Telah Foundation Complaint
Telah Foundation Complaint
v.
Defendants.
Plaintiff, The Evolutionary Level Above Human, Inc. d/b/a The Telah Foundation (the
“Foundation”) hereby brings the present action against the named defendants and alleges as
follows:
the provisions of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq.) and the Copyright Act (17
2. This Court also has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, since there is
citizen of the state of Arizona, and the matter in controversy is over $75,000.
3. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)–(c), and this Court may
properly exercise personal jurisdiction over Defendants since each of the Defendants is
{06046176 / 2} 1
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 2 of 19
PARTIES
4. Plaintiff, The Evolutionary Level Above Human, or Telah Foundation, Inc. (the
5. Upon information and belief, Defendants Steven Robert Havel (a/k/a Sawyer, Swyody, and
Swy) and Cathy Joann Weaver are currently believed to be residing at 111 Campbell St.
Mishawaka, IN 46544.
6. Upon information and belief, Defendant Jason Bartel (a/k/a Crlody, Carlan, and Crl) is
7. Steven Havel, Cathy Weaver, and Jason Bartel are collectively referred to herein as the
Defendants.
INTRODUCTION
8. In 1994 the directors of the Foundation renewed a long-standing relationship with a group
Three years later, in 1997, all the physical property and intellectual property belonging to the
9. Prior to being able to obtain all of the property in the storage locker, the locker was seized by
10. From 1997–1999 the Foundation was involved in litigation with San Diego County (who
represented both the County and the estates of members in the Group) over ownership of the
Property. That litigation ended with the entry of a consent decree in 1999, which conveyed
to the Foundation not only a large amount of physical property, but also all of the intellectual
11. A second lawsuit, filed in 1998 also ended in a 1999 consent decree which likewise
confirmed the Foundation’s ownership of, inter alia, the intellectual property of the Group.
12. The Foundation has been the owner of the Property from 1997 to the present.
{06046176 / 2} 2
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 3 of 19
13. Included in the Property transferred to the Foundation is a number of audio cassettes,
14. In particular, the Property transferred included the intellectual property rights to hundreds of
audio cassettes and video tapes which the County of San Diego and the estates represented
15. The hundreds of audio cassettes (hereafter the “Audio Works”) were registered (by the
Foundation) with the United States Copyright Office on October 27, 1997 as Reg. No.
SRu00298530.
16. A true and correct copy of the Audio Works registration is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
17. The video tapes (hereafter the “Video Works”) were registered (by the Foundation) with the
United States Copyright Office on September 22, 1997 as Reg. Nos. PA0000867224.
18. A true and correct copy of the Video Works registrations are attached hereto as Exhibit B.
19. The Foundation is also the owner of trademarks related to the Group.
20. The Trademarks (hereafter the “Trademarks”) were registered (by the Foundation) with the
United States Trademark Office on July 27, 2010, July 13, 2010, and February 28, 2017 as
21. A true and correct copy of the Trademarks registrations are attached hereto as Exhibit C–E.
22. The lithographic prints include artwork (hereafter the “Visual Work”) which was registered
23. A true and correct copy of the Art Work is attached hereto as Exhibit F.
24. The literary works include a book owned by the Foundation and registered as TXu
000817732 entitled “How and when ‘Heaven’s gate’ (the door to the physical kingdom level
above human) may be entered : an anthology of our materials” (the “Literary Work”).
25. A true and correct copy of the registration for the Literary Work is attached hereto as Exhibit
G.
{06046176 / 2} 3
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 4 of 19
disseminated copies of the audio tapes and other intellectual property belonging to the
Foundation.
27. On or about May 1, 2021 the Foundation first learned that Defendant, Jason Bartel had put
the Foundation’s registered copyrighted Audio Works and Video Works on a free online file
28. Over the summer of 2021, the Foundation sent Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)
takedown notices to 4Shared to get those illegally posted Audio and Video Works taken off
the site.
