TRANSPORT FOR NSW (TfNSW)

QA SPECIFICATION R57
DESIGN OF REINFORCED SOIL WALLS

NOTICE
This document is a Transport for NSW QA Specification. It has been developed for use with
roadworks and bridgeworks contracts let by Transport for NSW or by local councils in NSW. It is not
suitable for any other purpose and must not be used for any other purpose or in any other context.
Copyright in this document belongs to Transport for NSW.

REVISION REGISTER

Ed/Rev Clause Authorised

Description of Revision Date
Number Number By
Ed 1/Rev 0 First issued. GM, PSP 20.08.96
Ed 1/Rev 1 1.2, 3 Title and references to quality standards GM, RNIC 03.03.97
changed.
Annexure Austress Steel Reinforcement System added.
R57/1(A)
Ed 1/Rev 2 Term “accepted” replaced by “approved”. GM, RNIC 25.03.97
(W Ho)
1.5 Requirement for RSW system to be approved
“at close of tender” deleted.
4.3 Note added.
4.7.2 Equation modified.
4.8.1 Two Clauses added (4.8.1.1 and 4.8.1.2) and
minor changes.
Figure R57.1 Note added.
4
4.8.3 Note added.
Ed 1/Rev 3 1.1, 1.2 Substitute Australian Bridge Design Code for GM, RNIC 23.06.00
1.3.2, 4.1, ’92 AUSTROADS.
4.3, 4.8.8,
5.6, 5.8
1.2 AS 1170.2, ASTM A572M, ISO 2063 added.
1.2, 5.2, 5.6, AS 1650 replaced by AS/NZS 4680.
5.7
Annex 57/1
4.2 (f) Requirements for drainage of surface water
added.
4.2 (l) Maximum value of φ 1 , φ 2 , and φ 3 reduced
from 36o to 34° unless site specific testing
carried out.
Ed 1/Rev 3 4.2 Hold Point added.

Edition 2 / Revision 11 TRANSPORT FOR NSW

June 2020
 Ed/Rev Clause Authorised
Description of Revision Date
Number Number By
(cont’d) 4.5 Trapezoidal wall provisions not applicable
for top layer reinforcement lengthening for
impact loads.
4.6.6 Alternative method of analysis for
trapezoidal walls.
New 4.6.7 Requirements for sill beam bridge abutments.
4.7.1 Deletion of requirement to use Vesic formula
set out in Bowles.
4.7.3 Load factors for earthquake together with
live load effects modified.
4.8.1 s vj replaced by (s vj + s vj+1 ) 0.5 in equations.
4.9 (c) Verification of foundation preparation by
Geotechnical Engineer now required.
5.2 Table R57.9 corrosion allowances amended
in line with amendments to BS 8006.
5.3 Requirements for pretreatment of reinforced
fill amended in part (a) and Table R57.10.
Ban on using argillaceous material.
5.4 Test method added.
5.5 Requirements for fill adjacent to block added.
5.7 Table R57.13 corrosion allowances amended
in line with amendments to BS8006.
Corrosion allowance for steel to steel contact
added.
5.9 Addition of rubber pads and geotextile
backing. Deletion of open cell polyurethane
foam and cork strips.
6 Separation of design into external and
internal design.
Annex R57/1 Modifications to Reinforced Earth approval.
Annex R57/1 Renaming Pyramid to TerraMid and
modifications to approval.
Annex R57/1 Deletion of Austress Steel system.
Annex R57/1 Modifications to Freyssisol approval.
Annex R57/1 Modifications to approvals for systems with
Miragrid (T) reinforcement and addition of
systems with Miragrid (XT) reinforcement.
Annex R57/1 Miragrid (XT)-Keystone, Tensar-Concrete
Panel and Tensar-Loc-a-Bloc systems added.
Annex R57/3 Schedule of Hold and Witness Points added.
Annex R57/4 New annexure listing Identified Records.

ii
 Ed/Rev Clause Authorised
Description of Revision Date
Number Number By
Ed 1/Rev 4 Annex R57/1 Tensar RE geogrid-Loc-A-Bloc System and GM, RNIC 21.03.02
Miragrid (XT)-Keystone System modified.
KeySystem 1 System, Miragrid (XT)-Allan
Block Three System, Fortrac- Vertica Block
System, and Rockwood-Fortrac Classic
System added.
Ed 1/Rev 5 1.2, AS 1303 and AS 1304 replaced by AS/NZS GM, RNIC 21.02.03
Annex 4671.
R57/1A –
TerraMid &
KeySystem
Systems
Ed 2/Rev 0 Figures All figures converted to objects in picture GM, RNIC 16.05.05
format.
Annexures Annexures renumbered.
Foreword New clause after the Table of Contents.
Equations Two or more line equations re-written using
Equation Editor.
Text Font changed to 11pt with other minor format
changes.
Body Reference to ABCD (Australian Bridge
Design Code) changed to AS 5100.
1.1 Clarification of foundations.
1.2 Clause 1.2 now introduces annexures
Referenced standards transferred to
Annexure R57/M.
1.3.1 Definition for foundation added.
4.1 Design strength expressed in terms of
factored ultimate strength.
4.3.1.2 Road Functional Class replaced by type of
roads.
4.8.1.1 & Removed but contents incorporated in
4.8.1.2 Clause 4.8.1 with minor editorial changes for
clarity.
6 Transferred to Annexure R57/B.
Annex R57/E Keysteel System added in the inextensible
system category.

iii
 Ed/Rev Clause Authorised
Description of Revision Date
Number Number By
Ed 2/Rev 0 Annex R57/E Tensar RE geogrids-Westblock Fat Face
(cont’d) System, Landmark-Miragrid (XT) System,
Landmark-Fortrac System, Miragrid (XT) -
Allan Block AB Three, AB Classic and AB
Stones Systems, Miragrid (XT) - Allan Block
Systems, Miragrid (XT) - Keystone Compac
II System and Fortrac-Keystone Compac II
System added in the extensible system
category.
Modifications to Fortrac-Allan Block
System, Rockwood-Fortrac Classic System
and Fortrac-Vertica Block System approvals.
Change of owner for Rockwood-Fortrac
Classic System to C & M Brick Pty Ltd from
Rocla Pavers and Masonry.
Ed 2/Rev 1 Table 57.10 Specified Test Method corrected. GM, IC 10.05.07
Annex R57/E “Boral Besser Masonry Ltd” changed to
“Boral Masonry Ltd”.
Ed 2/Rev 2 Global Document reformatted and clauses reworded. GM, IC 14.03.11
Guide Notes Guide Notes revised to include new spec
R59.
Contact persons and phone numbers updated.
1.1 Reference to associated specifications
updated to include new spec R59.
1.3.1 Definitions of “you” and “your” changed.
1.4 Symbols and definitions for “a ih ”, “a iv ”, “k h ”,
“k v ”, “Z”, and β s inserted.
4.2 (f) Requirement for full height drainage layer
inserted.
4.2 (l), 5.3 & Option to use either version of Qld test
5.5 method added.
4.3, 4.9 Hold Point moved from clause 4.2 to 4.9.
Hold Point submission details changed.
4.3 ‘Note’ on load factor for water moved to
footnote for Table 1.
4.3.1.2, Hazard factor adopted.
4.3.1.3
4.5 Minimum width of berm at toe specified as
2m when slope greater than 18°.
Figure 5 modified to show this.
4.7.1 New sub-heading “General” introduced.
Subsequent clauses renumbered.
4.7.4 Load combination and load factors specified
for overall slip failure mechanism.

iv
 Ed/Rev Clause Authorised
Description of Revision Date
Number Number By
Ed 2/Rev 2 4.8.1 New sub-heading “General” introduced.
(cont’d) Subsequent clauses renumbered.
5.3 Requirement for material in Selected
Material Zone to comply with R44 inserted.
5.3, Table Test methods updated.
R57.10
Note 1 deleted. Remaining notes
renumbered.
5.4 Requirement for filter materials to satisfy
Clause 5.3 added.
Annex A Importance Levels in accordance with AS
1170 adopted for RSW classification.
Annex B Requirement for Progress Payment claims to
be supported by documentation inserted.
Annex E INEXTENSIBLE SYSTEMS
TerraMid System - Section reference to
AS1170.2 updated.
KeySystem 1 System deleted.
Keysteel System – Aust Stds updated.
Annex E EXTENSIBLE SYSTEMS
Tensar-Concrete Panel system – Note
deleted.
Freyssisol System – Connection requirements
revised, name of system owner updated.
Tenax (SAMP)-Keystone System deleted.
Miragrid (T)-Diamond System deleted.
Miragrid (T)-Vertica System deleted.
Miragrid (XT)-Diamond System deleted.
Miragrid (XT)-Vertica System –
Requirements revised. System Owner
changed.
Miragrid (XT)-Keystone International
Compac System deleted.
Miragrid (XT)-Anchor Diamond Pro Straight
Face System added.
Miragrid (XT)-Allan Block Three System
replaced by Miragrid (XT)-Rockwood
Classic System. System Owner changed.
Tensar (RE geogrids)-Concrete Panel System
– Product grade updated and requirements
revised.
Tensar RE geogrids-WestBlock Fat Face
RSW System – Requirements expanded.
Landmark-Miragrid (XT) System deleted.

v
 Ed/Rev Clause Authorised
Description of Revision Date
Number Number By
Ed 2/Rev 2 Landmark-Fortrac System – Note (b) added.
(cont’d)
Fortrac-Anchor Diamond Pro Straight Face
System added.
Miragrid (XT)-Allan Block AB Three, AB
Classic & AB Stones Systems deleted.
Miragrid (XT)-Allan Block Systems – Note
(b) added. Joint System Owner “Ten Cate
Nicolon Australia Pty Ltd” deleted.
Miragrid (XT)-Keystone Compac II System –
Requirements changed. Joint System Owner
“Ten Cate Nicolon Australia Pty Ltd”
deleted.
Fortrac-Keystone Compac II System – Note
(b) added.
Annex M Referenced documents updated.
Ed 2/Rev 3 5.2, 5.6, 5.7 Minimum average galvanized coating GM, IC 22.03.11
thickness of 85 μm specified.
Annex E Reinforced Earth System, VSL Retained
Earth System, Terramid System, Keysteel
System -
Minimum average galvanized coating
thickness of 85 μm specified.
Annex E EXTENSIBLE SYSTEMS
ACE-Vertica System and ACE-Keystone
Compac II System added.
Ed 2/Rev 4 5.5 Clause on material parameters above and GM, IC 14.09.11
behind reinforced soil block reworded to suit (M Andrew)
design context.
Ed 2/Rev 5 Table R57.12 Note 2 added, allowing NATA laboratories GM, IC 10.10.11
accredited to either BS or AS to perform (M Andrew)
sulphate ion content test to BS.
Ed 2/Rev 6 Guide Notes, RMS approved RSW Systems formerly listed GM, IC 19.06.12
1.3.1 in Annex R57/E now placed on RMS
website.
Reference to Annex R57/E replaced by url of
document.
1.5, 5.6, 5.7 Reworded, due to change in location of list of
approved RSW Systems.
Annex E List of RMS approved RSW Systems
removed.
Ed 2/Rev 7 Guide Notes Contact persons details updated. GM, CPS 29.10.14
4.4 Table 4: previous 2 separate tables combined
into single table, Φn changed to 1.0 for
overall slip failure.

vi
 Ed/Rev Clause Authorised
Description of Revision Date
Number Number By
Ed 2/Rev 7 4.5 Prohibition of using trapezoidal sections
(cont’d) when inclination of facing panels is other
than vertical deleted.
Figure 4: definition of dimension D m
corrected.
4.6.6 Requirements on analysis of trapezoidal cross
section rewritten to improve clarity.
5.2 AS 4671 added for carbon steel.
Table 9 presentation changed.
5.3 1st & 2nd para: clause rewritten to clarify
requirements for obtaining design parameter
values of reinforced fill material.
Table 10 presentation changed, and note on
standard method for taking and preparing
samples added.
Requirement for reinforced fill material
within SMZ moved to, and consolidated with
same requirement stated in spec R58/R59.
Chemical and electrical property
requirements, including Tables 11 and 12, for
reinforced fill material moved to, and
consolidated with same requirements stated
in spec R58/R59.
5.4 Grading requirements for drainage layer
materials moved to, and consolidated with
same requirements stated in spec R58/R59.
5.5 1st & 2nd para: clause rewritten to clarify
requirements for obtaining design parameter
values of fill above and behind reinforced
soil block.
Values of LL and PI to be assumed in design
tabulated in new Table 11.
5.6 Previous miscellaneous tables (without
reference Table nos) and note on acceptable
facing types combined in new Table 12.
Table 13 presentation changed.
Annex M Referenced Documents updated.
Ed 2/Rev 8 Annex B Pay Item P1 introduced. GM, CB 15.02.16
Ed 2/Rev 9 4.5 References in Table 5 to Figures 4(a) and (b) MCQ 07.06.17
corrected to Figures 5(a) and (b) respectively.
4.6.1 Requirements of friction angle reinstated.
5.2 Table 9 for sacrificial steel thickness:
amended description of environment in
which steel soil reinforcement is located.

vii
 Ed/Rev Clause Authorised
Description of Revision Date
Number Number By
Ed 2/Rev 9 5.6 Table 13 for sacrificial steel thickness:
(cont’d) amended description of environment in
which steel facing connections or elements is
located.
5.7 Requirements of steel facing connections
revised.
Reference to Table 14 corrected to Table 13.
Ed 2/Rev Global Term “bridge abutment” replaced by “sill MCQ 27.05.20
10 beam”.
Guide Notes Link to RMS approved RSW systems
& 1.5 updated.
1.3.1 Link for RMS approved RSW systems
replaced by reference to clause 1.5.
Definition for sill beam reworded.
4.2 (f) Term “drains, filter and outlet etc” replaced
by “drainage layer”.
New requirement on impermeable layer to
prevent water entering RSW from above.
4.2 (s) Materials which are susceptible to scour in
100 year ARI flood to be ignored in RSW
design.
4.5 Table 5 reworded for clarity.
Captions to RSW (a) and (b) in Fig 3 revised.
4.9 (a) Term “filter and drainage materials” replaced
by “drainage layers”.
5.2 (a) Reworded to ban use of steel with ductility
class L to AS 4671.
Table 9 heading revised to include facing
connections. Term “assess” in table replaced
by “determine”.
5.3 “% passing 37.5 mm AS sieve” added to
Table 10.
5.4 Materials for drainage layer reworded.
5.6 Table 13 heading revised by removing term
“facing connections”. Term “assess”
replaced by “determine”.
5.7 Reworded for clarity. Sacrificial thickness
requirements revised.
5.9 Previous clause titled “Joint Fillers and
Sealants” deleted and moved to RMS
R58/R59.
Annex M Reference to RMS R63 deleted.

viii
 Ed/Rev Clause Authorised
Description of Revision Date
Number Number By
Ed 2/Rev Global References to “Roads and Maritime DCS 22.06.20
11 Services” or “RMS” changed to “Transport
for NSW” or “TfNSW” respectively.

ix
 GUIDE NOTES
(Not Part of Contract Document)

Using Specifications for Reinforced Soil Walls

The main points to note regarding the specifications for Reinforced Soil Walls (RSW) are:

1. Specifications for RSW has been divided, for ease of use, into 3 documents
• TfNSW R57 “Design of Reinforced Soil Walls”;
• TfNSW R58 “Construction of Reinforced Soil Walls (Contractor’s Design)”;
• TfNSW R59 “Construction of Reinforced Soil Walls (Principal’s Design)”.

