Mini-Project - PHASE - 2 Report
Mini-Project - PHASE - 2 Report
2022-23
Chapter 1
PREAMBLE
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Communication helps us to transfer information from one place to another. Two individuals who
are near can communicate through sound waves. As the distance increases, people communicate
through wired networks with user cables to connect devices and they are tethered to a router with
one end connected to an ethernet port and the other end to a device therefore user can’t instantly
move a device from one location to another and installation and maintenance is expensive and
tedious. This is where the wireless network comes into the picture; it allows us to transfer
information without using any cables or physical medium. An antenna is a critical component of a
wireless network. The antenna is a transducer (converts energy from one form to another) that
converts electric power into electromagnetic waves and vice versa. The antennas have acquired new
significance in the last hundred years. Antennas are the communication link for aircraft and ships,
cellular phones, and all types of wireless devices link [1].
The antenna is a transducer element developed for the transmission of electromagnetic waves from
the source station to the destination. An antenna generates electromagnetic waves from the supply
given to it. The antenna converts the electrical signal into electromagnetic waves at the source
station and in the destination station, the receiver antenna amplifies the received electromagnetic
waves and converts them to an electrical signal. The movement of electrons involved in an energy
supply makes invisible radio waves when it is connected to a metal antenna. The generated
electromagnetic waves carry the information available in the electrical signal given to the antenna.
The transmission of the signal takes place at the speed of light [2].
From the very beginning of the era of wireless communication, antennas have been a topic of
interest for all engineers, scientists and wireless planners. However, in the past few decades,
antennas have taken a huge leap from large dish-like structures to foldable small printed
components inside mobile phones or watches. With the changing time, the design of antenna and its
printing has been getting easier with the introduction of Microstrip patch antenna. Microstrip patch
antennas were first proposed in 1953; however, Munson and Howell developed the first practical
Microstrip patch antenna in the 1970s. A Microstrip Patch Antenna, in its simplest form, consists of
a radiating patch on one side of a dielectric substrate, and a ground plane on the other side of the
substrate. The Microstrip Antennas have numerous advantages over a traditional antenna such as
low weight, small size, small volume, and ease of fabrication using printed circuit technology. With
increasing requirements for personal and mobile communications, the demand for smaller and low-
profile antennas has brought Microstrip patch antennas to the forefront [3].
Akash Bansal and Richa Gupta [4] made a comparison of four feeding methodologies. Here
authors Considered the rectangular patch antenna which consists of radiating patch on one side of
the dielectric substrate and a ground plane on the other side of the substrate. Here authors use FR4
substrate as dielectric material and it is designed for 2.45 GHz. The authors were going through a
comparative study on microstrip line feed, insert line feed, and coaxial line feed. By comparing the
four feeding methodologies the authors concluded the magnitude of the signal at 2.4 GHz is much
better in coaxial feed, and comparative output can also be seen for insert feed but direct feed or
microstrip feed does not provide the optimum response at 2.4 GHz. Further authors use an array
antenna which enhances the output more than any other feeding technique. The array antenna
presented uses insert fed for all the antennas.
U. Tata, H. Huang, R.L. Carter, and J.C. Chiao [5] made a study on Exploiting a patch antenna
for strain measurements. The authors concluded that patch antennas can be effectively utilized for
strain measurement. The resonance frequency of a patch antenna is influenced by the size of its
metallic patch, and when strains are applied, the dimensions of the patch change, resulting in a shift
in the antenna's resonant frequency. By measuring the changes in resonant frequency, the applied
strains can be determined. The experimental measurements of strain sensitivity obtained from the
study aligned well with the analytical predictions, further validating the effectiveness of the patch
antenna for strain measurement. Therefore, based on the results, it can be concluded that patch
antennas show promise as a reliable method for measuring strains, offering potential applications in
various fields.
compact and efficient solution for wireless communication systems, with the potential for improved
performance in terms of frequency range and bandwidth.
