Framework PR Tools
Framework PR Tools
The Collaborative Assessment and Planning Framework was developed by and is copyrighted by Phil Decter
and Sonja Parker.
The Three Houses tool was developed by and is copyrighted by Nicki Weld and Maggie Greening.
Structured Decision Making ® and SDM® are registered in the US Patent and Trademark Office. SDM® is
copyrighted by the Children’s Research Center of the National Council on Crime and Delinquency, all rights
reserved.
The framework begins with a commitment to always viewing families in context and
constantly eliciting families’ strengths, knowledge and wisdom throughout our work
together. The process is organised around a rigorous and balanced assessment and
planning process that is developed collaboratively with children, their families and their
communities. This assessment process provides the focus for families, professionals and
helping networks to work together to develop and implement detailed plans that describe
the day-to-day actions everyone will take to ensure and enhance children’s safety,
belonging and wellbeing.
This document is the second in a series about this framework. The Foundational Elements
document introduces the background and underpinning of the framework and includes
descriptions of the best hopes, values, principles, knowledge and core skill areas
associated with the approach. These elements, particularly the core skills, are
operationalised by an array of practice tools and processes that workers can use in their
everyday work with families. This document introduces these core practice tools and
processes, implemented in other jurisdictions, and identified as effective and able to be
built on.
The Framework for Practice explicitly views child protection as a change process and child
protection workers as facilitators and change agents. What comes in the pages that follow
are some of the ‘tools of the trade’ for this work. Each of these tools helps to make easier
some of the difficult aspects of engagement, assessment, planning and process. They help
to provide a bridge from the values and principles to the day-to-day work with families.
Some of these tools are, or will become, part of key organisational processes that will be
undertaken with every family the department works with. Others will be used at worker and
supervisor discretion when they are needed or when workers and families feel they will be
most helpful.
All of these tools are designed to deepen practice; to make it more collaborative and
participatory; to ensure that practice is robust and rigorous; to create action steps and
plans that allow children, young people and families to thrive; and to ultimately work more
effectively in seeking to strengthen families and to secure enduring child safety, belonging
and wellbeing.
1. Miracle questions are used to help children, young people and families create goals and
vision what they will be doing differently in their desired future.
Let us imagine it is six months in the future from now and all the problems that
brought us into your life are totally resolved. What would it look like? What steps
would you have had to take to get there?
2. Exception questions uncover instances when the problem could have occurred but
did not, and help obtain a balanced picture of the family, creating a vision that change
is possible.
Can you tell me about a time when this problem was not happening? When was that?
How did you make that happen? What kind of difference did that make for your child?
3. Scaling questions help create discussion and understanding of danger and safety. It is
not the number that is important, but the conversation that follows the scaling process.
Scaling questions can also help elicit ‘next steps’ to change.
On a scale of zero to 10, where zero being your child is not safe and will be
immediately hurt, and 10 being your child is now completely safe, where would you
say things are? What are you already doing or what is already in place that has you
this high on the scale? What would need to happen to bring things up by one?
5. Coping questions acknowledge difficulty and help people discover skills they possess
and supports that helped them survive challenges and difficulties.
I imagine that raising five children under the age of six on your own must keep you
very busy. How do you manage day after day? What helps you to keep going?
6. Detail questions are useful to elicit details of goals and help to operationalise the
change process in small steps of actions and behaviours.
• What specifically are you going to do?
• When are you going to do it?
• How are you going to do it?
• Is it ‘doable’?
• Who will notice that you are doing it?
• What difference do you think it will make?
• On a scale of zero to 10, if 10 is the highest and zero is the lowest, how confident are
you that you will do it?
1. What has happened/is happening within the family that worries us? (Harm and
complicating factors.)
2. What is going well within the family? (Protection and belonging, and strengths.)
3. Safety and wellbeing scale: On a scale of zero to 10, how safe is it for the children in the
care of the family at this point in time?
4. What needs to happen for the children to be safe and well in the future? (Identifying
future worries, collaborative goals and action steps to achieve these goals.)
As these four domains illustrate, the collaborative assessment and planning framework
focuses on understanding what has happened and what is happening within a family in
relation to the safety, belonging and wellbeing of the children, and then working together to
plan for the future. Including all four key questions or domains of inquiry ensures a
balanced assessment focusing on the worries as well as what is going well, that the safety
judgment is made explicit as part of the assessment and planning process, and that the
focus is on moving forward from the past toward building future safety and wellbeing for the
children.