2. Where the design of reinforced soil walls is to be carried out by the Contractor, use TfNSW R57
in conjunction with TfNSW R58.

3. Where the design of reinforced soil walls is provided by the Principal, use TfNSW R57 in
conjunction with TfNSW R59.

4. TfNSW R57 incorporates a mandatory limit state design procedure to be followed which is
based on BS 8006:1995 with modifications in line with AS 5100.

5. A list of TfNSW approved RSW Systems, the respective System Owner, their applications and
their Conditions of Use, can be obtained from:
https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/partners-suppliers/documents/approved-
products-materials/approved_rsw_systems_and_conditions_of_use.pdf

6. Annexure R57/A, containing job specific requirements for each contract, requires completion by
the Project Manager in close liaison with the project road and bridge designers.

Questions regarding the specifications may be referred to one of the following persons:
Manager Geotechnical Engineering (Ground Engineering)
Telephone: (02) 8837 0764 Facsimile: (02) 8837 0059
or
Contracts Quality Manager
Telephone: (02) 9462 6590

x
 QA S PECIFICATION R57

DESIGN OF REINFORCED SOIL WALLS

Copyright – Transport for NSW
IC-QA-R57

VERSION FOR:
DATE:

Edition 2 / Revision 11 TRANSPORT FOR NSW

June 2020
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

CONTENTS
CLAUSE PAGE
FOREWORD ...............................................................................................................................................II
TfNSW Copyright and Use of this Document ...............................................................................ii
Revisions to Previous Version .......................................................................................................ii
Project Specific Changes ...............................................................................................................ii

1 GENERAL ........................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Scope .............................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Structure of the Specification ......................................................................................... 1
1.3 Definitions ...................................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Notation .......................................................................................................................... 3
1.5 Reinforced Soil Wall Systems Approved for Use in the Works .................................... 8

2 SITE INVESTIGATION ...................................................................................................................... 8

3 DESIGN CONTROL .......................................................................................................................... 8

4 DESIGN ........................................................................................................................................... 9
4.1 Principles of Design ....................................................................................................... 9
4.2 Design Requirements...................................................................................................... 9
4.3 Load Combinations ...................................................................................................... 12
4.4 Material and Economic Ramification Factors .............................................................. 18
4.5 Dimensions and Embedment of the RSW .................................................................... 19
4.6 Information for External and Internal Design .............................................................. 22
4.7 External Design ............................................................................................................ 25
4.8 Internal Design ............................................................................................................. 28
4.9 Design Output and Certification ................................................................................... 41

5 MATERIALS .................................................................................................................................. 43
5.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 43
5.2 Soil Reinforcement ....................................................................................................... 43
5.3 Reinforced Fill .............................................................................................................. 44
5.4 Drainage Layer ............................................................................................................. 45
5.5 Soil Above and Behind Reinforced Soil Block ............................................................ 46
5.6 Facing Elements ........................................................................................................... 46
5.7 Facing Connections and Other Components ................................................................ 48
5.8 Concrete........................................................................................................................ 48

ANNEXURE R57/A – PROJECT SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGN OF RSW ................................... 50

ANNEXURE R57/B – MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ............................................................................ 53

ANNEXURE R57/C – SCHEDULES OF HOLD POINTS AND IDENTIFIED RECORDS .................................... 53

C1 Schedule of Hold Points ............................................................................................... 53
C2 Schedule of Identified Records..................................................................................... 53

ANNEXURES R57/D TO R57/L– (NOT USED) ......................................................................................... 53

ANNEXURE R57/M – REFERENCED DOCUMENTS .................................................................................. 54

LAST PAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT IS .......................................................................................................... 55

Ed 2 / Rev 11 i
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

FOREWORD

TFNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT

Copyright in this document belongs to Transport for NSW.

When this document forms part of a contract

This document should be read with all the documents forming the Contract.

When this document does not form part of a contract

This copy is not a controlled document. Observe the Notice that appears on the first page of the copy
controlled by TfNSW. A full copy of the latest version of the document is available on the TfNSW
Internet website: http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/partners-
suppliers/specifications/index.html.

REVISIONS TO PREVIOUS VERSION

This document has been revised from Specification TfNSW R57 Edition 2 Revision 10.

All revisions to the previous version (other than minor editorial and project specific changes) are
indicated by a vertical line in the margin as shown here, except when it is a new edition and the text
has been extensively rewritten.

PROJECT SPECIFIC CHANGES

Any project specific changes are indicated in the following manner:

(a) Text which is additional to the base document and which is included in the Specification is
shown in bold italics e.g. Additional Text.

(b) Text which has been deleted from the base document and which is not included in the
Specification is shown struck out e.g. Deleted Text.

ii Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)

TfNSW QA SPECIFICATION R57

DESIGN OF REINFORCED SOIL WALLS

1 GENERAL

1.1 SCOPE
This Specification sets out the requirements for the design of Reinforced Soil Walls (RSW) which is
provided for either the Principal or the Contractor. It includes design requirements for the reinforced
fill material, soil reinforcement, facing elements and associated components.

The requirements for construction of RSW are set out in Specification TfNSW R58 where the design
is provided by the Contractor, or in Specification TfNSW R59 where the design is provided by the
Principal.

This Specification does not cover the requirements for the design of reinforced slopes or foundations
for structures other than RSW. This specification assumes that the design of structures on top of,
behind or within RSW has been carried out in accordance with AS 5100.

1.2 STRUCTURE OF THE SPECIFICATION

This Specification includes a series of annexures that detail additional requirements.

1.2.1 Details of Work

Project specific requirements are shown in Annexure R57/A.

1.2.2 Measurement and Payment

Measurement and Payment will be in accordance with Annexure R57/B.

1.2.3 Schedules of HOLD POINTS and Identified Records

The schedules in Annexure R57/C list the HOLD POINTS that must be observed. Refer to
Specification TfNSW Q for the definition of HOLD POINTS.

The records listed in Annexure R57/C are Identified Records for the purposes of TfNSW Q
Annexure Q/E.

1.2.4 Referenced Documents

Unless specified otherwise or is specifically supplied by the Principal, the applicable issue of a
referenced document, is the issue current at the date one week before the closing date of tenders, or
where no issue is current at that date, the most recent issue.

Standards, specifications and test methods are referred to in abbreviated form e.g. AS 1289. For
convenience the full titles are given in Annexure R57/M.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 1
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

1.3 DEFINITIONS
1.3.1 General Definitions

The terms “you” and “your” refer to “the entity undertaking the design”.

Abutment A structure or wall which extends beyond the bridge to retain the earth and
support the ends of the bridge.

Capping The element over the top course of facing elements to complete the RSW to
specified finished levels.

Engineer Professional engineer who is a member of Engineers Australia (or equivalent)

and with appropriate qualifications and experience for the type of engineering
work engaged in.

Extensible soil Soil reinforcement which is strained to greater than 1% under the
reinforcement serviceability tensile force.

Facing connections Any connections, whether mechanical, frictional or other type, between
facing elements and the soil reinforcement, designed to transfer loads
between the soil reinforcement and facing elements.

Facing elements Elements retaining the reinforced fill material, with provision for connection
to the soil reinforcement.

Foundation Portion of ground in contact with the RSW and supporting the loads from it.

Geosynthetic Soil reinforcement made of polymeric materials used in geotechnical

reinforcement engineering e.g. linear straps and geogrids.

Geotechnical Engineer(s) with qualifications and experience in geotechnical engineering.

Engineer

Inextensible soil Soil reinforcement which is strained to less than or equal to 1% under the
reinforcement serviceability tensile force.

Reinforced fill Granular soil, decomposed rock or crushed rock fill material in the RSW in
material which the soil reinforcement is embedded.

Reinforced Soil Wall A retaining structure, with the face within 20° of vertical, which comprises
(RSW) soil reinforcement embedded in reinforced fill material, together with any
facing elements, facing connections and footings.

RSW Designer Engineer(s) with qualifications and experience in the design of RSW.

RSW System A system which has been pre-assessed and approved by Transport for NSW
as suitable for specific RSW applications, and which may be subject to
certain conditions for use. For this purpose, a "system" includes the
reinforcing elements, wall facings and any associated components such as
connections, joint fillers and sealants.

2 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

RSW System Owner A company which has a RSW System approved by Transport for NSW (refer
to Clause 1.5). The RSW System Owner also certifies that all components
supplied for construction of a RSW meet the RSW System specifications
under TfNSW R58 or TfNSW R59.

Sill beam A concrete abutment which is bearing on a reinforced soil wall.

Soil reinforcement Components which are embedded in the reinforced fill material and act
through interface friction, bearing or other means to improve the stability and
structural adequacy of the RSW.

1.3.2 Design Definitions

Characteristic value The material and load factors in this Specification are calibrated using
characteristic values. The designer must make safe estimates of the
characteristic values for use in design.

Characteristic values must be based on a careful assessment of the range of

values which could reasonably be expected to occur in the field. It is
emphasised that a statistical analysis of a limited amount of measured data
may be useful but will rarely lead directly to characteristic values. The
designer is referred to Section 7.3.4 of AS 5100.3 for further information.

The guaranteed minimum values for yield stress and tensile strength of steel
may be used for the characteristic values.

Dead loads Permanent effects acting on the RSW as defined in Clauses 5.1 and 5.2 of
AS 5100.2 but excluding differential settlement and/or mining subsidence
effects.

Design value for Characteristic value of material parameter multiplied by the appropriate
material parameter material factor, except for the soil frictional angle φ which is specified in
Clause 4.4.

Design strength (or Strength (or resistance or capacity) calculated from design values of material
resistance or parameters, incorporating the economic ramification factor as appropriate.
capacity)

Design load Nominal load multiplied by the appropriate load factor.

Live loads Thermal and transient effects acting on the RSW as defined in Clauses 22.1.2
and 22.1.3 of AS 5100.2 but excluding earthquake effects.

Nominal load The unfactored loads and load effects as specified in this Specification.