29. On or about June 20, 2021 Defendant Bartel announced that more stolen audio tapes were on
being sent to him by Co-Defendant Havel and that Defendant Bartel would post those
30. On or about June 30, after receiving additional tapes from Co-Defendant Havel, Defendant
Bartel put up the entirety of the Audio Works on his Wordpress blog for free download.
31. On or about July 9, 2021, Defendant Bartel announced on Wordpress that 15 gigabytes of the
Audio Works and Video Works had been uploaded to either Google Drive or to the 4Shared
32. The uploading of this material to 4Shared or Google Drive, and the subsequent availability
for download, was done without the permission or authorization of the Foundation.
33. On or about July 9, 2021, Defendant Bartel thanked Co-Defendant Havel for assisting him in
obtaining the Audio Works and helping him make the Audio Works available for download.
34. Upon information and belief, Defendants Havel and Weaver knowingly intend to infringe the
Foundation’s copyrights in the Audio Works and to take active steps to continue infringing,
35. For example, on or about July 12, 2021, Defendant Havel posted to his website a log of the
{06046176 / 2} 4
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 5 of 19
So just weeks ago, [a third party] who I had been in contact with on and off for
years sent me the digitized audios, all in .mp3 format and I quickly sent them to
[Defendant Bartel] and someone else who I know I can trust to be sure to upload
them to the internet in mulitple [sic] places so that even if [the Foundation]
somehow sue us it will be far too late to keep them from being available to those
who want to listen to them.
36. A true and correct copy of this post is attached hereto as Exhibit H.
37. Through use of the DMCA, the Foundation was able to, over a month later, get the materials
taken down and on or about August 29, 2021, Defendant Bartel announced on Wordpress
that the 4Shared archive of the Audio Works and Video Works had been taken down due to
38. On information and belief, in September 2021 Defendant Cathy Weaver met up with
infringement and to make the Audio and Video Works available for free download on the
internet.
39. On information and belief, in October and November, 2021, at various locations, Defendants
Havel and Weaver live streamed discussions on the internet providing instructions to others
regarding how individuals could obtain copies of the Audio and Video Works owned by the
Foundation.
40. Defendants Havel and Weaver have also repeatedly engaged in public performances of the
Audio Works, streaming them directly over their YouTube channel, and advertising this
{06046176 / 2} 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 6 of 19
41. Upon information and belief, Defendants Havel and Weaver sent copies of the Audio and
Video Works to a third-party during the summer and fall of 2021 to make sure they were
transferred into another country, in order to prevent the Foundation from enforcing its
{06046176 / 2} 6
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 7 of 19
Copyrights.
42. Upon information and belief, Defendants Havel and Weaver’s decision to provide Co-
Defendant Bartel with copies of the Audio and Video Works was also, in part, done to
43. Indeed, Defendants Havel and Weaver repeatedly stated in YouTube videos that they
continue to want to disseminate the copyrighted material and that the Foundation is “not
44. At the same time Defendant Havel expressly concedes that the Foundation owns the Property
45. Upon information and belief, Co-Defendants Steven Havel, Cathy Weaver, and Jason Bartel
are all working in a conspiracy to disseminate the Audio Works and/or Video Works in a
manner that violates the Foundation’s United States copyrights and in a manner designed to
46. Upon information and belief, at the time of filing, each of the Co-Defendants are still
engaged in the conspiracy to commit further infringement of the Foundation’s copyrights and
will continue to illegally copy and disseminate the property of the Foundation in violation of
47. Further, upon information and belief Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver have
prepared and are preparing a number of derivative works of copyrights owned by the
48. Upon information and belief, Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver have created
49. Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver are also engaging in public performances of
the Literary Work and recording them and disseminating the public performances through
{06046176 / 2} 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 8 of 19
50. Over the past few months this behavior has escalated exponentially, with Co-Defendants
Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver posting now fewer than thirteen recordings containing the
Foundation’s copyrighted Audio Works and other material.
