KEMBAR78
Telah Foundation Complaint | PDF | Copyright Law Of The United States | Damages
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3K views19 pages

Telah Foundation Complaint

Federal Copyright Infringement, Contributory Copyright Infringement, Conspiracy, Federal Trademark Infringement

Uploaded by

Kenan Farrell
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3K views19 pages

Telah Foundation Complaint

Federal Copyright Infringement, Contributory Copyright Infringement, Conspiracy, Federal Trademark Infringement

Uploaded by

Kenan Farrell
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19

USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 1 of 19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
SOUTH BEND DIVISION

The Evolutionary Level Above Human, Inc.


d/b/a The Telah Foundation,

an Arizona nonprofit corporation,


Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00395
Plaintiff,

v.

Steven Robert Havel;


Cathy JoAnn Weaver;
Jason Bartel,

Defendants.

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff, The Evolutionary Level Above Human, Inc. d/b/a The Telah Foundation (the

“Foundation”) hereby brings the present action against the named defendants and alleges as

follows:

JURISDICTION AND VENUE


1. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over the claims in this action pursuant to

the provisions of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq.) and the Copyright Act (17

U.S.C. § 101, et seq.), and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a)–(b).

2. This Court also has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, since there is

complete diversity. The Foundation is an Arizona nonprofit corporation, no defendant is a

citizen of the state of Arizona, and the matter in controversy is over $75,000.

3. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)–(c), and this Court may

properly exercise personal jurisdiction over Defendants since each of the Defendants is

engaged in actions which directly targets and harms the Foundation.

{06046176 / 2} 1
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 2 of 19

PARTIES
4. Plaintiff, The Evolutionary Level Above Human, or Telah Foundation, Inc. (the

“Foundation”) is an Arizona 501(C)(3), Nonprofit Corporation with its principal place of

business located at P.O. Box 25098, Scottsdale, AZ 85255.

5. Upon information and belief, Defendants Steven Robert Havel (a/k/a Sawyer, Swyody, and

Swy) and Cathy Joann Weaver are currently believed to be residing at 111 Campbell St.

Mishawaka, IN 46544.

6. Upon information and belief, Defendant Jason Bartel (a/k/a Crlody, Carlan, and Crl) is

currently residing at in Madison, WI.

7. Steven Havel, Cathy Weaver, and Jason Bartel are collectively referred to herein as the

Defendants.

INTRODUCTION
8. In 1994 the directors of the Foundation renewed a long-standing relationship with a group

known as “Total Overcomers Anonymous”, “TOA”, or “Heaven’s Gate” (the “Group”).

Three years later, in 1997, all the physical property and intellectual property belonging to the

Group (collectively the “Property”) was transferred to representatives of the Foundation or

was placed, to be obtained, from a storage locker in San Diego County.

9. Prior to being able to obtain all of the property in the storage locker, the locker was seized by

officials from San Diego County.

10. From 1997–1999 the Foundation was involved in litigation with San Diego County (who

represented both the County and the estates of members in the Group) over ownership of the

Property. That litigation ended with the entry of a consent decree in 1999, which conveyed

to the Foundation not only a large amount of physical property, but also all of the intellectual

property rights belonging to the Group.

11. A second lawsuit, filed in 1998 also ended in a 1999 consent decree which likewise

confirmed the Foundation’s ownership of, inter alia, the intellectual property of the Group.

12. The Foundation has been the owner of the Property from 1997 to the present.

{06046176 / 2} 2
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 3 of 19

13. Included in the Property transferred to the Foundation is a number of audio cassettes,

audiovisual works, fabric designs, lithographic prints, and literary works.

14. In particular, the Property transferred included the intellectual property rights to hundreds of

audio cassettes and video tapes which the County of San Diego and the estates represented

by the County of San Diego, transferred to the Foundation.

15. The hundreds of audio cassettes (hereafter the “Audio Works”) were registered (by the

Foundation) with the United States Copyright Office on October 27, 1997 as Reg. No.

SRu00298530.

16. A true and correct copy of the Audio Works registration is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

17. The video tapes (hereafter the “Video Works”) were registered (by the Foundation) with the

United States Copyright Office on September 22, 1997 as Reg. Nos. PA0000867224.

18. A true and correct copy of the Video Works registrations are attached hereto as Exhibit B.

19. The Foundation is also the owner of trademarks related to the Group.

20. The Trademarks (hereafter the “Trademarks”) were registered (by the Foundation) with the

United States Trademark Office on July 27, 2010, July 13, 2010, and February 28, 2017 as

Trademark Reg. Nos. 3824482, 3816596 and 5,148,959.