1.4 NOTATION
The symbols used in this Specification are listed below. This list may not be complete; however,
where a symbol is first used in the text, they are usually first defined in the text.
a distance of the centre line of the sill beam from inside face of facing elements, measured
horizontally
a cs a′ cs characteristic value for connection strength (ultimate and serviceability respectively)
between geosynthetic reinforcement and segmental retaining wall units

Ed 2 / Rev 11 3
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

a u a′ u characteristic value for shear capacity (ultimate and serviceability respectively) between
segmental retaining wall units
a ih design horizontal acceleration coefficients developed within the RSW
a iv design vertical acceleration coefficients developed within the RSW
b width of the sill beam measured normal to the facing elements
cb characteristic value of cohesion intercept of foundation soil under effective stress
conditions
c* b design value of cohesion intercept of foundation soil under effective stress conditions
c ub characteristic value for undrained shear strength of foundation soil
*
c ub design undrained shear strength of foundation soil
e eccentricity of resultant design load S* v from centre line of the base of the RSW
ej eccentricity of resultant design load S* vj from centre of the jth layer of soil reinforcement
hj depth of the jth layer of soil reinforcement from the top of the facing elements at height
(H 1 ) of the RSW
q* r design bearing pressure acting on the base of the RSW according to an idealised
Meyerhof distribution, calculated from resultant design load S* v
q* ult bearing capacity of foundation soil using design values for soil parameters
*
q design bearing capacity of foundation soil incorporating the economic ramification factor
s vj vertical spacing of soil reinforcement at the jth level of soil reinforcement in the RSW
zj depth of the jth layer of soil reinforcement from the upper level of the mechanical height
(H) of RSW
B transposed width of RSW in accordance with Meyerhof's approach
Dm wall embedment depth
E eccentricity of resultant design load S* vb from centreline of sill beam
F* e design earthquake forces acting on the RSW from the bridge superstructure given in
Annexure R57/A
F* h horizontal component of design load (dead and live) acting on the RSW from the bridge
superstructure given in Annexure R57/A
F* hd dead load component of F* h acting on the RSW from the bridge superstructure given in
Annexure R57/A
F* h1 live load component of F* h acting on the RSW from the bridge superstructure given in
Annexure R57/A
Fm nominal load due to mining subsidence effects
F* m design load due to mining subsidence effects
Fs nominal load due to differential settlement effects
F* s design load due to differential settlement effects
F* v vertical component of design load (dead and live) acting on the RSW from the bridge
superstructure given in Annexure R57/A
F* vd dead load component of F* v acting on the RSW from the bridge superstructure given in
Annexure R57/A

4 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

F* vl live load component of F* v acting on the RSW from the bridge superstructure given in
Annexure R57/A
H mechanical height of the RSW
H1 facing height of the RSW
kh nominal horizontal pseudo-static acceleration coefficient
kv nominal vertical pseudo-static acceleration coefficient
K* 1 (z j ) design coefficient of earth pressure mobilised at depth z j within the zone of reinforced fill
material
K* o design coefficient of at rest earth pressure within the zone of reinforced fill material
*
K a1 design coefficient of active earth pressure within the zone of reinforced fill material
K* a2 design coefficient of active earth pressure behind the zone of reinforced fill material
K* a3 design coefficient of active earth pressure behind sill beam and/or behind the zone of
reinforced fill above the top level of the RSW
L length of bottom layer of soil reinforcement at the base of the RSW, measured from the
inside face of facing elements
Lj length of jth layer of soil reinforcement measured from the inside face of facing elements
to the far end of the soil reinforcement. For trapezoidal sections, L j is the transformed
length as shown in Clause 4.6.6.
L bj length of jth layer of soil reinforcement within non-yielding zone
Nm number of soil reinforcements per metre width
Q1 nominal vertical live load above the zone of reinforced fill material
Q2 nominal vertical live load behind the zone of reinforced fill material
Ru ultimate strength (or resistance or capacity)
*
S design action
S* h resultant horizontal design load per linear metre acting at the base of the RSW
appropriate to the load combination under consideration
S* v resultant vertical design load per linear metre acting at the base of the RSW appropriate to
the load combination under consideration
S* vj resultant vertical design load per linear metre acting at the jth layer of soil reinforcement
appropriate to the load combination under consideration, but excluding the effects of
loading from sill beam
S* hb resultant horizontal design load per linear metre at the base of the sill beam appropriate to
the load combination under consideration. It includes horizontal loads from the bridge,
earth pressures on the virtual back of the sill beam, and includes earthquake effects as
appropriate.
S* vb resultant vertical design load per linear metre at the base of the sill beam appropriate to
the load combination under consideration. It includes sill beam self weight, vertical
forces from dead and live loads on the sill beam heel behind the curtain wall, and bridge
bearing loads.
T* dc design tensile strength of soil reinforcement based on post-construction creep
deformation considerations
T* dcj T* dc of the jth layer of soil reinforcement
T* dr design tensile strength of soil reinforcement based on long term rupture considerations

Ed 2 / Rev 11 5
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

T* drj T* dr of the jth layer of soil reinforcement

T* j maximum design tensile force (per metre width) to be resisted by the jth layer of soil
reinforcement (see Clause 4.8.2)
T* pj design tensile force (per metre width) in the jth layer of soil reinforcement induced by
design values of self weight of fill/soil above the jth layer of soil reinforcement, surcharge
and any associated lateral soil thrust effects acting on the virtual back of the RSW, as
prescribed in Clause 4.8.2. T* pj must exclude the effects of loading from sill beam.
T* sj design tensile force (per metre width) in the jth layer of soil reinforcement induced by
S* vb , as specified in Clause 4.8.2
T* tj design tensile force (per metre width) in the jth layer of soil reinforcement induced by
S* hb , as specified in Clause 4.8.2
Wj width of the individual jth layer of soil reinforcement
W* 2 any vertical load effect due to soil above zone of reinforced fill material which has not
been included in the calculation of S* vb
Z earthquake hazard factor, equivalent to an acceleration coefficient with an annual
probability of exceedance of 1/ 500 (i.e. a 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years)
α(z j ) coefficient of reduction of soil reinforcement tensile force at the facing
connections/facing elements at depth z j . The coefficient is defined as the ratio of soil
reinforcement tensile force at the facing connections/facing elements to the soil
reinforcement tensile force at the locus of maximum tension.
β 1 , β 2 , etc inclination of a potential failure plane to the vertical plane
βs Slope of ground adjacent to toe of RSW
δ* design friction angle along the virtual back of the RSW
φb characteristic value for peak angle of friction of foundation soil under effective stress
conditions
φ1 characteristic value for angle of friction at constant volume of reinforced fill material
under effective stress conditions
φ2 characteristic value for angle of friction at constant volume of soil behind the zone of
reinforced fill material under effective stress conditions
φ3 characteristic value for angle of friction at constant volume of soil above the zone of
reinforced fill material under effective stress conditions
φ* b design peak angle of friction of foundation soil under effective stress conditions
φ* 1 design angle of friction at constant volume of reinforced fill material under effective
stress conditions
φ* 2 design angle of friction at constant volume of soil behind the zone of reinforced fill
material under effective stress conditions
φ* 3 design angle of friction at constant volume of soil above the zone of reinforced fill
material under effective stress
γ1 characteristic value for weight per unit volume of reinforced fill material (dry, wet,
buoyant or saturated as appropriate)
γ2 characteristic value for weight per unit volume of soil behind the zone of reinforced fill
material (dry, wet, buoyant or saturated as appropriate)
γ3 characteristic value for weight per unit volume of soil above the zone of reinforced fill
material (dry, wet, buoyant or saturated as appropriate)

6 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

γb characteristic value for weight per unit volume of foundation soil (dry, wet, buoyant or
saturated as appropriate)
γs characteristic value for weight per unit volume of sill beam (bulk or buoyant as
appropriate)
γw density of water
λ cs λ′ cs characteristic value for angle of friction for connection (ultimate and serviceability
respectively) of geosynthetic reinforcement to segmental retaining wall units
λ u λ′ u characteristic value for angle of friction (ultimate and serviceability respectively) between
segmental retaining wall units
µp interaction coefficient relating tan(φ 1 ) to the interface friction angle for reinforcement
pullout under large deformation conditions
µ s1 interaction coefficient relating tan(φ 1 ) to the interface friction angle for sliding on
reinforcement under large deformation conditions
µ sb interaction coefficient relating tan(φ b ) to the interface friction angle for sliding on
reinforcement under large deformation conditions
θ inclination of facing elements to the vertical plane
σ vj vertical effective stress acting on the jth level of soil reinforcement according to an
idealised Meyerhof distribution, calculated from the design load, S* vj
σ* vj(avg) average vertical effective stress along L bj . It is limited to the undistributed factored dead
and live loads directly above the jth layer of soil reinforcement under consideration
ω1 inclination of backfill immediately behind facing elements to the horizontal plane
Ψ angle between the normal to the wall face and the longitudinal alignment of the soil
reinforcement
ϒ g1 load factor for γ 1
ϒ g2 load factor for γ 2
ϒ g3 load factor for γ 3
ϒ gs load factor for γ s
ϒ gw load factor for γ w
ϒ q1 load factor for Q 1
ϒ q2 load factor for Q 2
Φ γb material factor for γ b
Φ cb material factor for c ub and c b
Φ φb material factor for tan(φ b )
Φ φ1 material factor for tan(φ 1 )
Φ φ2 material factor for tan(φ 2 )
Φ φ3 material factor for tan(φ 3 )
Φc material factor for characteristic value for structural connection resistance
Φ po material factor for characteristic value for pull out resistance of soil reinforcement from
the facing connections/facing elements
Φ µp material factor for µ p

Ed 2 / Rev 11 7
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Φ µs material factor for µs 1 and µ sb

Φn economic ramification factor

1.5 REINFORCED SOIL WALL SYSTEMS APPROVED FOR USE IN THE WORKS
Use in your design only RSW Systems that have been approved by TfNSW.

A list of the TfNSW approved RSW Systems, the respective System Owner, their applications and
Conditions of Use can be obtained from:
https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/partners-suppliers/documents/approved-products-
materials/approved_rsw_systems_and_conditions_of_use.pdf

Comply fully with the Conditions of Use for the respective System.

2 SITE INVESTIGATION
Arrange for an assessment of the available site information, including the topography and relevant soil
parameter values required for the RSW design, by a Geotechnical Engineer and a RSW Designer.

Carry out any further site investigations as required to obtain reliable estimates of all relevant soil
parameters and the composition and profile of the ground water necessary for the RSW design.

Determine the characteristic value for peak angle of friction φ b and cohesion intercept c b of foundation
soil under effective stress conditions in the laboratory using triaxial tests carried out in accordance
with BS 1377 or equivalent.

Determine the characteristic value for undrained soil shear strength c ub of foundation soil by insitu
and/or laboratory tests, which may include one of the following methods:
(a) insitu vane shear test;
(b) unconsolidated undrained triaxial test;
(c) cone penetration test.

3 DESIGN CONTROL
Notwithstanding TfNSW Q, provide design control in accordance with the requirements of
AS/NZS ISO 9001 Clause 7.3.

Design records must include calculations produced during design and verification.

The internal and external design of the RSW must be carried out by an Engineer(s) experienced in the
design of RSW. Design, verification and certification of the geotechnical aspects of the RSW design
covered in Clause 4.7 (External Design) must be carried out by a Geotechnical Engineer. Design,
verification and certification of all other aspects of the RSW design (Internal Design) must be carried
out by a RSW Designer.

Obtain from the RSW System Owner certification that the design complies with all the requirements
of this Specification.

8 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

Submit to the Principal the certifications, and the design output specified in Clause 4.9, at least 10
working days before commencing the manufacture of facing elements, or the preparation of the
foundation for the RSW, whichever occurs first.

4 DESIGN

4.1 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN

The design must be in accordance with limit state principles. The requirements to be satisfied in the
design are those of Clause 7 of AS 5100.3.

The overall approach governing the design must generally be as specified in Clause 7 of AS 5100.3
and the requirements of this Specification. For each design requirement under consideration, the
following relationship must be satisfied:

φR u ≥ S*
where R u is the ultimate strength (or resistance or capacity), φ is a strength reduction factor and S* is
the design action effect.

The design strength (or resistance or capacity) φR u is a function of the material parameters and must
be derived from the design values of the material parameters. The calculation of some design
strengths (or resistances or capacities) such as bearing capacity, sliding resistance and soil
reinforcement pull out resistance depend on the design loads as well as the design values of material
parameters. In such cases, use design loads which are relevant to the load case under consideration in
the derivation of the design strength (or resistance or capacity), unless otherwise specified.

Include an economic ramification factor Φ n when calculating φR u . Determine Φ n in accordance with

Clause 4.4.

Calculate the design action S* in accordance with the load combinations tabulated in Table R57.1.

The anticipated movements of the RSW must be smaller than the limits specified in this Specification
for the Serviceability Limit State.

4.2 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

The design of the RSW must be in accordance with Clause 4 and the details shown in the Principal’s
Drawings and Specifications. The design must take into account the following:

(a) (i) Ultimate and Serviceability Limit States;

(ii) requirements for components and materials used in the RSW as specified in Clause 5 of
this Specification;
(iii) durability of the materials and components used in the RSW;
(iv) sequence and method of construction as stated in the design output in Clause 4.9.

(b) The requirements specified in Annexure R57/A.

(c) The design of structural members, e.g. footings, facing elements, facing connections and soil
reinforcement. Design the facing elements and their connections for fire resistance, where
specified in Annexure R57/A.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 9
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

(d) Post-construction service deflections specified in Annexure R57/A, for the most onerous
combination of:
(i) design loads;
(ii) soil reinforcement strain and long term creep;
(iii) temperature effects;
(iv) environmental degradation;
(v) foundation displacements.

(e) Design temperatures for the RSW System must not be less than 35°C in the zone which lies
within 1 metre below finished ground level or 1 metre behind facing elements. Outside this
zone, design temperatures for the RSW System must not be less than 25°C. Where necessary,
the RSW Designer must use higher design temperatures for the structure depending on
environmental conditions.

(f) The design must make adequate provision for sub-surface and surface drainage to prevent build-
up of pore water pressure in or behind the RSW, and must contain details of drainage layers in
the design output.
For RSW which abut hillsides or are located in areas where water may enter the RSW block
from behind or above, provide a full height drainage layer at the virtual back of the RSW.
Where water may enter the RSW block from above, or where the ground surface above it is
unpaved, provide a suitable impermeable layer, e.g. a geomembrane liner, to prevent water from
entering the RSW block and to discharge the water to the drainage layer at the virtual back of
the RSW.
Provide a separate surface drainage system to collect surface stormwater runoff, and discharge
the water collected to a stormwater drainage system. Do not use the subsurface drainage system
for drainage of surface water.
With the exception of RSW which are permanently submerged or subject to flooding, the design
water table level must be the ground surface level in front of the RSW.
For RSW subject to flooding, assume the water table level in front of the RSW to be a minimum
of 1 metre below the flood level which is assumed to occur within the RSW. More extreme
circumstances may occur under flood conditions and these must be considered by the designer.
For permanently submerged RSW, consideration must be given to the appropriate water level
within and outside the RSW, particularly in tidal situations.

(g) Any future extensions of the RSW in width and/or height as shown in the Principal’s Drawings
and Specification.

