BUS 5110-01 Managerial Accounting
Dr. Rebecca Attah (Instructor)
Date: February 23, 2022
Case Study:
A vacuum manufacturer has prepared the following cost data for manufacturing one of its engine
components based on the annual production of 50,000 units.
Description Cost per Month
Direct Materials $75,000
Direct Labor $100,000
Total $175,000
In addition, variable factory overhead is applied at $7.50 per unit. Fixed factory overhead is
applied at 150% of direct labor cost per unit. The vacuums sells for $150 each. A third party has
offered to make the engines for $60 per unit. 75% of fixed factory overhead, which represents
executive salaries, rent, depreciation, and taxes, continue regardless of the decision. Should the
company make or buy the engines?
Description Cost per Month
Sales $150 ($150 x 50,000 = $7500,000)
Variable Factory Overhead $7.50 ($7.50 x 50,000 = $375,000)
Direct Materials $75,000
Direct Labor $100,000
Fixed Factory Overhead $66,700 = ($100,000 /150 x100)
Vacuum Manufacturer Cost Data
(Alternative 1)
Sales $7,500,000
Variable Cost $550,000
Contribution Margin $6,950,000
Fixed Costs $66,700
Total $6,883,300
Description Cost per Month
Sales $60 ($60 x 50,000 = $3,000,000)
Fixed Factory Overhead $133,300 = ($100,000 /75 x100)
Third Party Cost Data Analysis
(Alternative 2)
Sales $3,000,000
Variable Cost $0
Contribution Margin $3,000,000
Fixed Costs $133,300
Total $2,866,700
Differential Analysis Alternative 1 is
Sales $4,500,000 Higher
Variable Cost $550,000 Higher
Contribution Margin $3,950,000 Higher
Fixed Costs ($66,600) Lower
Total $4,016,600 Higher
From the Differential Analysis Alternative 1 (Vacuum Manufacturer Cost Data) is higher than
Alternative 2. Therefore, the company should buy the engines from the Third Party, Alternative
2.