CHAPTER V

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter present the summary of findings, conclusion and the

recommendations that resulted from the interpretation of The Impact of Mobile Phone

Usage to the Academic Performance of Grade 12-Hermes Students. From the findings

derived, the researcher drew a conclusion and made relevant recommendations based

on the result of this research.

Summary of Findings

Using appropriate statistical tool, the results revealed that;

1. There were 66.66% of respondents belong to 17 years old and below and 33.33%
belong to 18 years old and above in terms of age.
There were 58.98% of the respondents belong to male and 41.02% belong to female
in terms of sex.
There were 56.41% of the respondents that have an average of 80-86 and 23.08% of
the respondents that have an average of 79 below and 20.51% respondents that has an
average of 87 and above, in terms of GPA.
2. Using appropriate statistical tool, the result revealed that the level of mobile phone
usage to Grade 12-Hermes students when taken as a whole is 4.36 and it is interpreted
as “strongly agree”.
3. Using appropriate statistical tool, the result revealed that the level of academic
performance to Grade 12-Hermes students when taken as a whole is 4.36 and it is
interpreted as “strongly agree”.
4. Using appropriate statistical tool, the result revealed that the t-value of mobile
phone usage is 130.09 and has a p-value of 0.0001 and it is interpreted as significant.
5. Using the analysis, the result revealed that there are twenty-four (24) respondents
says that because of mobile phone they got a low grade, six (6) says that mobile
phones are distraction to their studies, five (5) says that they get addicted to mobile
phone and four (4) of them says that mobile phones lose their concentration from
studies.
Conclusion
1. Based on survey of problem number 1.1, therefore more respondents were
ages 17 and below most of the respondents are male
Based on survey of problem number 1.2, therefore most of the respondents are
male.
Based on survey of problem number 1.3, therefore more of the respondents has
the average of 80-86.
2. Based on the survey of problem number 2, therefore the level of mobile phone
usage
of Grade 12-Hermes students is interpreted as strongly agree.
3. Based on the survey of problem number 3, therefore the level of academic
performance of Grade 12-Hermes students is interpreted as strongly agree.
4. Based on the survey of problem number 4, therefore the significant relationship of
mobile phone usage is interpreted as significant.
5. Based on the survey of problem number 5, therefore more of the respondents has
the
lowest grades because of mobile phone usage.

Recommendations
Based on the findings in this study, the following are recommended by the
researchers:

Students. In the classroom, students must create a conducive study environment: Find

a quiet, well-lit space with minimal distractions to study and complete assignments.

Break tasks into smaller segments: Breaking down tasks into manageable chunks can

make them less overwhelming and help maintain focus. Practice mindfulness and
relaxation techniques: Engage in activities such as deep breathing, meditation, or yoga

to reduce stress and improve concentration. Manage time effectively: Use tools like

planners or apps to schedule study sessions and allocate time for breaks. Limit

distractions: Minimize interruptions by turning off notifications on electronic devices

and setting specific times for checking messages or social media. Stay organized:

Keep study materials and notes in order to reduce clutter and make it easier to find

what's needed. Get enough rest: Adequate sleep is crucial for maintaining focus and

cognitive function. Aim for7-9 hours of sleep per night. Stay physically active:

Regular exercise can improve overall cognitive function and help reduce stress,

leading to better concentration. Seek help if needed: If concentration issues persist,

consider reaching out to a teacher, counselor, or mental health professional for

support and guidance. By implementing these recommendations, students can work

towards improving their concentration and overall academic performance.

School Head/ Principal. The findings of this study will serve as a basis for school

head/ principal to foster a positive school culture: Encourage a supportive and

inclusive environment where students, teachers, and staff feel valued and respected.

Prioritize professional development: Invest in ongoing training and development

opportunities for teachers and staff to enhance their skills and keep up with the latest

educational trends. Implement effective communication channels: Establish clear and

open lines of communication with students, parents, teachers, and staff to ensure

transparency and collaboration. Embrace technology: Integrate technology into the

learning process to enhance teaching methods, streamline administrative tasks, and

provide students with modern learning tools. Support student well-being: Implement

programs and initiatives that promote mental health, emotional well-being, and a

positive school climate. Encourage community involvement: Foster partnerships with

local organizations, businesses, and community members to enrich the educational

experience and provide additional resources for students. Focus on student

achievement: Set clear academic goals and provide support systems to help students

excel academically. Promote a safe and secure environment: Implement safety

protocols and measures to ensure the physical and emotional well-being of students

and staff. Emphasize continuous improvement: Regularly assess and evaluate school

programs, policies, and practices to identify areas for improvement and innovation.

By implementing these recommendations, school heads or principals can contribute to

creating a positive and enriching educational environment for students and staff.

Parents. The findings of this study will serve as a way to identify the cause of the

factors affecting their students school performance and teach them a better way on

what to do, so that they can also give a proper better guidance on their children to

minimize their usage in mobile phone. And in order to assist the students more

effectively, developing and maintaining a good grade.