(h) Loads and displacements imposed by piles in or adjacent to the RSW as detailed in the relevant
Drawings and Specification, both during installation and in-service. The following minimum
provisions apply:
(i) where piles pass through the reinforced fill material (e.g. to support the bridge abutment),
the design must coordinate the soil reinforcement locations with the pile locations and
allow for all tolerances in the construction of the pile and the RSW.
(ii) where piles are placed in or adjacent to the RSW, the design must allow for any pile-soil
interaction or other effects, both short and long term.
(iii) where piles are driven in or adjacent to the RSW, the design must allow for possible pile
driving effects on RSW components. Where there is a possibility of disturbing facing
elements during pile installation, make special provisions, e.g. a compressible filler

10 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

placed adjacent to the landward side of the RSW at the pile location, or pre-boring used
where there is an absolute certainty that soil reinforcement will not be disturbed. Extend
the filler and/or preboring a minimum of 500 mm below the underside of the RSW block.
(iv) where piles are used to support bridge abutments, accommodate any horizontal forces
transmitted from the bridge structure to the RSW due to pile-soil interaction in the design.
(v) for the case where piles are located within the reinforced fill material, post-construction
movements of the RSW must not exceed the permissible pile movement specified in item
(f) of Annexure R57/A.

(i) Where a RSW neither retains road embankments nor supports bridges, there is no possibility of
these occurring in the future, design the RSW for a minimum nominal vertical live load of
10 kPa.
Otherwise, accommodate a minimum nominal vertical live load of 20 kPa on the RSW in the
design unless specified otherwise in item (i) of Annexure R57/A.

(j) The effect of nearby structures and services on the RSW, both during and after construction e.g.
leaking water mains.

(k) Post-construction strain of soil reinforcement must not be greater than 0.5% for RSW
supporting sill beams, and within H of the abutment, and not greater than 1% for other RSW.
Post-construction service deflections must comply with item (e) of Annexure R57/A.

(l) The maximum value of φ 1 , φ 2 , and φ 3 , adopted in the design must be 34° in the absence of test
data. If site specific test data is available before placement of the fill takes place, the maximum
value adopted for φ 1 must be 36°. In all cases, the design value must be less than or equal to the
actual tested shear angle of the soil when tested in accordance with Q181C: Draft 1994 or
Q181C: 2008. For soil foundations, the maximum values of c b and φ b adopted in the design
must be 20 kPa and 40° respectively. Give special consideration to foundations comprised of
rock.

(m) The design life of the RSW (see Annexure R57/A (a)).

(n) The RSW System specification.

(o) ψ, the angle between the normal to the wall face and the longitudinal alignment of the soil
reinforcement, must be ≤ 20°.

(p) Exclude the effect of passive earth pressures exerted on the foot of the wall below ground level
when the passive earth pressure may increase the margin of safety on sliding in the design.
For bearing capacity calculations, the effect of this foundation material may be assumed to be
retained provided that excavations are restricted (e.g. a small trench 0.6 m wide by 1.0 m deep)
in front of the RSW. Where larger excavations may occur, the effect of this foundation material
must be assumed to be excluded.

(q) Superimposed loadings from minor structures as appropriate e.g. impact on traffic barrier kerbs.

(r) The design must take into account both short and long term soil properties to allow for
conditions during and after construction, and any foreseeable changes in pore water pressures.

(s) Any material, including scour protections, which are susceptible to scour in a 100 year average
recurrence interval (ARI) flood, must be ignored in the design of RSW.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

4.3 LOAD COMBINATIONS

As a minimum requirement, the following load combinations must be considered in the design:

Load
Details
Combination
A Loads applicable during construction
B Maximum values of all loads, excluding earthquake effects
C Maximum overturning loads with minimum gravity loads, excluding earthquake
effects
D Dead loads with partial live loads, earthquake and differential settlement effects
E Maximum overturning loads with minimum gravity loads, partial live loads,
earthquake and differential settlement effects
F Dead and live loads with mining subsidence/differential settlement effects at the
Serviceability Limit State

Table R57.1 details the load combinations to be considered in design together with the appropriate
load factors.

12 Ed 2 / Rev 11
 (TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

Table R57.1 - Loads Combinations to be Considered and Appropriate Load Factors

Ultimate Serviceability
Load factors Limit States Limit State
Items or design Load combinations
loads A B C D E F
Wt. of sill beam and Load factor ϒ gs
1.0 1.25 1.0 1.25 1.0 1.0
structural components for γ s
Load factor ϒ gw
Wt. of water (2) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
for γ w
Wt. of soil etc. within zone Load factor ϒ g1
1.0 1.25 1.0 1.25 1.0 1.0
of reinforced fill material for γ 1
Dead Wt. of soil etc. behind zone Load factor ϒ g2
1.0 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.0
Loads of reinforced fill material for γ 2
Wt. of soil etc. above zone
of reinforced fill material Load factor ϒ g3
1.0 1.25 1.0 1.25 1.0 1.0
incl. effect of soil loads on for γ 3
sill beam
Vertical load from bridge F* vd F* vd F* vd F* vd F* vd
0
superstructure Design loads (max) (min) (max) (min) (max)
Horizontal load from bridge (refer Annex. F* hd F* hd F* hd F* hd F* hd
0
superstructure R57/A) (max) (max) (max) (max) (max)
Traffic load above zone of Load factor ϒ q1
0 1.5 0 0.5 0 1.0
reinforced fill material for Q 1
Traffic load behind zone of Load factor ϒ q2
0 1.5 1.5 0.5 0.5 1.0
Live reinforced fill material for Q 2
Loads Vertical load from bridge F* vl F* vl 0.5 F* vl 0.5 F* vl F* vl
(1) 0
superstructure Design loads (max) (min) (max) (min) (max)
Horizontal load from bridge (refer Annex. F* hl F* hl 0.5 F* hl 0.5 F* hl F* hl
0
superstructure R57/A) (max) (max) (max) (max) (max)
Design loads
Earthquake effects from bridge
(refer Annex. 0 0 0 F* e F* e 0
superstructure
R57/A)
Load factor on
Earthquake effects on RSW and sill
nominal load
beam but excluding earthquake 0 0 0 1.0 1.0 0
(refer Clause
effects from bridge superstructure
4.3.1)
Design loads
Mining subsidence effects from
(refer Annex. 0 F* m F* m 0 0 F* m
bridge superstructure
R57/A)
Design loads
Differential settlement effects from
(refer Annex. 0 F* s F* s F* s F* s F* s
bridge superstructure
R57/A)

Notes:
(1)
Collision loads on traffic barrier kerbs, wind pressures on noise barriers and traffic impact loads on the RSW
must be included in the live loads in accordance with AS 5100 where appropriate.
(2)
In load cases A, B, C and F, a load factor of unity on water must be used in conjunction with the design water
table with due allowance for flooding. In load cases D and E, a load factor of unity on water must be used in
conjunction with the design water table, but flooding need not be considered simultaneously with earthquake
effects.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 13
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Loads, load factors, material parameters and material factors for the RSW are shown in Figure R57.1.

Figure R57.1 - Typical Loads, Load Factors, Material Parameters and Material Factors for
RSW (earthquake effects, mining subsidence and differential settlements effects not shown).
Refer to Table R57.1 for the different load combinations.

S* vb and S* hb are the resultant vertical and horizontal design loads per linear metre at the base of the
sill beam. These forces depend on the load combination under consideration and may include effects
of loads from the bridge, the sill beam self weight, soil on the sill beam heel and earth pressures on the
back of the sill beam curtain wall.

It must be noted that the sill beam may not be sufficiently rigid to distribute the bridge bearing load
evenly to the base of the sill beam. The RSW Designer must make adequate provisions in the design
of the RSW for any such localised concentrations.

4.3.1 Earthquake Effects

4.3.1.1 General

Design the RSW for earthquake forces with respect to both internal and external design. Add
the dynamic stresses to the static stresses (from self-weight, surcharge, live loads and static
thrust) acting on the RSW. Also include other earthquake forces where they are transferred to
the RSW. Where applicable, the earthquake forces from the bridge superstructure are given in
item (d) of Annexure R57/A.

4.3.1.2 Dynamic Stresses

The soil behind the zone of reinforced fill material exerts a dynamic thrust on the virtual back of
the RSW. The evaluation of the thrust must be in accordance with soil mechanics principles.
Use either the pseudo-static “Mononobe-Okabe” approach using nominal pseudo-static
acceleration coefficients (typically half of the peak ground acceleration), or dynamic analyses
using the estimated ground acceleration spectrum.

14 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

The nominal horizontal and vertical pseudo-static acceleration coefficients are defined as k h and
k v respectively. Determine the value of k h for pseudo-static analyses from Table R57.2.

Table R57.2 - Nominal Horizontal Acceleration

Nominal horizontal pseudo-static acceleration coefficient (k h )

Hazard factor (Z) in RSW supporting sill beams for bridges
accordance with on principal interstate freeways and All other RSW
AS 1170.4 highways or on urban freeways
> 0.14 0.15 0.12
0.10 – 0.14 0.12 0.10
0.08 – 0.09 0.09 0.07
< 0.08 0 0

a ih and a iv are the design horizontal and vertical acceleration coefficients respectively developed
within the RSW, and are related to k h and k v as follows:

a ih = (1.45 – k h ) k h a iv = (1.45 – k v ) k v

Unless otherwise stated, take a iv and k v , whether positive or negative (i.e. acting either up or
down), as not less than half of a ih and k h respectively. For RSW which do not support a bridge
sill beam, take a iv as zero. For other cases, apply k v in the most critical direction.

For permanently submerged RSW, the effect of dynamic water pressures on and within the
RSW may be evaluated in accordance with the approach of Matasuzawa et al (ASCE Journal of
Geotechnical Engineering, Volume III, No.10, October 1985).

The following assumptions are considered to apply:

(a) Dynamic water pressure forces on the water side of the RSW must be determined from
Westergaarde’s theory and taken to reduce the static water pressures on the outside of the
RSW.
(b) Dynamic water pressure forces on the landward side of the RSW must be determined
using the above mentioned method and applied together with static earth and water
pressures.
(c) Dynamic water pressure forces on the water side and on the landward side of the RSW
must be taken to act simultaneously to destabilise the structure.

Assess the effect of dynamic water pressures for both internal and external stability for all
failure modes, e.g. pullout, sliding etc.

For RSW subjected to flooding, it is considered that the possibility of earthquake loads and
flooding occurring together is remote. The design of the RSW does not need to allow for these
effects simultaneously.

4.3.1.3 Earthquake Effects - External Design

In external design, it is unlikely that the dynamic thrust exerted by the soil behind the zone of
reinforced fill material and the inertia force of the RSW block will peak simultaneously.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 15
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Take the dynamic inertia force arising from acceleration of the RSW block as 50% of the
calculated value; i.e. take the horizontal inertia force of the RSW block as:
0.5 a ih × mass of wall (per unit width)

Calculate the vertical inertia force in a similar manner. For calculation of wall inertia forces,
restrict the width of the RSW block to the mechanical height H.

Calculate the dynamic stresses applied by the inertia effects in the backfill to the RSW using the
pseudo-static “Mononobe-Okabe” approach with the hazard factors given in Table R57.2, or
using the estimated ground acceleration spectrum as input into a dynamic analysis. With the
pseudo-static method, the distribution of applied stress and the location of the resultant force are
shown in Figure R57.2.

Figure R57.2 - Distribution of Inertia Force Applied to Rear of RSW Block

Apply wall friction in accordance with Clause 4.6.1 of this Specification. For external stability,
consider the combined effects of static stresses, dynamic stresses from the backfill to the RSW
and the inertia of the RSW block together with the inertia effects of fill above the RSW and
dynamic and static forces transmitted from the bridge superstructure.

In the overall slip failure analysis, obtain the nominal earthquake force by multiplying the
appropriate gravity loads by k h and k v respectively.

4.3.1.4 Earthquake Effects - Internal Design

In internal design, distribute the total horizontal inertia force acting on the block of reinforced
fill material to the different layers of soil reinforcement in proportion to their resistant area.
Combine the internal dynamic force with the static tensile forces generated from the weight of
the structure, applied static earth pressure and other surcharge forces to give the maximum
tensile force in the reinforcement.

16 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

The horizontal dynamic force is equal to the weight of the active zone multiplied by the
acceleration coefficient a ih . The active zone is considered to be identical to that defined for the
static calculations, with the area bounded by the wall face and the loci of maximum
reinforcement tension as given in Figure R57.11.

Distribute the dynamic force among the individual reinforcing strips in accordance with their
resistant area as a proportion of the total resistance. Obtain the resistant area of an individual
layer by multiplying the width of the reinforcement and the embedded length in the resistant
zone, L bj (per unit width of wall).

The ratio of the horizontal internal dynamic force distributed to an individual layer of
reinforcement to the total dynamic force must be as the ratio of the resistant area of that layer to
the sum of the resistant area of all of the layers of reinforcement (per unit width of wall).

In the wedge analysis, obtain the design earthquake force by multiplying the appropriate gravity
loads of the wedge segment by a ih and a iv , as appropriate.

4.3.1.5 Detailing for Earthquake Effects

The design of the RSW must ensure that:

(a) Any failure is in a ductile mode, i.e. yielding of soil reinforcement, or breaking of bond
between the reinforced fill material and the soil reinforcement occurs before failure at
connections. Achieve this by multiplying the material factors Φ po , Φ up and Φ us used to
calculate the pull out resistance of soil reinforcement by a factor of 0.9.
(b) For RSW supporting a sill beam, loss of support to the sill beam will not occur. The
Engineer responsible for the bridge design will have allowed for a minimum edge
distance at the support as shown on the drawings for the bridge structure. Maintain this
minimum edge distance.

