0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 210 views284 pagesF8 Lecture Note Scan - 040221
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
@snpp percent i ee tee, te as
‘Composers: Do Hong Quan ~ Le Dinh Dat
Reviewer: Nguyen Duc Thai ~ Vu Cam Tu
Reference:
© ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA) Study text (June 2020) ~ BPP Learning media
© ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA) Practice and revision kit (June 2020) ~ BPP Learning
media
© AA-F8 Study text 2019-20 ~ Kaplan Publishing UK
© https://kfknowledgebank. kaplan.
‘+ https://knowledge.sapp.edu.vn/
+ bttps://www.accaglobal.com/gb/en.html
* ACCA Code of Ethics
Page 1 of 283CONTENTS,
CHAPTER 1; AUDIT AND OTHER ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS......
LEARNING OUTCOMES 6
1. ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENT
Il AUDIT ENGAGEMENT. oe ncnotacen Hmmm
lil, REVIEW ENGAGEMENT...
IV. PRACTICE...
CHAPTER 2: AUDIT LAW AND REGULATION...
LEARNING OUTCOMES...
|. STATUTORY REGULATION... 16
Il AUDIT REGULATION sn 20
IIL INTERNATIONAL LEVEL OF AUDIT REGULATION... a1
IV. PRACTICE... cnt 24.
CHAPTER 3: CORPORATE GOVERNANCI
LEARNING OUTCOMES...
|. OBJECTIVES OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE... 26
Il. THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE .. 27
Il, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN ACTION... sssrnsnnnnnnntnninmnnsnnsnsie 32
Iv. AUDIT COMMITTEES fi 35
V. COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE.. 40
IV, PRACTICE sno
CHAPTER 4: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND ACCEPTANCE. .ssssssssnsesne
LEARNING OUTCOMES 00 43
|. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS ...- 43
Il, THREATS AND SAFEGUARDS... 45
I ACCEPTING/CONTINUING AN AUDIT ENGAGEMENT 60
Iv, ENGAGEMENT LETTER...
Ve PRACTICE saree F 67
CHAPTER 5: RISK ASSESSMENT .
LEARNING OUTCOME...
Page 2 of 283,@sap seinen nr et
1, THE OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF THE AUDITOR,
I. AUDIT RISK...
70
pad
76
78
ai 2 84
VI. LAW AND REGULATION (ADDITIONAL READING)... eee
Vil. RESPONDING TO THE RISK ASSESSMENT.
VII, PRACTICE.
IL MATERIALITY.....
IV. RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES «ns
V. FRAUDS AND ERRORS..
86
feria 102)
CHAPTER 6: AUDIT PLANNING AND DOCUMENTATION .. 104
LEARNING OUTCOMES jo. ag 104
|. PURPOSE OF PLANNING AND THE PLANNING PROCESS ees 104
I THE AUDIT STRATEGY.
105
THE AUDIT PLAN... 110
IV, QUALITY CONTROL. 113
V. AUDIT DOCUMENTATION ...ccsesesennnne erent
VI PRACTICE Pee rs . sn 118
CHAPTER 7: INTERNAL CONTROL. 118
LEARNING OUTCOME «cscs
us
118
124
127
L._ INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEM...
I DOCUMENTING CLIENT SYSTEMS. eae
ll, THE EVALUATION OF INTERNAL CONTROL COMPONENTS......
IV, COMMUNICATION OF DEFICIENCIES IN INTERNAL CONTROL. 129
V. INTERNAL CONTROLS IN A COMPUTERISED ENVIRONMENT na 082:
Mle PRACTICE strstr ty erneeti aba 133,
CHAPTER 8: TESTS OF CONTROLS.
135
LEARNING OUTCOME... 135
1. THE SALES SYSTEM... 135
Ml THE PURCHASES SYSTEM ese 141
Il, THE INVENTORY SYSTEM. ..0. 146
IV. THE BANK AND CASH SYSTEM. eee 149
Page 3 of 283V. THE PAYROLL SYSTEM cece 154
VI. NON-CURRENT ASSETS...
VIL PRACTICE...
CHAPTER 9: INTERNAL AUDIT.....
LEARNING OUTCOMES
|. THE SCOPE OF INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION...
Il. INTERNAL AUDIT ASSIGNMENTS...
I INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT.
IV. OUTSOURCING INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION...cccesnesnnnnne i
{Vi pI PRACTIGE sri tet erect niteecreseti net etrtcesritrarrr 185
CHAPTER 10: EVIDENCE, ASSERTION AND SAMPLING ...ss.ssese
LEARNING OUTCOMES,
|. AUDIT EVIDENCE...
I. FINANCIAL STATEMENT ASSERTION ...
Il, SELECTING ITEMS TO TEST 2
IV. COMPUTER-ASSISTED AUDIT TECHNIQUES
V. USING THE WORK OF OTHERS
VI. PRACTICE
CHAPTER 11: AUDIT PROCEDURE 0:0
LEARNING OUTCOMES ....0
|. TEST OF CONTRO!
Il SUBSTANTIVE PROCEDURES.
Ill, TYPICAL AUDIT PROCEDURES..
IV, PRACTICE
CHAPTER 12: THE AUDIT OF SPECIFIC ITEMS
LFARNING QUTCOMES
|. NON-CURRENT ASSET... i
accra 217
ML INVENTORY... ee 224
lll RECEIVABLES 226
IV. BANK AND CASH...
Page 4 of 283©®snpp Sica um rt et,
‘roy Ho" 2A Loti Mu Khanh, Distt 190 CH Cy
V. _NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES, PROVISIONS AND CONTINGENCIES.. vos BBL
VL. PAYABLES, ACCRUALS... : oe 233
Vil. SHARE CAPITAL, RESERVE, DIRECTOR'S EMOLUMENTS..... 236
Vill, ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES .... 238
1X. EXAM FOCUS.
X. PRACTICE
CHAPTER 13: AUDIT FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANISATIONS AND SMALLER ENTITIE
LEARNING OUTCOMES.....
sais : 239
243
248
248
|. NON-PROFIT ORGANISATIONS. 248
Il SMALLER ENTITIES... 251
CHAPTER 14: AUDIT REVIEW AND FINALISATION ese 254
LEARNING OUTCOMES..... 254
1. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS. 254
I. GOING CONCERN .. 259
lll WRITTEN REPRESENTATION. 267
IV. OVERALL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - 268
Ve PRACTICE sssre
CHAPTER 15: AUDIT REPORTING.
LEARNING OUTCOMES... m
|, _ INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT... 273
I. AUDIT OPINION...
MW PRACTICE ssn ieee Sonnet
Page 5 of 2839pre acateny ‘et 0406 70988
i A Faw A Banking Le Thanh Ng Haan tie, Ia Noi Sopp
SX For Groom Str Tor, Ha 261 Phown Van Dong, fae Tu Liem st aged Helin 0968 29463
1 Foor, Ne. 2ALivon Haw Khanh, De, Mo CN Ra Cay
CHAPTER 1: AUDIT AND OTHER ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
+ Have knowledge of assurance engagements;
+ Have knowledge of audit engagement and review engagement.
‘Audit engage
|. ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENT
1. Definition and Characteristic
1.1. Definition
‘An assurance engagement is an engagement in which a practitioner obtains sufficient
appropriate evidence in order to express a conclusion designed to enhance the degree of
confidence of the intended users other than the responsible party about the outcome of the
evaluation or measurement of a subject matter against criteria.
Accountability is being required or expected to justify actions and decisions, It suggests an
obligation or willingness to accept responsibility for one's actions.
Page 6 of 283SAPP Aeadony Toto4es 7091808
"Floor, Narn ABank bung 54 Le thant gh Maia Truny dati Ha Nol Sapp va
2n* Flow, Gtesn Slr tower, No. 261 Pam Ven Dong. fae Tut iam dott Havel Hone 000 729463
pi ‘oc, Ho 2A cet as Ky, Dis 1 Ho Cr fl Cay
Stewardship refers to the duties and obligations of a person who manages another person's
property.
Agents are people employed or used to provide a particular service. In the case of a company,
the people being used to provide the service of managing the business also have the second
role of trying to maximize their personal wealth in their own right.
Exampl
Shareholders (Principal)
There have agency relationship between directors and shareholders, Directors act as stewards
of the shareholders’ investments. They are agents of the shareholders and they have
accountability to shareholder.
1.2. Characteristics
‘Assurance can never be absolute, Assurance providers will never give a certification of absolute
correctness due to the limitations set out below.
Page 7 of 283®sapp Ci anagram oa ee ae
oor No. 2h arg Ha Khanh, Ds , Ho cs wn hy
Some users incorrectly believe that an audit provides absolute assurance that the audit opinion
is a guarantee the financial statements are ‘correct’. This and other misconceptions about the
role of an auditor are referred to as the expectation gap.
Example:
Auditors test all transactions and balances. | Auditors test on a sample basis.
Auditors are required to detect all fraud, ‘Auditors are required to provide reasonable
assurance that the financial statements are
free from material misstatement, which may
be caused by fraud,
| Auditors are responsible for preparing the __| Preparing the financial statement is the
financial statements, responsibility of management.
2. Key elements of assurance engagement
There are 5 key elements of an assurance engagement.
Three party Practitioner (the review of the ‘Auditor
involvement subject matter who provides the
assurance).
Intended users (of the information). | Shareholders
Responsible party (those Directors/Managers
responsible for preparing the
subject matter).
‘Appropriate subject —_| The information subject to Financial statements
matter: examination by the practitioner.
Suitable criteria The subject matter is evaluated Financial reporting
framework
jence is | Sufficient appropriate
: against the suitable crite
Sufficient appropriate | Sufficient appropriate
evidence needed to provide a basis for the evidence is obtained by
opinion/conclusion. performing audit procedures
Written assurance The output of the assurance — Independent auditor's report
report in an engagement expressing a providing an opinion asto |
appropriate form conclusion/opinion about the whether the financial
subject matter. statements give a true and
fair view
Page 8 of 283,SAPP Aeadnny Tet 0405 705498
8° Flor Nam A Bork blog. Le than ig Hala Teg dave Ha Nok Sapp vn
2," Floor, eves Sta Tu, Ho. 261 Pha Va Dong, ac tim ve, Haha: OO 729.463,
Fi eae 1 oe Ho 2A Ln Hhar Khanh, Ds 1, Ho Cah hy
Exam focus: Explain the five elements of an assurance engagement |
Example: You are an accountant who has been approached by Jamal, who wants to invest in
Company X. He has asked you for assurance whether the most recent financial statements of
Company X are a reliable basis for him to make his investment decision.
Identify the key elements of an assurance engagement in this scenario, if you accepted the
engagement.
Answer:
Three party «Jamal (the intended user);
ie vement * You {the practitioner);
«The directors of Company X as they produce the financial statements
(the responsible party)
Subject matter | The most recent financial statements of Company X are the subject.
matter.
Suitable criteria | It is most likely in this instance that the criteria would be accounting
standards, so that Jamal was assured that the financial statements were
properly prepared and comparable with other companies’ financial
statements. :
Evidence You would have to agree the extent of procedures in relation to this
assignment with Jamal so that he knew the level of evidence you were
intending to seek. This would depend on several factors, including the
degree of secrecy in the proposed transaction and whether the directors
of Company X allowed you to inspect the books and documents,
Report The nature of the report would be agreed between you and Jamal,
however, it would be a written report containing your opinion on the
financial statements.
3. Level of assurance
‘There are 2 levels of assurance set out below.
Ahigh level of assurance, that is less than
absolute assurance,
Gathers sufficient & appropriate evidence.
‘A meaningful level of assurance, that is less
than reasonable assurance.