Future Researchers. The current study has provided useful data about the effects of

mobile phone usage to the student’s academic performance, which other studies can

build upon. Future researcher can investigate whether or not age and sex directly

affects students’ academic performance by using this research as a basis of their

study. There is still an open field for the researcher to explore about the impact of

mobile phone usage to the student’s academic performance.

 REFERENCES

Deepinder, F., Makker, K., & Agarwal, A. (2007). Cell phones and male infertility:
Dissecting the relationship. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 15(3),
266270.
Retrieved November 30, 2015, from

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648310603380

Patel, R. (2015, June 17). Cell Phone use before bedtime might impact sleep, and
Daytime tiredness. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from

https://u.osu.edu/emotionalfitness/2015/06/17/cellphone-use-before-bedtime-

Andreassen, C. (2015). Online Social Network Site Addiction: A Comprehensive

Review. Curr Addict Rep Current Addiction Reports, 2015(2), 175-184.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9
Lepp, A., Li, J., Barkley, J., & Salehi-Esfahani, S. (2015). Exploring the relationships
between college students’ cell phone use, personality and leisure. Computers
in Human Behavior, 43, 210-219. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563214005822
Greenfield, D. (2013). Smartphone Abuse Test. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from
http://virtual-addiction.com/new-smartphone-abuse-test-now-online/
Young, K. (2007). Cognitive Behavior Therapy with Internet Addicts: Treatment
Outcomes and Implications. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 671-679.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9971
Young, K. (2013). Treatment outcomes using CBT-IA with Internet-addicted patients.
Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(4), 209-215.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/JBA.2.2013.4.3
Andreassen, C. (2015). Online Social Network Site Addiction: A Comprehensive
Review. Curr Addict Rep Current Addiction Reports, 2015(2), 175-184.
 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9

Przepiorka, A., Blachnio, A., Miziak, B., & Czuczwar, S. (2014). Clinical approaches
to treatment of Internet addiction. Pharmacological Reports, 66(2), 187-
191.
Internet & Tech Addiction Anonymous (ITAA). (n.d.).
Retrieved November 30, 2015, from
http://www.netaddictionanon.org/
ReSTART. Center for Technology Sustainability. (2015).
Retrieved November 30, 2015, from
http://www.netaddictionrecovery.com/
Camp Grounded – Summer Camp for Adults – Digital Detox. (2014).
Retrieved November 30, 2015, from
http://campgrounded.org/
Mobile Technology Fact Sheet. (2013, December 27).

Retrieved November 30, 2015, from

http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/mobile-technology-fact-sheet/

Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. (5th ed.). (2013).

Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association. Singh Bhatia, M.

(2008). Cell Phone Dependence — a new diagnostic entity. Delhi Psychiatry

Journal, 11(2), 123-124.

Retrieved November 30, 2015, from

http://medind.nic.in/daa/t08/i2/daat08i2p123.pdf

Digital Eye Strain Report 2015. (2015).

Retrieved November 30, 2015, from

 http://www.thevisioncouncil.org/digital-eye-strain-report-2015

Hansraj, K. (2014). Assessment of Stresses in the Cervical Spine Caused by Posture

and Position of the Head. (25), 277-279.

Retrieved November 30, 2015, from

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25393825

Health Risks of Using Mobile Phones. (n.d.).

Retrieved November 30, 2015, from

http://source.southuniversity.edu/health-risks-of-using-mobile-

phones137310.aspx.

Dangers of Texting Whilst Driving. (2008).

Retrieved November 30, 2015, from

http://www.trl.co.uk/case-studies/behaviour-dangers-of-texting-whilst-driving/

Hong S-B, Zalesky A, Cocchi L, Fornito A, Choi E-J, Kim H-H, et al. (2013)

Decreased

Functional Brain Connectivity in Adolescents with Internet Addiction. PLoS

ONE 8(2): e57831. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057831

Kim, H. (2013). Exercise rehabilitation for smartphone addiction. Journal of Exercise

Rehabilitation, 9(6), 500-505. doi: https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.130080

O’keeffe, G., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The Impact of Social Media on Children,
 Adolescents, and Families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800-804. Teens, Social Media

&

Technology Overview 2015. (2015, April 8).

Retrieved December 1, 2015, from

http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/

Appendix A

A Survey Questionnaire on The Impact of Mobile Phone Usage to the Academic

Performance of Grade 12-Hermes Students
Part 1. Demographic Profile
Name (Optional): ______________________________ Age:17 years old and below
Gender: Female ___ Male ___ General Point Average: 87 Above
80-86
Part 2. Survey Questionnaire 79 Below
Directions: Read each item carefully and the needed information. Kindly put (/) in the
table based on how you agree or disagree with the statements below honestly
answering each item. Use the following scale.
Legend:
5- Often 4- Always 3- Sometimes 2- Rarely 1- Never

Variables (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

1. Do you always spend more than 5

hours using mobile phone?
2. Do you feel that you spend too much
time using mobile phone?
3. Do you keep on using mobile phone
while the teacher is talking in class?
4. Do you gain more of concentration
from studies when your mobile phone
 is off?
5. Do you lose of concentration from
studies when your mobile phone is on?
6. Does using mobile phone help you
in answering some assignments?
7. Do you consider mobile phone
applications helpful?
8. Do you think using mobile phone
inside the classroom helps learning?
9. Do you find that bringing mobile
phone during class hour is a
disturbance from others?
10. Do you often use mobile phone for
your academic works?