4.3.1.6 Liquefaction

Assess the foundation materials for any liquefaction potential induced by an earthquake,
particularly for saturated granular materials. Where it can be demonstrated that granular
materials have a relative density index of greater than 65% or an SPT value (at 60% energy
rating) in excess of 25, the material can be considered to be resistant to liquefaction. Where the
thickness of saturated granular material exceeds 10 m, the resistance to liquefaction requires
more detailed consideration.

4.3.2 Differential Settlement and/or Mining Subsidence Effects

Design the RSW to accommodate any differential settlement and/or mining subsidence effects
specified in item (d) of Annexure R57/A.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 17
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

4.4 MATERIAL AND ECONOMIC RAMIFICATION FACTORS

Derive the design values for soil shear strength parameters from the following equations:
tan(φ*) = Φ φ tan(φ)
tan(φ* b ) = Φ φb tan(φ b )
c* b = Φ cb c b
c* ub = Φ cb c ub
where φ and c are the estimated characteristic values for the soil friction angle and cohesion
respectively; and
Φ is the appropriate material factor shown in Table R57.3.

Table R57.3 - Material Factors

Ultimate Serviceability
Limit States Limit State
Material Load combinations
Item factors A, B, C, D, E F
Φ φ1 , Φ φ2 , Φ φ3 1.0 1.0
Soil strength parameters Φ φb 0.8 1.0
Φ cb 0.5 1.0
Foundation soil density Φ γb 1.0 1.0

Tensile strength of Inextensible System Refer to Conditions of Use for System

soil reinforcement Extensible System for values of T* dr and T* dc
Pull out resistance of soil reinforcement from
Φ µp 0.75 1.0
reinforced fill material
Sliding resistance between soil reinforcement
Φ µs 0.85 1.0
and reinforced fill material/foundation soil
Pull out resistance of soil reinforcement from
Φ po 0.70 1.0
the facing connections/facing elements
Structural strength of connection
Pullout resistance of connection from facing Φc 0.85 1.0
element

An economic ramification factor Φ n has been included in the equations for R*. Φ n is specified in
Table R57.4. Obtain the RSW classification as a major or minor structure from item (b) of Annexure
R57/A.

18 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

Table R57.4 - Economic Ramification Factor Φn

Ultimate Serviceability
Limit States Limit State
RSW RSW Case
Design Life Classification (1) (Clause Reference) Load combinations
A, B, C, D, E F
Clause 4.7.4 1.0 1.0
> 5 years, Major
Other than Clause 4.7.4 0.9 1.0
≤ 100 years
Minor All 1.0 1.0
Major All 1.0 1.1
≤ 5 years
Minor All 1.1 1.1
Note:
(1)
Refer Annexure R57/A for classification.

The appropriate values of material and economic ramification factors must not be less stringent than
those specified in Table R57.3 and Table R57.4. However, the RSW Designer must select the
appropriate values of material and economic ramification factors used in the design based on the
nature of the RSW System, test data representative of the materials to be used in the Works, and the
reliability of all parameters used in the design.

State clearly in the design output all material factors used in the RSW design.

4.5 DIMENSIONS AND EMBEDMENT OF THE RSW

Prior to external or internal design, define the overall geometry of the RSW. The dimensions of the
RSW must not be less than the minimum values specified in Table R57.5.

Table R57.5 - Minimum Dimensions of RSW

Application Minimum soil reinforcement length

RSW not supporting sill beams Walls with uniform greater of 2 metre or
reinforcement length (0.6H + 1) metre
Trapezoidal walls refer to Figures R57.3(d),
R57.3(e) and R57.5(a)
Stepped walls refer to Figure R57.5(b)
RSW supporting sill beams greater of 7 metre or (0.6H + 2) metre
Walls subject to low thrust from retained fill such as negative
0.6H
backslope or embedded walls - see Figures R57.3(f) and R57.3(g)
Trapezoidal walls: Vertical spacing of soil reinforcement is as follows:
L j /H < 0.55, s vj /H ≤ 0.125
where 0.55 ≤ L j /H < 0.65, then s vj /H ≤ 0.167

0.65 ≤ L j /H, s vj /H ≤ 0.222

Note: Read this table in conjunction with Figures R57.3 and R57.5.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 19
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Base the geometric size of a RSW upon the concept of a mechanical height, H, which is defined in
Figure R57.3.

Acceptable details for trapezoidal sections are shown in Figures R57.3 (d) and R57.3 (e).

Figure R57.3 - Minimum Dimensions of RSW

For the purposes of this clause, the lengthening of the upper layers of soil reinforcement to account for
the effects of short term horizontal impact type loading (e.g. impact loads on a traffic barrier and
vehicle braking loads) does not mean that the limitations on trapezoidal sections contained in this

20 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

Specification apply. Do not take seismic loads and wind loads as short term horizontal impact type
loads.

Do not use trapezoidal sections under the following circumstances:

(a) where foundations are not formed by excavation into sound rock;
(b) where the RSW supports a sill beam.

For the purposes of this clause, sound rock is defined as rock which is slightly weathered (or better)
with medium strength (or better) in accordance with AS 1726. The Geotechnical Engineer must make
allowance for joints and other factors affecting rock behaviour.

The toe of the RSW must be embedded below the ground surface. The embedment D m is defined in
Figure R57.4, and must not be less than that given in Table R57.6, which is applicable to RSW with
slenderness ratios greater than L/H = 0.6, and in good ground conditions.

jth layer of soil

reinforcement
min 2.0 m
if βs > 18º

1m
Dm

βs

Figure R57.4 - Definition of Embedment D m

Table R57.6 - Minimum Embedment of RSW

Embedment,
Slope of the ground at toe, β s (refer to Figure R57.5)
D m (m)
β s = 0° RSW not supporting sill beams H/20
RSW supporting sill beams H/10

β s = 18° RSW not supporting sill beams H/10

β s = 27° RSW not supporting sill beams H/7

β s = 34° RSW not supporting sill beams H/5

Notes:
(1)
D m ≥ 0.3 m
(2)
For β s > 0, minimum embedment D m for RSW supporting sill beams must be subjected to
special consideration.

Give special consideration for trapezoidal walls. Restrictions on the cross-sectional dimensions of the
RSW with trapezoidal and stepped cross sections are given in Figure R57.5.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 21
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Figure R57.5 - Special Requirements for Trapezoidal and Stepped Cross Sections

On sites where the Geotechnical Engineer considers the foundation to comprise weak or soft soils, a
greater embedment depth may need to be provided.

Where the slope of the ground adjacent to the toe of the RSW, β s , is greater than 18°, provide a berm
at the toe of the RSW with minimum width of 2 m, to provide sufficient safe working area for
compaction using a small roller and for carrying out inspections after completion of the RSW. In this
case, the embedment depth is measured from the top of the berm. Provide to the berm 2% crossfall
away from the RSW for drainage.

4.6 INFORMATION FOR EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL DESIGN

4.6.1 Design Friction Angle δ* Along Virtual Back of RSW

The sign convention for δ* is as shown in Figure R57.6.

Select the friction angle δ* along the virtual back of the RSW by considering the anticipated relative
movement between the retained fill and the zone of reinforced fill material.

If the reinforced fill material cannot move downward relative to the retained fill, take δ* as follows:

(a) Inextensible soil reinforcement

δ* ≤ (1.2 - L/H) φ* 2 or (1.2 - L/H) φ* 1 , whichever is less

(b) Extensible soil reinforcement

for ω 3 ≥ 0 δ* ≤ ω 3 or 0.5φ* 1 or 0.5φ* 2 , whichever is less
for ω 3 < 0 δ* ≤ 0
where ω 3 is the equivalent slope angle at a horizontal distance 0.5H v from the top of the virtual
back of the RSW as defined in Figure R57.6.

22 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

Figure R57.6 - Sign Convention for Design Friction Angle δ* and Definition of ω 3

4.6.2 Angle of Inclination θ of Facing Elements to Vertical Plane

Determine the angle of inclination θ of facing elements to the vertical plane in accordance with
Figure R57.7. The angle θ must not be more than 20°.

Figure R57.7 - Definition of Angle of Inclination θ of Facing Elements to the Vertical Plane

4.6.3 Design Earth Pressure Acting on Virtual Back of RSW

Where the backfill slope angle is constant (i.e. ω2 is a constant) behind the virtual back of the RSW,
calculate the minimum design active earth pressure acting at an angle δ* to the normal to the virtual
back of the RSW in accordance with the Coulomb Earth Pressure Theory, using a coefficient of active
earth pressure as follows:
cos 2 (θ + φ*2 )
K *a2 or K *a3 ≥ 2

 sin (φ*2 + δ * ) sin (φ*2 − ω2 ) 

cos θ cos (θ − δ )1 +
2 *

 cos (θ − δ ) cos (θ + ω2 ) 
*



Where the backfill slope angle ω 2 varies behind the virtual back of the RSW, the backfill design active
earth pressures acting on the virtual back of the RSW must be the maximum earth pressure calculated
from the trial wedge method as described in Chapter 11.11 of “Foundation Analysis and Design” by

Ed 2 / Rev 11 23
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Joseph E. Bowles, 4th Edition, McGraw Hill, 1988, or by taking a conservative constant slope angle
using the equation above.

4.6.4 Design Earth Pressure Acting behind Sill Beam

Calculate the design earth pressure behind a sill beam ignoring wall friction, and acting normal to the
sill beam curtain wall.

4.6.5 Design Coefficient of Earth Pressure within Zone of Reinforced Fill Material

For a RSW with an angle of inclination θ of facing elements to the vertical plane, derive minimum
values of coefficient of active and at rest earth pressure, K* a1 and K* o as follows:
cos 2 (θ + φ1* )
K *a1 ≥
cos(θ )[cos(θ ) + sin(φ1* )]2

cos 2 (θ + φ1* )
K ≥ *

cos(θ )[cos(θ ) + sin(φ1* )]

o

Take the design coefficient of earth pressure at depth z j , K* 1 (z j ), within the RSW as follows:
(a) Extensible soil reinforcement
K* 1 (z j ) = K* a1 , for all z j
(b) Inextensible soil reinforcement
(i) For z j ≤ 6 m
K* 1 (z j ) = (1 – z j /6) K* o + (z j /6) K* a1
(ii) For z j > 6 m
K* 1 (z j ) = K* a1

Take the earth pressure as acting normal to facing elements.

4.6.6 Trapezoidal Cross Sections

Analyse each trapezoidal cross section as follows:

(a) For Clauses 4.7.4, 4.8.5 and 4.8.6, analyse the trapezoidal section using the actual reinforcement
layout.
(b) For Clause 4.8.4, take L bj as the actual physical length of soil reinforcement beyond the line of
maximum tension in the calculation of pullout resistance. For other requirements in this clause,
analyse the trapezoidal section by transforming it into an equivalent block as shown in
Figure R57.8.
(c) For Clauses other than 4.7.4, 4.8.4, 4.8.5 and 4.8.6, analyse the trapezoidal section by
transforming it into an equivalent block as shown in Figure R57.8. The length of soil
reinforcements of the transformed section must exceed the minimum value specified in Clause
4.5.
(d) For Clause 4.7.2, take foundations effective width as the actual physical length of the bottom
layer of soil reinforcement or (L – 2 e ), whichever is the lesser.
(e) Take inclination of facing, θ, as zero for all design purposes.

24 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

Figure R57.8 - Transformation of Trapezoidal Section to Uniform Length Model

4.6.7 Sill Beams

For sill beams, under the serviceability load case, the maximum permissible vertical pressure at the
underside of the sill beam must be:
(a) 150 kPa for dead loads only;
(b) 200 kPa when other loads are included.

The eccentricity E of resultant forces S*vb (refer Figure 57.14) must not exceed:
(i) b/8 for dead loads only;
(ii) b/6 when other loads are included.

4.7 EXTERNAL DESIGN

4.7.1 General

The external design of the RSW must be carried out by a Geotechnical Engineer.

The design must consider both Ultimate and Serviceability Limit States and must include, but not be
limited to, the following failure mechanisms:
(I) Ultimate Limit States:
(i) bearing failure;
(ii) sliding;
(iii) slip failures.
(II) Serviceability Limit State:
(i) settlement, tilting, eccentricity, rotational and lateral movement;
(ii) slip failures.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 25
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

4.7.2 Bearing Failure

For design purposes, assume an idealised Meyerhof distribution to be acting on the base of the RSW
(refer to Figure R57.9). Calculate the design bearing pressure q*r as follows:
S*v
q *r =
B
For non-trapezoidal sections, take B as L – 2 e . For trapezoidal section, take B as the actual physical
length of the bottom layer of soil reinforcement or L – 2 e , whichever is the lesser.
S*v and e in the above equation must include the effect of all loads relevant to the load combination
under consideration.

Figure R57.9 - Idealised Meyerhof Pressure Distribution Along Base of RSW

The design bearing capacity q* must be larger than or equal to the design bearing pressure q*r. The
design bearing capacity q* must satisfy the following:
q* = Φn q*ult
q* ≥ q*r
For RSW founded on soil or extremely low to low strength rock, calculate q*ult in accordance with
Appendix A of Geoguide 1, using the design values of foundations shear strength parameters derived
in accordance with Clause 4.4 of this Specification.
In the calculation of q*ult, for non-trapezoidal sections, take foundation’s effective width as L – 2 e .
For trapezoidal sections, take the foundation’s effective width as L – 2 e or the actual physical length
of the bottom layer of soil reinforcement, whichever is the lesser.
Apply a load factor of 1.0 to the density of the foundation soil (dry, submerged or saturated as
appropriate).

Where necessary, the Geotechnical Engineer must specify in the design output details of the method of
preparing and improving the foundation to achieve the design bearing capacity.

26 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

4.7.3 Sliding

The design must take into account the stability against forward sliding of the RSW at the interface
between the reinforced fill material and the foundation soil, and sliding on or between any soil
reinforcement layers.

