Chapter 2 Target Testing
Chapter 2 Target Testing
TARGET TESTING
Overview
Instructional goals and objectives are significant in both instructional process and
assessment process. These are a vital part of instructional design because they provide the
roadmap for designing and delivering curriculum. These objectives are important in the
assessment of students learning outcomes. Teachers should know how to write and classify
objectives of the lesson because this will help them in selecting the teaching method and
instructional materials. Assessing learning outcomes is one of the functions of a teacher.
In this module, the K-12 assessment guidelines are presented where some of the
important terms in the standard-based assessment are found. Unpacking learning competencies
and writing instructional objectives are also the highlight of this module.
Learning Outcomes
Lesson 1
Standards-Based Assessment
Constructive Alignment
Outcomes based teaching and learning is based on meeting set standards of teaching and
learning to ensure students meet the requirements for a degree. Assessment is marked
against criteria referenced to the outcomes (Spady, 1994).
In constructive alignment, assessment is aligned to the intended learning outcomes and
students construct knowledge through teaching and learning experiences. Students show
evidence of how they meet the outcomes through assessment where they
show construction of knowledge and skills. Teaching provides the opportunities for
students to demonstrate their learning.
The focus in constructive alignment is on what and how students learn, rather than on the
topic the teacher teaches. The action verb in a learning outcome describes to students
what they should perform to achieve the intended learning outcome (for example, “apply
procedures” or “compare theories”). Learning activities are what the student undertakes
to meet these learning outcomes and students construct knowledge and skills based on the
learning activities. Assessment shows how well they have learned from the activities.
Student-centered, active learning activities provide opportunities for students to construct
new knowledge.
Constructive alignment is relevant for individual subjects as well as at the course level.
Analysis of learning outcomes and levels of thinking for a subject informs the rationale
for assessment and the design of structured learning opportunities to develop skills and
knowledge throughout a subject. Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy can be used in the
development of learning activities.
1. Thoughtfully determining intentions for what students should learn and how they
will demonstrate their achievement of these intended learning outcomes, and
clearly communicating these to students;
2. Designing teaching and learning activities so that students are optimally engaged
in achieving these learning outcomes; and
Learning Outcomes:
On completion of
this module, Assessment Methods Teaching/Learning Activities
students should be
able to:
To identify the main Multiple Choice Questions Lecture on various
signs and symptoms signs/symptoms, In class
of multiple sclerosis exercises/quizzes on
terminology.
To formulate end Poster Display – 15% Lecture presenting case studies
products using Presentation of End Product – 85% of the design history of some
selected ingredients market leaders .Students plan
own project and present as
poster. Student projects on
food formulation
To develop and 1, 000 word research proposal Presentation of examples of
identify an area for research questions, Student
research in the discussion groups on research
discipline area
To demonstrate In-class graded presentation Practices sessions in the class,
effective Peer-assessment, using set
presentational skills criteria, of others in class
POLICY GUIDELINES ON CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR THE K TO 12 BASIC
EDUCATION PROGRAM (BEP)
Theoretical Basis
Classroom Assessment is a joint process that involves both teachers and learners. It is an
integral part of teaching and learning. Teachers provide appropriate assessment when
they aim to holistically measure learners’ current and developing abilities while enabling
them to take responsibility in the process.
This view recognizes the diversity of learners inside the classroom, the need for multiple
ways of measuring their varying abilities and learning potentials, and the role of learners
as co-participants in the assessment process.
At the heart of this assessment framework is the recognition and deliberate consideration
of the learners’ zone of proximal development (Vygotsky 1978).
From this point of view, assessment facilitates the development of learners’ higher-order
thinking and 21st-century skills.
Various kinds of assessments shall be used appropriately for different learners who come
from diverse contexts, such as cultural background and life experiences.
Classroom Assessment is an ongoing process of identifying, gathering, organizing, and
interpreting quantitative and qualitative information about what learners know and can
do.
Teachers should employ classroom assessment methods that are consistent with
curriculum standards.
It is important for teachers to always inform learners about the objectives of the lesson so
that the latter will aim to meet or even exceed the standards.
The teacher provides immediate feedback to students about their learning progress.
Classroom assessment also measures the achievement of competencies by the learners.
1. Formative assessment
Formative assessment involves teachers using evidence about what learners know
and can do to inform and improve their teaching.
Teachers observe and guide learners in their tasks through interaction and
dialogue, thus gaining deeper insights into the learners’ progress, strengths,
weaknesses, and needs.