Gathers sufficient & appropriate evidence
but at lower level
Page 9 of 283& SAPP Acaemy. Fotos 709 998
Fos. Ham A Bonk king, 4 Le than Mah ak Tung dei, Enno
7" Fn No 7A oa Ha Khanh este Ha CI Rt CY
Gives a positively worded assurance [Gives a negatively worded assurance
conclusion. conclusion.
Concludes that the subject matter conforms | Concludes that the subject matter,
in all material respects with identified respect to identified suitable criteria, is
suitable criteria, plausible in the circumstances, |
Example:
ion, the statement by the “In the course of my seeking evidence about
Chairman regarding X is reasonable”. the statement by the Chairman, nothing has
come to my attention indicating that the
statement is not reasonable”
Exam focus: Explain the purpose of review engagements and how these differ from
external audits
june 2015-Sample Question-5c
Exampl
Sycamore’s new finance director has read about review engagements and is interested in the
possibility of Maple & Co undertaking these in the future. However, she is unsure how these
engagements differ from an external audit and how much assurance would be gained from this
type of engagement.
Require: Describe the level of assurance provided by external audits and review engagements.
Guidance:
Thisis a simple question (theory), you just make sure your answer meets all requirements of
the question: Follow the content of the question to describe each level of assurance.
Always remember that: assurance can never be absolute and level of audit is higher than
level of review
Answer:
‘The level of assurance provided by audit and review engagements is as follows:
‘© External audit ~ A high but not absolute level of assurance is provided, this is known as
reasonable assurance, This provides comfort that the financial statements present fairly in
all material respects (or are true and fair) and are free of material misstatements.
‘© Review engagements — where an opinion is being provided, the practitioner gathers
sufficient evidence to be satisfied that the subject matter is plausible; in this case negative
assurance is given whereby the practitioner confirms that nothing has come to their
attention which indicates that the subject matter contains material misstatements
Page 10 of 283,@snpp
SAPP Acadny
BP Hor Nat A Bark big, 4 Lo Thanh Nl, Hal fa Teun da, Ha Not
2 Foor, Geen Sta Towa, No. 261 Pham Van Dag, a Ts ar se, Han
1 rer Wo, 2A toon at Kb, Dstt 1H Gh tit Cy
4, Type of assurance engagement
‘Audit engagement
‘An audit engagement is an arrangement
that an auditor has with a client to
perform an audit of the client's
accounting records and financial
statements
Reasonable
Tet 0408 709 68
Sapp vn
othe 0009 729 463
Review engagement
‘Areview engagement is conducted to
provide assurance that there are no
material modifications that should be
made to the financial statements for them
‘to be in conformity with the financial
reporting framework.
Limited
5. Benefits of assurance
There are some benefits of assurance and their impacts for the entities.
Page 11 of 283SAPP Acateny
Tot o405 709.090
A loo, Ham A Bank tse. Le thon Not Sapp
Dat Fh, Crees Stay Rowe, 261 Pha Yan Dg ee cy Mane Has 720.464
Flor No. 2A ona Hn Khanh, De
i, AUDIT ENGAGEMENT
1, External audit engagement
An external audit is a type of assurance engagement that is carried out by an auditor to give an
independent opinion on a set of financial statements.
SER MeL eT aT)
Purpose of audit engagement: Achieved by
Enhance the degree of confidence
of intended users in financial
‘agtemiants, Near eRe curl
eee ec iA UY
applicable financial reporting
Geen
i
Objectives of auditor according to ISA 200:
+ Obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements as a
whole are free from material
misstatement.
+ Express an opinion on whether the
financial statements are prepared, in
all material respects, in accordance
with an applicable financial reporting
framework.
+ Report on the financial statements,
and communicate as required by ISAs,
in accordance with the auditor's
findings.
“True: factually correct information which conforms with accounting standards and relevant
legislation, and agrees with the underlying records.
** Fair: clear, impartial and unbiased information which reflects the commercial substance of
the transactions of the entity.
Page 12 of 283,Sy? Sseseecee St.
2. Statutory and Non-statutory audit
The table shows the main points of distinction between statutory audit and non-statutory audit.
Requirement
Authorized and governed by
law ora statute,
The company's owners, proprietors,
members, trustees, professional and
governing bodies or other interested
parties want them, rather than
because the law requires them.
Itisvoluntary
‘The auditor need not possess any
academic or professional
qualifications.
‘The audit report is made known to the
‘employers or partners.
Nature
Practitioner
Itis compulsory
‘The academic or professional
qualification is prescribed for
the auditor.
The audit report is published
for the public.
IIL REVIEW ENGAGEMENT
The review (not legally required) will still provide some assurance to users but is likely to cost,
less and be less disruptive than an audit.
The objective of a review engagement is to obtain limited assurance about whether the subject
matter information is free from material misstatement.
There are 2 types of review engagement
\ttestation engagement and direct engagement.
‘The underlying subject matter has not been
measured or evaluated by the practitioner.
The underlying subject matter has been
measured and evaluated by the practitioner.
‘The practitioner concludes whether or not
the subject matter information is free from
material misstatement,
The practitioner presents conclusions on the
reported outcome in the assurance report
| Bample:
review of a sustainability report, which has
been prepared by management.
Example:
review of the effectiveness of a company's
system of internal controls.
Page 13 of 283,@®sapp Seeenhogn tents en ee a ee, a
IV. PRACTICE
1. Question
Question 4: Which of the following is NOT a benefit of an audit?
‘A. Increased credibility of the financial statements
B. Deficiencies in controls may be identified during testing
C. Fraud may be detected during the audit
D. Sampling is used
Question 2; Which of the follo
1g are examples of the expectation gap?
(i) The independent auditor's report confirms the financial statements are accurate.
{ii) An unmodified opinion means the company is a going concern.
{ii The auditor tests all transactions.
(iv) The auditor can be sued for negligence if they issue an inappropriate opinion,
A. (i), i) and (i)
8. (i), (i) and (Iv)
C (i)and (i) only
D. Gi) and (ii) only
‘Question 3: What level of assurance will be provided by the independent auditor's report?
A. Absolute
B. Reasonable
C. Moderate
D. Limited
Page 14 of 283,& SAPP Acatny Tet ous ro ane
2a peo cio Sater he 20 Pamir earner as RS rma
ae Trtaihe Shlomprtutecacuower recone,
2. Answers
Question 1: D.
‘Sampling provides a limitation of the audit process, not a benefit
luestion 2: A.
The auditor cannot confirm the accuracy of the financial statements as they contain estimates
and judgments of management. The company may not be a going concern and the financial
statements may correctly reflect this resulting in an unmodified audit opinion. The auditor does
not test all transactions,
Question
Reasonable assurance is given in an independent auditor's report.
Page 15 of 283Floor, ier A Rank bing, tLe Thanh Nah a Ba Tang dst a toh Speck
Fo Gran Sr Tower, te 261 Pham Van Dong, ae Tw lam eset, Haned Het 0969729 463,
oor fe. 2k img a han, Este, en ty
@®snrp
CHAPTER 2: AUDIT LAW AND REGULATION
LEARNING OUTCOMES
+ Introduce audit law.
+ Have knowledge of duties and rights of auditor;
+ Introduce audit regulation and level of audit regulation.
Appointment
Removal Rights & Duties of National audit International audit
Resignation of auditor regulation regulation
auditor
|. STATUTORY REGULATION
1. Appointment, Removal and Resignation of auditor
11.1. Appointment
The auditors should be appointed by and therefore answerable to the shareholders. The table
below shows what the position should ideally be, again using the UK as an example:
Directors Can appoint auditor:
* Before company's first period for appointing auditors;
© Following a period during which the company did not have an
auditor (as exempt), at any time before the next period for
appointing auditors;
* Tofillacasual vacancy.
‘Can appoint auditor by ordinary resolution:
Members
© During a period for appointing auditors;
Page 16 of 283®snpp seem mm en eo te
A eer 1 tooo 2A Lucena Khan Dt 1 Gti Cy,
‘© If company should have appointed auditor during a period for
appointing auditors but failed to do so;
# Ifdirectors fail to do so.
Secretary of State | Can appoint auditors if no auditors are appointed per above.
1.2, Removal
Arrangements for removing the auditor have to be structured in such a way that:
© The auditor has sufficiently secure tenure of office, to maintain independence of
management,
© Auditors can be removed if there are doubts about their cont
their duties effectively.
ing abilities to carry out
The chart below shows how to remove an auditor:
‘Auditor action
The auditors have the right to make representations of reasonable length to the company if a
resolution is proposed either to;
+ Remove the auditors before their term of office expires;
+ Change the auditors when their term of office is complete,
se
Company action
+ Notify members in the notice of the meeting of the representations;
* Send a copy of the representations in the notice;
+ If tis not sent out, the auditors can require
ee
Convening of general meeting
‘Auditors removed before expiry of their office may:
+ Attend the meeting at which their office would have expired;
+ Attend any meeting at which the appointment of their successors is discussed.
If auditors are removed at a general meeting they must make a statement of circumstances
for members and creditors,
is read at the meeting,
Page 17 of 283,®sapp Rrbetiehowy plang mentite emt as
1.3. Resignation
In practice, if the auditor and management find it difficult to work together, the auditor will
usually resign. The chart below shows procedures for resignation of auditors an auditor:
Auditor action
‘Auditors must deposit a statement of circumstances at the registered office with their
resignation statin
= For quoted companies — the circumstances around their departure;
+ Fornon-quoted public companies and all private companies — there are no
circumstances that the auditor believes should be brought to the attention of the
members or creditors.
Company action
+ The company must send notice of the resignation to the Registrar.)
The company must send a copy of the statement of circumstances to every person
entitled to receive a copy of the accounts.
Ss
Convening of general meeting
Ifthe auditors have deposited a statement of circumstances, they may:
* Circulate a statement of reasonable length to the members;
+ Requisition a general meeting to explain their reasons;
Attend and speak at any meeting where appointment of successors is to be discussed.
Page 18 of 283@snpp cette is met teense a as
ys Soon Tee Mo 2A rg thas ha Ds 1, Ho Cu ety Cy
2, Duties and Rights of auditor
2.1, Duties of auditor
The auditors are required to comply with following duties:
Compliance with Whether the financial statements have been prepared in
legislation accordance with the relevant legislation.
Truth and fairness of Whether the financial statements shows a true and fair view of
the company's affairs
‘Adequate accounting ‘Whether adequate accounting records have been kept and
records and returns returns adequate for the audit received from branches not
visited by the auditor.
‘Agreement of accounts to | Whether the accounts are in agreement with the accounting
records records and returns.
‘Consistency of other Whether the information in the directors’ report is consistent
information with the financial statements.
Directors’ benefits Whether disclosure of directors’ benefits has been made in
accordance with the law.
2.2. Rights of auditor
‘The auditors must have certain rights to enable them to carry out their duties effectivel
| Access to records ‘A right of access at all times to the books, accounts and
vouchers of the company
Information and A right to require from the company's officers such information
explanations and explanations as they think necessary for the performance of
their duties as auditors. é
‘Attendance at/notices of — | A right to attend any general meetings of the company and to
general meetings receive all notices of and other communications relating to such
meetings which any member of the company is entitled to
receive
Right to be heard at ‘A right to be heard at general meetings which they attend on
general meetings any part of the business that concerns them as auditors.
Rights in relation to A right to receive a copy of any written resolution proposed.
written resolutions
Page 19 of 283,Eerie nantes enritraint ses
Hl. AUDIT REGULATION
1. The regulatory environment
The role of the auditor has come under increased scrutiny over the last thirty years due to an
increase in high profile audit failures (the collapse of Enron and its auditor Arthur Andersen).
