KEMBAR78
Probabilistic Modelling - Part 2 - 2023 | PDF
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views30 pages

Probabilistic Modelling - Part 2 - 2023

The document discusses the Poisson process, which models random events occurring continuously and independently over time. It defines the key properties of a Poisson process, including that the number of events in a given time period follows a Poisson distribution. It also covers how to analyze scenarios involving multiple independent Poisson processes and random arrival times.

Uploaded by

Mostafa Saneii
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views30 pages

Probabilistic Modelling - Part 2 - 2023

The document discusses the Poisson process, which models random events occurring continuously and independently over time. It defines the key properties of a Poisson process, including that the number of events in a given time period follows a Poisson distribution. It also covers how to analyze scenarios involving multiple independent Poisson processes and random arrival times.

Uploaded by

Mostafa Saneii
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 30

Poisson Process

 Most often applied to occurrences of events in time

 Examples
 Arrivals of passengers at a stop of a high-frequency bus route
 Arrivals of vehicles at an isolated intersection
 Arrivals of customers at a bank teller machine
 Arrivals of telephone calls at a switchboard
 etc.

 Thereafter, the term “Arrivals” will be used to refer to occurrences


of events in a Poisson Process

34
Postulates of the Poisson Process
 If we have a process involving a number of arrivals occurring
between t1 and t2 and  is the arrival rate (i.e. number of arrivals
per unit time between t1 and t2). This process is called a Poisson
Process if the following conditions are met:
 P{at least one arrival occurring in a short time period t}  . t
 The number of arrivals occurring at t2-t1 is not dependent on t1 or on
the number of arrivals prior to t1

| x xxxxx xx x|
t1 t2

 E.g. the number of people arriving at a particular subway station between


3pm and 6pm is dependent only on the 3-hour period (3-6pm) and does not
depend on the starting time (3pm) or the # of arrivals before 3pm

35
Postulates of the Poisson Process
 The number of arrivals occurring in disjoint time intervals are mutually
independent RVs

| x x x x |
t1 t1 t2 t3 t4 t2
 E.g.If # of arrivals between t1 & t2 : X
# of arrivals between t3 & t4 : Y
Then
X & Y are mutually independent

 Given that one arrival occurs at a particular time, the


conditional probability that another occurs at exactly the same
time is zero
 this means no more than one arrival should occur at the
same time
36
Properties of the Poisson Process
 For a Poisson Process occurring over time
interval t and having an arrival rate of 
 The number of arrivals in t, N(t), is Poisson
distributed with mean
k  t
and variance t
( t ) e
P{ N (t )  k }  for k  0 ,1, 2 ,....
k!
E { N ( t )}   t
Var { N ( t )}   t

 The elapsed time to the occurrence of the next


arrival (i.e. inter-arrival time) is L and has an
exponential PDF (i.e. L is exponentially distributed)
with mean of 1/ and variance of 1/2
 fL(x) = e-x for x0
 E[L] = 1/
 Var[L] = 1/2 37

 Recall the no-memory property of exponential PDF


Properties of the Poisson Process
(cont’d)
 The elapsed time to the occurrence of the kth arrival is
Lk and has a kth-order Erlang PDF

k x k 1e  x
f Lk ( x )  for x  0 and k  1,2,....
( k  1)!
k
E[ Lk ] 

k
Var [ Lk ] 
2

 For k = 1, obviously L1 is exponentially distributed


 Lk can be thought of as the sum of k independent, and
identically distributed exponential RVs each with mean
1/
38
Properties of the Poisson Process
(cont’d)
 An important property of the Poisson Process

 the unordered arrival times in a Poisson Process are


independently and uniformly distributed over the fixed
time interval of interest

 i.e. the probability of each arrival occurring at any time


between 0 & t is equally likely

39
Multiple Independent Poisson
Processes
 If we have 2 Poisson Processes operating independently with
arrival rates 1 and 2 (e.g. arrivals of males and arrivals of
females at a particular bus stop)
 The combined (i.e. pooled) process is also a Poisson Process with
 N(t) = N1(t) + N2(t)