Part 3. Qualitative Questions:

•How is using mobile phones affect your academic performance?

Answer:

_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________.
 Appendix B

Communication Letter to Respondents

Deer Respondents:

We, the Group 3 of G12-Hermes of Vito National High School will conduct a
research study entitled “The Impact of Mobile Phone Usage to the Academic
Performance of Grade 12-Hermes Students,” as a part of our academic requirements
the subject 3i’s.

In connection with this, we, the researchers humbly request for your voluntary
participation in our study. Rest assured that the data we will gather will remain
absolutely confidential and to be used in academic purpose only.

We believe that you are with us in our enthusiasm to finish the requirements as
compliance for our subject and to develop our wellbeing. We hope of positive
compliance response on this humble matter. Your approval to participate voluntary in
this study will be greatly appreciated.

Respectfully yours,

DANIELLA A. MAHINAY JOHN PAUL R. MENDOZA

Researchers Researcher
JEZIL B. NORCA CLIED NACION
Researcher. Researcher
KARYLLE C. MADAITON KIMJOHN C. MAGDALI
Researcher Researcher
KYLA C. MADAITON KENT BRYAN MENDREZ
Researcher Researcher
 RENNIE LIGARAY
Researcher
ANNIEVI D. ATABELO
Subject Teacher

APPENDIX C

Result for Validation of Research Instrument

Criteria for Validity Jury Total Mean Verbal

1 2 3 Interpretation
1. This questionnaire is short 4 4 5 13 4.33 Very good
and respondents respect it
and would not drain much of
their previous time.
2. The questionnaire is 4 4 3 11 3.66 Good
interesting and has a face
appeal such that respondents
will be induced to respond to
it and accomplish it fully.
3. The questionnaire can 5 5 4 14 4.66 Very good
obtain some depth from
respondents and avoid
superficial answer.
4. The items/questions and 4 5 4 13 4.33 Very good
their alternative responses
and too suggestive and not
too stimulating.
5. The questionnaire can 5 5 5 15 5 Very good
elicit responses which are
definite but not mechanically
forced.
6. Questions /items are stated 5 5 5 15 5 Very good
in such a way that the
responses will not be
embarrassing to the
person/persons concerned.
7. Questions / items are 5 4 5 14 4.66 Very good
formed in such a manner as
to avoid suspicion on the
part of the respondents.
8. The questionnaire is not 4 4 5 11 3.66 Good
too narrow nor restrictive nor
limited in its philosophy.
9. The reasons to the 4 5 4 13 4.33 Very good
questionnaire when taken as
a whole could answer the
basic purpose for which the
questionnaire is designed and
therefore considered valid.
AVERAGE RATING 4.40 Very good
 APPENDIX D

MS Excel Results

MS EXCEL RESULTS FOR SOP 1

Age Frequency Percentage (%)

17 years old and below 26 66.66%

18 years old and Above 13 33.33%

TOTAL 39 100%

Sex Frequency Percentage (%)

Male 23 58.98%

Female 16 41.02%

TOTAL 39 100%

GPA Frequency Percentage (%)

87 Above 8 20.51%
80-86 22 56.41%

79 Below 9 23.08%

TOTAL 39 100%

MS EXCEL RESULTS FOR SOP 2

___________________________________________________________________________
Items Mean Interpretation
_____________________________________________________________________
1. Do you always spend more than 5 hours using 4.61 Strongly Agree
mobile phone?
_____________________________________________________________________
2. Do you feel that you spend too much time using 4.48 Strongly Agree
mobile phone?
_____________________________________________________________________
3. Do you keep on using mobile phone while the 4 Agree
teacher is talking in class?
_____________________________________________________________________
4. Do you gain more of concentration from studies 4.58 Strongly Agree
when your mobile phone is off?
_____________________________________________________________________
______
5. Do you lose of concentration from studies 4.84 Strongly Agree
when your mobile phone is on?
_____________________________________________________________________
6. Does using mobile phone help you in 4.23 Strongly Agree
answering some assignments?
_____________________________________________________________________
7. Do you consider mobile phone applications 4.12 Agree
helpful?
_____________________________________________________________________
8. Do you think using mobile phone inside the 4.20 Agree
classroom helps learning?
_____________________________________________________________________
9. Do you find that bringing mobile phones 4.23 Strongly Agree
during class hour is disturbance from others?
_____________________________________________________________________
10. Do you often use mobile phone for 4.38 Strongly Agree
your academic works?
_____________________________________________________________________
Total (Mean of Means) 4.36 Strongly Agree

MS EXCEL RESULTS FOR SOP 3

Variables t-value p-value Interpretation

-Academic
performance

-Mobile phone 130.09 0.0001 significant

usage