1 The assessment and planning framework has been adapted from the Signs of Safety risk assessment and planning framework (Turnell &
Edwards, 1999; The Consultation and Information Sharing Framework (Lohrbach, 2000); and the Massachusetts Safety Mapping Framework
(Chin, Decter, Madsen and Vogel, 2010).
2 Adapted from the four domains of inquiry within the Signs of Safety approach (Turnell & Edwards, 1999; Turnell & Parker, 2009).
A simplified version was developed for use with children and young people (and can also
be used with adults and in family conferences). Using drawings of three houses (or any
other images that the child or young person relates to), the tool explores the child’s or
young person’s worries about their lives, the good things or positive things that are
happening in their lives, and their hopes and dreams for the future.
The family roadmap process starts by inviting the parent or family members to describe
what life is like when things are at their best for their family, and then moves to a
description of what life is like when things are at their worst. This provides the opportunity
to acknowledge that every parent and every family has difficult and challenging times when
they are far from their best. A path or scale is then created between these two positions.
This enables the family to describe where they see themselves at this point (relative to life
at its best or worst), what has happened that has enabled them to do as well as they are
(wherever they are on the path) and what they would need to do to move closer toward their
vision of life at its best. The family roadmap process also identifies who has supported or
who could support the family in achieving this and explores the obstacles or roadblocks
that the family has already dealt with and may deal with in the future.
In particular, SDM helps to highlight the differences between the concepts of harm and risk.
Immediate harm is focused on situations that could imminently hurt a child and is assessed
using the safety assessment tool. Risk is focused on the likelihood or probability of harm
occurring in the future, an assessment made with an actuarial risk tool called the family risk
evaluation (FRE).
The CRC has worked to integrate the SDM system with this Framework for Practice. This
ensures the SDM tools are not misunderstood as forms that need to be simply filled out.
The foundational elements of the Framework for Practice (such as the values and principles)
underpin the approach and should be present in a practitioner’s work at all points. The core
practices (such as the collaborative assessment and planning framework, Three Houses and
others) give practitioners methods for bringing collaboration alive in their day-to-day
practice and can be used at any point in their work with families. The SDM assessments
help to ensure the framework continues to be guided by valid and reliable tools at the key
decision points. Together the overall approach helps to bring the art and science of the field
together and create the best outcomes for children, young people and families.
The circles of safety and support tool, inspired by the concentric circles used by Susie Essex
in the Words and Pictures method and the circles concept from the Protective Behaviours
approach, was designed to help family members identify people for the family’s safety and
support network. This tool also helps workers have conversations with family members
about why a safety and support network is necessary, about the role the network can play,
and the process of assessing who would be the most appropriate people to participate in
this network.
“Circles
Circles of safety of
Safety
and support tool&
Support”
Tool
The immediate story provides a simple explanation to the child and family members about
the reason for the child protection intervention, about what is happening now or has just
happened (for example, the child is being removed from their parents’ care and going to
stay with other family members or foster carers, or Dad is going to stay somewhere else and
Grandma is going to move in), and what is going to happen next in the collaborative
planning process. The immediate story also provides an immediate explanation to parents,
carers and family members so they are able to reinforce this explanation and provide
informed comfort and support to the child.
Case example (for a five-year-old child who is being taken into care)
A foster carer profile, such as the example below, can be used to support parents and
carers to start to build a relationship4. The profile is first developed with the carers and is
then shared with parents in order to help parents understand a little about the people who
are caring for their child.
After the foster carer profile is shared with the family, it creates the possibility for family
members to then share some information about themselves and their child with the foster
carers. This might take the form of a profile, a letter, photographs, a phone call or a video
— whatever the parents are most comfortable with. It might include detailed information
about the child’s likes or dislikes — or more global information about the family and their
hopes for the future.
Example: Foster carer profile When carers and family members can make
this connection right from the start it can
become easier for families and foster carers
to work together. This might take a variety
of forms: Carers and parents might share
information about the child via the worker
or agency; foster carers might supervise
contact visits, either in their home, within
the family home or a neutral venue; foster
carers and parents may participate together
in family meetings; and foster carers can
act as mentors to the parents and become
part of the family’s ongoing support
network.
3 Based on the Te Whanau Nei process, developed by Jill Devlin from Open Home Foundation, New Zealand.
4 As well as helping children to understand who they will be staying with, as discussed in the ‘Immediate Story’.
The safe contact tool is designed to be used with children, families, their networks and
carers over the entire period of working with a family to ensure that decision making about
contact continues to be collaborative, transparent and centred on safety, belonging and
wellbeing.