The following conditions at the base of the RSW must be satisfied:

(a) For long term stability, where there is soil-to-soil contact at the base of the RSW:
Φn S*v tan(φ*1) ≥ S*h and
Φn [S*v tan(φ*b) + c*b B] ≥ S*h
(b) For short term stability, where there is soil-to-soil contact at the base of the RSW:
Φn c*ub L ≥ S*h
(c) For long term stability, where there is soil reinforcement-to-soil contact at the base of the RSW:
Φn Φµs µs1 tan(φ*1) S*v ≥ S*h and
Φn Φµs µsb [tan(φ*b) S*v + c*b B] ≥ S*h
(d) For short term stability, where there is soil reinforcement-to-soil contact at the base of the RSW:
Φn Φµs µsb c*ub L ≥ S*h
where µs1, and µsb are product specific coefficients.

The Geotechnical Engineer must select the appropriate values of µs1 and µsb in the design based on the
nature of RSW System and the variability of parameters involved in the design. In no case must the
selected values be greater than the values stated in Conditions of Use for the corresponding system.

4.7.4 Overall Slip Failures

Perform stability analyses (both circular and non-circular failure surfaces), examining an extensive
number of trial slip surfaces, to identify the most critical overall slip surface(s).

It may be assumed that no slip surface will pass through the strip contact area representing a bridge sill
beam. When the facing consists of a structural element formed in one piece, the shear resistance of the
facing may be included in the analysis.

Use load combination F in Table R57.1 of this Specification with all load factors set to 1.0 and
earthquake effects included in the analysis where appropriate. Do not apply the material factors in
Table R57.3. The calculated factor of safety must apply to soil shear strength as well as reinforcement
strength (tensile capacity and pullout strength) in order to reach a limit equilibrium state.

Where earthquake together with live load effects are included in the analysis, the load factor for
earthquake effects and live load effects may be set to 0.75 and 0.5 respectively. Take the strength of
the fill (φ1, φ2, and φ3) at constant volume conditions. The minimum overall factor of safety achieved
must be 1.35 for RSW not supporting sill beams and 1.6 for RSW supporting sill beams.

An acceptable alternative is to check the overall stability using the peak friction angle or other suitable
material shear strength with a minimum overall factor of safety of 1.6. In this case, limit the peak
effective friction angle for the earthworks to a maximum of 40o and the effective cohesion to a
maximum of 10 kPa.

Where a RSW retains an overlying cut batter alone, check the local stability of the batter slope using
conventional techniques.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 27
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

In the case of a slip surface passing through the RSW, the resistance provided by the soil
reinforcement intercepted by the slip surface may be included in the analysis.

Determine the design resistance of the jth layer of soil reinforcement intercepted by a slip surface as the
lesser of:
Φn Nm T*dcj cos(Ψ); and
Φn Φµp 2 Nm Wj Lbj µp tan(φ*1) [σ*vj(avg)] cos(Ψ)

Exclude loading from the sill beam from the calculation of pull out resistance provided by the soil
reinforcement.

For the purpose of this clause, Lbj is defined as the length of the jth layer of soil reinforcement within
the non-yielding zone outside the potential overall slip surface under consideration. An example of
this is shown in Figure R57.10.

Figure R57.10 - Examples of Overall Slip Surfaces

4.7.5 Settlement, Tilting, Rotational and Lateral Movement

Limit post-construction horizontal and vertical movement of the RSW due to settlement, tilting,
rotational and lateral movement to that specified in item (e) of Annexure R57/A.

4.7.6 Eccentricity at RSW Base

e/L must be less than 1/6 for the Serviceability Limit State.

4.8 INTERNAL DESIGN

4.8.1 General

The internal design of the RSW must be carried out by a RSW Designer. The design must take into
account, but not be limited to, the following limit states and failure mechanisms:
(I) Ultimate Limit State
(i) stability of individual soil reinforcement, involving rupture of reinforcement and soil pull
out failure;
(ii) stability of wedges;

28 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

(iii) forward sliding of the wall;

(iv) structural failure of facing connections and pull out failure of facing connections from
facing elements;
(v) structural failure of facing elements;
(vi) durability.

(II) Serviceability Limit State

(i) stability of individual soil reinforcement, involving post-construction creep and soil pull
out failure;
(ii) stability of wedges;
(iii) structural failure of facing connections and pull out failure of facing connections from
facing elements.

Where necessary, carry out additional checks using established soil mechanics principles which have
been proven (theoretically as well as by use of full scale monitoring records) to be applicable for such
situations.

4.8.2 Maximum Tensile Force and Locus of Force

For the purpose of this Clause, Lbj is defined as the length of jth layer of soil reinforcement beyond the
locus of maximum tension as shown in Figure R57.11. Figures R57.11 (a) and (b) define the loci of
maximum tension for inextensible and extensible soil reinforcement respectively for RSW not
supporting sill beams. Figures R57.11 (c) and (d) define the loci of maximum tension for inextensible
and extensible soil reinforcement respectively for RSW supporting sill beams.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 29
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Note: θ and φ*1 are in degrees.

Figure R57.11 (a) & (b) - Loci of Maximum Tension for Soil Reinforcement for RSW Not
Supporting Sill Beams

30 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

Note: θ and φ*1 are in degrees.

Figure R57.11 (c) - Loci of Maximum Tension for Soil Reinforcement for RSW Supporting Sill
Beams (Inextensible Soil Reinforcement)

Ed 2 / Rev 11 31
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Note: θ and φ*1 are in degrees.

Figure R57.11 (d) - Loci of Maximum Tension for Soil Reinforcement for RSW Supporting Sill
Beams (Extensible Soil Reinforcement)

The maximum tensile force per metre width, T*j, to be resisted by the jth layer of soil reinforcement at
a depth of zj must be calculated from the summation of the appropriate forces as follows:

T*j = T*pj + T*sj + T*tj at the locus of maximum tension

32 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

See Figure R57.12 for further details.

Figure R57.12 - Internal Design for RSW

(a) T*pj is the tensile force (per metre width) at the jth layer of soil reinforcement due to the loads
acting on the wall as shown in Figure R57.13, including earthquake loads. Derive T*pj as
follows:
T*pj = K*1(zj) σ*vj (svj + svj+1) 0.5
For design purposes, idealise σ*vj as a Meyerhof distribution as shown diagrammatically in
Figure R57.13, where:
S*vj
σ *vj =
Lj − 2ej

S*vj and ej in the above equation must include the effects of soil self weight, dead and live
surcharges and retained soil which are relevant to the load combinations under consideration.
Exclude effects of soil loading acting onto the sill beam which are already included when
deriving S*vb and S*hb in the calculation of S*vj.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 33
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Notes:
(1)
Check soil reinforcement pull-out failure for all ej values.
(2)
Include additional loading due to earthquake effects on fill material above jth layer of soil
reinforcement the calculation of T*pj.
(3)
Exclude any loading from the sill beam.

Figure R57.13 - Stress Imposed Due to Self Weight W*, Surcharge and Lateral Earth Pressure

For computation purposes, evaluate the effects of loading from the sill beam separately according to
paragraphs (b) and (c) below.

(b) T*sj is the tensile force (per metre width) at the jth layer of soil reinforcement due to loading
from the sill beam as shown in Figure R57.14. T*sj must be derived as follows:
K 1* (z j )S*vb  
(s vj + s vj+1 ) 0.5
6 E'
Tsj* = 1 +
Dj  Dj 
 
where
Dj= (hj + b) if hj ≤ (2a – b)/[1 – 2 tan(θ)]
Dj= (hj + b)/2 + a + hj tan(θ) if hj > (2a – b)/[1 – 2 tan(θ)]

and E′= E + (b + hj – Dj)/2

E is +ve if S*vb is in front of centre line of base of sill beam

E is -ve if S*vb is behind centre line of base of sill beam

34 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

The dispersion of stress from the sill beam must be calculated using a 1 (horizontal) to 2
(vertical) dispersion, but limited by facing elements or other special configurations as
appropriate. This is shown diagrammatically in Figure R57.14.

Figure R57.14 - Tension Due to Resultant Vertical Load S*vb Only

(c) T*tj is the tensile force (per metre width) at the jth layer of soil reinforcement due to horizontal
loads acting on the base of the sill beam as shown in Figure R57.15. Derive T*tj as follows:
T*tj must be the greater of
2 S*hb G (1 – hj G) (svj + svj+1) 0.5; and
6K 1* (z j )S*hb h j
(s vj + s vj+1 ) 0.5
L2j

where
1 − tan(ξ ) tan(θ )
G=
(a + b ) tan(ξ )
2
but in no case must G be taken as less than 1/H1; and
[ ]
cot(ξ ) = sec(φ1* ) sec(φ1* ) + tan(θ )cosec(φ1* ) − tan(φ1* )
The soil shear stress distribution is shown in Figure R57.15.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 35
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Figure R57.15 Dispersal of Horizontal Shear Through Reinforced Fill Due to Horizontal
Load S*hb

4.8.3 Soil Reinforcement Tensile Force at the Facing Connections/Facing Elements

Due to the redistribution of soil reinforcement tensile forces near the facing connections/facing
elements, the soil reinforcement tensile force at the facing connections/facing elements may be smaller
than T*j. The coefficient of reduction of soil reinforcement tensile force at the facing
connections/facing elements must not be less than as specified in Table R57.7.

Calculate the soil reinforcement tensile force at the facing connections/facing elements from the
product of α(zj) and T*j.

Table R57.7 - Coefficient of Reduction of Soil Reinforcement Tensile Force at the Facing
Connections/Facing Elements

Coefficient of reduction of soil reinforcement

Extensible soil reinforcement
tensile force, α(zj)
All facings with movement capacity or with α(zj) = 0.75 + 0.25 (zj/H)
movement capacity at connections
Stiff facing e.g. full height panels & no α(zj) = 1
movement capacity at connections
Coefficient of reduction of soil reinforcement
Inextensible soil reinforcement
tensile force, α(zj)
All facings with movement capacity or with α(zj) = 0.85 for zj/H ≤ 0.6
movement capacity at connections
α(zj) = 0.85 + 0.375 (zj/H – 0.6) for zj/H > 0.6

Stiff face, e.g. full height panels & no movement α(zj) = 1

capacity at connections

36 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

4.8.4 Design of Individual Soil Reinforcement

(a) Rupture and post-construction creep of soil reinforcement

At the locus of maximum tension at the jth layer of soil reinforcement, the following conditions
must be satisfied:
Φn Nm T*drj cos(Ψ) ≥ T*j for Ultimate Limit State
Φn Nm T*dcj cos(Ψ) ≥ T*j for Serviceability Limit State

At the facing connections/facing elements at the jth layer of soil reinforcement, the following
conditions must be satisfied:
Φn Nm T*drj cos(Ψ) ≥ T*j α(zj) for Ultimate Limit State
Φn Nm T*dcj cos(Ψ) ≥ T*j α(zj) for Serviceability Limit State
where T*drj and T*dcj are product specific design tensile strengths of the soil reinforcement. The
RSW Designer must select the values of T*drj and T*dcj in the design based on the nature of RSW
and the variability of all parameters involved in the design. The selected values must not be
greater than the values specified in the Conditions of Use for the System.

Also check the soil reinforcement tensile force at locations between facing elements and the
locus of maximum tension by assuming a linear variation of soil reinforcement tensile force
between the facing connections/facing elements and the locus of maximum tension. The design
tensile force at any point along the length of the soil reinforcement at any layer must be less
than or equal to Φn T*dr and Φn T*dc , as appropriate.

It must be noted that the design temperature for the RSW within 1 metre below finished ground
level or within 1 m behind facing elements is higher than that inside the general reinforced fill
material, as specified in Clause 4.2(e). Depending on the type of reinforcement, the design
strengths T*dr and T*dc may be reduced by the higher temperatures, and values not exceeding
those given in the Conditions of Use for the System must be adopted for checking the relevant
limit states.

(b) Pull out failure of soil reinforcement from zone of reinforced fill material beyond locus of
maximum tension

Check the jth layer of soil reinforcement must be checked at both Ultimate and Serviceability
Limit States such that:
Φn Φµp 2 Nm Wj Lbj µp tan(φ*1) [σ*vj(avg)] cos(Ψ) ≥ T*j
where µp is a product specific coefficient. The RSW Designer must select the value of µp for
design based on the nature of RSW and the variability of parameters involved in the design.
The selected value must not be greater than the value specified in Conditions of Use.

The definition of Lbj for this clause is given in Figure R57.11 (a) and (c) for inextensible soil
reinforcement and Figure R57.11 (b) and (d) for extensible soil reinforcement respectively.
Note: When Lbj is measured perpendicular to the wall face, delete the term cos(Ψ) in the
equation above.

(c) Pull out failure of soil reinforcement from the facing connections/facing elements

The connections must be those specified for the accepted RSW System. Justify the
characteristic values for facing pull out resistance adopted, unless otherwise specified in this
Specification, by tests representative of the connection arrangement on site.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 37
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

For modular block walls, the pull out resistance of soil reinforcement from facing elements (i.e.
the modular units) must be the characteristic value for pull out resistance of soil reinforcement
from facing elements multiplied by Φpo. Evaluate the characteristic value for pull out resistance
in accordance with Section 5.7.1 of the publication “Segmental Retaining Walls” published by
National Concrete Masonry Association, USA, using values of acs, a ′cs, λcs, λ′cs between the soil
reinforcement and the segmental retaining wall units less than or equal to those values specified
in Conditions of Use for the System.

The product of Φn and the facing pull out resistance at any layer of soil reinforcement must be
larger than or equal to the design soil reinforcement tensile force at facings connections/facing
elements for all load combinations.