21. A true and correct copy of the Trademarks registrations are attached hereto as Exhibit C–E.

22. The lithographic prints include artwork (hereafter the “Visual Work”) which was registered

by the Foundation as VA000877834 entitled “The C.B.E. (Celestial Being Entity).”

23. A true and correct copy of the Art Work is attached hereto as Exhibit F.

24. The literary works include a book owned by the Foundation and registered as TXu

000817732 entitled “How and when ‘Heaven’s gate’ (the door to the physical kingdom level

above human) may be entered : an anthology of our materials” (the “Literary Work”).

25. A true and correct copy of the registration for the Literary Work is attached hereto as Exhibit

G.

{06046176 / 2} 3
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 4 of 19

DEFENDANTS’ UNLAWFUL CONDUCT


26. Defendants have knowingly and willfully have illegally acquired, transported and

disseminated copies of the audio tapes and other intellectual property belonging to the

Foundation.

27. On or about May 1, 2021 the Foundation first learned that Defendant, Jason Bartel had put

the Foundation’s registered copyrighted Audio Works and Video Works on a free online file

sharing and storage site called “4Shared.com.”

28. Over the summer of 2021, the Foundation sent Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)

takedown notices to 4Shared to get those illegally posted Audio and Video Works taken off

the site.

29. On or about June 20, 2021 Defendant Bartel announced that more stolen audio tapes were on

being sent to him by Co-Defendant Havel and that Defendant Bartel would post those

additional tapes for free download on the 4Shared website.

30. On or about June 30, after receiving additional tapes from Co-Defendant Havel, Defendant

Bartel put up the entirety of the Audio Works on his Wordpress blog for free download.

31. On or about July 9, 2021, Defendant Bartel announced on Wordpress that 15 gigabytes of the

Audio Works and Video Works had been uploaded to either Google Drive or to the 4Shared

and were available for download.

32. The uploading of this material to 4Shared or Google Drive, and the subsequent availability

for download, was done without the permission or authorization of the Foundation.

33. On or about July 9, 2021, Defendant Bartel thanked Co-Defendant Havel for assisting him in

obtaining the Audio Works and helping him make the Audio Works available for download.

34. Upon information and belief, Defendants Havel and Weaver knowingly intend to infringe the

Foundation’s copyrights in the Audio Works and to take active steps to continue infringing,

despite their knowing infringement.

35. For example, on or about July 12, 2021, Defendant Havel posted to his website a log of the

Audio Works with the following commentary:

{06046176 / 2} 4
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 5 of 19

So just weeks ago, [a third party] who I had been in contact with on and off for
years sent me the digitized audios, all in .mp3 format and I quickly sent them to
[Defendant Bartel] and someone else who I know I can trust to be sure to upload
them to the internet in mulitple [sic] places so that even if [the Foundation]
somehow sue us it will be far too late to keep them from being available to those
who want to listen to them.
36. A true and correct copy of this post is attached hereto as Exhibit H.

37. Through use of the DMCA, the Foundation was able to, over a month later, get the materials
taken down and on or about August 29, 2021, Defendant Bartel announced on Wordpress

that the 4Shared archive of the Audio Works and Video Works had been taken down due to

“Copyright Infringement action by the legal owners, the Telah Foundation.”

38. On information and belief, in September 2021 Defendant Cathy Weaver met up with

Defendant Steven Havel with the intentions of continuing to engage in copyright

infringement and to make the Audio and Video Works available for free download on the

internet.

39. On information and belief, in October and November, 2021, at various locations, Defendants

Havel and Weaver live streamed discussions on the internet providing instructions to others

regarding how individuals could obtain copies of the Audio and Video Works owned by the

Foundation.

40. Defendants Havel and Weaver have also repeatedly engaged in public performances of the

Audio Works, streaming them directly over their YouTube channel, and advertising this

infringement via their twitter account:

{06046176 / 2} 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 6 of 19

41. Upon information and belief, Defendants Havel and Weaver sent copies of the Audio and

Video Works to a third-party during the summer and fall of 2021 to make sure they were

transferred into another country, in order to prevent the Foundation from enforcing its

{06046176 / 2} 6
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 7 of 19

Copyrights.

42. Upon information and belief, Defendants Havel and Weaver’s decision to provide Co-

Defendant Bartel with copies of the Audio and Video Works was also, in part, done to

prevent the Foundation from enforcing its Copyrights.

