Chapter – 4
Data Analysis and Interpretation
The results of qualitative data analysis guide subsequent data collection, and analysis is thus
a less-distinct final stage of the research process than qualitative analysis, where data
analysis does not begin until all data have been collected and condensed into numbers;
qualitative researchers create new concepts and theory by blending together empirical and
abstract concepts, while quantitative researchers manipulate numbers in order to test a
hypothesis with variable constructs; and qualitative data analysis is in the form of words,
which are relatively imprecise, diffuse and context based, but quantitative researcher use
the language of statistical relationships in analysis.
Table No-4.1 Gender of respondents.
Option No. of respondents Percentage
Male 27 53%
Female 23 47%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.1
46%
54%
male female
Interpretation
The above table shows that 50 respondents, There were 27 male respondents and 23
female respondents, indicating a fairly equal gender distribution in the sample.
Table No-2 Age of the respondents.
Option No. of respondents Percentage
20-30 year 45 88%
30-40 year 5 12%
40-50 year 0 0
50-60 year 0 0
Total 50 100%
2%
10%
88%
20to30 30to40 40to50 option5 total
Interpretation
The above table shows that the 50 respondents are aged between 20-30 years, 45
respondents indicating a predominantly young participant group. Only 5 respondents are
aged between 30-40 years, with no respondents in the 40-50 or 50-60 age categories.
Table No-4.3 Educational qualification of the respondents.
Option No. of respondents Percentage
SSLC 5 10%
PUC 12 24%
Graduate 23 44%
Postgraduate 10 22%
Total 50 100%
10%
22%
24%
44%
sslc puc graduate postgraduate total
Interpretation
The above table shows that the 50 respondents, 23 respondents are graduates, 10
respondents have postgraduate qualifications, 12 respondents completed PUC, and 5
respondents have SSLC qualifications. This data highlights a predominantly graduate-level
education within the surveyed group.
Table No-4.4 Marital Status of the respondents.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Single 40 80%
Married 10 20%
Total 50 100%
20%
80%
single married total
Interpretation
The above table shows that the 50 respondents, 40 respondents are single, and 10
respondents are married, indicating a predominantly unmarried participant group.
Table No-4.5 Number of members in the family
Option No. of respondent Percentage
2-4 20 42%
4-6 24 46%
Above 6 members 6 12%
Total 50 100%
12%
42%
46%
2to4 4to6 above 6 members total
Interpretation
The above table shows that the 50 respondents, 20 respondents have 2-4 family members,
24 respondents have 4-6 members, and 6 respondents have more than 6 members in their
families. This data indicates a varied distribution of family sizes within the surveyed group.
Table No -4.6 Training programme attended till now.
Option No. of respondents Percentage
Yes 35 72%
No 15 28%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.6
28%
72%
yes no total
Interpretation
The above table shows that out of 50 respondents, 35 respondents have undergone training
programs, while 15 respondents This suggests a significant majority of the surveyed group has
participated in some form of training. This information is valuable for understanding the
willingness or opportunity for skill development within the surveyed population.
Table No-4.7 organization conducting training programme frequently.
Option No. of Respondent Percentage
Yes 38 78%
No 12 22%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.7
22%
78%
yes no total
Interpretation
The above table shows that the Out of 50 respondents, 38 respondents confirmed their
organizations conduct frequent training programs, indicating a proactive approach to
employee development. Only 12 respondents reported no regular training initiatives in their
workplaces.
Table No-4.8 Number of training programmes conducted in year.
Option No. of Respondents Percentage
1-2 22 44%
3-4 21 42%
5-6 7 12%
More than 6 0 2%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.8
2%
12%
44%
42%
1to2 3to4 5to6 more than 6 total
Interpretation
The above table shows that the 50 respondents, 22 respondents have 1-2 training programs
annually, 21 respondents have 3-4, and 7 respondents have 5-6. None reported having more
than 6 training programs per year. This indicates a common trend of moderate training
frequency in the surveyed organizations.