In order to achieve this try and re
follow regulatory guidance:
trust in the auditing profession, practitioners have to
‘© National corporate law;
'* Auditing Standards (the ba
Of this text is International Standards on Auditing);
© Code of Ethics.
2, The reasons for regulation
Regulators aim for audits to be valuable both to shareholders and to the wider public.
3. Level of audit regulation
‘There are two types of audit regulation: National level and International level.
The accounting and auditing profession varies in structure from country to country. Therefore,
regulations governing auditors will, in most countries, be most important at the national level.
International regulation, however, can play a major part.
Page 20 of 283,®snpp Ema a a
a YF Por No 2 aon Kha, stat, ho Cla hn Cy
IIL. INTERNATIONAL LEVEL OF AUDIT REGULATION
__ International
G sas * Isac *
hics for Professional
International Standards International Standards. CO® eae Pere
on Auditing on Quality Control
Jk Not mentioned in this lecture note
1. International organization
1.4. IFAC
The international Federation of Accountants (IFAC) is the global organization for the accountancy
profession.
IFAC promotes international regulation of the accountancy profession. By ensuring minimum,
requirements for accountancy qualifications, post qualification experience and guidance on
accounting and assurance for accountants around the world, there will be greater public
confidence in the profession as a whole.
1.2. IAASB
‘The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board or IASB is an independent standard-
setting board that develops the International Standards on Auditing. 1AASB issues International
Standards on Auditing covering various services offered by professional accountants world
like auditing, review, other assurance, quality control, and related services.
Page 21 of 283,SAP Acadery ‘et 0400 70900
{3 Fos Rim A Genk ulin, 54 Lo Thaah Ng HniBa Teng dati. Hla Hei Sapp sn
24" Fa, Goon Star Tey 261 Pham Van Dong, Bae T Lams, Harel Metin: 0960 720 463
1 Hono 2A sng Hi khan, ist, Ho Ch Cy
2, International standards on auditing (ISAs)
2.1, Main features of ISAs
Page 22 of 283y spe Aeasony Teo 700088
fcr Remaking, Abe ha Ba Tag ve Moa Sepa
RSE her ak Lng ash Dates Gs Oy
2.2. Development of ISAS
For an ISA to be issued, a lengthy process of discussion and debate occurs to ensure the
members affected by the guidance have had an input. The process sets out below:
HHH
2.3. The relationship between international and national standards and regulation
IFAC is simply a grouping of accountancy bodies, therefore it has no legal standing in individual
countries. Countries therefore need to have their own arrangements in place for:
© Regulating the audit profession;
‘© Implementing auditing standards.
National standard setters:
© May develop their own auditing standards and ethical standards;
© May adopt and implement ISAs, possibly after modifying them to suit national needs;
In the event of a conflict between the two sets of guidance, local regulations will apply.
Page 23 of 283,@snpp i estes ie ai ig st be engage Fact
IV. PRACTICE
1, Question
Question 1: Which of the following statements is FALSE?
‘A. Auditing standards are laws which must be followed during all audits.
8. Auditing standards should be followed during all audits unless there are exceptional
circumstances which would mean the audit objective would not be met.
C. Auditing standards are professional regulations.
D. Auditing standards may be different in different countries, even those using ISAs.
Question 2: Which of the following are reasons for the audit profession issuing auditing
standards?
{i) To ensure consistency of audits across different firms.
(ii) To provide bureaucracy for auditors.
(ii) To ensure quality in the standard of audits performed.
A. (i) and (i) only
8. (i)and (iil) only
Gil) and (ii) only
D. Allof them
Question 3: Using the UK as an example, who can appoint an auditor?
Page 24 of 283(®sapp Sitters ee a a a a
Ps Seen ‘ror fl. 2h tong Hau Ka, Disht eC i Cy
2, Answer
Juestion 1:
Auditing standards are professional guidance, not law,
Question,
By issuing standards, audits should be performed more consistently which should improve
quality.
Question 3:
* Members can appoint the auditors (at each general meeting where accounts are laid),
® Directors can appoint the auditors (before the first general meeting where accounts are laid
or to ill a casual vacancy),
© The Secretary of State can appoint the auditors (if no auditors are appointed/reappointed
at the general meeting where accounts are laid).
Page 25 of 283Qu Seer ee EE.
CHAPTER 3: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Understand the objectives of Corporate Governance;
Understand the Corporate Governance code;
Understand the Corporate Governance in action, especially audit committees;
‘Acknowledge the need and matters to be communicated with those charged with
governance.
composton | onmess
Chairman Risk
> Chief > Remuneration
executive
Executive |» Nomination
I+ Non-executive > WV. Audit
‘committees
|. OBJECTIVES OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance is the means by which a company is operated and controlled.
Objective of corporate governance:
‘* To ensure that companies are run well in the interests of their shareholders, employees,
and other key stakeholders such as the wider community.
Page 26 of 283,(®snpp Simatgtnamy tic eh et ed a
pi nee ‘Pron "2A Luong Hu Han, Otel, Ho Chin Oy
To try and prevent company directors from abusing their power which may adversely affect
these stakeholder groups. For example, the directors may pay themselves large salaries and
bonuses whilst claiming they have no money to pay a dividend to shareholders.
Advantages of a company following good corporate governance principles:
Greater transparency;
Greater accountabil
Efficiency of operations;
Better able to respond to risks;
Less likely to be mismanaged
Il, THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE
‘The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) - an international
organization who works on establishing evidence-based international standards and finding
solutions to a range of social, economic and environmental challenges, has produced a set of six
principles of corporate governance to guide policy makers when setting regulations for their
‘own country.
The six OECD Principles are:
Ensuring the basis of an effective corporate governance framework;
The rights of shareholders and key ownership functions;
The equitable treatment of shareholders;
‘The role of stakeholders in corporate governance;
Disclosure and transparency;
The responsibilities of the board.
‘The UK Corporate Governance Code reflects the OECD principles. The main requirements of the
Code are given below.
Leadership
Each company should have an effective board who take collective
responsibility for the long term success of the company.
* There should be clear division of responsibilities between running the
board and the running of the company. No one should have unlimited
| powers of decision.
© The chairman should lead the board and ensure it is effective.
Page 27 of 283roy, Harm Aan dng 5 Le Than gh Ha Ba Tong atic, Na) Spd
{Voor No. 2A Lung Hea Khia, Ist 1, He Chi inh Cay |
Non-executive directors should constructively challenge and help |
develop strategy.
Effectiveness
The board should have the appropriate balance of skills, experience,
independence and knowledge of the company.
Appointment of directors should be made through a formal, transparent
and rigorous process.
Directors should allocate sufficient time to discharge their
responsibilities.
All directors should receive induction on joining the board and should
regularly update and refresh their skills and knowledge.
The board should be supplied with timely information in an appropriate
form and quality.
The board should undertake formal and rigorous evaluation of its
performance and that of its committees and individual directors.
All directors should be submitted for re-election at regular intervals
subject to satisfactory performance.
Accountability
| Remuneration
The board should present a balanced and understandable assessment of |
the company's position and prospects.
The board is responsible for determining the nature and extent of the
significant risks itis willing to take in achieving its strategic objectives,
The board should maintain sound risk management and internal control
systems.
The board should establish formal and transparent arrangements for
maintaining an appropriate relationship with the company's auditor.
Levels of remuneration should be sufficient to attract, retain and
motivate directors of the quality required but should not pay more than
necessary.
Remuneration should be designed to promote the long-term success of
the company.
The board should establish formal and transparent procedures for
developing the policy for executive directors’ remuneration
No director should be involved in setting his own pay.
Relations with
There should be dialogue with shareholders based on a mutual
Page 28 of 283SAPP Academy Tet ots 700 886
8° For Mam A Bark tag. Le Tha Noh, Hala Trung usec. Har Sapp
2nM Floor, Gua Star Towa No. 261 Phen Var Dong, ac Tu ttn Ue wd Hate: 0999729 403,
Ps eon eter He. 2A Lung Pas Kah, Dist 1, Ho Cnn hy
shareholders
| understanding of objectives. zi
© The board as a whole has responsibility for ensuring satisfactory
dialogue with shareholders takes place.
* The board should use general meetings to communicate with investors
and encourage their participation.
Exam focus: Identify corporate governance deficiencies and make recommendations to
improve corporate governance.
Example: (March/June 2019 ~ Sample Questions)
Freesia Co is a company listed on a stock exchange. It manufactures furniture which it supplies
to a wide range of retailers across the region. The company has an internal audit (IA)
department and the company's year end is 30 June 20X9. You are an audit supervisor with
Zinnia & Co, preparing the draft audit programmes and reviewing extracts from the internal
controls documentation in preparation for the interim audit.
The listing rules of the stock exchange require compliance with corporate governance principles
and the directors of Freesia Co are confident that they are following best practice in relation to
this. However, the chairman recently received correspondence from a shareholder, who is
concerned that the company is not fully compliant. The company's finance director has
therefore requested a review of the company’s compliance with corporate governance
principles,
Freesia Co has been listed for over eight years and its board comprises four executive and four
independent non-executive directors (NEDs), excluding the chairman. An audit committee
comprised of the NEDs and the finance director meets each quarter to review the company's,
internal controls.
‘The directors’ remuneration is set by the finance director. NEDs are paid a fixed fee for their
services and executive directors are paid an annual salary as well as a significant annual bonus
based on Freesia Co's profits. The company's chairman does not have an executive role and so
she has sole responsibility for liaising with the shareholders and answering any of their
questions.
Page 29 of 283,21" Fleer, Groon Stat Toner, No 261 Pham Vian Dong, Bae 1 Liem dsl, Hot Motine. 0869 729 453
1 Hr 2A tang ama Manin Ose ct Ch Ra ty
Required: Describe TWO corporate governance weaknesses faced by Freesia Co and provide a
recommendation to address each weakness to ensure compliance with corporate governance
principles.
Guidance:
Step 1: Identify corporate governance deficiencies
Candidates can answer based on requirement of UK Corporate Governance Code. Most
candidates were able to confidently identify weaknesses from the scenario, However many
could not explain the weakness, relying on explanations such as “this is not good corporate
governance”, This was not sufficient to score the extra & marks available for each point.
Candidates needed to be able to explain how these weaknesses impacted the company.
Step 2: Provide recommendation
Be careful with recommendation provided. Candidates often give insufficient ansert or give
corporate governance objectives rather than recommendations, such as, “the board should
be balanced between executive and non- executives”
This is an objective; the recommendation should have been to “appoint additional non-
executive directors to ensure a balanced board”.
Answer:
The finance director is a member of | Leadership | The audit committee must be
the audit committee. comprised of independent NEDs
only; therefore the finance director
The audit committee should be made
should resign from the committee.
Up entirely of independent NEDs. The
role of the committee is to maintain
reporting; this is difficult if the
finance director is a member of the
committee as the finance director
will be responsible for the
preparation of the financial
statements.
‘The remuneration for directors is set | Remuneration | There should be a fair and
| by the finance director. However, no transparent policy in place for
Page 30 of 283@sapp
et 0806 7094
director should be involved in setting
their own remuneration as this may
result in excessive levels of pay being
set
setting remuneration levels. The
NEDs should form @ remuneration
committee to decide on the
remuneration of the executives. The
board as a whole should decide on
the pay of the NEDs.
Executive remuneration includes a
significant annual profit related
bonus. Remuneration should
motivate the directors to focus on
the long-term growth of the business,
however, annual targets can
encourage short-term strategies
rather than maximising shareholder
wealth,
Remuneration
The remuneration of executives
should be restructured to include a
significant proportion based on long-
term company performance. For
example, executives could be
granted share options, as this would
‘encourage focus on the longer term
position,
The chairman has sole responsibility
for liaising with the shareholders and
answering any of their questions.