The results of formative assessments will help teachers make good
instructional decisions so that their lessons are better suited to the learners’
abilities.
2. Summative assessment
This form of assessment usually occurs toward the end of a period of learning in
order to describe the standard reached by the learner.
Often, this takes place in order for appropriate decisions about future learning or
job suitability to be made.
Judgments derived from summative assessment are usually for the benefit of
people other than the learner (UNESCO-TLSF).
The results of summative assessments are recorded and used to report on the
learners’ achievement.
Primarily, the results of summative assessment are reported to the learners and
their parents/guardians. In addition, these are reported to principals/school heads,
teachers who will receive the child in the next grade level, and guidance teachers
who should help students cope with challenges they experience in school.
Assessment in the classroom is aimed at helping students perform well in relation to the
learning standards. Learning standards comprise content standards, performance standards, and
learning competencies that are outlined in the curriculum.
A. Content Standards identify and set the essential knowledge and understanding that
should be learned. They cover a specified scope of sequential topics within each learning strand,
domain, theme, or component. Content standards answer the question, “What should
the learners know?”
B. Performance Standards describe the abilities and skills that learners are expected to
demonstrate in relation to the content standards and integration of 21st-century
skills. The integration of knowledge, understanding, and skills is expressed through creation,
innovation, and adding value to products/ performance during independent work or in
collaboration with others. Performance standards answer the following questions:
Learners are assessed in the classroom through various processes and measures
appropriate to and congruent with learning competencies defined in the K to 12 curriculum.
Some of these processes and measures may be used for both formative and summative
assessment, which have different goals. Individual formative assessment enables the learner to
demonstrate independently what has been learned or mastered through a range of activities such
as check-up quizzes, written exercises, performances, models, etc. Collaborative formative
assessment (peer assessment) allows students to support each other’s learning. Discussions, role
playing, games, and other group activities may also be used as performance-based formative
assessment wherein learners support and extend each other’s learning.
Summative Assessment is a form of assessment that measures the different ways learners
use and apply all relevant knowledge, understanding, and skills. It must be spaced properly over
the quarter. It is usually conducted after a unit of work and/or at the end of an entire quarter to
determine how well learners can demonstrate content knowledge and competencies articulated in
the learning standards. Learners synthesize their knowledge, understanding, and skills during
summative assessments. The results of these assessments are used as bases for computing
grades. Learners may be assessed individually through unit tests and quarterly assessment.
Collaboratively, learners may participate in group activities in which they cooperate to produce
evidence of their learning. The process of creating a learning project is given more weight or
importance than the product itself.
Formative assessment conducted before the lesson informs the teacher about the students’
understanding of a lesson/topic before direct instruction. It helps teachers understand where the
students stand in terms of conceptual understanding and application. Formative assessment
provides bases for making instructional decisions, such as moving on to a new lesson or
clarifying prerequisite understanding.
Formative assessment conducted during the lesson proper informs teachers of the
progress of the students in relation to the development of the learning competencies. It also helps
the teacher determine whether instructional strategies are effective. The results of formative
assessment given at this time may be compared with the results of formative assessment given
before the lesson to establish if conceptual understanding and application have improved. On this
basis, the teacher can make decisions on whether to review, re-teach, remediate, or enrich lessons
and, subsequently, when to move on to the next lesson.
Formative assessment conducted after the lesson assesses whether learning objectives
were achieved. It also allows the teacher to evaluate the effectiveness of instruction. Students
who require remediation and/or enrichment should be helped by the teacher using appropriate
teaching strategies.
Summative assessments are classified into three components, namely, Written Work
(WW), Performance Tasks (PT), and Quarterly Assessment (QA). These three will be the bases
for grading. The nature of the learning area defines the way these three components are assessed.
A. Written Work
The Written Work component ensures that students are able to express skills and
concepts in written form. Written Work, which may include long quizzes, and unit or long tests,
help strengthen test-taking skills among the learners. It is strongly recommended that items in
long quizzes/tests be distributed across the Cognitive Process Dimensions so that all are
adequately covered. Through these, learners are able to practice and prepare for quarterly
assessment and other standardized assessments. Other written work may include essays, written
reports, and other written output.
B. Performance Task
The Performance Task component allows learners to show what they know and are able
to do in diverse ways. They may create or innovate products or do performance-based tasks.