Table No-4.9 Training programmes conducted in organization.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Every month 15 30%
Every quarterly 25 50%
Half yearly 6 12%
Once in a year 4 8%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.9
8%
12% 30%
50%
every month every quaterly half yearly once in a year total
Interpretation
The above table shows that 50 respondents, 25 respondents have quarterly training, 15
respondents have monthly sessions, 6 respondents conduct training every six months, and 4
respondents have yearly training programs. This indicates a prevalent preference for
quarterly training sessions in surveyed organizations.
Table No-4.10 Number of training session attended
Particular No. of Respondents Percentage
1-2 22 42%
3-4 24 48%
5-6 3 6%
More than 6 1 0
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.10
4%
6%
42%
48%
1to2 3to4 5to6 more than 6 total
Interpretation
The above table shows that Out of 50 respondents, 22 respondents attended 1-2 training
sessions, 24 respondents attended 3-4 sessions, and 3 respondents attended 5-6 sessions.
None reported attending more than 6 sessions, indicating a balanced participation in
training activities.
Table No-4.11 Training methods used to trained
Option No. of respondent Percentage
On the job method 16 32%
Off the job method 4 10%
Both 30 58%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.11
32%
58%
10%
on the job method off the job method both total
Interpretation
The table shows that Out of 50 respondents, 16 respondents were trained on-the-job, 4
respondents off-the-job, and 30 respondents experienced both methods. This highlights a
widespread use of a combined training approach, emphasizing a comprehensive learning
strategy within the surveyed organizations.
Table No-4.12 Level of satisfied with the information provide by the trainer during the
training session.
Option No. of respondents Percentage
More satisfied 18 36%
Satisfied 19 38%
Average 12 24%
Not satisfied 1 2%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.12
2%
24%
36%
38%
more satisfied satisfied average not satisfied total
Interpretation
The above table shows that the Out of 50 respondents, were satisfied with the training
information provided, with 18 respondents being "more satisfied" 19 respondents
"satisfied,” Average 12 respondents, and 1 respondents were not satisfied, indicating a
predominantly positive response to the training sessions.
Table No-4.13 Training session involved.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Only theory 3 8%
Only practical 15 32%
Both theory and practical 32 60%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.13
8%
32%
60%
theory practical both theory and practical total
Interpretation
The above table shows that Out of 50 respondents, 60% preferred training sessions
incorporating both theory and practical components, indicating a preference for a balanced
learning approach. Additionally, 15 respondents preferred only practical training, while 3
respondents fevered purely theoretical sessions. This suggests a demand for comprehensive
training experiences integrating both theoretical concepts and practical applications.
Table No-4.14 Trainer clear the doubts regarding the topic.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Yes 44 86%
No 6 14%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.14
14%
86%
yes no total
Interpretation
The above table shows that Out of 50 respondents, 44 respondents confirmed their trainers
cleared doubts regarding the topic, indicating a positive training experience. Only 6
respondents reported unresolved doubts, emphasizing the effectiveness of trainers in
addressing participants' queries.
Table No-4.15 Type of training is being imported for new recruitments in organisation.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Technical training 16 32%
Management training 21 42%
Technical skill 8 16%
Presentation skill 5 10%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.15
10%
32%
16%
42%
technical training management training technical skill
presentation skill total
Interpretation
The above table shows that Out of 50 respondents, 21 respondents receive management
training, 16 respondents technical training, 8 respondents technical skill training, and 5
respondents presentation skill training in their organizations. This indicates a well-rounded
approach to new employee training, covering management, technical, and soft skills.
