplier.
(b) Bribe and Gift The conflict arises when accepting large gifts from the suppliers. Bribe is
different from a gift. The following table shows a comparison of the nature of bribe and
gift.
Tests Bribe Gift
1. Timing Given before Given after
2. Cost of item Large amount Small amount, articles of
daily use
3. Quality of product Poor Good/High
4. Giver is a friend Yes No
5. Transparency Made in secret Made in open
6. Motive Expect undue favour Expect a favour or thanking
for the favour
7. Consequence on Damaging the goodwill and No damage is involved
organization’s goodwill reputation
Codes of ethics do not encourage even gifts, but employees have set forth flexible policies.
Government and company policies generally ban gifts more than a nominal value
(>Rs.1000?) An additional thumb rule is that the acceptance of gift should not influence
one’s judgment on merit.
(c) Moonlighting It is a situation when a person is working as employee for two different
companies in the spare time. This is against the right to pursue one’s legitimate self-interest.
It will lead to conflict of interests, if the person works for competitors, suppliers or
customers, while working under an employer. Another effect of moonlighting is that it leaves
the person exhausted and harms the job performance in both places.
(d) Insider Information Another potential conflict of interest is when using ‘inside’
information to establish a business venture or get an advantage for oneself or one’s family or
friends. The information may be either of the parent company or its clients or its business
partners, e.g., engineers might inform the decision on the company’s merger with another
company or acquisition or an innovative strategy adopted. In such cases, their friends get
information on stock holding and decide on trading their stocks to sell or buy quickly, so that
gain more or prevent a loss. For example, in WorldCom USA, the insider information was
used to manipulate and sell a large amount of stock holding by the Director, upon knowing
that the government has declined to admit their product.
OCCUPATIONAL CRIME
An occupational crime may be committed by (1) wrong actions of a person through one’s
lawful employment or (2) crime by an employee to promote ones own or employer’s interest
or (3) theft or pilferage by the employee or (4) damage to the property or an employee of
one’s organisation. These are also called white-collared crimes.
Many of these crimes are examples of conflicts of interest. These are motivated by the greed,
corporate ambition, and misguided loyalty. Even the crime to promote the interests of the
employer, is an occupational crime. Some of the examples of occupational crimes are:
1. Price fixing
Fixing the bidding rate by companies, in collusion with other companies, especially for the
contract/services, is called price fixing. This is an occupational crime, prevalent in electrical
equipments industries, where there used to be a few contractors but large number of
contracts. Because of this, public as well as the government incur huge loss. Two top officers
of Westinghouse and GE, USA who were involved in price fixing without the knowledge of
their Directors, were sentenced to imprisonment a few years back. These officers held that it
was legal to fix price and even argued that this procedure is really beneficial to the people.
However, the court did accept this view.
2. Industrial Espionage
It means simply spying for personal or company benefits, e.g., in the Silicon Valley area,
there are several company manufacturing computer chips, ICs, and microprocessors. There
are a lot of engineers who are entrepreneurs and venture capitalists. The espionage is more
prevalent here because of the following factors:
(a) The development of chips is extremely competitive and on fast track. Profit and loss can be
made quicker.
(b) Manufacture of chips is very costly. Huge saving through reverse engineering could be made
only by breaking open the competitors gadgets or fast tests. Some organisations prefer to
steal the design details through illegal means rather testing and development.
(c) The components involved are very small. Hence pilferage or removal of gadgets could be
done easily and without being caught.
(d) The crime detection and law enforcement are difficult and ineffective.
(e) Employees do not carry out the activities directly, but through engineers who were employees
or through the weakest link in the supplier-producer chain.
3. Bootlegging
Manufacturing, selling or transporting products (liquor and narcotics) that are prohibited by
law, is called bootlegging. In engineering context, it refers to working on projects which are
prohibited or not properly authorised.