Performance-based tasks may include skills demonstration, group presentations, oral work,
multimedia presentations, and research projects. It is important to note that written output may
also be considered as performance tasks.
C. Quarterly Assessment
Quarterly Assessment measures student learning at the end of the quarter. These may be
in the form of objective tests, performance-based assessment, or a combination thereof.
1. What type of assessment is used as basis for giving grades? Give some examples of this
kind of assessment.
2. Why is constructive alignment important? Explain.
3. Write 5 learning outcomes in your area of specialization. Identify the assessment
methods to be used and suggest some teaching and learning activities
Lesson 2
Appropriate Targets
According to the American Heritage Dictionary, the learning terms are defined as
follows:
o Competency: Competence. The state or quality of being competent. Properly or
well qualified, capable.
o Objective: Something worked toward or striven for, a goal.
o Outcome: A natural result, consequence.
Competency is a general statement detailing the desired knowledge and skills of student
graduating from one course or program.
Objective is a very general statement about the larger goals of the course or program.
Objectives can be general or specific.
Outcome is a very specific statement that describes exactly what a student will be able to
do in some measurable way.
The main distinction between objective or competency and a true learning outcome is
that a learning outcome is written so that it can be measured or assessed. Thus, learning
outcomes are the basis for an assessment program that focuses on what student can do
either upon completion of a course or upon graduation from a program.
Example:
Competency:
The student should be able to use the mass and energy balances for a given food process.
Objectives:
Learning Outcomes:
Draw and use process flow diagrams with labels on flow streams for mass
balance problems.
Characteristics of Objectives
Specific Make sure to use clear and direct language. This makes it easier to
communicate to the learner and let them know what exactly he or she should
learn.
It must also give them a clear idea about the things he or she should be able
to do once completed.
It needs to be an action you could observe. Here is where you correct the
common mistake of using words which signify actions that could not be
observed objectively. Examples are words like “know” and “understand”.
It must be relevant and not something they will never need at all.
You must explain if there are time constraints on the performance of the
learner.
Knowledge: At the end of this lesson, learners will be able to solve trigonometric problems by
applying the Law of Sines.
Affective: At the end of the communications skills course, learners will be able to demonstrate
awareness of cultural differences in working with actors as simulated patients in three different
clinical scenarios.
Psychomotor: At the end of the training session, learners will be able respond hand-signals of
instructor while learning to operate a forklift.
Specific. The goal must be explicitly defined and cannot be subjected to individual interpretation
or ambiguity.
Measurable. The goal must have clear quantitative and/or qualitative criteria to evaluate its
completion.
Attainable. The goals must be challenging yet achievable (available means, level of authority to
execute, skills to acquire, resources…)
Relevant. The goal must be tied to your organization priorities, strategy, team mission, andthe
employee maturity and potential.
Time-bound. The goal must have a start date and an end date, with possible intermediate
milestones and related expected outcomes.
Evaluated. The execution progress must be assessed by the manager through multiple
checkpoints that should include feedback and guidance.
Recognized/Rewarded or Revisited. When reaching the end of the time frame defined for the
goal execution, the final evaluation performed against the completion criteria initially set must be
shared by the manager. If the objective is reached, the staff should be recognized for his
accomplishments and possibly rewarded. On the other hand, if the outcomes are below
expectation, a detailed review of what went wrong and how things could be improved is
necessary; situation and objectives need then to be revisited. In both cases, lessons
learned should also be shared.
There are three main domains of learning that all teachers should know about them and
use them to construct lessons. These domains of learning are the cognitive (thinking), the
affective (social/emotional/feeling), and the psychomotor (physical/kinesthetic) domain, and
each one of these has a taxonomy associated with it. Taxonomy is simply a word for a
classification. All of the taxonomies below are arranged so that they proceed from the simplest to
more complex levels.
Lorin Anderson a former student of Bloom together with Krathwolh, revised the Bloom’s
taxonomy of cognitive domain in the mid-90s in order to fit the more outcome-focused modern
education objectives. There are two major changes: (1) the names in the six categories from noun
to active verb, and 920 the arrangement of the order of the last two highest levels as shown in the
given figure below. This new taxonomy reflects a more active form of thinking and is perhaps
more accurate.
A. Cognitive Domain
The cognitive domain involves knowledge and the development of
intellectual skills (Bloom, 1956). This includes the recall or recognition of specific facts,
procedural patterns, and concepts that serve in the development of intellectual abilities
and skills. There are six major categories of cognitive processes, starting from the
simplest to the most complex (see the next table).