43. Indeed, Defendants Havel and Weaver repeatedly stated in YouTube videos that they

continue to want to disseminate the copyrighted material and that the Foundation is “not

going to stop us.”

44. At the same time Defendant Havel expressly concedes that the Foundation owns the Property

at issue in this case.

45. Upon information and belief, Co-Defendants Steven Havel, Cathy Weaver, and Jason Bartel

are all working in a conspiracy to disseminate the Audio Works and/or Video Works in a

manner that violates the Foundation’s United States copyrights and in a manner designed to

thwart the Foundation’s ability to assert and enforce its copyrights.

46. Upon information and belief, at the time of filing, each of the Co-Defendants are still

engaged in the conspiracy to commit further infringement of the Foundation’s copyrights and

will continue to illegally copy and disseminate the property of the Foundation in violation of

the Foundation’s copyrights unless enjoined by this Court.

47. Further, upon information and belief Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver have

prepared and are preparing a number of derivative works of copyrights owned by the

Foundation in violation of the Foundation’s copyrights.

48. Upon information and belief, Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver have created

or are creating an audio book version of a the Literary Work owned.

49. Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver are also engaging in public performances of

the Literary Work and recording them and disseminating the public performances through

Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver’s YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/3spm, and advertising such performances on their twitter account:

{06046176 / 2} 7
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 8 of 19

50. Over the past few months this behavior has escalated exponentially, with Co-Defendants

Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver posting now fewer than thirteen recordings containing the
Foundation’s copyrighted Audio Works and other material.

51. This includes the following YouTube videos and Audio Works:

Tape No. 149 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 11/08/2021


Tape No. 263 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 11/08/2021
Tape No. 004 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 11/08/2021
Tape No. 030 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 3/26/22
Tape No. 161 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 4/08/22
Tape No. 156 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 4/12/22
Tape No. 011 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 4/13/22
Tape No. 054 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 4/14/22
Tape No. 052 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 4/17/22
Tape No. 050 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 4/18/22
Tape No. 200 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 4/19/22
Tape No. 201 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 4/20/22
Tape No. 202 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 4/21/22
Tape No. 203 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 4/26/22
Tape No. 204 - Broadcast on YouTube 3spm channel on 4/27/22

52. In addition, Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver have advertised and plan to sell

or have sold t-shirts containing the Foundation’s Trademarks including the trademarked

design and word marks.

53. The sales of material containing the Foundation’s Trademarks is likely to cause confusion

{06046176 / 2} 8
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 9 of 19

that these t-shirts are affiliated with the Foundation.

54. Upon information and belief, Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver have created

or are creating plush dolls based on images owned by the including “The C.B.E. (Celestial

Being Entity)” and routinely use this image in on their YouTube channel and on t-shirts

being sold by Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver.

55. The creation of such derivative works and use in videos and on t-shirts constitutes copyright

infringement of the Foundation’s copyrights in its Art Work.

COUNT I
INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION NO. SRU00298530
56. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the

preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.

57. Defendants’ conduct infringes upon the Foundation’s exclusive rights of reproduction and

distribution that are protected under the Copyright Act.

58. The Audio Works, recorded at the U.S. Copyright Office as Copyright Registration No.

SRu00298530 are owned by the Foundation and have been owned by the Foundation

continuously since 1997.

59. Each Defendant knew or had constructive knowledge that the reproduction and distribution

of the Audio Works without the consent of the Foundation constituted copyright

infringement.

60. Defendants’ conduct was willful within the meaning of the Copyright Act, namely, it was

intentional and with indifference to the Foundation’s rights.

61. The Foundation has been damaged by Defendants’ conduct, including, but not limited to,

economic and reputation losses. The Foundation continues to be damaged by such conduct

and has no adequate remedy at law to compensate the Foundation for all of the possible

damages stemming from the Defendants’ conduct.

62. The Foundation hereby reserves the right, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), to elect to recover

statutory damages for each infringement, in lieu of seeking recovery of actual damages.

{06046176 / 2} 9
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 10 of 19

63. As Defendants’ infringement was intentional and willful and as Defendants’ conduct make

this case exceptional, the Foundation is entitled to an award of statutory damages, exemplary

damages, attorneys’ fees, and the costs of the suit.

64. The conduct of each Defendant is causing and, unless enjoined and restrained by this Court,

will continue to cause the Foundation great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be

compensated or measured in money. The Foundation has no adequate remedy at law.

Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 503, the Foundation is entitled to injunctive relief

prohibiting each Defendant from further infringing the Foundation’s copyrights and ordering

that each Defendant destroy all copies of Copyrighted Audio Works made in violation of the

Foundation’s copyrights.

COUNT II
INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION NO. PA0000867224
65. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the

preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.

66. Defendants’ conduct infringes upon the Foundation’s exclusive rights of reproduction and

distribution that are protected under the Copyright Act.

67. The Video Works, recorded at the U.S. Copyright Office as Copyright Registration No.

PA0000867224 are owned by the Foundation and have been owned by the Foundation

continuously since 1997.

68. Each Defendant knew or had constructive knowledge that the reproduction and distribution

of the Video Works without the consent of the Foundation constituted copyright

infringement.

69. Defendants’ conduct was willful within the meaning of the Copyright Act, namely, it was

intentional and with indifference to the Foundation’s rights.

70. The Foundation has been damaged by Defendants’ conduct, including, but not limited to,

economic and reputation losses. The Foundation continues to be damaged by such conduct

{06046176 / 2} 10
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 11 of 19

and has no adequate remedy at law to compensate the Foundation for all of the possible

damages stemming from the Defendants’ conduct.

71. The Foundation hereby reserves the right, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), to elect to recover

statutory damages for each infringement, in lieu of seeking recovery of actual damages.

72. As Defendants’ infringement was intentional and willful and as Defendants’ conduct make

this case exceptional, the Foundation is entitled to an award of statutory damages, exemplary

damages, attorneys’ fees, and the costs of the suit.

73. The conduct of each Defendant is causing and, unless enjoined and restrained by this Court,

will continue to cause the Foundation great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be

compensated or measured in money. The Foundation has no adequate remedy at law.

Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 503, the Foundation is entitled to injunctive relief

prohibiting each Defendant from further infringing the Foundation’s copyright and ordering

that each Defendant destroy all copies of Copyrighted Video Works made in violation of the

Foundation’s copyrights.

COUNT III
INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION NO. TXU000817732
74. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the

preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.

75. Defendants’ conduct infringes upon the Foundation’s exclusive rights of creating derivative

works that are protected under the Copyright Act.

76. The Literary Work entitled “How and when ‘Heaven’s Gate’ (the door to the physical

kingdom level above human) may be entered : an anthology of our materials”, recorded at the

U.S. Copyright Office as Copyright Registration No. TXu000817732 (the “Literary Work”)

is owned by the Foundation and has been owned by the Foundation continuously since 1997.

77. Defendants Weaver and Havel know that the creation of a derivative work, such as an audio

version, of the Literary Work without the consent of the Foundation constitutes copyright

{06046176 / 2} 11
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 12 of 19

infringement.

78. Defendants Weaver and Havel know that the public performance and the recording of public

performances (and subsequent dissemination of such) of the Literary Work without the

consent of the Foundation constitutes copyright infringement.

79. Defendants’ conduct in creating a derivative work and publicly performing and distributing

copyrighted works is willful within the meaning of the Copyright Act, namely, it was

intentional and with indifference to the Foundation’s rights.

80. The Foundation has been damaged by Defendants’ conduct, including, but not limited to,

economic and reputation losses, and the loss of control of its copyrighted material. The

Foundation continues to be damaged by such conduct and has no adequate remedy at law to

compensate the Foundation for all of the possible damages stemming from the Defendants’

conduct.

81. The Foundation hereby reserves the right, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), to elect to recover

statutory damages for each infringement, in lieu of seeking recovery of actual damages.

82. As Defendants’ infringement was intentional and willful and as Defendants’ conduct make

this case exceptional, the Foundation is entitled to an award of statutory damages, exemplary

damages, attorneys’ fees, and the costs of the suit.

83. The conduct of each Defendant is causing and, unless enjoined and restrained by this Court,

will continue to cause the Foundation great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be

compensated or measured in money. The Foundation has no adequate remedy at law.

Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 503, the Foundation is entitled to injunctive relief

prohibiting each Defendant from further infringing the Foundation’s copyrights and ordering

that each Defendant destroy all copies of Copyrighted Audio Works made in violation of the

Foundation’s copyrights.

{06046176 / 2} 12
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 13 of 19

COUNT IV
INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION NO. VA000877834
84. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the

preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.

85. Defendants’ conduct infringes upon the Foundation’s exclusive rights of creating derivative

works that are protected under the Copyright Act.

86. Upon information and belief, Co-Defendants Steven Havel and Cathy Weaver have created

or are creating plush dolls based on images registered as VA000877834 entitled “The C.B.E.