However, this is a role which the
board as a whole should undertake
Relation with
shareholders
Page 31 of 283,
All members of the board should be
involved in ensuring that satisfactory
dialogue takes place with
shareholders, for example, all should
attend meetings with shareholders
such as the annual general meeting.
The board should state in the annual
report the steps they have taken to
ensure that the members of the
board, and in particular the non-
executive directors, develop an
understanding of the views of major
shareholders about the company.gp0P Academy Tet o4en 709 808
fF oor, HamA Bonk bing, Lo Thanh Noh a Trung die, or
Dx Floor, Groom Sae Ter No. 261 Pham Van Ding, ie Ts e009 720 42
1 loo, 28 ur a khan ste 1, Ho CRA Cy
Ill, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN ACTION
1. Board composition
‘The board should comprise a balance of executive directors (headed up by the chief executive}
and non-executive directors (headed up by the chairman).
Having a balanced board will mean that board decisions are not influenced by one group of
directors,
The roles of the chairman and chief executive officer (CEO) should be held by two separate
people to avoid concentration of power.
Page 32 of 283“siseq Aep
on fep e uo Auedwioa ap Sujuuny «
“huedwioo ay
Jo aahojdua auyny aya si 2us/2y
se om se wuy ay; jo quewazeuew
2ugnos ayy ut panjonut
uo aus! soyauig annnoaxg uy
‘uo129uIp anlynDaxe 342 Jo PDH
“Aueduios a3
Jo uonevado annzaye ayy saunsuz
£82 JO €€ aBeq
i juapuadapur
i '8q 07 S1apjsuod peog ay WoYM
| stoysauip aagnsaxs-uou astiduioa
! Pinoys pueog ayy yjey sea] ay °
“pueog ayy 03 sitys ‘a2uaadxe
‘quawagpn! annoafgo Sug
‘suomauip ananoaxe ay} J011UOW SC3N ©
‘Auedwioa
ayy jo quawaBeuew annnoaxe aunnos
‘aug ul ed 292 10U op pue siseq aun
~ued 2 uo patojdua Aljensn aie sa3N ©
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
dl
i
i
“SsauannDe]jo SoueYUs 02
auepuadapul aq pjnoys uews!ey> a4,
“seayyuuos-qns,
pueog jo uonesado annzay seansu3
Jewsayxa aun Ym UoegUNULOD
Jo sjauueyp Aio33¢ysnes seunsug
sBuaau pieog ye uoIssnosip
pue uoneuuoyul Jo moy saiqeug
i
iL
i
i
i
1 ‘suoMpne
i
i
i
i
i
‘suomauip angnaxs-uou aur jo peaH « |SAPP Aendony Tet 046 700 aa
For, Ham A Ba bldng, 54 Lo Thos Ng Ha Ba Trang dst Ha Nk Sapp
24 Foor, Grog Star Tae Ho. 261 Pham Van ong. ae Tu Liem ast Heol bine O99 29468
‘heer, Wo, 28g as Kha, Disk, HCH Cy
‘Advantages and disadvantages of participation by NEDs
‘© Oversight of the whole board; '* May not be sufficiently well-informed or
hhave time to full the role competently;
As they are independent they act as a eaenty
‘corporate conscience’; ‘© They are subject to the accusation that they
are staffed by an ‘old boy’ network and
may fail to report significant problems and
approve unjustified pay rises.
© They bring external expertise to the
‘company.
2. Committees
Page 34 of 283®sapp feet te Dae areas ote a
oo, Xt Ih Dit Ha Cn hy
IV. AUDIT COMMITTEES:
‘An audit committee is a committee, consisting of non-executive directors, which is able to view
a company’s affairs in a detached and independent way and liaise effectively between the main
board of directors and the external auditors.
1, Membership of audit committees
© — Agroup of independent, non-executive directors. Audit committees
* The committee should have at least 3 members (2 for smaller @@ @
companies). J
© Atleast one member should have recent and relevant financial
experience with an appropriate professional accountancy
qualification, © Atleast 3 members
# Atleast one
* Committee members should be independent of operational member should have
management. recent and relevant
financial experience
© Appointments to the audit committee should be made by the
board on the recommendation of the nomination committee.
‘© Appointments should be for a period of up to 3 years, extendable by no more than two
additional 3 year periods,
All requirements is subject to increase independence of audit committees,
Page 35 of 2832. The objectives and functions of the audit committee
Increasing public confidence in the credibility and objectivity of
published financial information;
+ Assisting
reporting;
rectors in meeting their responsi
ies in respect of financial
+ Strengthening the independent position of a company's external auditor
by providing an additional channel of communication.
* Monitoring the integrity of the financial statements;
+ Reviewing the company's internal financial controls;
+ Monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the internal audit
function;
* If there is no internal audit function, consider annually whether there is
‘anneed for one and recommend to the board;
+ Recommend in relation to the appointment and removal of the external
auditor and their remuneration;
Reviewing and monitoring the external auditor’s independence and
objectivity and the effectiveness of the audit process;
Developing and implementing policy on the engagement of the external.
auditor to supply non-audit services.
[ Exam focus: Benefits of establishing an audit committees
Exampl
eptember ~ December 2014 ~ Sample Question
Bluebird Enterprises Co (Bluebird) isa retail company planning to list on a stock exchange within
the next six months, and management has been advised by the company’s auditors about the
heed for compliance with corporate governance provisions. In particular, the finance director is
looking to recruit non-executive directors as he understands that Bluebird will need to establish
an audit committee.
The finance director has two potential non-executive directors whom he is considering,
approaching to join the board of Bluebird. Antony Goldfinch is currently an executive sales
director of a listed multi-national banking company; he sits on an audit committee of another
Page 36 of 283,(®snpp eek tn rae,
A Stes 1 ar, Ne. 2A Loy Ha sn, Oe 1, Ho Ch Cy
company as a non-executive director and Is agreeable to being paid a fixed fee which is not
related to profits. Jacob Mallard is currently a finance director of a small retail company, which
does not compete with Bluebird; he has expressed an interest in a fixed seven year contract and
he is the brother of Bluebird’s chief executive.
Required
1) Explain the benefits to Bluebird Enterprises Co of establishing an audit committee.
2) Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of appointing:
‘© Anthony Goldfinch; and
* Jacob Mallard
‘as non-executive directors of Bluebird Enterprises Co.
Guidance:
You will be given a case study in which a company has problems. Audit committee could
help company solve these problems and increasing public confidence in the credibility and
objectivity of published financial information.
Make sure you understand the functions of audit committees so you are able to explain their
benefits,
You should analyse the case using input information given in the question.
Answer:
1) Appointing an audit committee will benefit Bluebird in the following ways:
© Bluebird does not currently have any non-executive directors, hence once appointed, they
will bring considerable external experience to the board as well as challenging the decisions
of executive directors and contributing to independent judgements,
‘©The finance director will benefit in that he will be able to raise concerns and discuss
accounting issues with the audit committee.
+ {twill help to improve the quality of the financial reporting of Bluebird; whilst the company
already has a finance director, the audit committee will assist by reviewing the financial
statements.
‘© The establishment of an audit committee can help to improve the internal control
environment of the company. The audit committee is able to devote more time and
attention to areas such as internal controls.
Page 37 of 283,@snpp
2 Peen, Gro Sat Ton, No.2 v8
4 ror, No, tong Khao Ds
© If Bluebird has an internal audit (1A) department, then establishing an audit committee will
also improve the independence of I.
‘+ The audit committee can also provide advice on risk management to the executive
directors. They can create a climate of discipline and control and reduce the opportunity for
fraud, and increase public confidence in the credibility and objectivity of the financial
statements.
© The audit committee will assume responsibility for appointing and liaising with the external
audit firm, thus ensuring the independence of the external auditor especially in cases of
dispute with management.
oO)
i
i
‘Antony Goldfinch
Jacob Mallard
‘Advantages
Antony Goldfinch already has,
experience of being a NED for
another company and he has sat on
an audit committee, hence he will be
familiar with what the role entails
and will be able to bring experience
of being a NED to Bluebird. In
addition, Antony Goldfinch has
indicated he is agreeable to being
paid a fixed fee which is not profit
related; this is important as an
independent NED's remuneration
should be unrelated to the
performance of the company.
Jacob Mallard is currently a finance
director and so he possesses recent
and relevant financial experience
which is required for at least one
member of the audit committee. In
addition, he operates in the retail
industry and so would be aware of
key issues facing companies like
Bluebird and so would have an
appropriate mix of experience and
knowledge.
Disadvantages
Appointing Antony Goldfinch as a
NED has disadvantages as he works
for a banking company and so would
not have relevant experience of
companies such as Bluebird; hence
he could lack the critical skills and
relevant experience needed to
provide meaningful advice to the
executive directors. In addition,
‘Antony Goldfinch is already an
executive director for a _large
Jacob Mallard is the brother of the
chief executive and therefore he is
ot an independent NED. He might
be inclined to agree with the chief
executive as he is his brother rather
than providing the level of objective
judgement required from a NED.
Also he wants a contract as a NED
for a period of seven years; all
directors including NEDs must be
subject to re-election at _regular
Page 38 of 283,LAPP Rcaeny
Bh Hor, Nam A Baw tld, 58 Le Thin Nl a Trg dst, a Nod
2 Foot, Geer Star Mo, 261 Ph Nn Oey, ae Tra Ql, Had
another company; it
3. Benefi
and problems
© Improve credibility of the financial
statements through an impartial review of
the financial statements and discussion of
significant issues with the external
auditors,
‘© Increase public confidence in the audit
opinion as the audit committee will
monitor the independence of the external
auditors.
© Stronger control environment as the audit
committee help to create a culture of
compliance and control.
© The internal audit function will report to
the audit committee increasing their
independence and adding weight to their
recommendations.
The skills, knowledge and experience (and
independence) of the audit committee
members can be an invaluable resource
for a business,
© It may be easier and cheaper to arrange
finance, as the presence of an audit
committee can give a perception of good
corporate governance.
¢ It will be less of a burden to meet listing
requirements if an audit committee
(which is usually a listing requirement) is
|__ already established.
multinational company and a NED for
might
difficult for him to devote sufficient
time to his role at Bluebird.
|
be
intervals not exceeding three years.
Difficulties recruiting the right -non-
executive directors who have relevant
skills, experience and sufficient time to
become effective members of the
‘committee.
‘The cost. Non-executive directors are
normally remunerated and their fees
can be quite expensive,
Page 39 of 283@®snpp Teeth rats nti orat te Sn
V. COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE
1, The need of communicating with those charged with governance
Those charged with governance is defined by ISA 260 as: “The person(s) or organisation(s) with
responsibility for overseeing the strategic direction of the entity and obligations related to the
accountability of the entity.”
ISA 260 (Revised) Communication with Those Charged with Governance, sets out guidance for
auditors on the communication of audit matters arising from the audit of the financial
statements of an entity with those charged with governance.
‘Communication with those charged with governance is necessary because:
© It assists the auditor and those charged with governance to understand audit-related
‘matters in context and allows them to develop a constructive working relationship.
© Itallows the auditor to obtain information relevant to the audit.
‘© It assists those charged with governance to fulfil their responsibility to oversee the financial
reporting process, thus reducing the risks of material misstatement in the financial
statements.
2. Matters to be communicated by auditors to those charged with governance
© The auditor's responsibilities in relation to the financial statement audit.
© Planned scope and timing of the audit.
‘© Significant findings from the audit.
© Auditor independence.