B. Affective Domain
C. Psychomotor Domain
Drive a car.
5. Complex Overt Response (Expert): The Sample verbs appropriate for objectives written
skillful performance of motor acts that involve at the complex overt response level: assembles,
complex movement patterns. Proficiency is builds, calibrates, constructs, dismantles,
indicated by a quick, accurate, and highly displays, fastens, fixes, grinds, heats,
coordinated performance, requiring a minimum manipulates, measures, mends, mixes,
of energy. This category includes performing organizes, sketches
without hesitation, and automatic performance.
For example, players are often utter sounds of Examples: Operates a computer quickly and
satisfaction or expletives as soon as they hit a accurately.
tennis ball or throw a football, because they
can tell by the feel of the act what the result Displays competence while playing the piano.
will produce
NOTE: The Key Words are the same as
Mechanism, but will have adverbs or
adjectives that indicate that the performance is
quicker, better, more accurate, etc.
6. Adaptation: Skills are well developed and Sample verbs appropriate for objectives written
the individual can modify movement patterns at the adaptation level: adapts, alters, changes,
to fit special requirements. rearranges, reorganizes, revises, varies
There are two other popular versions of psychomotor domain aside from is Simpson
(1972). Other versions are from Dave (1975) and Harrow (1972):
Dave (1975)
Harrow (1972)
While Bloom's Taxonomy has been quite useful in that it has extended learning from
simply remembering to more complex cognitive structures, such as analyzing and evaluating,
newer models have come along. However, it has become more useful with the revised taxonomy.
One model that might prove more useful is the Structure of Observed Learning Outcome
(SOLO) taxonomy. It is a model that describes levels of increasing complexity in a learner's
understanding of subjects (Biggs, Collis, 1982). It aids both trainers and learners in
understanding the learning process. The model consists of five levels in the order of
understanding:
1. Pre-structural. The learner doesn't understood the lesson and uses a much too simple
means of going about it—the learner is unsure about the lesson or subject.
3. Multi-structural. The learner's response focuses on several relevant aspects but they
are treated independently—the learner has several concepts about the subject but they are
disconnected. Assessment of this level is primarily quantitative.
4. Relational. The different aspects have become integrated into a coherent whole—the
learner has mastered the complexity of the subject by being able to join all the parts together.
This level is what is normally meant by an adequate understanding of a subject.
Robert Marzano, respected educational researcher, has proposed what he calls A New
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (2000). Developed to respond to the shortcomings of the
widely used Bloom’s Taxonomy and the current environment of standards-based instruction,
Marzano’s model of thinking skills incorporates a wider range of factors that affect how students
think and provides a more research-based theory to help teachers improve their students’
thinking.
Marzano’s New Taxonomy is made up of three systems and the Knowledge Domain, all
of which are important for thinking and learning. The three systems are the Self-System, the
Metacognitive System, and the Cognitive System. When faced with the option of starting anew
task, the Self System decides whether to continue the current behavior or engage in the new
activity; the Metacognitive System sets goals and keeps track of how well they are being
achieved; the Cognitive System processes all the necessary information, and the Knowledge
Domain provides the content.
Metacognitive System
Specifying learning Monitoring the Monitoring Clarity Monitoring Accuracy
goals execution of
Knowledge
Knowledge Domain
Information Mental procedures Physical procedures
1. Choose a topic in your own specialization and develop cognitive, affective, and psychomotor
learning outcomes for each level.
2. Give 2 examples of learning competency in your field of specialization. Make objectives and
learning outcomes based on the given competency.
Lesson 3
“Unpacking” is a technique teachers can use to make sense of standards, and then create
focused learning targets to make them actionable. This process, also called
“deconstructing” or “unwrapping” standards, fosters a collaborative dialogue that
supports growth and effectiveness.
It is the process of taking the text of each standard and translating it into actual teaching
strategies. This process involves setting long term teaching goals for each standard and
identifying the major understanding students should reach—and the tasks they should
complete—while mastering the standard. By unpacking standards, we place them in the
broader context of a student’s education. We take the language of the standard as written,
which is often only a few sentences, and begin to create the framework on which the
actual learning will take place.
1. Carefully read and analyze the Content Standard, Performance Standards and the Learning
Competencies
2. Look for the signal words for the knowledge (noun), skills (verbs) and conditions for
attaining such standards and competencies.
4. Develop the learning objective to attain the signal words – these are the unpacked/sub-tasked
competencies.