51. This includes the following YouTube videos and Audio Works:
52. In addition, Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver have advertised and plan to sell
or have sold t-shirts containing the Foundation’s Trademarks including the trademarked
53. The sales of material containing the Foundation’s Trademarks is likely to cause confusion
{06046176 / 2} 8
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 9 of 19
54. Upon information and belief, Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver have created
or are creating plush dolls based on images owned by the including “The C.B.E. (Celestial
Being Entity)” and routinely use this image in on their YouTube channel and on t-shirts
55. The creation of such derivative works and use in videos and on t-shirts constitutes copyright
COUNT I
INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION NO. SRU00298530
56. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the
57. Defendants’ conduct infringes upon the Foundation’s exclusive rights of reproduction and
58. The Audio Works, recorded at the U.S. Copyright Office as Copyright Registration No.
SRu00298530 are owned by the Foundation and have been owned by the Foundation
59. Each Defendant knew or had constructive knowledge that the reproduction and distribution
of the Audio Works without the consent of the Foundation constituted copyright
infringement.
60. Defendants’ conduct was willful within the meaning of the Copyright Act, namely, it was
61. The Foundation has been damaged by Defendants’ conduct, including, but not limited to,
economic and reputation losses. The Foundation continues to be damaged by such conduct
and has no adequate remedy at law to compensate the Foundation for all of the possible
62. The Foundation hereby reserves the right, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), to elect to recover
statutory damages for each infringement, in lieu of seeking recovery of actual damages.
{06046176 / 2} 9
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 10 of 19
63. As Defendants’ infringement was intentional and willful and as Defendants’ conduct make
this case exceptional, the Foundation is entitled to an award of statutory damages, exemplary
64. The conduct of each Defendant is causing and, unless enjoined and restrained by this Court,
will continue to cause the Foundation great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be
Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 503, the Foundation is entitled to injunctive relief
prohibiting each Defendant from further infringing the Foundation’s copyrights and ordering
that each Defendant destroy all copies of Copyrighted Audio Works made in violation of the
Foundation’s copyrights.
COUNT II
INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION NO. PA0000867224
65. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the
66. Defendants’ conduct infringes upon the Foundation’s exclusive rights of reproduction and
67. The Video Works, recorded at the U.S. Copyright Office as Copyright Registration No.
PA0000867224 are owned by the Foundation and have been owned by the Foundation
68. Each Defendant knew or had constructive knowledge that the reproduction and distribution
of the Video Works without the consent of the Foundation constituted copyright
infringement.
69. Defendants’ conduct was willful within the meaning of the Copyright Act, namely, it was
70. The Foundation has been damaged by Defendants’ conduct, including, but not limited to,
economic and reputation losses. The Foundation continues to be damaged by such conduct
{06046176 / 2} 10
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 11 of 19
and has no adequate remedy at law to compensate the Foundation for all of the possible
71. The Foundation hereby reserves the right, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), to elect to recover
statutory damages for each infringement, in lieu of seeking recovery of actual damages.
72. As Defendants’ infringement was intentional and willful and as Defendants’ conduct make
this case exceptional, the Foundation is entitled to an award of statutory damages, exemplary
73. The conduct of each Defendant is causing and, unless enjoined and restrained by this Court,
will continue to cause the Foundation great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be
Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 503, the Foundation is entitled to injunctive relief
prohibiting each Defendant from further infringing the Foundation’s copyright and ordering
that each Defendant destroy all copies of Copyrighted Video Works made in violation of the
Foundation’s copyrights.
COUNT III
INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION NO. TXU000817732
74. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the
75. Defendants’ conduct infringes upon the Foundation’s exclusive rights of creating derivative
76. The Literary Work entitled “How and when ‘Heaven’s Gate’ (the door to the physical
kingdom level above human) may be entered : an anthology of our materials”, recorded at the
U.S. Copyright Office as Copyright Registration No. TXu000817732 (the “Literary Work”)
is owned by the Foundation and has been owned by the Foundation continuously since 1997.
77. Defendants Weaver and Havel know that the creation of a derivative work, such as an audio
version, of the Literary Work without the consent of the Foundation constitutes copyright
{06046176 / 2} 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 12 of 19
infringement.