Muhammad Umar Khan, Mohammad Said Sharawi, and Raj Mittra [7] made research on
Patch antenna miniaturization techniques. In their study authors discuss some of the principal
techniques that have been reported in the literature to reduce the size of a microstrip patch antenna.
These miniaturization techniques include material loading, reshaping the antenna, shorting and
folding, introducing slots and defects in the ground plane, and the use of metamaterials. After trying
different miniaturization techniques authors conclude that Some methods provided greater
miniaturization, whereas others only achieved a moderate level of miniaturization in an attempt to
keep a balance between a decrease in bandwidth and loss of efficiency while reducing the size.
G. Christina [8] made a Review on how to increase the performance of microstrip patch antennae
for various applications. The author says the gain and bandwidth are the primary factors describing
the efficiency of microstrip patch antennas. There are several ways available for improving the gain
and bandwidth of an antenna. The feeding method of a microstrip patch antenna is a primary one
for attaining better gain and bandwidth. The basic feed methods are line feed and coaxial probe
field. Aperture-coupled feeding is a recent feeding technique developed for attaining larger gain
with reduced space occupation.
C. L. Mak, K. M. Luk [9] made an Experimental study of a microstrip patch antenna with an L-
Shaped probe. The author says an L-shaped probe is an attractive feed for the thick microstrip
antenna and the performance of this new feeding technique is quite similar to that of a U-Shaped
slot patch antenna. After conducting the experiment author come to the conclusion that both L and
U-shaped probe exhibit broad-band and high-gain characteristics. The bandwidth and gain of the
proposed antenna are 36% and 7 dB, respectively.
Chapter 2
METHODOLOGY
A ground plane is made of high-conductivity metal (copper). We can find the dielectric material on
top of the ground plane; different materials can be used as per the requirement.FR4 dielectric
material was used as substrate in our project and its dielectric constant can vary from 3.8-4.8. A
radiating material present above the dielectric material is known as a patch which is made up of
high-conductivity metal (copper). Different shapes of patches are available but, in the project, we
considered rectangular shape patch.
2.2.1 Directivity
Directivity is defined as the “maximum radiation intensity in a given direction to the radiation
intensity averaged over all direction”. Directivity is a measure of the increase in maximum power
density at a fixed distance in W/m2 (or equivalently, radiation intensity in W/m2/steradian),
compared to that from a hypothetical isotropic radiator. Directivity, D, is a unit-less power ratio,
usually expressed in dB, using 10logD. A higher directivity indicates a strong concentration of
energy in a particular direction, and lower directivity implies a broad radiation pattern [10].
Directivity can be evaluated if the radiation pattern, F (θ, ∅), is known for all angles, using
4π
D= (1)
A
2π π
0 0
in the main lobe and the side lobes indicate the energy wasted by radiating in other directions. Side
lobes levels below -20dB are usually not suitable for many applications [11].
2.2.3 Wavelength
“The distance among consecutive maximum (peak) or consecutive minimum(valleys) is known as
the wavelength”. The distance between the two positive peaks and the negative peak is none other
than the length of the wave. As frequency increases wavelength becomes shorter and vice versa
[11].
c
λ= (2)
f
Where, = wavelength
c = speed of light (3∗108 meter / second)
f = frequency
2.2.4 Gain
The gain of an antenna is defined as “the ratio of the intensity in a given direction to the radiation
intensity that would be obtained if the power accepted by the antenna were radiation isotopically”
[10].
4 π radiation intensity
Gain = (3)
total input ( accepted ) power
2.2.5 VSWR
“The ratio of the maximum voltage to the minimum voltage of a standing wave is called the voltage
standing wave ratio”. VSWR is a sign of the quantity of mismatch between an antenna and the feed
line connecting to it. The variety of values for VSWR is from 1 to ∞. A VSWR below 2 is taken
into consideration as appropriate for maximum antenna application [11].
2.2.6 Bandwidth
The bandwidth of an antenna refers to the range of frequencies over which the antenna can
effectively transmit or receive signals with acceptable performance. It represents the frequency span
within which the antenna operates efficiently and maintains desired characteristics such as
impedance matching, radiation pattern, and gain [11][12].