Table No-4.16 Improvement through the training sessions.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Re designing the job 18 36%
Re organising 20 40%
Remove interference 2 4%
Upgrade the information the 10 20%
marital given during training
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.16
40%
40% 36%
30%
20%
20%
10% 4%
0%
l
ng
ce
ta
n
ng
jo
to
en
si
ni
ni
e
er
th
i
ga
tra
f
re
or
ng
g
e
ni
re
rin
ov
ig
du
m
s
de
re
n
ive
re
lg
ia
er
at
m
e
th
on
ati
rm
fo
in
e
th
r
Column1 Column3 Column2
de
un
Interpretation
The above table shows that the result, it is evident that there are several areas that need
improvement through training sessions, as indicated by the respondents. The majority,
comprising 20 of the respondents, emphasized the need to reorganize the existing job
structures.
Table No-4.17 Training session help to improve the work efficiency.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Yes 45 90%
No 5 10%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.17
10.00%
90.00%
yes no total
Interpretation
The above table shows that 45 of respondents believe that training sessions have improved
their work efficiency, highlighting the positive impact of the training programs. Ten percent
disagreed, indicating a nor need for further support or customization in training approaches.
Table No-4.18 Assessment of the impact of training.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Performance 31 60%
Feedback 14 28%
Interview 5 11%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.18
11%
28%
60%
performance feedback interviev total
Interpretation
The above table shows that organization assesses training impact primarily through
performance evaluations 31 respondents, supplemented by employee feedback 14
respondents and interviews 5 This multi-faceted approach ensures a comprehensive
understanding of the effectiveness of training programs, combining quantitative and
qualitative data for a well-rounded evaluation.
Table No-4.19 Enhancement of employee after each training programme.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Yes 44 86%
No 6 14%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.19
14%
86%
yes no
Interpretation
The above table shows that 44 of respondents reported receiving pay or promotion
enhancements after training programs, highlighting the significant positive impact of these
initiatives on career development within the organization. Only 6 did not experience such
benefits, indicating a need for further investigation into their training outcomes.
Table No-4.20 General complaints about the training session.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Takes too much time of 30 60%
employees
Too many gaps between 13 25%
employees
Training sessions are 6 14%
unplanned
Boring and not useful 1 1%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.20
70%
60%
60%
50%
40%
30% 25%
20% 14%
10% 1%
0%
l
l
ta
ed
ee
fu
s
ee
to
se
nn
oy
oy
tu
pl
a
pl
pl
m
no
em
un
e
d
of
re
an
n
ee
a
e
tim
g
ns
w
rin
io
et
bo
h
ss
sb
uc
se
ap
m
ng
o
yg
to
ni
an
i
s
tra
ke
m
ta
o
to
Series 1 Column1 Column2
Interpretation
The above table shows that main complaints about the training sessions include the
excessive time they take (30 of respondents), followed by gaps between sessions (13) and
perceived lack of planning (6). Only 1 found the sessions boring and not useful. Addressing
time management, session frequency, and planning is essential to improve overall
effectiveness and employee satisfaction.
Table No-4.21 Career growth after training programme attended.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Yes 40 80%
No 10 20%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.21
20%
80%
yes no total
Interpretation
The table shows that 40 of respondents affirm that their career growth is linked to the
training programs they attended, underscoring the pivotal role of training in professional
advancement. Only 10 respondents disagreed, suggesting a potential need for clearer
communication regarding the connection between training and career progression.
Table-4.22 Opinion of employee about present training session.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Excellent 18 36%
Good 27 54%
Fair 3 5%
Average 2 5%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.22
5%
5%
36%
54%
excellent good fair average total
The above table shows that 90% of respondents view the present training system positively,
with 18 respondents considering it excellent and 27 rating it as good. However, 10 find it fair
or average, suggesting room for improvement and the importance of addressing their
concerns.
Table No-4.23 The training method focus on developing team work and leadership.
Option No. of respondent Percentage
Yes 45 90%
No 5 10%
Total 50 100%
Graph 4.23
10%
90%
yes no total
The above table shows that 45 of respondents confirm that the training methods prioritize
teamwork and leadership development, highlighting the organization's strong focus on
enhancing these essential skills. Ten percent disagreed, suggesting a need for consistency
and further integration of these aspects in training programs.