Page 40 of 283ha, Nam ABan bldg, 54 La Than Ng Ht a Tung die, a Noi Seppe
ray Si oa 20 Pa ht fo at Hane Ht 29483
IV. PRACTICE
1. Question
Question 1: Which TWO of the following are functions of audit committees?
(i) Planning the annual external audit.
(ii) Reviewing the effectiveness of internal financial controls.
(iil) Reviewing and monitoring the external auditor's independence.
(iv) Processing year-end journal adjustments to the financial statements.
A. (i)and (iv)
8. (i) and (ii)
Cc. il) and (iv)
D. Gi) and (i
Question 2: Cocklebiddy Co does not currently have an internal audit function. Which of the
following summarises the requirements of corporate governance regulations in respect of
internal audit?
‘A. The audit committee must review the need for an internal audit function on an annual
basis.
B. The audit committee must establish an internal audit committee as soon as possible.
CC. There must either be an audit committee or internal audit fun
requirement to have both,
n in place but there is no
D. The finance director must review the need for an internal audit function and should make a
request to the audit committee if itis decided that an internal audit function would be
beneficial
Question 3: Which of the following is the main purpose of the remuneration committee?
A. To ensure that the costs of the company are kept under control.
8. To ensure no director is involved in setting his own pay and the pay that is set is at an
To ensure decision making power for the company is not concentrated in the hands of one
individual
D, To ensure executives are paid a large basic salary irrespective of performance.
Page 41 of 283APP Acadamy Yet 406 700 #8
Foy, Nam Aan balding 4 Le Thanh Nigh Ha a Tang atic, Ha Nah Spe
Dn Pot, anen Stor tes fn 261 Pham Van Dong, fae Unmet Hank MefineOa68 72046
2. Answer:
Question 1: D
Reviewing the effectiveness of internal financial controls and reviewing and monitoring the
external auditor's independence.
Question 2: A
Reviewing the effectiveness of internal financial controls and reviewing and monitoring the
external auditor's independence.
Question 3: 8
Directors should not be involved in setting their own pay. Remuneration should be performance
related. Remuneration should be sufficient to attract, retain and motivate but should not be
excessive,
Page 42 of 283,(®snpp Peeing ero ea ae
Teo: Ho 2ALtong Fu Kan Dobe 9, Ho Chek hy
CHAPTER 4: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND ACCEPTANCE
LEARNING OUTCOMES
* Acknowledge fundamental principles of ethical behavior.
© Understand and be able to identify Potential threats recommend safeguards.
© Understand actions auditor need to carry out when accept/continuing an audit
engagement.
‘* Understand the importance of engagement letters and their contents.
|. Fundamental — i
ae
principles
|. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS,
1. The need of professional ethics
The purpose of assurance engagements is to increase the confidence of the intended users. To
do that, the assurance provider needs to be independent of their client, behave and be seen to
behave in an ethical, professional manner.
2. The fundamental principles
The ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct sets out five fundamental principles of professional
ethics and provides a conceptual framework for applying those principles.
Page 43 of 283Bh or Nem A nding 5 Le Thanh Ng Ha a Tung ee Ha Noh Sappeiin
2a Foon Groen Stor orto, 26% Pham Van Gang fae Tu amshet Hanol tine Ha 729468
The five fundamental principles are summarised in the table below:
Integrity Members shall be ‘straightforward and honest in
all professional and business relationships'. |
Members shall ‘not allow bias, conflicts of
‘Objectivity interest or undue influence of others to override
professional or business judgements’
Members have a continuing duty to ‘maintain
professional knowledge and skill at the level
required to ensure that a client or employer
receives competent professional services based
on current developments in practice, legislation
and techniques
Act diligently and in accordance with applicable
technical and professional standards’,
Members shall ‘respect the confidentiality of
information acquired as a result of professional
and business relationships and, therefore, not
disclose any such information to third parties
without proper and spe authority, or unless
Comidenaly there is a legal or professional right or duty to
disclose’. Confidential information acquired as a
result of professional and business relationships
must not be used for the personal advantage of
members or third parties.
Members shall comply with relevant laws and
Professional behaviour regulations and avoid any action that discredits.
the profession,
Professional competence and due care
Page 44 of 283,Sap Acton Tel 0466 709 848
Sappoauvn
att 0309 729469
Il, THREATS AND SAFEGUARDS
1, Threats to independence and objectivity
Roce
ee a
cerca
er urn
eae
or regulation,
into the profession,
ional development,
's, monitoring and dis
stion/ren
feguards created by inc
professional devel
contentious iss
rofessional bo
1.1. Self-interest threats
Aselt-interest threat is the threat that a financial or othe
the professional accountant's judgement or behaviour’
Fee dependency Non-listed clients
Over-dependence on an audit client could | ¢ Reducing dependency on the client.
lead the auditor to ignore adjustments
required in the financial statements for fear
of losing the client
© Consulting with a third party on key audit
judgments,
‘© Having an external quality control review.
Listed clients
A firm's independence is threatened, and
Page 45 of 2834" Flor, Mo. 24 Long Has Khan, Obit 1, No Ci in Cay |
@sapp
Gifts and hospitality
Acceptance of goods, services or hospitality
from an audit client can create self-interest
and familiarity threats as the auditor may
feel indebted to the client,
‘Owning shares/financial interests
‘The auditor will want to maximise return
from the investment and overlook audit
adjustments which would affect the value of
their investment
Loans and guarantees
A loan or guarantee from (or deposit with)
an assurance client will not create a threat to
independence provided that:
© Itis on commercial terms, and
Made in the normal course of business.
Business relationships
‘Audit firms (or members) enter into business
relationships with clients (e.g. joint ventures,
marketing arrangements).
Potential employment with an audit client
should be reviewed if total fees from a listed
audit client exceed 15% of the firm's total
fees for two consecutive years.
* Disclose the issue to those charged with
governance at the client.
* An independent review of the work should
be performed
Gifts may be accepted if:
© Trivial and inconsequential.
‘© Offered in the normal course of business
without intention to influence decision-
making.
* Approved by a partner.
‘The offer of gifts and hospitality must be
documented in the audit file even if refused.
Dispose of the shares immediately or be
removed from the team.
External review of the work performed,
© In the case of audit firms, or partners of
those firms, unless immaterial, no
safeguard can reduce this threat to an
acceptable level.
In the case of audit team members, the
individual should be removed from the
audit team.
© The policies and procedures of the fir
Page 46 of 283,PP Academy Tet 00 70944
1h or, Nm A Bank nag, Lo Than Nh, Hal a Trung dic a Noi Sappedv
4 2 Foor, Gree Star Toa, No. 261 Phat Van bang, Hac Tuam dt, Hanh Hat G89 729463
Teer No 2 tong a, Ds 3 Chi i ay
‘A member of the engagement team has
reason to believe they may become an
employee of the client they will not wish to
do anything to affect their potential future
employment.
should require such individuals to notify
the firm of the possibility of employment
with the client.
‘© Remove the individual from the assurance
engagement.
* Perform an independent review of any
significant judgments made by that
“individual.
Overdue fees
The overdue fees may be regarded as a loan
(loans are not permitted to an audit client)
© Do not perform any further work for, or
issue any reports to, the client until the
outstanding fees are paid or arrangements
have been agreed with the client for
payment.
* An independent review of the work should
be performed.
Contingent fees
The auditor would have incentive to ensure a
particular outcome is achieved in order to
maximise the audit fee. £.g. overlook audit
adjustments that would reduce profit if the
fee is a percentage of the profit.
‘Compensation and evaluation policies
‘A member of the audit team is evaluated on
‘or compensated for selling non assurance
services to that audit client. As a result, they
will compromise their independence.
‘Actual or threatened litigation
Litigation could represent a breakdown of
trust in the relationship between auditor and
dient. This may affect the impartiality of the
auditor, and lead to a reluctance of
management to disclose _—_relevant
information to the auditor.
Fees based on a particular outcome, e.g. level |
of profits of the company, are not permitted
for assurance services.
© Removing such members from the audit
team.
© Having a professional accountant review
the work of the member of the audit
team. vee
© Discussing the matter with the client's
audit committee.
© If the litigation involves an individual,
removing that individual from the
engagement team,
© Obtaining an external review of the work
done.
* If adequate safeguards cannot be
implemented the firm must withdraw
from or decline the engagement.
Page 47 of 283supp ala eo St rin 26 Pn a a he
Toor, Mo. 28 Ler Kha, Ds 1, oh Mh hy
1.2. Familiarity threats
Familiarity threat can occur when the auditor becomes too sympathetic or too trusting of a
client and loses professional scepticism, or where the relationship between the auditor and
client goes beyond professional boundaries.
Long association of senior personnel
Using the same senior personnel in an Rotate senior personnel.
engagement team over a long period may
cause the auditor to become too
trusting/less sceptical of the client resulting
in material misstatements going undetected. | Listed clients
* Independent partner/quality control
reviews,
+ Key audit partners must be rotated after
‘no more than seven years with a minimum
break of two years. Ifthe client becomes
listed, the length of time the partner has
served before becoming listed is taken
into account.
* In exceptional circumstances, a maximum
‘one year extension is permitted where
necessary to maintain audit quality
Family and other personal relationships | «Remove the individual from the
A partner (or employee) of the firm has a engagement teams:
family or personal relationship with © Structisre the engagement team so that
someone at the client who is able to exert the individual does not deal with matters
significant influence over the financial that are the responsibility of the close
statements (or subject matter of another family member.
assurance engagement)
Recruitment services The firm cannot provide recruitment services.
Familiarity, self.interest and intimidation _| if FesPect of directors or senior management
threats may occur ifthe firm is involved in _| For listed clients,
recruiting senior personnel for the client.
‘Audit staff leave the firm to join the client | © Assign individuals to the audit team who
A self-interest, familiarity or intimidation havessufficientexper/ence in relation to
threat may arise where an employee of the | the individual who has joined the client,
firm becomes a director or employee of an_| » Perform a quality control review of the
Page 48 of 283SAPP Acadony Tet 0406 709 898
18 Flor, Nam A Bark Luling Le thant Mg, Haifa Teng dati Ha Nol Suppo rn
24 Flot, Green Sta Toes Wo. 201 Pham Yan Dov, Hae tiem Stel, anol Hodes 0 72946
pn Me) 1 oar, No 2A Lng Has hon, Ds 1, Ho CaM iy
assurance client (in a position to exert
significant influence over the financial
statements or subject matter of another
assurance engagement).
1.3. Self-review threats
assurance engagement,
‘Accounting and bookkeeping services
Self-review threats arise when members review their own work or advice as part of an
‘engagement.
© For partners joining public interest
entities, independence would be deemed
to be compromised unless:
© Subsequent to the partner ceasing to
be a key audit partner or senior
partner, the public interest entity had
issued audited financial statements
covering a period of not less than
‘twelve months and
© The partner was not a member of the
audit team with respect to the audit of
those financial statements.
Non-listed clients
© Afirm can provide accounting and
bookkeeping services, including payroll
services, of a routine or mechanical nature.
© Separate teams must be used,
© Managerial decisions must not be made by
the firm, and the source data, underlying
assumptions, and subsequent adjustments
must be originated or approved by the
client,
Listed clients
‘* Afirm cannot provide accounting and
bookkeeping services.
* A firm can provide accounting services for
divisions or related entities of a listed client
if separate teams are used and the service
relates to maltersinmmaterial tothe |
Page 49 of 283Qu SSeecccerce SE:
division/related entity.
Internal audit services
In addition to the self-review threat, the
auditor needs to be careful not to assume
‘management responsibilities.
‘A firm cannot provide internal audit services
for a listed audit client.
Where services are provided, separate teams
must be used.
Taxation services
Tax calculations for inclusion in the
financial statements and tax planning
advice create a self-review threat.