2.3 DESIGN
c
Leff = (9)
2 fo √ ε eff
( )
−1
ℇr +1 ℇr −1 h 2
ℇeff = + [1+ 12 ] (10)
2 2 w
w
( ℇ eff +0.3 )∗( + 0.265)
h
∆L=0.412*h* (11)
w
( ℇ eff −0.258 )∗( +.8)
h
In our design, we considered FR4 epoxy as substrat material with a dielectric constant of 4.4 with a
substrate height 1.6 mm.
1. Width of the substrat, Ws can be calculated,
Ws = 6h+W (12)
2. Length of the substrat, Ls can be calculated
Ls = 6h+L (13)
Here length and width of ground plane is same as substrat except height.
This technique offers high radiation efficiency and low losses, but it requires additional components
and can be difficult to integrate into certain devices [13][14][15].
Microstrip feed is a popular technique used in planar antennas, such as patch antennas. A
microstrip transmission line is used to connect the antenna to the feeding network. The microstrip
line is typically printed on a dielectric substrate and is connected to the radiating element through a
feed probe or aperture.
This technique is simple and easy to implement, but it can result in low radiation efficiency and
high losses due to the proximity of the feed to the ground plane [13][16][17].
Proximity coupling involves placing the feeding structure, such as a microstrip line or a waveguide,
close to the radiating element of the antenna without any physical connection. To match with input
impedance, the feed line is moved to a lower level below the patch. Here the power transfer from
the feed to the patch takes place through electromagnetic field coupling.
Since the feed line has been moved to a lower level, feed line radiation has been reduced to a great
extent and also this technique allows planar feeding. This technique offers higher radiation
efficiency and lower losses than the microstrip feed, but it requires careful tuning of the gap width
and position to achieve optimal performance [13][16][17].
This technique offers high radiation efficiency and low losses, and it also provides good isolation
between the feed and the ground plane. However, it requires precise alignment of the aperture and
the metal strip for optimal performance [13][16][17].
Chapter 3
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
3.1 Ansys HFSS Software
Ansys HFSS evaluation version 15 is the software used for designing proposed antenna and to
simulate it to analyze the antenna parameters. The accurate solution is provided based on the
physics or electromagnetics of the design. This is possible by automatic adaptive mesh refinement.
For resolving a wide range of antenna designs and integration issues, it provides automatic accuracy
within multiple distinct modelling technologies. Large scale issues can be effectively and quickly
solved when combined with high performance computing techniques like domain decomposition or
hybrid solving. More over the software is easy to work. Where in simulation we can recreate a real-
world process in a controlled environment which allows to change parameters values and helps us
to obtain efficient antenna design.
3.2.3 Patch
A patch is a radiating material that can be mounted on the surface of the dielectric substrate.
Patches are available in different shapes like rectangular, circular, triangular, or any geometrical shape, we
have to select shape as per our requirement. We can calculate length and width of patch by using standard formula
as mentioned in chapter 2. In this project we have considered rectangular shape patch with dimension
29.4 mm x 38mm.
range of applications including antenna connections for most sub-6 GHz technologies like Wi-Fi
and Bluetooth.
There are different types of SMA connectors, such as standard-polarity, reverse-polarity, straight,
right-angle, edge mount, panel mount, bulkhead fitting, etc. They are also available in a variety of
different materials, including brass, stainless steel, and nickel. SMA connectors are available in two
versions Male and Female
Chapter 4
RESULT CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE
4.1 Result
4.1.1 S11 or Return Loss
Figure 4.1 shows the simulated plot for return loss and the maximum fall is at -21.977 dB at a
frequency of 2.49 GHz for the Rectangular patch antenna.
4 .1. 2 VSWR
An indicator of impedance mismatch between the transmitter and receiver antenna is the VSWR.
The VSWR at unity indicates a perfect match. Practically the input impedance of an antenna should
be 50 . As shown in figure 4.2 the VSWR obtained at 2.49 GHz frequency is 1.38.