4. Endangering lives (Occupational hazards)
Industries who expose their employees to hazards usually escape penalties. Victims have the
right to sue, but only to claim some monetary compensation. The asbestos industries in USA
were responsible for the death of one lakh workers and 27 million workers afflicted with
cancer, in the 80s. Even after 22 years since Bhopal gas tragedy, appropriate compensation
has not been paid. Even the government could not bring to book the culprits for the crime
committed.
Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series, OHAS-18001 Certification has been
adopted in many Indian Industries. As per the Annual report of RIL10, an initiative called
Project CASH, Change Agent for Safety and Health, had been formed to bring about a
positive change and continual improvement in occupational health practices at the work
place, besides attitudinal and behaviour changes. This is claimed to have prevented work-
related diseases, injuries, reduced absenteeism, and ultimately increased the productivity
level.
HUMAN RIGHTS
Human rights are defined as moral entitlements that place obligations on other people to treat
one with dignity and respect. Organisations and engineers are to be familiar with the
minimum provisions under the human rights, so that the engineers and organizations for a
firm base for understanding and productivity. Provisions under ‘human rights’ are as follows:
1. Right to pursue legitimate personal interest
2. Right to make a living
3. Right to privacy
4. Right to property
5. Right of non-discrimination
6. No sexual harassment
Under professional rights, the following provisions are protected:
1. Right to form and express professional judgment: It is also called the right of professional
conscience. In pursuing professional responsibilities, this empowers one to form and exercise
the professional judgment. Both technical and moral judgments are included. This right is
bound by the responsibilities to employers and colleagues.
2. Right to refuse to participate in unethical activities: It is also called the right of conscientious
refusal. It is the right to refuse to engage in unethical actions and to refuse to do so solely
because one views that as unethical. The employer can not force or threaten the employee to
do something that is considered by that employee as unethical or unacceptable. For example,
unethical and illegal activities that can be refused are: falsifying data, forging documents,
altering test results, lying, giving or taking bribe etc. There may be situations, when there is a
disagreement or no shared agreement among reasonable people over whether an act is
unethical. Medical practitioners have a right not to participate in abortions. Similarly, the
engineers must have a right to refuse assignments that violate their personal conscience, such
as when there exists a threat to human life or moral disagreement among reasonable people.
3. Right to fair recognition and to receive remuneration for professional services: Engineers
have a right to professional recognition for their work and achievements. This includes fair
monetary and non-monetary forms of recognition. It is related to morality as well as self-
interest. They motivate them to concentrate their energy on jobs and to update their
knowledge and skills through continuing education. This will prevent the engineers from
diversion such as moonlighting or bother on money matters. Many times, the engineers who
have laboured to get patents on the organizations are not adequately remunerated. Based on
the resources of the organization and the bargaining power of the engineers, the reasonable
salary or remuneration for patent discovery can be worked out.
4. Right to warn the public about dangers: It should be done without damaging the reputation of
the employer. The views can be expressed through the professional society to get a backing.
5. Right to talk publicly about the job: This should be done within the limits of decency,
confidentiality and loyalty.
6. Right to engage in the activities of professional societies: Attending membership campaign
and seminars are typical activities to promote the professional society.
The basic rights of engineers include the right to live freely and pursue their legitimate
interests as any human being, along with the right to be against racial or sexual
discrimination, receiving one’s salary according to the work, choosing of political activities,
etc., as other employees. Besides all of them, engineers have some special rights as
professionals.
PROFESSIONAL RIGHTS
The rights that engineers have as professionals are called Professional Rights. These
professional rights include −
EMPLOYEE RIGHTS
Employee rights are the moral and legal rights that are obtained by the status of being an
employee. The provisions made to the employees under this category are:
1. Professional rights (discussed already)
2. Basic human rights (discussed already)
3. Institutional rights or contractual employee rights. This include the rights to the
institution due to the organisational policies or contracts, right to receive specified
salary and annual increments and profit sharing. The quantum of such benefits, scale
of pay etc, are fixed and reviewed periodically by the employers and employees.