4.8.5 Stability of Linear Wedges

Consider linear wedge failures to identify the most critical potential linear wedges and analyse a
sufficient number of trial wedges. Each of these trial wedges must be in a force equilibrium condition
under the design loads and the product of the appropriate Φn and the relevant strengths (or resistances
or capacities) of the reinforcement.

It may be assumed that no potential linear wedges will pass through the strip contact area representing
a bridge sill beam.

When the facing consists of a structural element formed in one piece, the shear resistance of the facing
may be included in the analysis.

For the jth layer of soil reinforcement intercepted by a potential linear wedge under consideration, take
the design pull out resistance from the soil, for the limit state under consideration, as follows:

Ultimate Limit State

The lesser of:
Φn Nm T*drj cos(Ψ); and
Φn Φµp 2 Nm Wj Lbj µp tan(φ*1) [σ*vj(avg)] cos(Ψ)

Serviceability Limit State

The lesser of:
Φn Nm T*dcj cos(Ψ); and
Φn Φµp 2 Nm Wj Lbj µp tan(φ*1) [σ*vj(avg)] cos(Ψ)

For the purpose of this clause, Lbj is defined as the length of the jth layer of soil reinforcement within
the non-yielding zone outside the potential failure linear wedge under consideration. An example of
this is shown in Figure R57.16.

38 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

Figure R57.16 - Examples of Linear Wedges

4.8.6 Stability of Two-Part Wedges and Internal Slip Surfaces for Trapezoidal
Sections

For trapezoidal sections, carry out the following limit equilibrium analyses:
(a) two-part wedge analyses;
(b) internal slip surface analyses (both circular and non-circular).

Consider a sufficient number of two-part wedge failures (or potential internal slip surface failures,
both circular and non-circular) to identify the most critical potential two-part wedge (or internal slip
surface). Each of these two-part wedges (or internal slip surfaces) must be in a force equilibrium
condition under the design loads and the design strengths (or resistances or capacities).

It may be assumed that no potential two-part wedge and internal slip surface will pass through the strip
contact area representing a sill beam.

When the facing consists of a structural element formed in one piece, the shear resistance of the facing
may be included in the analysis.

The design resistance of the jth layer of soil reinforcement intercepted by the failure planes must be
evaluated in accordance with Clause 4.8.5, where Lbj is defined as the length of jth layer of soil
reinforcement within the non-yielding zone outside the two part wedge/internal slip surface under
consideration.

Examples of potential failure planes are shown in Figure R57.17.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 39
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Figure R57.17 - Examples of Two-Part Wedges and Internal Slip Surfaces for Trapezoidal
Sections

4.8.7 Forward Sliding of Any Portion of a Wall on Any Horizontal Plane

Consider the stability against this mode of failure at the following interfaces where applicable:
(a) fill on fill within any layer;
(b) soil reinforcement and fill on any layer of fill.

Refer to Clause 4.7.2 of this Specification for design requirements.

4.8.8 Structural Failure of Facing Connections and Pull Out Failure of Facing
Connections from Facing Elements

For design purposes, the design soil reinforcement tensile force at facing connections must be taken as
those specified in Clause 4.8.3.

Justify the characteristic value for the structural connection resistance, C, adopted by representative
tests on the RSW System. The structural connection resistance must be the characteristic value for
structural connection resistance multiplied by Φc; i.e.

C* = φc C

The product of Φn and the structural connection resistance at any layer of soil reinforcement must be
larger than or equal to the design soil reinforcement tensile force at facing connections/facing elements
for all load combinations and limit states; i.e.

Φn C*j ≥ Tj* α(zj)

4.8.9 Structural Failure of Facing Elements

Design facing Elements to accommodate the design loads resulting from:

(a) horizontal soil pressures and the corresponding soil reinforcement tension load developed in
facing connections as specified in Clause 4.8.3 of this Specification;
(b) forces arising from higher facing units and capping;
(c) any externally applied loads (temporary or permanent).

40 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

Design facings under a system of equilibrium forces.

For precast concrete panel facings, structural design of the facings must be in accordance with
AS 5100.5.

For modular block walls, evaluate the stability of an individual unit in accordance with Section 5.7 of
the publication “Segmental Retaining Walls” published by National Concrete Masonry Association,
USA, using values of au, a′u, λu, λ′u between the segmental retaining wall units less than or equal to
those values specified in Conditions of Use for the System.

4.8.10 Differential Movement Capacity of the Facing Connections/Facing Elements

Limit the calculated movement of the facing connections/facing elements due to internal settlement
(refer to Clause 4.7.4) to that specified in Table R57.8 and that due to differential settlement to 1 in
100.

Table R57.8 - Vertical Movement Capacities Required for the Facing Connections/Facing
Elements to Cope with Internal Settlement of RSW

Structural form Minimum vertical movement capacity of system required

Discrete panels Joint closure of 1 in 150 relative to panel height
Full height panels Vertical movement capacity of connections 1 in 150 relative to
panel height
Semi-elliptical facings Vertical distortion of 1 in 150 relative to panel height
Geotextile wrap-around No specific limit except for appearance or serviceability
facings considerations

4.8.11 Design for Soil Reinforcement Joints

(a) Geosynthetic reinforcement

All soil reinforcement joints for geosynthetic reinforcement designed to carry loads must have a
design joint strength at the design temperature and design life at least equal to the design tensile
strength of the geosynthetic reinforcement.
Determine the design tensile strength of geosynthetic reinforcement joints in accordance with
BS 6906 Part 1:1987 or ISO 10321:1992, or equivalent.
Do not employ overlapping in the primary tensile direction in the RSW for load transfer.

(b) Metallic soil reinforcement

Lapping of soil reinforcement is not permitted.

4.9 DESIGN OUTPUT AND CERTIFICATION

Submit the design output and certification in accordance with Clause 3. Submission of this design
documentation constitute a Hold Point.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 41
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

HOLD POINT
Process Held: Completion of Design of RSW.

Submission Details: Design documentation, as specified in Clause 3 “Design Control” and Clause
4.9 “Design Output and Certification”.

Release of Hold Point: The Principal will consider the submitted documents and may inspect
supporting documents prior to release of the Hold Point.

The design output submitted must include:

(a) a design report stating the RSW System to be used, including the type of soil reinforcement,
details of drainage layers, facing connections, facing elements and capping to be used.
The design report must state the design assumptions including parameters for the soil
reinforcement, reinforced fill material, general backfill materials and foundation material used
in the design.
Include the following detailed information in the design report:
(i) specification of the physical, chemical and electrical properties of reinforced fill material
including a design grading envelope and where necessary appropriate pretreatment
requirements to ensure that the characteristic values of material parameters used in the
design can be achieved in the reinforced fill material after placement in the Works;
(ii) relevant characteristic values adopted in the design for:
(A) reinforced fill material parameters, e.g. φ1, and γ1;
(B) material parameters of soil above and behind zone of reinforced fill material,
e.g. φ3, φ2 and γ3, γ2;
(C) foundation soil material parameters, e.g. φb, cb, cub, and γb;
(D) the soil reinforcement interaction coefficients, e.g. µp, µs1 and µsb;
(E) pull out resistance of soil reinforcement from the facing connections/facing
elements;
(F) connection strengths;
(iii) design tensile strength T*dr and T*dc for soil reinforcement;
(b) RSW Drawings showing the proposed geometry of the RSW, drainage provisions, arrangement
of soil reinforcement, extent of the foundation, and arrangement and finish of facing elements
and capping;
(c) where necessary, details of the method, appropriate to the site conditions and verified by a
Geotechnical Engineer, of preparing and improving the foundation to fully meet the design
values of foundation soil material parameters;
(d) the sequence of construction of the RSW including the sequence of placing and compacting the
reinforced fill material;
(e) the requirements for monitoring of the RSW incorporating requirements of the Principal
specified in item (g) of Annexure R57/A;
(f) any other requirements specified by the RSW Designer and the Geotechnical Engineer; and
(g) certification in accordance with Clause 3 and any other requirements specified by the RSW
System Owner.

42 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

5 MATERIALS

5.1 GENERAL
The RSW System Owner must certify that all components supplied by the System Owner for
construction of a RSW meet the requirements of the RSW System specifications.

Design all components and materials to meet the specified design life and the required durability under
site specific conditions.

Metallic components, i.e. soil reinforcement, facing connections, facing lugs and facing elements, in
contact with each other must be of electrolytically compatible materials. Alternatively, provide
electrical insulation with durability not less than the design life of the RSW between different
materials.

5.2 SOIL REINFORCEMENT

Soil reinforcement must comprise one of the following:

(a) Carbon steel to AS 3678, AS 3679 or AS 4671 (steel of ductility class L must not be used),
unless otherwise stated in the Conditions of Use of the System, and hot-dip galvanized in
accordance with AS/NZS 4680, except that the average galvanized coating thickness must not
be less than 85 μm.
In the design of the steel soil reinforcement, allow for a loss of section due to corrosion not less
than the minimum sacrificial steel thickness shown in Table R57.9, unless otherwise stated in
the Conditions of Use of the System.

Table R57.9 - Sacrificial Steel Thickness for Hot-dip Galvanized Steel Soil Reinforcement and
Facing Connections

Minimum sacrificial steel thickness for each surface

exposed to corrosion (mm) (1, 2, 3)
Structural Location
Design Life (years)
5 10 20 30 50 100
Above water table / flood level of an
0 0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.85
average recurrence interval of 1 year
Below water table / flood level of an
0 0.05 0.3 0.35 0.65 1.0
average recurrence interval of 1 year
In environment which is more
Determine by investigation
aggressive than above

Notes:
(1)
Soil reinforcement assumed to be fully embedded within reinforced fill material conforming to the
requirements of TfNSW R57.
(2)
Linear interpolation may be used for intermediate values.
(3)
These values may not be applicable in the presence of stray electrical currents from adjacent power sources.
In such cases, determine the values by investigation.

(b) Polymeric material, demonstrated by testing as sufficiently strong, stable and durable to satisfy
the performance and design requirements of this Specification. Tests must establish the

Ed 2 / Rev 11 43
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

performance and durability of the geosynthetic reinforcement under the following job specific
environmental conditions:
(i) loading;
(ii) exposure to water;
(iii) site damage;
(iv) UV exposure;
(v) temperature;
(vi) chemical/bacterial composition of reinforced fill material;
(vii) aggressive fluids.

Consider any interaction of the above conditions in the design.

Characteristic values of material parameters for geosynthetic reinforcement used for design
must allow for:
(A) Any creep deformation and creep rupture over the design life of the RSW at the design
temperatures.
(B) Loss of strength due to environmental degradation (e.g. biological, hydrolysis and
chemical attack).
(C) Variations in manufacturing process.
(D) Extrapolation uncertainties where test duration is less than the design life.
(E) Installation damage (including weathering during storage and/or mechanical damage
during installation).
(F) Any other requirements specified for the RSW System.

5.3 REINFORCED FILL

For the characteristic value of the angle of friction at constant volume of the reinforced fill material
under effective stress conditions adopted for your design, φ1, obtain it by an assessment of the material
at potential sources of supply and taking into account the requirements for verification and conformity
testing in accordance with Clauses 2.10 and 4.8 of TfNSW R58/R59.

Determine the value of the angle of friction at constant volume in accordance with Q181C:Draft 1994
or Q181C:2008, pretreated in accordance with TfNSW Test Method T102 using 3 repeated
compaction cycles.

Take the effective cohesion as zero.

In addition to any requirements particular to the RSW System, the reinforced fill material must comply
with the following requirements:

(a) The reinforced fill material must be composed of inert, hard, durable granular material, without
properties that would cause deterioration of the RSW components.
It must be either soil, decomposed rock or crushed rock fill material, free from organic or other
deleterious material such as plastic, metal, rubber or other synthetic material, inorganic
contaminants, dangerous or toxic material, or material susceptible to combustion.
Material derived from argillaceous rock such as shales and claystones or other materials which
are susceptible to breakdown to a friable material must not be used as reinforced fill material.

44 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

(b) The reinforced fill material must meet the minimum physical properties shown in Table R57.10.

Table R57.10 – Physical Properties of Reinforced Fill Material

Property Test Method (1) Requirement

Soil reinforcement material:
Maximum particle dimension – - steel: 150 mm (2)
- geosynthetic: 75 mm (2)
Percentage passing AS sieve (3) AS 1289.3.6.1
37.5 mm ≥ 60
9.5 mm 25 – 100
(4)
2.36 mm 15 – 100
600 μm 10 – 100
75 μm 0 – 15
Coefficient of Uniformity (5) N/A ≥5
Liquid Limit LL (%) (3) TfNSW T108 ≤ 30
Plasticity Index PI (3) TfNSW T109 ≤ 12
Notes:
(1)
Taking and preparing samples must be in accordance with AS 1289.1.2.1 and AS 1289.1.1
respectively.
(2)
Dimension quoted refers to maximum particle dimension of the reinforced fill material, not the soil
reinforcement (made from steel or geosynthetic). This maximum particle dimension must not, in any
case, be greater than one third of lift thickness.
(3)
Prior to testing, pretreat the material in accordance with Test Method TfNSW T102 using 3 repeated
compaction cycles; and then in accordance with TfNSW T103 by artificial weathering using 5 cycles
of alternate wetting and drying.
(4)
Washing Method.
(5)
Coefficient of Uniformity = D60/D10, where D60 and D10 are the equivalent sieve sizes in mm, as
interpolated from particle size distribution curve and through which 60% and 10% of reinforced fill
material passes respectively.

(c) The reinforced fill material must meet the chemical and electrical requirements stated in
TfNSW R58/R59.