4 .1. 4 Directivity
The term directivity is defined as “maximum radiation intensity in a given direction to the radiation
intensity averaged over all directions”. Figure 4.4 shows the directivity of the designed antenna at
phi = 0 & 90 deg.
4 .1. 5 Gain
The gain of an antenna is defined as “the ratio of the intensity in a given direction to the radiation
intensity that would be obtained if the power accepted by the antenna were radiation isotopically”.
Figure 4.4 shows the gain parameter of the antenna.
XY Plot 1 HFSSDesign1
34.00
32.00
30.00
28.00
dBm(PeakGain)
26.00
24.00
22.00
20.00
18.00
16.00
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
Freq [GHz]
4.2 Conclusion
The designed antenna is simulated using HFSS. The proposed antenna is a low-profile antenna thus
it is very compact, is also easy to fabricate, and is fed by a microstrip feedline via an SMA
connector which makes it an attractive structure for current as well as future applications. SMA
connectors provide a strong and durable connection that minimizes reflections, limits attenuation,
and makes it a great choice when working with microwave frequencies. The designed antenna is
resonating at 2.49 GHz with VSWR 1.3 and peak gain of 33.3 dB which is acceptable as per IEEE
standards.
References:
1. F.Blaabjerg, A. Consoli, J.A. Ferreira and J.D.Van Wyk, “The future of electronic power
processing and conversion”, IEEE Transaction on Power electronics, Vol.20, No.3, pp.715-720,
May 2005.
2. K.L. Wong, Planar Antennas for Wireless Communications, John Wiley & Sons, USA, 2003.
3. Indeasen Singh, Dr V.S. Tripathi Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad
(2011).
4. Akash Bansal, Richa Gupta Maharaja Surajmal Institute of Technology Guru Gobind Singh
Indraprastha University New Delhi India.
5. U. Tata, H. Huang, R.L. Carter, and J.C. Chiao Department of electrical engineering, University
of Texas at Allington, 416 Yates Street NH538 Allington TX 76019, USA.
6. U. Chakraborty, S. Chatterjee, S. K. Chowdhury, and P.P. Sarkar’s progress In electromagnetics
research C, Vol. 18, 211-220, 2011.
7. Muhammad Umar Khan, Mohammad Said Sahrawi and Raj Mittra IET Microw. Antennas
Propag., 2015, Vol. 9, ISS. 9, pp. 913–922 &The Institution of Engineering and Technology
2015.
8. G. Christina, Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering,
Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, India
9. C. L. Mak, K. M. Luk, Senior Member, IEEE, K. F. Lee, Fellow, IEEE, and Y. L. Chow.
10. W.L. Stutzman; “Estimating Directivity and Gian of Antenna”, IEEE Publications,
10.1109/74.730532.
11. Constantine A. Balanis. “Antenna Theory Analysis and Design”, Fourth Edition.
12. John D Kraus and Ronald J Marhefka, “Antennas and Wave Propagation”, Fourth Edition
13. Sibi Chakravarthy S, Shanmugapriya M; “Comparative Study on Different Feeding Techniques
of Rectangular Patch Antenna”, IEEE Publications, 10.1109/WOCN.2016.7759032.
14. B.W. Hakki and P.D. Coleman; "A Dielectric Resonator Method of Measuring Inductive
Capacities in the Millimeter range," IRE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 80, no. MTT 8, pp.
402-410, 1960.
15. Jeffrey W. Honchell, Ash L. Miller Purdue University, W. Lafayette ‘Antenna Design,
Simulation, Fabrication and Test Tailored for Engineering Technology Students’ Proceedings of
the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
16. Udit Raithatha, S. Sreenath Kashyap ; “Microstrip Patch Antenna Parameters, Feeding
Techniques & Shapes of the Patch – A Survey”, International Journal of Scientific &
Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 4.
17. Sourabh Bisht, Shweta Saini; “Study The Various Feeding Techniques of Microstrip Antenna
Using Design and Simulation Using CST Microwave Studio”. IJETAE Publications, Volume 4,
Issue 9.