(Celestial Being Entity)” (the “Visual Work”) which is owned by the Foundation and has

been owned by the Foundation continuously since 1997.

87. Defendants Weaver and Havel know that the creation of a derivative work, such as an these

commercial dolls, of the Visual Work without the consent of the Foundation constitutes

copyright infringement.

88. Defendants’ conduct in creating a derivative work is willful within the meaning of the

Copyright Act, namely, it was intentional and with indifference to the Foundation’s rights.

89. The Foundation has been damaged by Defendants’ conduct, including, but not limited to,

economic and reputation losses, and the loss of control of its copyrighted material. The

Foundation continues to be damaged by such conduct and has no adequate remedy at law to

compensate the Foundation for all of the possible damages stemming from the Defendants’

conduct.

90. The Foundation hereby reserves the right, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), to elect to recover

statutory damages for each infringement, in lieu of seeking recovery of actual damages.

91. As Defendants’ infringement was intentional and willful and as Defendants’ conduct make

this case exceptional, the Foundation is entitled to an award of statutory damages, exemplary

damages, attorneys’ fees, and the costs of the suit.

92. The conduct of each Defendant is causing and, unless enjoined and restrained by this Court,

will continue to cause the Foundation great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be

{06046176 / 2} 13
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 14 of 19

compensated or measured in money. The Foundation has no adequate remedy at law.

Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 503, the Foundation is entitled to injunctive relief

prohibiting each Defendant from further infringing the Foundation’s copyrights and ordering

that each Defendant destroy all copies of Copyrighted Audio Works made in violation of the

Foundation’s copyrights.

COUNT V
CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT BY HAVEL AND WEAVER
93. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in the

preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.

94. Defendants’ conduct constitutes contributory infringement upon the Foundation’s exclusive

rights of reproduction and distribution that are protected under the Copyright Act.

95. In particular, with respect to Defendant Bartel’s direct infringement, through posting the

Foundation’s copyrighted material on the 4Shared website, Defendants Havel and Weaver

actively induced, caused, and materially contributed to that infringement by sending him

stolen copies of the Audio and Video Works that were in the possession of Defendants Havel

and Weaver.

96. Defendants Havel and Weaver sent the stolen copies of the Audio and Video Works to

Defendant Bartel knowing that he would be copying and redistributing the Foundation’s

copyrighted material.

97. Defendants Havel and Weaver’s conduct was willful within the meaning of the Copyright

Act, namely, it was intentional and with indifference to the Foundation’s rights.

98. The Foundation has been damaged by Defendants Havel and Weaver’s conduct, including,

but not limited to, economic and reputation losses. The Foundation continues to be damaged

by such conduct and has no adequate remedy at law to compensate the Foundation for all of

the possible damages stemming from the Defendants’ conduct.

99. The Foundation hereby reserves the right, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), to elect to recover

{06046176 / 2} 14
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 15 of 19

statutory damages for each infringement, in lieu of seeking recovery of actual damages.

100. As Defendants Havel and Weaver’s infringement was intentional and willful and as

Defendants Havel and Weaver’s conduct make this case exceptional, the Foundation is

entitled to an award of statutory damages, exemplary damages, attorneys’ fees, and the costs

of the suit.

101. The conduct of each Defendants Havel and Weaver is causing and, unless enjoined and

restrained by this Court, will continue to cause the Foundation great and irreparable injury

that cannot fully be compensated or measured in money. The Foundation has no adequate

remedy at law. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 503, the Foundation is entitled to injunctive

relief prohibiting Defendants Havel and Weaver from further infringing the Foundation’s

copyrights and ordering that each Defendant destroy all copies of Copyrighted Audio and

Video Works made in violation of the Foundation’s copyrights.

COUNT VI
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
102. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in

the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.

103. As described above, each Defendant engaged in a concerted action with other Defendants

to reproduce and distribute the Foundation’s Audio and Video Works by sending each other

stolen copies of these works and then uploading these Works to the internet to be

downloaded by anyone.

104. By so doing, the Defendants constructively agreed to engage in the unlawful reproduction

and distribution of Foundation’s copyrighted works.

105. In furtherance of this civil conspiracy, Defendants committed overt tortious and unlawful

acts by copying the Works to distribute amongst each other and to distribute over the internet

and were willful participants in this joint activity.

106. As a proximate result of this conspiracy, the Foundation has been damaged, as is more

{06046176 / 2} 15
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 16 of 19

fully alleged in Counts I–IV, above.