Completion of tax returns is not deemed to
create a self-review threat.
Non-listed clients
‘© Advice should be obtained from an external
tax professional
© The work should be reviewed by a senior
person with appropriate expertise that has
not been involved with the audit.
Listed clients
A firm cannot prepare tax calculations.
Tax advice
IT services
IT services may create a self-review threat
and also be considered to be assuming
management responsibilities.
Valuation services
The firm should not provide tax advice that
depends on a particular accounting treatment
and is material to the financial statements.
Other tax advice is allowable with safeguards.
The firm can only provide IT services which
involve:
‘© Design or implementation of IT systems
unrelated to internal controls or financial
reporting.
‘© Implementation of off-the-shelf accounting
software,
‘© Evaluating and making recommendations
‘on a system designed or operated by
another service provider or by the entity.
Non-listed clients
‘© Valuation services that are material to the.
financial statements and involve a
significant degree of subjectivity should not
be provided.
© Where the threat is not deemed significant,
different personnel should be used.
Page 50 of 283
Httne 0369 729.468SAPP Acadeny Tol 0466 709 a8
2 Flor, NA Hank bang, $4 Le Thanh Noh Ha Ba Teng dae ta Not Sappe sn
29 Foor Gree Star Towet, No. 201 Phan Yan Dor, 8 Trem asic Hanct—— Hotis a 729463
Pi Rear 7 Flo Ho. 2A veg Ht Khanh, Dist! Ha Ch hl Cy
© A professional should review the valuation
work performed.
Listed clients
Valuation services that are material to the
financial statements should not be provided,
Temporary staff assignments
A self-review threat will be created if staff
are loaned from the audit firm to the client.
If the person was assigned to the audit they
would be evaluating work for which they
had been responsible during the temporary
assignment and may not detect errors in
their work.
Corporate finance services
Self-review and advocacy threats may be
created if a firm:
© Assists an audit client in developing
corporate strategies.
© Identifies possible targets for the audit
client to acquire.
'* Advises on disposal transactions.
‘© Assists finance raising transactions.
© Provides structuring advice.
Client staff joins audit firm
A director or employee of an assurance
client becomes an employee of the firm.
1.4. Advocacy threats
Staff may be loaned to the client provided:
© The loan period is short.
© The person does not assume management
responsibilities,
© The client is responsible for directing and
supervising the person.
© The loaned staff member is nota member
of the audit team,
If there is doubt over the accounting treatment
or if the outcome will materially affect the
financial statements, the service should not be
provided.
Where services can be provided, the firm
should use professionals who are not members
of the audit team to perform the service, or
advise the audit team on the service.
Such individuals should not be assigned to the
audit if that person would be evaluating
elements of the financial statements for which
they had prepared accounting records.
‘An employee or partner of a firm cannot also
be an employee or director of an assurance:
client
Advocacy threats arise in those situations where the audit firm promotes a position or opinion
to the point that subsequent objectivity is compromised. Advocacy threats might also arise if
the firm promoted shares in a listed audit client.
Page 51 of 283,(®sapp recreeonmeeee mene aera Set Reet a
Examples include:
© Representing the client in court or in any dispute where the matter is material to the
financial statements.
© Negotiating on the client's behalf for finance.
Where the amounts are material the audit firm must not act for the audit client in this way. Any
request for such services must be politely declined:
Where the matter is not material to the financial statements the firm should:
© Use professionals who are not members of the audit team to perform the service, or
© Have a professional who was not involved in providing the legal services advise the audit
team on the service and review any financial statement treatment.
Providing services involving promoting, dealing in, or underwriting an audit client’s shares
would create an advocacy or self-review threat so significant that no safeguards could reduce
the threat to an acceptable level. Accordingly, a firm shall not provide such services to an audit
lent.
15. Intimidation threats
‘Actual or perceived pressures from the client, or attempts to exercise undue influence over the
assurance provider create an intimidation threat, e.g. actual or threatened litigation between
the auditor and audit client (in which case it may be necessary to resign from the engagement).
Intimidation can arise from some of the same situations mentioned above, for example:
© Fee dependency.
© Personal relationships.
© Audit partner joining the client.
© Litigation between the audit firm and client.
‘The safeguards to address these threats are the same as to address the other threats.
If the threat cannot be eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level, the assurance provider
must decline or resign from the engagement.
Page 52 of 283,(®snpp Seoermete Sete pe PaO
Ho Chan chy
Exam focus: Identify ethical threats and suggest safeguards
Guidance:
Step 1: Identify ethical threats
Candidates need to identify the threats incurred from the scenario which may affect
independence and then identify which category of which each ethical threat belongs to. Just
restating the fact would not score any marks, as the identification of the ethical threat was
required along with an explanation.
Step 2: Suggest safeguards
Candidates need to explain how this may affect the auditor's independence. Many
candidates did not explain the threats correctly or in sufficient details, often stating “this will
reduce independence and objectivity’, this is not an explanation of HOW objectivity could be
affected.
1.6. Example
Example 1
You are an audit manager at Buffon & Co, responsible for the audit of Maldini Co,
The audit engagement partner for Maldini Co, a listed company, has been in place for
approximately eight years and her son has just been offered a role with Maldini Co as a sales,
manager.
‘This role would entitle him to shares in Maldini Co as part of his remuneration package.
Maldini Co's board of directors are considering establishing an internal audit function, and the
finance director has asked the audit firm, Buffon & Co, about the differences in the role of
internal audit and external audit.
If the internal audit function is established, the directors have suggested that they may wish to
outsource this to Buffon & Co.
‘The finance director has suggested to the board that if Buffon & Co are appointed as internal as
well as external auditors, then fees should be renegotiated with at least 20% of all internal and
external audit fees being based on the profit after tax of the company, as this will align the
interests of Buffon & Co and Maldini Co.
In relation to the audit engagement partner holding the role for
of employment with Maldini Co
ight years, and her son's offer
Page 53 of 283®snpp ree rea i pe eee RE
Required:
1) Identify which of the following facts from the scenario represent valid threats to
independence, matching each threat to the appropriate category.
Facts Category of threat
(1) Maldini Co has asked for advice regarding Familiarity
role of internal audit
(2) Partner's son may hold share in Maldini Co. Self interest
(3) Maldini Co has asked Buffon & Co to carry Self — review
cout internal audit work.
(4) Audit partner has been in position for eight Self - interest
years.
(5) Fee will be 20% of profit after tax. No threat
2) Which of the following safeguards should be implemented in order to comply with ACCA's
Code of Ethics and Conduct?
‘A. The audit partner should be removed from the audit team.
8. - The audit partner should be removed if her son accepts the position.
C. An independent review partner should be appointed.
D.
Buffon & Co should resign from the audit.
Page 54 of 283,(sapp ‘erentrwmi ss nearest et a
7 Bor Mo 2A ong Hs Kan vst, Ho hb
Answer:
et)
‘Audit partner has been in position for eight years > Familiarity (Long association of senior
personnel).
Partner's son may hold shared in Maldini Co > Selt-interest (Owning shares/finani
iterests).
Maldini Co has asked Buffon & Co to carry out internal audit work > Self-review (Internal audit
services)
Fee will be 20% of profit after tax > Self-interest (Contingent fees).
2A
If the engagement partner's son accepts the role and obtains shares in the company it would
constitute a self-interest threat BUT as the partner has already exceeded the seven-year.
selationship rule, in line with ACCA’s Code of Ethics and Conduct, the partner should be rotated
off the audit irrespective of the decision made by her son.
‘As Maldini Co is a listed company an engagement quality control reviewer should already be in
place in line with ISA 220.
It is unlikely that the firm needs to resign from the audit (due to the stated circumstances) as
the threat to objectivity can be mitigated.
Example 2: (March/June 2017 ~ Sample Questions)
You are an audit supervisor of Caving & Co and you are planning the audit of Hurling Co, a listed
company, for the year ending 31 March 20X7. The company manufactures computer
components and forecast profit before tax is $33-6m and total assets are $79-3m.
Hurling Co distributes its products through wholesalers as well as via its own website, The
website was upgraded during the year at a cost of $1:1m. Additionally, the company entered
into a transaction in February to purchase a new warehouse which will cost $3-2m. Hurling Co's,
legal advisers are working to ensure that the legal process will be completed by the year end,
The company issued $5m of irredeemable preference shares to finance the warehouse
purchase.
During the year the finance director has increased the useful economic lives of fixtures and
fittings from three to four years as he felt this was a more appropriate period. The finance
director has informed the engagement partner that a revised credit period has been agreed
with one of its wholesale customers, as they have been experiencing difficulties with repaying
the balance of $1:2m owing to Hurling Co. In January 20X7, Hurling Co introduced a new bonus
based on sales targets for its sales staff. This has resulted in a significant number of new
Page 55 of 283,@®snpp SFr ate tts ea eg sa
1 Foor, Ho: 2R Lg as Khanh, Ds Ho Cn ly,
wholesale customer accounts being opened by sales staff. The new customers have been given
favorable credit terms as an introductory offer, provided goods are purchased within a two-
month period. Asa result, revenue has increased by 5% on the prior year.
The company has launched several new products this year and all but one of these new
launches have been successful. Feedback on product Luge, launched four months ago, has been
mixed, and the company has just received notice from one of their customers, Petanque Co, of
intended legal action, They are alleging the product sold to them was faulty, resulting in a
significant loss of information and an ongoing detrimental impact on profits. As a precaution,
sales of the Luge product have been halted and a product recall has been initiated for any Luge
products sold in the last four months.
The finance director is keen to announce the company’s financial results to the stock market
earlier than last year and in order to facilitate this, he has asked if the audit could be completed
in a shorter timescale. In addition, the company is intending to propose a final dividend once
the financial statements are finalised
Hurling Co's finance director has informed the audit engagement partner that one of the
‘company's non-executive directors (NEDs) has just resigned, and he has enquired if the partners
at Caving & Co can help Hurling Co in recruiting a new NED. Specifically, he has requested the
engagement quality control reviewer, who was until last year the audit engagement partner on.
Hurling Co, assist the company in this recruitment. Caving & Co also provides taxation services
for Hurling Co in the form of tax return preparation along with some tax planning advice. The
finance director has recommended to the audit committee of Hurling Co that this year's audit
fee should be based on the company's profit before tax. At today's date, 20% of last year’s audit
fee Is still outstanding and was due to be paid three months ago.
Required:
1) Identify and explain FIVE ethical threats which may affect the independence of Caving & Co's
audit of Hurling Co; and
2) For each threat, suggest a safeguard to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.
Page 56 of 283sup
Answer
Co's financial results earlier than normal and
has asked if the audit can be completed in a
shorter time frame,
This may create an intimidation threat on the
team as they may feel under pressure to cut
corners and not raise issues in order to satisfy
the deadlines and this could compromise the
audit performed.
‘A non-executive director (NED) of Hurling Co
hhas just resigned and the directors have asked
whether the partners of Caving & Co can assist
them in recruiting to fill this vacancy.
This represents a self-interest threat as the
audit firm cannot undertake the recruitment of
| members of the board of Hurling Co, especially
a NED who will have a key role in overseeing
the audit process and audit firm
The engagement quality control reviewer
(EQCR) assigned to Hurling Co was until last
year the audit engagement partner.
This represents a familiarity threat as the
| partner will have been associated with Hurling
Co for a tong period ot time and so may not
retain professional scepticism and objectivity.
Caving & Co provides taxation services, the
to the recruitment of the NED.
