Surname 1
Student's name
Lecturer
Unit
Date
The Impact of Technology on Interpersonal Communication
Many people argue that technology has made society a better place; however, when it
comes to communication, it is a two-sided sword. In terms of the former, it provides one with
unique opportunities for instant connectivity; in the latter, it often hinders the creation of
meaningful contact. The shift from the use of telegraphs to smart phones and social media as we
see it has brought about a drastic change in methods of passing information, bringing out
controversies on whether this transformation benefits or deteriorates relations among human
beings. This essay will, therefore, seek to examine the social implications of communication
technology in society for health communication and argue that while using technology has many
advantages, it raises questions about the nature of authentic face-to-face communication.
Agree Points/Reasons
One advantage of employing or using technology is that it makes it possible to converse
in an instant, even from distant areas. WhatsApp and Skype on social networks let individuals
communicate with relatives and friends anywhere in the world. For example, Yuan et al. (163)
pointed out that the main reason why most adults in the United States access social media sites is
to connect with friends and family members. This accessibility gives a leeway for the fact that
Surname 2
although people may be separated by distance, the relationship can continue. According to me,
travel experiences are updated in real-time, and frequent communication strengthens the social
ties of individuals as communication becomes more fluid.
The other benefit of technology is the availability of different commutation means to suit
those with various inclinations and requirements that enhance their communication. Instead of
the face-to-face format, there is an opportunity to select the most appropriate variant: email,
video, or audio call. This versatility likewise adds not only to the complexity but to the
accessibility of physical activity as well (Humeniuk et al. 35). For instance, introverted people
may prefer writing and viewing text to speaking on the phone or face-to-face. In contrast,
extroverts may prefer video, phone calls, or face-to-face with the help of technology. These
kinds of choices enable people to express themselves in a manageable way or within the realms
that are most comfortable to them, with the aim of enhancing interactions within certain social
circles.
The contemporary denotes its role of giving voices to minorities and making information
available to the public. More often than not, social media is used for social analytical movements
and effective group organization. For instance, Ford et al. (275) described how technology could
be employed to plan for the protests and spread information as and when needed. The media
creates an environment where a largely diverse population must transact, and technology
enhances this aspect of common communication. This is important for any large group activity,
as people from different backgrounds can get involved in discussions and initiatives that can
make a difference in society, thus making the communication process more effective and
beneficial.
Surname 3
Counter Argument and Objection
One may agree with the criticism stating that technology leads to the creation of shallow
connections and communication expressed in short messages and emoticons. Concerns have
been raised about the superficiality of communication due to the overuse of technology and a
lack of interpersonal communication skills as a result of only engaging in short written or voice-
only electronic communications (Ford et al. 277). It can result in misconceptions and the absence
of real affection between not only spouses but also acquaintances and friends. Also, there is the
concept of 'technological ratification,' where people tend to opt more for virtual relations than
actual interpersonal relations, which has potential effects on the overall relational quality.
Indeed, the use of digital communication tends to be poorer in some measure than face-to-face
communication full-stop; to judge it inferior is, however, a generalization. According to the
findings of Nguyen et al. (2047), such digital media do not replace conventional forms of
communication but support them in some way. These tools can strengthen bonding as people can
stay connected who would not have time or distance to meet physically. Moreover, it is a perfect
place to build a community of like-minded people and have support that otherwise cannot be
found. For instance, online forums and associated social media groups offer companionship for
people with similar emotions and values.
Conclusion
Analysing the role of technology in shaping communication, it may be stated that this
process is rather conflicted and diverse. The permutations include direct contact, multiple
communication avenues, and the provision of information to everyone. Thus, it can open up
opportunities but also face issues such as a lack of close human contact and over-reliance on
Surname 4
technology. Innovative and inclusive communication in terms of technological factors requires
that these aspects be balanced effectively. As a result, it is possible to build an environment that
would positively facilitate technology's strengths and negate its negative aspects, which fosters
people's improved real-life relationships in society. As we proceed deeper into the world of
technology, we must not forget that developing good relations and character involves us
responding with proper care, genuine concerns, and deliberation.
Surname 5
Work Cited
Ford, Bryan, et al., "Technologizing democracy or democratising technology? A layered-
architecture perspective on potentials and challenges." Digital technology and
democratic theory (2021): 274–321. https://books.google.com/books?
hl=en&lr=&id=aXoWEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA274&dq=technology+has+democrat
ized+access+to+information+and+provided+a+platform+for+marginalized+voices.&ots=
GJUtNacnSC&sig=ym4vdjarvh6cy4K-22q3M-R4eqY
Humeniuk, Tetiana, and Pavlo Romaniuk. "On the development of information and
communication technologies in education of the future: the possibilities of cloud
computing technology." Futurity Education 3.1 (2023): 34–44 https://futurity-
education.com/index.php/fed/article/view/92
Nguyen, Minh Hao, et al., "Staying connected while physically apart: Digital communication
when face-to-face interactions are limited." New Media & Society 24.9 (2022): 2046-
2067. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444820985442
Yuan, Shupei, et al., "What do they like? Communication preferences and patterns of older
adults in the United States: The Role of Technology" Educational Gerontology 42.3
(2016): 163–174 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03601277.2015.1083392