78. Defendants Weaver and Havel know that the public performance and the recording of public
performances (and subsequent dissemination of such) of the Literary Work without the
79. Defendants’ conduct in creating a derivative work and publicly performing and distributing
copyrighted works is willful within the meaning of the Copyright Act, namely, it was
80. The Foundation has been damaged by Defendants’ conduct, including, but not limited to,
economic and reputation losses, and the loss of control of its copyrighted material. The
Foundation continues to be damaged by such conduct and has no adequate remedy at law to
compensate the Foundation for all of the possible damages stemming from the Defendants’
conduct.
81. The Foundation hereby reserves the right, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), to elect to recover
statutory damages for each infringement, in lieu of seeking recovery of actual damages.
82. As Defendants’ infringement was intentional and willful and as Defendants’ conduct make
this case exceptional, the Foundation is entitled to an award of statutory damages, exemplary
83. The conduct of each Defendant is causing and, unless enjoined and restrained by this Court,
will continue to cause the Foundation great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be
Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 503, the Foundation is entitled to injunctive relief
prohibiting each Defendant from further infringing the Foundation’s copyrights and ordering
that each Defendant destroy all copies of Copyrighted Audio Works made in violation of the
Foundation’s copyrights.
{06046176 / 2} 12
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 13 of 19
COUNT IV
INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION NO. VA000877834
84. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the
85. Defendants’ conduct infringes upon the Foundation’s exclusive rights of creating derivative
86. Upon information and belief, Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver have created
or are creating plush dolls based on images registered as VA000877834 entitled “The C.B.E.
(Celestial Being Entity)” (the “Visual Work”) which is owned by the Foundation and has
87. Defendants Weaver and Havel know that the creation of a derivative work, such as an these
commercial dolls, of the Visual Work without the consent of the Foundation constitutes
copyright infringement.
88. Defendants’ conduct in creating a derivative work is willful within the meaning of the
Copyright Act, namely, it was intentional and with indifference to the Foundation’s rights.
89. The Foundation has been damaged by Defendants’ conduct, including, but not limited to,
economic and reputation losses, and the loss of control of its copyrighted material. The
Foundation continues to be damaged by such conduct and has no adequate remedy at law to
compensate the Foundation for all of the possible damages stemming from the Defendants’
conduct.
90. The Foundation hereby reserves the right, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), to elect to recover
statutory damages for each infringement, in lieu of seeking recovery of actual damages.
91. As Defendants’ infringement was intentional and willful and as Defendants’ conduct make
this case exceptional, the Foundation is entitled to an award of statutory damages, exemplary
92. The conduct of each Defendant is causing and, unless enjoined and restrained by this Court,
will continue to cause the Foundation great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be
{06046176 / 2} 13
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 14 of 19
Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 503, the Foundation is entitled to injunctive relief
prohibiting each Defendant from further infringing the Foundation’s copyrights and ordering
that each Defendant destroy all copies of Copyrighted Audio Works made in violation of the
Foundation’s copyrights.
COUNT V
CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT BY HAVEL AND WEAVER
93. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the
94. Defendants’ conduct constitutes contributory infringement upon the Foundation’s exclusive
rights of reproduction and distribution that are protected under the Copyright Act.
95. In particular, with respect to Defendant Bartel’s direct infringement, through posting the
Foundation’s copyrighted material on the 4Shared website, Defendants Havel and Weaver
actively induced, caused, and materially contributed to that infringement by sending him
stolen copies of the Audio and Video Works that were in the possession of Defendants Havel
and Weaver.
96. Defendants Havel and Weaver sent the stolen copies of the Audio and Video Works to
Defendant Bartel knowing that he would be copying and redistributing the Foundation’s
copyrighted material.
97. Defendants Havel and Weaver’s conduct was willful within the meaning of the Copyright
Act, namely, it was intentional and with indifference to the Foundation’s rights.
98. The Foundation has been damaged by Defendants Havel and Weaver’s conduct, including,
but not limited to, economic and reputation losses. The Foundation continues to be damaged
by such conduct and has no adequate remedy at law to compensate the Foundation for all of
99. The Foundation hereby reserves the right, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), to elect to recover
{06046176 / 2} 14
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 15 of 19
statutory damages for each infringement, in lieu of seeking recovery of actual damages.