5.4 DRAINAGE LAYER

Unless specified otherwise, materials for the drainage layer must comprise granular material and a
suitable geotextile.

The granular material and geotextile must satisfy the requirements specified in Clause 2 of TfNSW
R58/R59.

Alternatively, for RSW with H1 less than 4 m, a prefabricated cellular material wrapped with a
synthetic filter fabric with equivalent design drainage and strength properties may be used.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 45
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

5.5 SOIL ABOVE AND BEHIND REINFORCED SOIL BLOCK

For the characteristic values of the angle of friction at constant volume under effective stress
conditions of the soil above, and the soil behind, the reinforced soil block, φ3 and φ2 respectively,
adopted for your design, obtain them by an assessment of the material at potential sources of supply
and taking into account the requirements for verification and conformity testing in accordance with
Clauses 2.10 and 4.8 of TfNSW R58/R59.

Determine the value of the angle of friction at constant volume in accordance with Q181C:Draft 1994
or Q181C:2008, pretreated in accordance with Test Method TfNSW T102 using 3 repeated
compaction cycles.

Take the effective cohesion as zero.

In your design, assume that the soil above and behind the reinforced soil block, within a distance of
H/2 from the reinforced soil block, have the properties shown in Table R57.11.

Table R57.11 – Physical Properties of Soil Above and Behind Reinforced Soil Block

Soil Property Test Method Assumed Limits

Plasticity Index TfNSW T109 ≤ 12
Liquid Limit TfNSW T108 ≤ 30%

5.6 FACING ELEMENTS

Facing elements may be classified as either hard or soft. Hard facing elements may consist of concrete
panels (either discrete or full height), steel sheet, steel grids or meshes, timber or a proprietary
polymeric material. Soft facing elements are formed by wrapping each layer of soil reinforcement
around individual lifts of reinforced fill material or pillows of fill material as specified in the RSW
System.

The selection of facing element type depends on the required durability for the site conditions and the
specified design life. Unless otherwise specified in the job specific requirements detailed in item (j) of
Annexure R57/A, facing elements acceptable for the Works are shown in Table R57.12.

46 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

Table R57.12 – Acceptable Facing Type and Materials

Acceptable Facing
Design Life and Location
Type and Materials
Design life ≤ 100 years, or Concrete block or masonry units
areas in tidal and/or splash zones Concrete panels
Design life < 50 years
Coastal (≤ 50 km from Concrete block or masonry units
coastline but excluding tidal Concrete panels
and/or splash zones)
Treated timber - “Cypress Pine” only
Inland (> 50 km from Concrete block or masonry units
coastline) Concrete panel
Treated timber - “Cypress Pine” only
Steel grids or meshes
Design life < 5 years Steel sheet and geofabric facing elements

Facing elements must also meet the requirements of the RSW System selected and the following
requirements:
(a) Concrete facing elements: Requirements of Specifications TfNSW B80 and B115, and
AS 5100.5. The amount of distribution reinforcement must be a minimum of 250 mm2 of steel
per metre for concrete facing elements with any dimensions (excluding diagonal dimensions)
greater than 2300 mm.
(b) Concrete masonry facing elements: Requirements of AS 2733 and AS 3700. Testing of
specimens cut from facing elements for compressive strength is permissible.
(c) Timber facing elements: Requirements of Specification TfNSW 2380 and AS 1720.1.
(d) Facing elements made of polymeric materials: Requirements of Clause 5.2 (b).
(e) Steel facing elements: Provide corrosion protection adequate for the insitu conditions and the
specified design life. Take into account any loss of section due to corrosion in the design.
(f) Hot-dip galvanized steel facing elements: Requirements of the relevant Australian and
AS/NZS Standards. Unless stated otherwise in the Conditions of Use of the System, average
galvanized coating thickness must not be less than 85 μm. The minimum sacrificial steel
thickness must be as specified in Table R57.13.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 47
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

Table R57.13 - Sacrificial Steel Thickness for Hot-dip Galvanized Steel Facing Elements and
Other Steel Components

Minimum sacrificial steel thickness for each surface

exposed to corrosion (mm) (1, 2, 3)
Structural Location
Design Life (years)
5 10 20 30 50 100
Above water table / flood level of an
0 0.05 0.3 0.35 0.65 1.0
average recurrence interval of 1 year
Below water table / flood level of an
0.05 0.15 0.40 0.50 0.75 1.2
average recurrence interval of 1 year
In environment more aggressive than
Determine by investigation
above

Notes:
(1)
Soil reinforcement assumed to be fully embedded within reinforced fill material conforming to the
requirements of TfNSW R57.
(2)
Linear interpolation may be used for intermediate values.
(3)
These values may not be applicable in the presence of stray electrical currents from adjacent power sources.
In such cases, determine the values by investigation.

5.7 FACING CONNECTIONS AND OTHER COMPONENTS

Provide facing connections and other components with corrosion protection adequate for the insitu
conditions and the specified design life.

Unless stated otherwise in the Conditions of Use of the System, all steel facing connections must meet
the requirements of Clause 5.2 (a). Other steel components must meet Table R57.13 for sacrificial
thickness.

Allow in the design for a loss of section not less than 0.5 of the sacrificial steel thickness shown in
Table R57.9 from each internal surface (in metal to metal contact or wholly enclosed within the
connection) of all steel component parts.

The RSW Designer may specify a plastic coating as additional corrosion protection to galvanized
steel. The plastic coating must be resistant to chipping, crushing and handling damage, and must be
free of defects.

For connections made of polymeric materials, the requirements of Clause 5.2 (b) must be met.

5.8 CONCRETE
Concrete for RSW elements must meet the design requirements for the RSW, including all the
requirements of AS 5100.5, this Specification and those of the Principal’s Drawings and
Specifications.

Concrete strength grades must not be less than:

(a) 25 MPa for footings and modular concrete blocks;
(b) 40 MPa for capping;

48 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

(c) 40 MPa for facing elements excluding modular blocks.

Ed 2 / Rev 11 49
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

ANNEXURE R57/A – PROJECT SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR

DESIGN OF RSW
Project: ........................................................................

(a) Design Life .......... years

(b) Classification of RSW:

• MINOR (consequences of failure are small)
• MAJOR⊗ (consequences of failure are large)
⊗
RSW supporting sill beams and RSW likely to affect structures with Importance Levels of 2, 3, 4
or 5 as per Appendix F of AS 1170.0 must be classified as MAJOR.

(c) Minimum clearance requirements after all long term movements of the RSW have occurred:
Under Bridge Elsewhere
Horizontal .................. ..................
Vertical .................. ..................

(d) RSW design must accommodate the following design earthquake forces F*e with respect to
centre line of bearings, transferred to the RSW from the bridge superstructure under the
ULS: (Note: F*e = 1.2 nominal earthquake force)
Horizontal Force ..................
Vertical Force ..................

Nominal ground movements/nominal loads due to mining subsidence effects:

Movements Nominal loads, Fm
Horizontal (longitudinally) .................. ..................
Horizontal (transversely) .................. ..................
Vertical ..................
For Ultimate Limit States, F*m = 1.5 Fm
For Serviceability Limit State, F*m = 1.0 Fm

Nominal ground movements/nominal loads due to differential settlement# effects:

Movements Nominal loads, Fs
Horizontal (longitudinally) .................. ..................
Horizontal (transversely) .................. ..................
Vertical ..................
#
Differential settlement effects must be calculated assuming dead load effects only acting.
For Ultimate Limit States, F*s = 1.5 Fs
For Serviceability Limit State, F*s = 1.0 Fs

(e) Permissible post-construction service deflections of the RSW:

Horizontal (any point on the face of the RSW) ..................
Vertical (any point on the top of facing elements) ..................

50 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

(f) Permissible movement of bridge piles under the RSW

In any direction ..................

The following assumptions have been made during the pile design regarding pile/RSW
interaction:
...................................................................................................................................

Example
(i) The reinforced fill is assumed to exert loads on the piles.
(ii) Piles are assumed to be supported laterally by the reinforced fill material.
(iii) Piles are assumed to sustain movements identical to the reinforced fill at the pile.
Delete this note before issue of Tender Documents.

The pile design allows for lateral and vertical loads imposed by movements of the RSW given
in (e) above and by the pile movements given herein.

(g) Monitoring requirements

Monitoring details are as specified in the Principal’s Drawings and Specification

(h) Heavy Load Platform HLP320 / HLP400

(i) Design dead and live loads applied to RSW:

(i) Loading from the bridge superstructure - As shown in the attached APPENDIX
(ii) Where the nominal vertical live load is greater than 20 kPa, the following load must be
used
= ....................

(j) Type of facing elements/capping accepted for the Works

Fire resistance requirement for facing elements
.....................

(k) Finish of facing elements and capping

(l) Details of drainage pipes or other minor structures on top of, behind or within the RSW

(m) Design dead and live loads applied to the RSW from the bridge superstructure
(Note: The format of this information is for the guidance of the Engineer responsible for the bridge’s
design only, and may be changed as required for specific projects.)

Ed 2 / Rev 11 51
 (TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

(I) Loads from Abutment A with respect to centre line of bearings

Serviceability Limit State Ultimate Limit States

Vertical load F*v Horizontal load F*h Horizontal load F*h
Loads Vertical load F*v (kN)
(kN) (kN) (kN)
Longitudinal Transverse Longitudinal Transverse
max F*v min F*v F*h F*h max F*v min F*v F*h F*h
Dead
loads
Live
loads
Total

(II) Loads from Abutment B with respect to centre line of bearings

Serviceability Limit State Ultimate Limit States

Vertical load F*v Horizontal load F*h Vertical load F*v Horizontal load F*h
Loads (kN) (kN) (kN) (kN)
Longitudinal Transverse Longitudinal Transverse
max F*v min F*v F*h F*h max F*v min F*v F*h F*h
Dead
loads
Live
loads
Total
Notes: Forces are referred to along the reference axes.
Loadings from each bearing are to be shown.

52 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

ANNEXURE R57/B – MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT

Payment will be made for all activities associated with completing the work detailed in this
Specification in accordance with the following Pay Item.

Where no specific pay items are provided for a particular item of work, the costs associated with that
item of work are deemed to be included in the rates and prices generally for the Work Under the
Contract.

Pay Item R57P1 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

This is a Lump Sum item.

This item covers all costs associated with the design of reinforced soil walls, including any site
investigation and testing required, external and internal design and preparation of design output and
certification.

Progress Payments will be made on the basis of the evidence of the percentage completion of site
investigation, design and certification.

ANNEXURE R57/C – SCHEDULES OF HOLD POINTS AND IDENTIFIED

RECORDS
Refer to Clause 1.2.3.

C1 SCHEDULE OF HOLD POINTS

Clause Description
4.9 Submission of design documentation

C2 SCHEDULE OF IDENTIFIED RECORDS

The records listed below are Identified Records for the purposes of TfNSW Q Annexure Q/E.

Clause Description of Identified Record

3 Certificates from Geotechnical Engineer and RSW designer, including specified design
output

ANNEXURES R57/D TO R57/L– (NOT USED)

Ed 2 / Rev 11 53
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
R57 Design of Reinforced Soil Walls

ANNEXURE R57/M – REFERENCED DOCUMENTS

Refer to Clause 1.2.4.

TfNSW Specifications

TfNSW Q Quality Management System

TfNSW B80 Concrete Work for Bridges
TfNSW B115 Precast Concrete Members (Not Pretensioned)
TfNSW R58/R59 Construction of Reinforced Soil Walls
TfNSW 2380 Timber for Bridges

TfNSW Test Methods

TfNSW T102 Pretreatment of Samples of Road Construction Materials by Compaction

TfNSW T103 Pretreatment of Road Construction Materials by Artificial Weathering
TfNSW T108 Liquid Limit of Road Materials
TfNSW T109 Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Road Construction Materials

Australian Standards

AS 1170 Structural design actions

AS 1170.0 General principles
AS 1170.2 Wind actions
AS 1170.4 Earthquake actions in Australia
AS 1289 Methods of Testing soils for engineering purposes
AS 1720.1 Timber structures – Design methods
AS 1726 Geotechnical site investigation
AS 2733 Concrete masonry units
AS 3678 Structural steel – Hot-rolled plates, floorplates and slabs
AS 3679 Structural steel – Hot-rolled bars and sections
AS 3700 Masonry structures
AS/NZS 4680 Hot-dip galvanized (zinc) coatings on fabricated ferrous articles
AS 4671 Steel reinforcing materials
AS 4969 Analysis of acid sulfate soil
AS 4969.1 Dried samples – Methods of test – Pre-treatment of samples
AS 4969.12 Dried samples – Methods of test – Complete suspension peroxide oxidation
combined acidity and sulfur (SPOCAS) method
AS 5100 Bridge design
AS/NZS ISO 9001 Quality management systems – Requirements

54 Ed 2 / Rev 11
(TfNSW COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS DOCUMENT - Refer to the Foreword after the Table of Contents)
Design of Reinforced Soil Walls R57

Queensland Department of Transport Test Method

Q181C:Draft 1994 Determination of the Effective Angle of Friction at Constant Volume

Conditions for Earthworks Materials
Q181C:2008 Effective Angle of Internal Friction at Constant Volume Conditions for
Granular (Coarse Grained) Materials

International Organisation for Standardisation Standards

ISO 10321:1992 Geotextile Tensile Test for Joints/Seams by Wide-Width Method

British Standards

BS 1377 Method of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes

BS 6906 Part 1:1987 Methods of Test for Geotextiles – Determination of the Tensile Properties
Using a Wide Width Strip

National Concrete Masonry Association, USA

Segmental Retaining Walls

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China

Geoguide 1 Guide to Retaining Wall Design

Ed 2 / Rev 11 55