The finance director is keen to report Hurling
objectivity of the audit team and quality of
audit engagement and possibly services related |
8 Flos, aA fan ug, Le Th Nght, Hal a Trung disie, Ha Nok Sapa
2a Flour, Coen Star fe, No 261 Pham Van Dor, ac TuCian Hetil Hanoi Hotun 009 729463
Fr No. 2A wong Haar anh Ove 1 Ho Cun cy
The engagement partner should discuss the
timing of the audit with the finance director
to understand if the audit can commence
earlier, so as to ensure adequate time for
the team to gather evidence,
If this is not possible, the partner should
politely inform the finance director that the
team will undertake the audit in
accordance with all relevant ISAs and
quality control procedures. Therefore the
audit is unlikely to be completed earlier.
If any residual concerns remain or the
intimidation threat continues, then Caving
& Co may need to consider resigning from
the engagement.
Caving & Co is able to assist Hurling Co in
that they can undertake roles such as
reviewing a shortlist of candidates and
reviewing qualifications and suitability.
However, the firm must ensure that they
are not seen to undertake management
decisions and so must not seek out
candidates for the position or make the
final decision on who is appointed.
| As Hurling Co is a listed company, then the
previous audit engagement partner should
not be involved in the audit for at least a
period of two years. An alternative EQCR
should be appointed instead.
Caving & Co should assess whether audit,
recruitment and taxation fees would |
represent more than 15% of gross practice
Page 57 of 283,@®sarp
Li etn ‘rac 2
2n' Foon Green Star lef 26 am Van ara ae Unmet
Noctis cy
There is a potential self-interest or intimidation
threat as the total fees could represent a
significant proportion of Caving & Co's income
and the firm could become overly reliant on
Hurling Co, resulting in the firm being less |
challenging or objective due to fear of losing
such a significant client.
income for two consecutive years.
If the recurring fees are likely to exceed
15% of annual practice income this year,
additional consideration should be given as
to whether the recruitment and taxation
services should be undertaken by the firm.
In addition, if the fees do exceed 15%, then
this should be disclosed to those charged
with governance at Hurling Co.
If the firm retains all work, it should
arrange for a pre-issuance (before the audit
nis issued) or post-issuance (after
the opinion has been issued) review to be
undertaken by an external accountant or by
a regulatory body.
The finance director has suggested that the
audit fee is based on the profit before tax of
Hurling Co which constitutes a contingent fee.
Contingent fees give rise to a self-interest
threat and are prohibited under ACCA’s Code
of Ethics and Conduct. If the audit fee is based
‘on profit, the team may be inclined to ignore
audit adjustments which could lead to a
reduction in profit.
Caving & Co will not be able to accept
contingent fees and should communicate
to those charged with governance at
Hurling Co that the external audit fee needs
to be based on the time spent and levels of
skill and experience of the required audit
team members.
At today’s date, 20% of last year’s audit fee is
still outstanding and was due for payment
three months ago.
A self-interest threat can arise if the fees
remain outstanding, as Caving & Co may feel
pressure to agree to certain accounting
adjustments in order to have the previous year
and this year’s audit fee paid.
In addition, outstanding fees could be
perceived as a loan to a client which is strictly
prohibited.
Caving & Co should discuss with those
charged with governance the reasons why
the final 20% of last year’s fee has not been
paid, They should agree a revised payment
schedule which will result in the fees being
settled before much more work is
performed for the current year audit.
Page 58 of 283©®sapp piece ti emt ea LE oy
os | 1 Floar o. 2AL ong has Kaa, Diu, Ho Chi Cty
2. Conflicts of interest
A conflict of interest arises when the same audit firm is appointed for two companies that
interact with each other, for example:
® Companies which compete in the same market.
© Companies which trade with each other.
A conflict of interest may create a threat to the fundamental principles of objectivity and
confidentiality.
It may be perceived that the auditor cannot provide objective services and advice to a company
where it also audits a competitor.
Professional accountants should always act in the best interests of the client. However, where
conflicts of interest exist, the firm's work should be arranged to avoid the interests of one being
adversely affected by those of another and to prevent a breach of confidentiality,
In order to ensure this, the firm must notify all affected clients of the conflict and obtain their
consent to act. The following additional safeguards should be considered:
® Separate engagement teams (with different engagement partners and team members).
# Procedures to prevent access to information, e.g, physical separation of the team members
and confidential/secure data filing.
‘© Signed confidentiality agreements by the engagement team members.
‘© Regular review of the application of safeguards by an independent person of appropriate
seniority.
© Advise the clients to seek independent advice.
If adequate safeguards cannot be implemented (i.e. where the acceptance/ continuance of an
engagement would, despite safeguards, materially prejudice the interests of any clients) the
firm must decline or resign from one or more conflicting engagements.
Example: Murray case study: Ethical issues
You are an audit manager in Wimble & Co, a large audit firm which specialises in providing audit,
and accountancy services to manufacturing companies. Murray Co has asked your firm to
accept appointment as external auditor. Murray Co manufactures sports equipment. Your firm
also audits Barker Co, another manufacturer of sports equipment, and therefore your firm is
confident it has the experience to carry out the audit.
Page 59 of 283,| SAPP Acatomy Tet 466 7098
A Hoo, Horm A Bane bing 5 19 Thanh Noi a Ba Tung esi, tai Sager
2x Foon Goon Stor Tony No 261 Pham Nan Deng fae I Unmet. ennt Metin: 0888 729463
{Pras No: 2g Khan, Dstt No Nt Cy
Required: Describe the steps Wimble & Co should take to manage the conflict of interest arising,
from performing the audit of Murray Co and Barker Co.
Answer:
Wimble & Co must inform both clients of the conflict and obtain their consent to act.
Separate teams and engagement partners must be used for each audi
Procedures should be in place to prevent access to information e.g. using teams from different
offices,
The audit teams should sign confidentiality agreements. An independent review partner should
be assigned to ensure the safeguards have been effective.
Ill, ACCEPTING/CONTINUING AN AUDIT ENGAGEMENT
1
Appointment H
‘ethics 1
t
| Accept/ continuing
an audit
1. Appointment ethics
1.1. Before accepting nomination
Before anew audit client is accepted, the auditors must ensure:
* No independence or other ethical problems likely to cause conflict with the ethical code.
© The audit have been appointed in a proper and legal manner.
‘An appointment decision chart is shown below:
Page 60 of 283PP Rcadeay
Approach by new audit
client
from client to
contact old
auditor?,
Yes
Le Than Nh Ba Tangs, Ha to
No need to follow professional
rules ~ the auditor can make own
decision
¥
Write for all information
pertinent to the
appointment section
Prospective auditor should,
decline appointment
Old auditor
have permission
to reply?,
Old auditor
provide
Information?,
Accept/reject appointment
decision
¥
Give old auditor due notice then
decide on basis of knowledge
obtained otherwise
Page 61 of 283nkctaing, Le Thanh Nh Hol Ra Tg il, Ha Nov Sapp
1.2 Procedures after accepting nomination
‘© Ensure that the outgoing auditors’ removal or resignation has been properly conducted in
accordance with national legislation.
© Ensure that the new auditors’ appointment is valid,
© Set up and submit a letter of engagement to the directors of the company.
‘These procedures should not be carried out until the client screening procedures discussed in
Section 2 have been carried out.
1.3 Other matters
Where the previous auditors have fees still owing to them by the client, the new auditors need
not decline appointment solely for this reason, They should decide how far they may go in
aiding the former auditors to obtain their fees, as well as whether they should accept the
appointment.
Once a new appointment has taken place, the new auditors should obtain all books and papers
which belong to the client from the old auditors.
2. Client screening
‘As well as contacting the previous auditors many firms, particularly larger ones, carry out
stringent checks on potential client companies and their management. Some of the basic factors
for consideration are given below.
2.1. Management integrity
The integrity of those managing a company will be of great importance, particularly if the
company is controlled by one or a few dominant personalities.
Page 62 of 283,®sapp ithe hte atte an a ae a a
1 Floor, Mo 2 Lucey as Kath, Ds 1, Ho Cut hy
2.2. Risk
‘The following table contrasts low and high risk clients:
Good long-term prospects. Poor recent or forecast performance:
Well-financed. ‘Likely lack of finance. re
Strong internal controls. Significant control deficiencies.
Conservative, prudent accounting policies. | Evidence of questionable integrity, doubtful |
accounting policies
| Competent, honest management. Lack of finance director.
Fewunusualtransactions. ——=——SS——= Significant related party or unexplained |
transactions.
It might be necessary to assign specialists in response to these risks, particularly industry
specialists, as independent reviewers.
2.3. Engagement economics
‘The firm should consider the acceptability of the fee. The fee should be commensurate with the
level of risk.
In addition, the creditworthiness of the prospective client should be considered as non-payment
of fees can create a self-interest threat.
2.4, Relationship with client
The audit firm will generally want the relationship with a client to be long term. This is not only
to enjoy receiving fees year after year but also to allow the audit work to be enhanced by better,
knowledge of the client, thereby offering a better service.
Conflict of interest problems are significant here; the firm should establish that no existing
clients will cause difficulties as competitors of the new client. Other services to other clients
may have an impact here, not just audit
2.5. Ability to perform the work
The audit firm must have the resources to perform the work properly, as well as any specialist
knowledge or stills,
Page 63 of 283(®sapp HimtenhoenniattementsisensTwmawain | Sa ay
4 rar No. 2g Fu Mann, Dab, No Ch chy
3. Preconditions for an audit
ISA 210 Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements and the Code of Ethics and Conduct provides
guidance to the professional accountant when accepting new work.
Before accepting (or continuing with) an engagement the auditor must establish whether the
preconditions for an audit are present and that there is a common understanding between the
auditor and management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance.
The preconditions for an audit are that management acknowledges and understands its
responsibility for
© Preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework.
* Internal control necessary for the financial statements to give a true and fair view.
‘© Providing the auditor with access to all relevant information and explanations.
If the client imposes a limitation on the scope of the auditor's work to the extent that the
auditor believes it likely that a disclaimer of opinion will ultimately be issued then the auditor
shall not accept the engagement, unless required to do so by law.
4. Approval
Once all the relevant procedures and information gathering has taken place, the company can
be put forward for approval. The engagement partner will have completed a client acceptance
form and this, along with any other relevant documentation, will be submitted to the partner
who is in overall charge of accepting clients.
5. Col
Once the engagement is complete, the audit firm must revisit the acceptance considerations
again to ensure it is appropriate to continue for the following year. If any significant issues have
arisen during the year such as disagreements with management or doubts over management
integrity, the firm may consider resigning.
uance assessments
Page 64 of 283,SAPP Acad ToL o40e 709 488
8 Flor, NamtA Bark ualng 58. Thiet Hot, Hala Trang doe, Hat Sapp
2A Floor, Groen Sta Tes, to. 201 Pham Van Oung, Bae Tu Lian Mow Neal Hotine: C09 729469
gas ‘Fac, Wo. 24 Luang Mas Khe, Ost, Ho Gta Cy
IV. ENGAGEMENT LETTER
1. Purpose
‘The engagement letter specifies the nature of the contract between the firm and client. Its
purpose is to:
© Minimise the risk of any misunderstanding between the practitioner and client.
© Confirm acceptance of the engagement.
'* Set out the terms and conditions of the engagement. The letter will be sent before the
audit commences.
2. The contents of the engagement letter
The form and content of the audit engagement letter may vary for each entity and should
include:
© The objective and scope of the audit of the financial statements.
‘©The responsibilities of the auditor.
‘© The responsibilities of management.
‘* Identification of the applicable financial reporting framework for the preparation of the
financial statements.
© _ Reference to the expected form and content of any reports to be issued by the auditor.
Example of an audit engagement letter:
To the Board of Directors or the appropriate representative of senior management:
{The objective and scope of the audit]
You have requested that we audit the balance sheet of .... as of .. and the
related statements of income and cash flows for the year then ending. We are pleased to
confirm our acceptance and our understanding of this engagement by means of this letter.