100. As Defendants Havel and Weaver’s infringement was intentional and willful and as
Defendants Havel and Weaver’s conduct make this case exceptional, the Foundation is
entitled to an award of statutory damages, exemplary damages, attorneys’ fees, and the costs
of the suit.
101. The conduct of each Defendants Havel and Weaver is causing and, unless enjoined and
restrained by this Court, will continue to cause the Foundation great and irreparable injury
that cannot fully be compensated or measured in money. The Foundation has no adequate
remedy at law. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 503, the Foundation is entitled to injunctive
relief prohibiting Defendants Havel and Weaver from further infringing the Foundation’s
copyrights and ordering that each Defendant destroy all copies of Copyrighted Audio and
COUNT VI
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
102. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in
103. As described above, each Defendant engaged in a concerted action with other Defendants
to reproduce and distribute the Foundation’s Audio and Video Works by sending each other
stolen copies of these works and then uploading these Works to the internet to be
downloaded by anyone.
104. By so doing, the Defendants constructively agreed to engage in the unlawful reproduction
105. In furtherance of this civil conspiracy, Defendants committed overt tortious and unlawful
acts by copying the Works to distribute amongst each other and to distribute over the internet
106. As a proximate result of this conspiracy, the Foundation has been damaged, as is more
{06046176 / 2} 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 16 of 19
COUNT VII
FEDERAL TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
107. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in
109. Defendants Havel and Weaver have used the Trademarks in connection with their
YouTube channel and in connection with selling T-Shirts in a manner that is likely to cause
confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive, in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act,
15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
110. The use by Havel and Weaver is unauthorized, is likely to continue, and is likely to cause
substantial injury to the public and to the Foundation, and the Foundation is entitled to
injunctive relief and its attorneys fees and costs under the Lanham Act.
111. Havel and Weaver’s infringement of the Trademarks, as aforesaid has caused and is
likely to continue to cause irreparable harm to the Foundation. Unless restrained and
enjoined by this Court, Havel and Weaver will persist in their infringement, thereby causing
112. The Foundation is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual
damages, Havel and Weaver’s profits, enhanced damages and profits, reasonable attorneys’
fees, and costs of the action under sections 34, 35, 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1116,
{06046176 / 2} 16
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 17 of 19
them, as follows:
injunctions providing that each Defendant shall be enjoined from directly or indirectly infringing
the Foundation’s rights in the Video and Audio Works, the Literary Work, and the Visual Work
including without limitation by using the internet to reproduce or copy the Video and Audio
Works, to distribute the Video and Audio Works, or to make the Video and Audio Works available
for distribution to the public, or to publicly perform the Video and Audio Works or the Literary
Work, or to create derivative works of the Literary Work or the Visual Work except pursuant to a
lawful license or with the express authority of the Foundation. Each Defendant also shall destroy
all copies of the Video and Audio Works that Defendant have in their possession, any and
derivative of the Literary Work or Visual Work created, and shall destroy all copies of those
downloaded audiovisual works transferred onto any physical medium or device in each
B. For actual damages or statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504, at the election of
the Foundation;
C. For an order of impoundment under 17 U.S.C. §§ 503 and 509(a) impounding all
infringing copies of the Foundation’s Video and Audio works, Literary Work, Visual Work, or
derivatives thereof, photographs or other materials that are in Defendants’ possession or under
their control;
D. For actual damages and profits of Defendants along with the costs of this action,
F. A finding that this case is exceptional under 15 U.S.C. § 1117 and an award of attorneys
fees;
{06046176 / 2} 17
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 18 of 19
G. For an order that Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Foundation in the full
amount of the Judgment on the basis of a common law claim for civil conspiracy to commit
copyright infringement;
K. An award of pre- and post-judgment interest on each and every monetary award; and
L. For such other and further relief as the Court deems proper.
{06046176 / 2} 18
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 19 of 19
Index of Exhibits
Exhibit Description
cult-2/ )
{06046176 / 2} 19