  = 1 + 2

 Probability that an arrival from Poisson Process 1 occurs before an


arrival from Poisson Process 2
 P{x1 < x2} = 1 / (1 + 2)

 Since the pooled Poisson Process has no memory, each arrival is


independent of other arrivals.
 We can think of each arrival as a Bernoulli trial with a probability of 1 / (1
+ 2) of being type 1 and a probability of 2 / (1 + 2) of being type 2

40
Random Incidence
 Bus Stop Example

 Suppose that buses arrive successively at a particular bus stop


with the Headway H (defined as the time interval between
successive bus arrivals) either equal to h1 with probability p1 or
h2 with probability p2

 Note that this a general point process (not necessarily


Poisson)

41
Random Incidence
 Bus Stop Example

 Now consider a passenger arriving at the bus stop at a


completely random time (i.e. arrival time of passenger
not influenced by the bus arrival process, which is the
case of high-frequency transit lines)

42
Random Incidence
 Bus Stop Example

 We are interested in 2 questions

 Q1: What is the probability that the passenger arrives


during a headway of h1 and the probability to arrive
during a headway of h2?

 Q2:On average, how long will the passenger have to


wait until the next bus arrives?

43
Pedestrian Crossing Problem
Auto Traffic

Pedestrian Traffic Pedestrian Traffic


L R

Pedestrian
Crossing Signal 44
Pedestrian Crossing Problem
 It is desired to design a pedestrian light at a crossing
location, and 3 control rules are considered

 Description
 Pedestrians approach from the left/right side of the crossing in
a Poisson process over an extended period of time, with
average arrival rates of L / R pedestrians per minute

 The left and right Poisson processes are mutually independent

 Under any rule, pedestrians would wait at the crossing light


until it flashes, at which time pedestrians would cross the
road, then the light would instantly turn red again

 Each time the light flashes is referred to as a “release”

45
Pedestrian Crossing Problem
 The 3 considered rules are:  You are required to analyze
each rule according to
 Rule A: release every T 1. NL = expected number of peds
minutes crossing L to R on any release

 Rule B: release whenever 2.  = probability of 0 peds


the total number of waiting crossing L to R on any release
pedestrians (from right
plus left) equal No 3. W = expected wait time until
crossing for a randomly
 Rule C: release whenever arriving ped (from L or R)
the first pedestrian (from R
or L) to arrive after the 4. V = expected wait time until
previous release has crossing for a randomly
waited To minutes arriving observer
46
Four Steps for Any Probabilistic
Modelling Experiment
 Step 1
 Define the random variables of interest
 Step 2
 Identify the joint sample space
 Step 3
 Determine the probability law over the sample space
 Step 4
 Work in the sample space to answer any question of
interest

47
Four Steps for Any Probabilistic
Modelling Experiment
 Step 1
 Recall in the stick cutting problem, we defined the 2
RVs X1 and X2 for the locations of the 1st and 2nd
marks, respectively

 Step 2, Identify the joint sample space


X2

Joint sample space

X1
1 48
Four Steps for Any Probabilistic
Modelling Experiment
 Step 3, Determine the probability law over the sample
space
X2

1
f(x1,x2)

X1
1

 Step 4, Work in the sample space to answer any 49


question of interest
Extension of the 4-Step Approach
for Functions of RVs
 In some problems, we may have one (or more) RV (say
X) of known probability law (i.e. PDF of X is known)
and we may be interested in deriving the probability law
of another RV (say Y) that is expressed as a function of X
 This class of problems is called “Functions of RVs” or “Derived
Distributions”

 In applying the 4-step approach to derived distribution


problems, we detail step 4 as follows:
 Step 4a
 Derive the CDF of the desired RV (i.e. Y), working in the sample
space of X
 Step 4b
 Take the derivative to obtain the desired PDF of Y
50
Example 1: Response Distance of an
Emergency Vehicle
 Consider a highway of a specific length where an
emergency vehicle (EV) travels back and forth between
the two ends of a highway segment. If an incident (e.g.
crash, vehicle breakdown, etc.) occurs at any point along
the segment, the EV is dispatched immediately from its
current location to the location of the incident

| | | |
EV I

51
Example 1: Response Distance of an
Emergency Vehicle
 Now, we are interested in asking questions about this
distance which the EV has to travel to reach the incident
(e.g. what is the expected distance the EV has to travel to
respond to incidents)

 As such, we need to determine the probability law (i.e.