Our audit will be made with the objective of our expressing an opinion on the financial
statements,
[The responsibilities of the auditor]
‘We will conduct our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (or refer to
relevant national standards or practices). Those Standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
| evaluating the overall financial statement presentation, |
S J
Page 65 of 283,yr SSeS.
[Limitation of an audit)
Because of the test nature and other inherent limitations of an audit, together with the
inherent limitations of any accounting and internal control system, there is an unavoidable
risk that even some material misstatements may remain undiscovered.
[Reporting]
In addition to our report on the financial statements, we expect to provide you with a
separate letter concerning any material weaknesses in accounting and internal control
systems which come to our notice.
[The responsibility of the managements]
We remind you that the responsibility for the preparation of financial statements including
adequate disclosure is that of the management of the company. This includes the
maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal controls, the selection and
application of accounting policies, and the safeguarding of the assets of the company. As part
of our audit process, we will request from management written confirmation concerning
representations made to us in connection with the audit.
We look forward to full cooperation with your staff and we trust that they will make available
to us whatever records, documentation and other information are requested in connection
with our audit. Our fees, which will be billed as work progresses, are based on the time
required by the individuals assigned to the engagement plus out-of-pocket expenses.
Individual hourly rates vary according to the degree of responsibility involved and the
experience and skill required.
[Other relevant information]
insert other information, such as fee arrangements, billings and other specific terms, as
‘appropriate.]
Iinsert appropriate reference to the expected form and content of the auditor’s report.)
[Confirmation of your agreement] Please sign and return the attached copy of this letter to
indicate that itis in accordance with your understanding of the arrangements for our audit of
the financial statements.
XYZ & Co.
‘Acknowledged on behalf of ABC Company by
(signed)
Name and Title
Date
Page 66 of 283,P Acany Tet 06 700 48
Toor, Nam Aank bldg, 54 Le Thanh tl, Mela Tony sui HAN) Sapp
‘eon Sar Towa, No. 261 Pha Varun, aT et ok, Naoko 09 729-409
@snpp
‘The content of the engagement letter should be agreed with the client before any engagement
related work commences.
V. PRACTICE
1. Question
Question 1; Which of these statements provides the best explanation of integrity?
Members should act diligently and in accordance with applicable professional standards.
A
8. Members should not bring the profession into disrepute.
C. Members should not use client information for personal advantage.
D.
Members should be straightforward and honest in all professional and business
relationships.
Question 2: Why do auditors need to be independent?
A. To ensure users of the auditor's report can place reliance on it and have faith it is not
biased.
B. Toensure the financial statements give a true and fair view.
To provide more regulation for auditors to increase the perception of quality,
D. The law requires it
Question 3: For clients where the level of fees must be monitored, what safeguard can the firm
apply to reduce the threat to an acceptable level?
{i) Rotation of audit team members on an annual basis.
(ii) Discussion of the matter with the audit committee.
(ii) Assign an engagement quality control review partner.
‘A. (i)and (i) only.
B. (i) and (ii) only.
C. (i) and (iii) only.
D.(, (i) and (ii
Page 67 of 2831 Aeademy Tet 0466 700 448
Floor, Ham A nk being, Le The Nahi Hal a Tn dic Ha No
2. Answer:
Question 1:0
Integrity means straightforward and honest.
Question 2:
Independence means freedom from bias and influence.
Question 3:
Independence matters should be discussed with the audit committee and an engagement
quality review partner should be assigned. Rotation of the audit team would not provide a
safeguard for this self-interest threat.
Page 68 of 283,‘SAH Acadtny Teles 709 68
1 oor Natt A ack bud. Le That Nh Hala Trung ds, Hs Not Sapp ata vi
2 Flog, Groen Sta: Towe, Mo. 201 Pham Van Dany, Bac Tu Len Ut, Heel Hot, 0909 720.46
Fron No, 28 wong Hos Khanh, Dstt Ho Cr Tih Ch
CHAPTER 5: RISK ASSESSMENT
LEARNING OUTCOME
© Acquire knowledge of audit risk, materiality.
© Understand risk assessment procedure and how to respond to the risk assessment.
© Understand frauds, errors, law and regulation,
Page 69 of 283@sapp erecta hoe ee ene
1. THE OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF THE AUDITOR
Auditor's objectives are given in ISA 200 Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the
Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with International Standards on Auditing.
Conducting the audit in
This is
achived by
Plan and perform the audi
Gideon eyc as be
apply professional judgement**
h
* To obtain reasonable assurance about whether
tthe financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error;
‘© Express an opinion on whether the financial
statements are prepared, in all material respects,
in accordance with an applicable financial
reporting framework;
© Report on the financial statements, and
communicate as required by the ISAs, in
accordance with the auditor's findings.
“Professional scepticism is ‘an attitude that includes a questioning mind, being alert to
conditions which may indicate possible misstatement due to error or fraud, and a critical
assessment of audit evidence’.
**Professional judgement is the ‘application of relevant training, knowledge and experience in
making informed decisions about the courses of action that are appropriate in the
circumstances of the audit engagement’,
In order to achieve these objective, a
sk assessment helps the auditor to ensure the key areas
more susceptible to material misstatement are adequately investigated and tested during the
audit.
Page 70 of 28324 Flow, Gree Sta Tow, No. 261 Phat Van Our Bae Tu tlm dle, Mano) Hels 0909 729-403
SAPP Ready oLotes 700885
£8 Foor, am Bank bling, 54 Le Thanh Nh Mala Tung dive, Hates Sapa
Pa SESE ‘Flor No.2 Loony Ha Kay Dstt 1 Ho Oh hint hy
Ml. AUDIT RISK.
1, Definition
There are two basic approaches that auditor use in performing the audit:
Aset of standard procedures and Procedures and tests are d
tests are carried out regardless of that could lead to material misstatements,
the parewlaohalue of Mie cient Priorities, tests, timing can be different between
each audit.
Auditors usually follow a risk-based approach to
auditing as required by ISAs.
‘Audit risk is the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the
financial statements are materially misstated’.
2. Types of audit risk
Audit risk has two major components:
‘We shall look in detail at the concept of materiality in the next section of this chapter. Audit risk
can be represented by the audit risk model:
hh + as - aa
Page 71 of 2832x Foon Groen Star Tee fo.
ocr No.2 Lion as Kh
2.1. Risk of material misstatement
Risk of material misstatement is the risk that t
prior to the audit
‘There are three categories of misstatements:
© Factual misstatements: a misstatement ab
considers unreasonable, or the selection
auditor considers inappropriate.
total misstatement in a population throug!
sample.
‘The risk of material misstatement comprises of
The risk of errors or misstatements due to
the nature of the company and its
transactions.
Example: where an accounting standard
provides guidance on a specific accounting
treatment this might not be understood by
the client and material misstatement could
result.
Inherent risk may arise due to
® The nature of the industry, entity; or
© The nature of the balance itself.
2.2, Detection risk
Detection risk is the risk that the procedures performed by the auditor to reduce audit risk to
an acceptably low level will not detect a misstatement that exists and that could be material.
"Bonk bldg, 64 Lo Thon Nh Ha Ba Trg i
Control risk may be high either because
Fone C3 72946
2s Pam Van Dan, Bae Ti Lon, Hao
rts 1, a CM hy
he financial statements are materially misstated
out which there is no doubt.
Judgmental misstatements: a difference in an accounting estimate that the auditor
or application of accounting policies that the
Projected misstatements: a projected misstatement is the auditor’s best estimate of the
fh the projection of misstatements identified in a
inherent risk and control risk.
The risk of errors or misstatements because
the company’s internal controls are not strong
‘enough to prevent, detect and correct them.
Example: Lack of physical controls, e.g.
‘Physical security of assets;
Restriction of access;
© Noccrv.
‘©The design of the internal control system is
insufficient; or
© The controls have not been
effectively during the period.
applied
Detection risk comprises sampling risk and non-sampling risk:
Page 72 of 283SAPP Acasa Tet oss rou as
5 Flor NamsA Bank bung. 54 Lo Thanh Nh, Hate Wang die, Ha Not Sapp
2A Fou, Gree Sta Tone, Ho. 261 Phat Van Oo Be Tum dc rca Hatin 00 729468
Pi ae ‘Foor, Ho: 2A Luong Hs Khao, Dstt Ho Chitin Cay
The risk that the auditor's conclusion based
on a sample is different from the conclusion,
that would be reached if the whole
population was tested.
The risk that the auditor reaches an erroneous
conclusion for any reason not related to
sampling risk.
Example: The application of inappropriate
procedures or the failure to recognise a
misstatement.
Example: The sample was not.
representative of the population from.
it was chosen.
Although increasing sample sizes or doing more work can help to reduce detection risk, the
following actions can also improve the effectiveness and application of procedures and
therefore help to reduce detection risk:
* Adequate planning
© Assignment of more experienced personnel to the engagement team
‘© The application of professional skepticism
Increased supervision and review of the audit work performed.
Example: Identify and classify audit risk.
Lack of IT based controls
© Lack of password
protection.
Lack of authorization
controls.
Lack of segregation of
duties.
| Account balances for
complex, judgemental
| areas of accounting, e.g
| provision.
Page 73 of 283@supp
For Nam A ane aldng 64 Le Thanh Noh Hoi Ba Tang da, Neh Sapper
2q For. Green Star Fete 261 Pam Vor era, eT Leak Hanoi Helin 0980 72483
cr No. ahLiung rs Khas, Dash, Ho CMa chy
‘Client operates in a high
5. | tech or fast moving
industry.
"| New company trades
6 | overseas.
"| New computer systems. oe al
Tt
Temporary staff used
8 | during the year.
A it ina speci
9 | industry.
y New audit client, a
10
Tight audit deadline
11 | imposed by client.
duties,
Lack of IT based controls | Computer systems and financial | Control risk
1 | © Lack of password information could be changed or
protection. modified without suitable authorization.
Lack of authoriz © High risk transactions performed, e.g. | Control risk
2 | controls. credit sales to high risk customers;
«Fraudulent transactions.
5 Lack of segregation of | Not identifying errors and fraud as only | Control risk
‘one person doing the job therefore
Page 74 of 2832° Flor Grea Sto Tome, fo, 261 PY
4 Flor No: 28 Luong Hu Khan, Dat
Toor Nam Bank bung, 54 La Thanh Noh, Hala Tung dite, Hao) Sapte
ong, Ba Tuto date Hack Heli 0808 729469
chu hir hy
ToLo4a 709 88
‘Account balances for
complex, judgemental
Due to the nature of these transactions a
Inherent risk
a high degree of judgement or estimation
areas of accounting, e.g. | is involved and is therefore open to
provision. manipulation or error.
Client operates in a high | Inventory may become obsolete and may | Inherent risk
5 | tech or fast moving be overstated in the financial statements.
industry, iE
New company trades |» foreign currency may | Inherent risk
g. | overseas. not be translated at the correct rate
© The company may make foreign
exchange losses. a
"| New computer systems. |e Errors in transferring the data from | Control risk +
one system to another Inherent risk
ui ‘© There may be inherent errors in the
new system that have not yet been
discovered -
|g | Temporary staff used | Errors more likely as staff are not familiar | Control risk
during the year. with the client’s systems.
9 | Adientina specialized | Errors more likely or fraud more likely. | Inherent risk
industry.
| New audit client. Lack of cumulative audit knowledge and | Detection
An) experience may lead to increased
detection risk.
"| Tight audit deadline © Staff working quickly to a tight | Detection risk |
imposed by client. deadline are more likely to make
a errors
© There is a shorter post statement of
financial position period that we can
use to help with our audit.
Page 75 of 283,