4. Non-contractual employee rights: These are the rights provided in common, besides
the contractual ones. They include:
I Right to privacy
It is the right to control the access and use of information about oneself. This right is
limited in certain situations by employers’ rights. But who among the employers can
access the personal information is again restricted. Only duty authorised persons can
get the personal information.
For example,
(a) The pay bill section can access the information on insurance premium paid, medical
reimbursement etc. But one’s immediate boss need not get this data.
(b) Persons who have applied for the jobs of cashier are required to report if there are any
criminal or civil cases pending against them. Those persons may mishandle the
money. Hence, that information may be ought from them.
(c) A supervisor might suspect a worker and conduct a search in his cupboard when the
worker is absent. But the supervisor is to have another officer as witness in such
cases. Otherwise the supervisor may plant-in some evidences against the worker.
(d) Upon frequent pilferage reported from the stores, the company may install
surveillance cameras or bugging devices to monitor personal conversations, without
notifying the employees. Prior notice to the employees on the intentions of such a step
along with the proposed date of implementation should have been communicated to
all concerned.
II Right to choose outside activities
This is also interpreted as a right to personal privacy as that means a right to have a private
life outside the job. There are some situations when this right can be curbed. For example,
1. When those activities lead to violation or found detrimental to the duties of their job.
2. When the activities of the employees form a conflict or interest (e.g., when moonlighting).
3. When the interest of the employer is getting damaged (if the employee transfers some vital
information on plans or strategies to the competitor).
III Right to Due Process from Employer
It is the right to fair process or procedures in firing, demotion and in taking any disciplinary
actions against the employees. Written explanation should be initially obtained from the
charged employee and the orders are given in writing, with clearly-stated reasons. Simple
appeal procedures should be framed and made available to all those affected. Fairness here is
specified in terms of the process rather than the outcomes.
IV Right to Equal Opportunity—Non-discrimination
Discrimination because of caste, sex, religion, creed, and language are regressive actions.
Discrimination which means a morally unjust treatment of people in the workplace is
damaging to the human dignity. For example, (a) A senior manager post is vacant. There is
competent and proven candidate from outside the state. A local engineer with lesser
competence is promoted. (b) Prize amounts for the winners in the world sport events are not
the same for men and women.
V Right to Equal Opportunity—Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
The sexual harassment is a display of arrogance and misuse of power through sexual means.
It is against the moral autonomy i.e., freedom to decide on one’s own body. It is also an
assault on one’s human dignity and trust.
Sexual harassment may be defined as the unwanted compulsion or attack on sexual
requirements (gratification) in the context of unequal power. It includes physical as well as
psychological attack or coercion and indecent gestures by men shown on women or by
women on men. Two such forms of harassment are found to exist. In one type called
‘exchange of favors’, senior officers demand sexual favor as a condition for giving a job, or
granting a promotion or increment. It may be either in the form of a physical or verbal threat
or sexual offer. In another type called ‘hostile work environment’, it is the sexually-oriented
work environment that threatens the employee’s right to equal opportunity. Undesirable
sexual proposals, advances, lewd remarks, mailing obscene photographs are some of the
typical examples of this type of harassment.
A rights ethicist interprets this as a serious violation of human right to pursue one’s job free
from extraneous force, compulsion, punishment or threat or insult. A duty ethicist would call
it as a blatant violation of duty to treat human being with dignity and individual freedom, and
not to treat as inanimate object for immoral gratifications. The utilitarian would expose the
effect on the happiness and the welfare of the victims, especially of women.
VI Right to Equal Opportunity—Affirmative Action or Preferential Treatment
It means giving a preference or advantage to a person of a group that was denied equal
treatment in the past. Such treatments are given especially to women and minorities all over
the world. It is also called ‘reverse preferential treatment’, because it reverses the historical
preferences.
There are arguments in favour of as well as against such treatments, all over the world.
Table 4.3 presents a comparison of these views.