PDF) of the travel distance (Y) for the EV to reach a
random incident

 Solution
 fY(y) = 2(1-y)

52
Important Relationships in
Probability Theory
 If X is a continuous RV with a known fX(x)>0 and Y is a
strictly increasing or decreasing function of X (i.e. Y =
g(X)), then
 fY(y) = fX(x) . |dX/dY|, with X=g-1(Y)

 If X is a RV and Y = g(X), and suppose we are


interested in E[Y]

E[Y ]  E[g(X )]   g(x i ).pX (x i ) if X is discrete


i

E[Y ]  E[g(X )]   g(X ). f X ( x)dx if X is continuous


53
Important Relationships in
Probability Theory
 If X is a RV and “a” is a constant
 E[aX] = a.E[X]
 E[a] = a

 Var[aX] = a2Var[X]
 Var[a] = 0

54
Applications of the Previous
Relationships to “Scaling”
 We often select a convenient scale for our problems, and
after we obtain the answer we apply scaling factors

 Suppose we derived the probability law of the RV W,


and we wish to rescale it as V = aW + b, where “a” and
“b” are constants (scaling factors)
dW
fV (v )  fW ( w).
dV
V b dW 1
W  
a dV a

v b 1
fV ( v )  fW ( ). for any a  0 55
a a
Applications of the Previous
Relationships to “Scaling”
 The above equation could also be derived
using the 4 steps

 Ifyou are only interested in the mean


value and variance of V

 E[V] = a E[W] + b

 Var[V] = a2Var[W]
56
Example 1: Revisited
 Let’s reconsider Example 1 but with the
following changes:

 Consider a rectangular response area of dimensions


Xo and Yo which has a grid street network

 The location of a random incident is (X1,Y1) and the


location of a patrolling EV at the moment of the
incident is (X2,Y2). The 2 locations are independent of
one another, and each is uniformly distributed over
the response area
57
Example 1: Revisited
Y

grid street network

yo

(x2,y2)

(x1,y1)
X
xo
58
Example 1: Revisited
 Denote the response distance as D1
 D1 = |X1 – X2| + |Y1 – Y2|
 To get E[D1], we can follow the 4-step approach (too
complicated with 4-d sample space!)
 Alternatively, we can use the results we obtained
before
 Here D1 can take on values between 0 and (Xo+Yo),
and since (Xo+Yo) is a constant, then

 D1 = (Xo+Yo) Y

 E[D1] = (Xo+Yo).1/3
59

of the example of unit length highway


Example 2: Ratio of Manhattan to
Airline Distance
 Consider a grid street network (like Toronto’s)

 We are interested in the following question


 How much longer on average do we have to travel
from a random point (x1,y1) to a random point (x2,y2)
through the network compared to the straight line
distance (i.e. airline distance or Euclidean distance)
between the 2 points?

 Stated differently, what is the expected penalty


incurred by travellers because of travelling through
the grid street network?
60
Example 2: Ratio of Manhattan to
Airline Distance
 Solution
 If R is the ratio of the 2 distances, we can use the 4-
step approach to show that
4 1
f R (r )  for 1  r  2
 2r 2

61
Perturbation to Random Variables
 In dealing with probabilistic problems in the
urban context, we often encounter complicated
settings which render the RV of interest hard to
study

 One approach to address this problem is to


define the RV of interest as the sum of an “easy
to analyze” RV (i.e. removing complications)
plus one or more “perturbation” RVs

62
Perturbation to Random Variables
 Example: Barrier to Travel

 Consider the rectangular response area of dimensions


Xo and Yo for an Emergency Vehicle

 If a barrier to travel (e.g. wall) of length “a” was


erected as shown, what is the expected travel distance
between the EV and a random incident?
Y
Yo

I a II
Xo X 63

You might also like