COUNT VII
FEDERAL TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
107. The Foundation hereby incorporates by reference each and every allegation contained in

the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.

108. The Foundation is the owner of all rights in the Trademarks.

109. Defendants Havel and Weaver have used the Trademarks in connection with their

YouTube channel and in connection with selling T-Shirts in a manner that is likely to cause

confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive, in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act,

15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).

110. The use by Havel and Weaver is unauthorized, is likely to continue, and is likely to cause

substantial injury to the public and to the Foundation, and the Foundation is entitled to

injunctive relief and its attorneys fees and costs under the Lanham Act.

111. Havel and Weaver’s infringement of the Trademarks, as aforesaid has caused and is

likely to continue to cause irreparable harm to the Foundation. Unless restrained and

enjoined by this Court, Havel and Weaver will persist in their infringement, thereby causing

the Foundation further irreparable harm.

112. The Foundation is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual

damages, Havel and Weaver’s profits, enhanced damages and profits, reasonable attorneys’

fees, and costs of the action under sections 34, 35, 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1116,

1117, 1125 together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest.

113. The Foundation has no adequate remedy at law.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL


The Foundation requests a trial by jury on all issues so triable.

{06046176 / 2} 16
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 17 of 19

PRAYER FOR RELIEF


WHEREFORE, the Foundation prays for judgment against the Defendants, and each of

them, as follows:

A. For entry of a preliminary injunctions, temporary restraining orders, and permanent

injunctions providing that each Defendant shall be enjoined from directly or indirectly infringing

the Foundation’s rights in the Video and Audio Works, the Literary Work, and the Visual Work

including without limitation by using the internet to reproduce or copy the Video and Audio

Works, to distribute the Video and Audio Works, or to make the Video and Audio Works available

for distribution to the public, or to publicly perform the Video and Audio Works or the Literary

Work, or to create derivative works of the Literary Work or the Visual Work except pursuant to a

lawful license or with the express authority of the Foundation. Each Defendant also shall destroy

all copies of the Video and Audio Works that Defendant have in their possession, any and

derivative of the Literary Work or Visual Work created, and shall destroy all copies of those

downloaded audiovisual works transferred onto any physical medium or device in each

Defendant’s possession, custody, or control;

B. For actual damages or statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504, at the election of

the Foundation;

C. For an order of impoundment under 17 U.S.C. §§ 503 and 509(a) impounding all

infringing copies of the Foundation’s Video and Audio works, Literary Work, Visual Work, or

derivatives thereof, photographs or other materials that are in Defendants’ possession or under

their control;

D. For actual damages and profits of Defendants along with the costs of this action,

pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117;

E. A trebling of all damages pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117;

F. A finding that this case is exceptional under 15 U.S.C. § 1117 and an award of attorneys

fees;

{06046176 / 2} 17
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 18 of 19

G. For an order that Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Foundation in the full

amount of the Judgment on the basis of a common law claim for civil conspiracy to commit

copyright infringement;

H. For an award of compensatory damages in favor of the Foundation and against

Defendants, jointly and severally, in an amount to be determined at trial;

I. For the Foundation’s costs;

J. For the Foundation’s reasonable attorneys’ fees;

K. An award of pre- and post-judgment interest on each and every monetary award; and

L. For such other and further relief as the Court deems proper.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 18th day of May 2022.

/s/ Isaac S. Crum


MESSNER REEVES LLP
Isaac S. Crum (AZ Bar #026510)
icrum@messner.com
7250 N. 16th Street, Suite 410
Phoenix, Arizona 85020
Telephone: (602) 641-6705
Facsimile: (303) 623-0552

{06046176 / 2} 18
USDC IN/ND case 3:22-cv-00395-JD-MGG document 1 filed 05/18/22 page 19 of 19

Index of Exhibits

Exhibit Description

Exhibit A Audio Works Copyright Registration (SRu00298530)

Exhibit B Video Work Copyright Registration (PA00667224)

Exhibit C Trademark Registration (Reg. No. 3,824,482)

Exhibit D Trademark Registration (Reg. No. 3,816,596)

Exhibit E Trademark Registration (Reg. No. 5,148,959)

Exhibit F Visual Work Copyright Registration (VA00877834)

Exhibit G Literary Work Copyright Registration (TXu00817732)

Exhibit H Post from Defendants’ website (https://sawyerhg.wordpress.com/category/ufo-

cult-2/ )

{06046176 / 2} 19

You might also like