5. Prioritize as needed for the arrangement of the developed objectives (sub-tasked/unpacked
competencies).
1. Audience
Often the audience is identified only in the 1st level of objective because of redundancy.
Examples:
The students…
2. Behavior
Must be observable and measurable (you will define the measurement elsewhere in the
goal).
If it is a skill, it should be a real world skill.
The “behavior” can include demonstration of knowledge or skills in any of the domains
of learning: cognitive, psychomotor, affective, or interpersonal.
Examples:
3. Condition
Equipment or tools that may (or may not) be utilized in completion of the behavior.
Environmental conditions may also be included.
Examples:
4. Degree
States the standard for acceptable performance (time, accuracy, proportion, quality, etc.)
Examples:
… without error.
… 9 out of 10 times.
…within 60 seconds.
1. Students will explain the social responsibility to ensure that adequate legal services are
provided to those who cannot afford to pay for them in three paragraphs.
2. Students will describe the steps in planning factual investigation in legal research,
including identifying and formulating relevant legal theories, generating alternative
solutions and strategies, applied to a hypothetical case.
3. Given a standard sentence, the English 101 student should be able to identify the noun and
verb without error.
4. Given an assortment of EMS equipment to pick from, the paramedic should be able to
identify all of the equipment necessary to perform rapid sequence intubation without
error.
About Competencies
A learning objective is an explicit statement that clearly expresses what the participant
will be able to do at the completion of the course or program.
It is specific.
It is written in behavioral terms.
It contains action verbs that are observable and measurable.
It identifies what behaviors a participant must demonstrate in order to confirm the
intended learning occurred.
Training courses are designed by working backwards from the desired competencies to
the method of instruction. Therefore, the first step is to determine what competencies are needed
to perform the necessary tasks. This is done by completing a needs analysis. A needs analysis is
a formal and systematic process to determine what an individual needs to be able to do in order
to successfully perform tasks at specific level.
When determining competencies, the goal is to describe the desired abilities needed to
perform the task. Desired competencies are then broken down into their basic
parts by determining what the participant would need to know to perform this competency at a
specific level. Those parts would be the learning objectives. Typically, there is more than one
learning objective defined for a given competency.
Once the competencies and learning objectives are defined, learning objectives are
mapped to each competency. As noted, each competency can be supported by multiple learning
objectives. Learning objectives can be thought of as the steps on the way to attaining a
competency.
Examples:
1. Competency:
Learning Objectives:
2. Competency:
Utilizes appropriate methods for interacting sensitively, effectively, and
professionally with persons from diverse cultural, socioeconomic, educational, racial,
ethnic and professional backgrounds, and persons of all ages and lifestyle preferences
Learning Objectives:
b. Compare and contrast diversity and cultural competency in the public health context;
and
c. Identify a framework to design culturally competent public health care services for
diverse populations.
1. Differentiate specific and general objectives. Write 3 specific objectives and 3 general
objectives in your area of interest.
2. Choose a topic on a subject of your choice from the DepEd curriculum guide and
unpack a related competency. Formulate learning objectives based on the
unpacked competency and write the objectives using the ABCD format.
Feedback
How did you go on so far with this module? Were you able to write educational
objectives focusing on the three domains of learning? How was it? I hope you were able
to follow the steps and suggestions in crafting objectives. Your skills in writing
objectives should be developed and enhanced because this will provide basis for
assessing the performance of your students.
If you are having a hard time on some lessons, you can always go back. Try to log
on to the links provided in the suggested readings for additional information.
Summary
To aid you in reviewing the concepts in this module, here are the highlights:
Constructive alignment is an outcomes-based approach to teaching in which the
learning outcomes that students are intended to achieve are defined before teaching
takes place. Teaching and assessment methods are then designed to best achieve those
outcomes and to assess the standard at which they have been achieved.
The two types of classroom assessment stipulated in the K-12 policy guidelines are
formative and summative assessment. Formative assessment refers to the ongoing
forms of assessment that are closely linked to the learning process. Summative
assessment is a form of assessment that measures the different ways learners use and
apply all relevant knowledge, understanding, and skills. The result of the summative
assessment is recorded and graded.
Objective is a very general statement about the larger goals of the course or program.
Outcome is a very specific statement that describes exactly what a student will be
able to do in some measurable way.
The cognitive domain involves knowledge and the development of intellectual skills
(Bloom, 1956). This includes the recall or recognition of specific facts, procedural
patterns, and concepts that serve in the development of intellectual abilities and skills.