These child- and family-centred safety plans contain a set of rules or guidelines that
describe in detail the practical, day-to-day arrangements (either for the immediate, short-
term or long term) that the family and their safety and support network will put in place to
make sure that the children are safe in relation to identified worries. These rules or
guidelines are written in clear, simple language that the children can understand, and the
children then draw pictures to the rules to help them understand the plan and demonstrate
their understanding. This collaborative planning process also involves the plan being put
into action and monitored, reviewed and revised over time so that everyone is satisfied it is
working and will continue to work to provide ongoing safety, belonging and wellbeing for the
children.
5 This work builds on the rigorous and innovative safety planning work of Susie Essex, Colin Luger and John Gumbleton in the Resolutions
Model from the UK and the development of these ideas within the Signs of Safety approach.
Developing these kinds of collaborative action plans involves the family (including the
children if they are old enough), the safety and support network, and workers meeting
together over a series of meetings to work through each of the goal statements and to
develop the detailed plan to achieve these goals. The collaborative action planning tool
was developed to provide structure and focus for these planning meetings and to help
everyone work together effectively to create these detailed plans.
IMPORTANT
SITUATIONS/
TIMES
OF
THE
DAY/WEEK:
What
are
the
1.
SAFETY
AND
PROTECTION
ALREADY
HAPPENING:
What
are
the
parents/caregivers
already
doing
or
what
were
they
particular
worrying
circumstances
or
situations
(identified
in
the
worry
statements)
doing
in
the
past
that
will
help
to
meet
this
goal
statement?
(Get
everyone’s
views).
and
the
important
times
during
the
day
and
the
week
that
the
action
plan
needs
to
cover
for
this
goal
statement?
NON-‐NEGOTIABLES:
Here
are
the
non-‐negotiables
for
this
goal
statement
that
the
child
protection
agency
has
said
have
to
be
included
in
the
action
plan.
0
10
Scale:
On
a
scale
of
0
-‐
1 0,
where
1 0
is
w hat
the
parents
are
a lready
d oing
is
enough
to
meet
this
goal
statement
a ll
of
the
time
a nd
0
is
that
they
have
not
yet
been
able
to
put
a nything
in
to
place
that
w ill
help
to
m eet
the
goal
statement,
w here
are
you
o n
the
scale?
2.
FUTURE
SAFETY
AND
PROTECTION:
What
else
could
the
parents/caregivers
do
that
will
help
to
meet
this
goal
statement?
(Brainstorm
everyone’s
i deas).
Continue
until
everyone
is
at
a
10
(enough
to
meet
goal
statement).
GUIDING
QUESTIONS:
These
questions
have
been
provided
by
the
child
protection
agency
to
help
us
think
about
all
the
areas
that
need
to
be
covered
for
this
goal.
0
10
Scale:
On
a
scale
of
0
-‐
1 0,
where
1 0
is
these
safety
ideas
are
enough
to
m eet
the
goal
statement
a ll
of
the
time
a nd
0
is
these
ideas
don’t
meet
the
goal
statement
a t
all,
where
are
you
on
t he
scale?
What
else
would
you
need
to
see
the
p arents
doing
to
move
to
a
10?
e a la a e a ec l e ca e a a cl e e ac la
e a la a e a ec l e ca e a a cl e e ac la
C.
PRESENTING
THE
ACTION
PLAN
TO
THE
CHILDREN
D.
MAKING
CHANGES
TO
THE
ACTION
PLAN
O ER
TIME
Who
will
r ead
the
action
plan
to
the
children
and
help
them
d o
pictures
f or
each
rule?
When
w ill
this
s
the
children
get
o lder,
w hat
c hanges
might
be
necessary
to
the
action
plan?
happen
and
who
n eeds
to
be
there
w hen
this
happens?
How
w ill
this
happen?
Who
w ill
be
part
of
changing
the
action
plan?
Who
will
m ake
c opies
of
the
action
plan
(with
c hildren s
drawings)
and
m ake
sure
everyone
gets
a
copy?
Who
will
get
a
copy
of
the
new
action
plan?
Where
w ill
the
family
copy
of
the
action
plan
be
kept
(so
that
it
is
visible
to
everyone
who
needs
to
see
it)?
What
if
other
c ircumstances
change
in
the
f amily?
How
o ften
in
the
future
will
the
action
plan
be
read
to
the
children?
Who
will
m ake
sure
this
happens?
e a la a e a ec l e ca e a a cl e e ac la
e a la a e a e c l e ca e a a cl e e ac la