KEMBAR78
Research Evaluation Checklist | PDF | Methodology | Science
Scribd
Upload
412 views2 pages

Research Evaluation Checklist

This document contains a rating sheet to evaluate the quality of a research proposal and presentation. The rating sheet lists 29 characteristics to evaluate the quality of the research paper, including whether the title and problem are clear, assumptions and limitations are stated, hypotheses are testable, literature is reviewed, methods are described and appropriate, writing is free of errors, and the problem is creative and significant. It also lists 7 characteristics to evaluate the quality of the research presentation, including whether it is organized, presenters communicate well and demonstrate knowledge of the subject. Ratings of Needs Improvement, Satisfactory, Very Satisfactory or Excellent are given for the overall quality of both the research paper and presentation.

Uploaded by

chuaa996
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
412 views2 pages

Research Evaluation Checklist

This document contains a rating sheet to evaluate the quality of a research proposal and presentation. The rating sheet lists 29 characteristics to evaluate the quality of the research paper, including whether the title and problem are clear, assumptions and limitations are stated, hypotheses are testable, literature is reviewed, methods are described and appropriate, writing is free of errors, and the problem is creative and significant. It also lists 7 characteristics to evaluate the quality of the research presentation, including whether it is organized, presenters communicate well and demonstrate knowledge of the subject. Ratings of Needs Improvement, Satisfactory, Very Satisfactory or Excellent are given for the overall quality of both the research paper and presentation.

Uploaded by

chuaa996
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

Rating Sheet

PART I. QUALITY OF THE RESEARCH PAPER


Put a check ( √ ) mark if the following characteristics are being displayed by the research paper. Write NA in the REMARKS
side if the characteristic is not applicable for the research paper.
Characteristic being Evaluated REMARKS
(1) Title is clear and concise
(2) Problem is significant and clearly stated.
(3) Limitations and delimitations of the study are stated.
(4) Delimitations are well defined and appropriate to solutions of
the problem.
(5) Assumptions are clearly stated.
(6) Assumptions are acceptable.
(7) The research projected by the proposal does not violate
human rights or confidence.
(8) Important items are well defined.
(9) Specific questions to be studied are clearly stated.
(10) Hypotheses, elements, or research questions are clearly
stated.
(11) Hypotheses, elements, or research questions are testable,
discoverable or answerable.
(12) Hypotheses, elements, or research questions derive from the
review of the literature.
(13) Relationship of study to previous research is clear.
(14) Review of literature is efficiently summarized.
(15) Procedures are described in detail.
(16) Procedures are appropriate for the solution of the problem.
(17) Population and sample are clearly described.
(18) Method of sampling is appropriate.
(19) Variables have been controlled.
(20) Data gathering methods are described.
(21) Data gathering methods are appropriate to solution of the
problem.
(22) Validity and reliability of data gathering are explained.
(23) Appropriate methods are used to analyze data.
(24) Sentence structure and punctuation are correct.
(25) Minimum typographical errors.
(26) Minimum grammatical errors.
(27) Material is clearly written.
(28) Tone is unbiased and impartial.
(29) Creativity and significance of the problem.

Overall Rating*

Other comments/remarks:

PART II. QUALITY OF THE PRESENTATION

*Needs Improvement, Satisfactory, Very Satisfactory, Excellent


Put a check ( √ ) mark if the following characteristics are being displayed by the research presenters. Write NA in the
REMARKS side if the characteristic is not applicable for the presenters.

Characteristic being Evaluated REMARKS


(1) Presentation is organized and clear.
(2) Presenters exhibit good communication skills
(3) Presenters’ voice are audible.
(4) Presenters’ physical appearance are decent.
(5) Presenters demonstrate depth of knowledge in the subject
matter.
(6) Responses are complete.
(7) Responses exhibit critical thinking.
OVERALL RATING*

Other comments/remarks

*Needs Improvement, Satisfactory, Very Satisfactory, Excellent

You might also like