The six major categories of cognitive processes are remembering, understanding,
applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating.
Affective domain describes learning objectives that emphasize a feeling tone, an
emotion, or a degree of acceptance or rejection. The level of affective domain
includes receiving, responding, valuing, organization, and characterization by value
or value set.
Marzano’s model of thinking skills incorporates a wider range of factors that affect
how students think and provides a more research-based theory to help teachers
improve their students’ thinking. It is made up the Knowledge Domain. The three
systems are the Self-System, the Metacognitive System, and the Cognitive System.
Unpacking” is a technique teachers can use to make sense of standards, and then
create focused learning targets to make them actionable. This process, also called
“deconstructing” or “unwrapping” standards, fosters a collaborative dialogue that
supports growth and effectiveness.
- Carefully read and analyze the Content Standard, Performance Standards and
the Learning Competencies.
- Look for the signal words for the knowledge (noun), skills (verbs) and
conditions for attaining such standards and competencies.
- Analyze and make connections between the signal words.
- Develop the learning objective to attain the signal words – these are the
unpacked/sub-tasked competencies.
- Prioritize as needed for the arrangement of the developed objectives (sub-
tasked/unpacked competencies).
Suggested Readings
If you want to learn more about the topics in this module, you may log on to the following links:
http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/Bloom/affective_domain.html
https://discovery.apsva.us/standards-based-assessment/
https://leadersyndrome.wordpress.com/2012/02/13/setting-objectives-better-than-smart-is-
smarter/
www.mdfaconline.org/presentations/ABCDmodel.doc
https://www.teacherph.com/classroom-assessment/
https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/04/01/do-8-s-2015-policy-guidelines-on-classroom-assessment-
for-the-k-to-12-basic-education-program/
https://www.csu.edu.au/division/learning-and-teaching/home/assessment-and
moderation/assessment-resources-and-information/constructive-alignment
https://flexforward.pressbooks.com/chapter/constructive-alignment/
http://www.ucdoer.ie/index.php/
Using_Biggs'_Model_of_Constructive_Alignment_in_Curriculum_Design/Introduction
https://depedtalks.blogspot.com/2019/
https://thepeakperformancecenter.com/business/learning/course-design/learning-goals-
objectives-outcomes/competencies-learning-objectives/
References
Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: the SOLO taxonomy. New
York, Academic Press
Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy
ofEducational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co
Inc.
Dave, R.H. (1970). Psychomotor levels in Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives,
pp.20-21. R.J. Armstrong, ed. Tucson, Arizona: Educational Innovators Press.
Gabuyo, Y.A. (2012) Assessment of Learning I. Rex Book Store, Inc., Manila, Philippines.
Overview
Instructional goals and objectives
are significant in both
instructional process and
assessment process. These are a vital
part of instructional design because
they provide the
roadmap for designing and
delivering curriculum. These
objectives are important in the
assessment of students learning
outcomes. Teachers should know
how to write and classify
objectives of the lesson because
this will help them in selecting
the teaching method and
instructional materials. Assessing
learning outcomes is one of the
functions of a teacher.
In this module, the K-12
assessment guidelines is presented
where some of the
important terms in the standard-based
assessment are found. Unpacking
learning competencies
and writing instructional objectives
are also the highlight of this module.
Learning Outcomes
After learning this module, you should
be able to:
identify learning outcomes that
are aligned with learning
competencies;
differentiate competencies,
objectives, and learning outcomes;
formulate appropriate learning
objectives and outcomes that are
constructively aligned
with national standards
Overview
Instructional goals and objectives
are significant in both
instructional process and
assessment process. These are a vital
part of instructional design because
they provide the
roadmap for designing and
delivering curriculum. These
objectives are important in the
assessment of students learning
outcomes. Teachers should know
how to write and classify
objectives of the lesson because
this will help them in selecting
the teaching method and
instructional materials. Assessing
learning outcomes is one of the
functions of a teacher.
In this module, the K-12
assessment guidelines is presented
where some of the
important terms in the standard-based
assessment are found. Unpacking
learning competencies
and writing instructional objectives
are also the highlight of this module.
Learning Outcomes
After learning this module, you should
be able to:
identify learning outcomes that
are aligned with learning
competencies;
differentiate competencies,
objectives, and learning outcomes;
formulate appropriate learning
objectives and outcomes that are
constructively aligned
with national standards