Effectiveness Of Implementing Positive Reinforcement in Addressing
Disruptive Behavior of Grade 10 Students in Science
An Action Research Proposal
Presented to the
Department of Teacher Education
College of Teacher Education Arts and Sciences
Visayas State University Villaba
Cagnocot, Villaba, Leyte
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the PrEd 154
Field Study 2
Participation and Teaching Assistantship
Presented by
LEAH A. HERMOSILLA
BSED III - Science
Presented to
JONATHAN Q. MONSANTO
Course Instructor
Second Semester
May 2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
COVER PAGE …………………………………………………………………i
TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………ii
I. CONTEXT AND RATIONALE …………………………………………………1
II. ACTION RESEARCH QUESTIONS …………………………………………
III. PROPOSED INNOVATION, INTERVENTION AND STRATEGY …………
IV. ACTION RESEARCH METHODS
Participants/Other Sources of Data and Information …………………
Data Gathering Methods …………………………………………………
Data Analysis Plan ………………………………………………………...
V. ACTION RESEARCH WORK PLAN AND TIMELINES …………………
VI. COST ESTIMATES …………………………………………………………
VII. PLANS FOR DISSEMINATION AND UTILIZATION …………………
VIII. REFERENCES …………………………………………………………
APPENDICES …………………………………………………………………
A. Letter Request to Conduct the Study …………………………………
B. Informed Consent ………………………………………………...
C. Pretest and Posttest Questionnaire ………………………………...
I. CONTENT AND RATIONALE
Education is a tool for producing skilled individuals who drive economic
development and address community challenges. Students are expected to
dedicate significant time to their education in order to graduate with strong
academic performance (Tadese & Mulu, 2022).
Students' academic performance has garnered considerable attention
for researchers. Trainers, educators, and researchers are focused on
identifying variables that positively affect learners' performance (Alshammari
et al., 2017). Academic performance is essential for students as it reflects the
knowledge, skills, and attitudes acquired during their educational journey in
college. It is a crucial determinant of students' success in their future careers
(Mappadang et al., 2022). Moreover, academic performance assesses a
student's proficiency in various academic areas. Educators often assess
student achievements by analyzing classroom performance, graduation rates,
and standardized test scores (Shahjahan et al., 2021).
According to the 2022 Program for International Student Assessment
(PISA) results, the mean performance in mathematics across Organization
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries dropped by 15
points between 2018 and 2022. In fact, math had remained steady between
2003 and 2018 but it was decrease by 15 points between 2018 and 2022.
Our country is one of the participating countries in PISA. Based on the
result, mathematics performance scored 355 points, which is below the
OECD points (472). In short, our country ranks 77th out of 81 countries in
which one of the reason of that rank is the poor performance of students in
mathematics.
Based on the results mentioned above, it is very alarming for our
country to be at that rank wherein the academic performance of students
towards mathematics is low to the OECD average and one of the solutions to
that problem is suggested by the study of Capinding (2021) which suggest
that teachers use a variety of methods to inspire students to improve their
academic performance. Teachers can enhance their academic performance
by innovating and implementing new strategies that cater to the needs of
students.
Particularly, here in Villaba National High School (VNHS) poor
academic performance of students towards mathematics is very evident as
shown in their numeracy test results which I personally observed during my
participation and observation in that school. This observation was supported
by my resource teacher and the mathematics coordinator of VNHS.
Additionally, the study of Pitogo and Oco (2023) which states that
One of the innovations that might solve that problem is the used of
peer tutoring. According to Nawaz & Reman (2017), peer-tutoring is described
as a teaching strategy where students are paired up in twos, regardless of
their abilities, to serve as both tutor and tutee in order to maximize the
benefits they receive from each other.
As a whole, this study will use peer tutoring in improving the academic
performance of grade 10 students of Villaba National High School towards
mathematics.
II. ACTION RESEARCH QUESTIONS
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of peer tutoring in
improving the poor academic performance of grade 10 students towards
mathematics.
Specifically, it seeks to answer the following questions:
1. What is the pretest mean score of the students before they exposed
to peer tutoring?
2. What is the posttest mean score of the students after they exposed
to peer tutoring?
3. Is there a significant difference between the pretest and posttest
mean score?
III. PROPOSED INNOVATION, INTERVENTION AND STRATEGY
Poor academic performance in mathematics will be improved through
the use of peer tutoring. In this intervention, the students will be paired with
each other. During pairing, the previous mathematics grade of the students
will be considered. High average students will be paired with lower average
students in which high average students will serve as a mentor and low
average students serve as mentee. They will help each other every activity
that I give to them during my discussion.
Positive reward will be given to the mentor when their mentees got a
passing score during assessments like giving them additional points,
chocolates and many more. In order to motivate the mentor to strive more to
teach their respective mentees.
The said intervention will start its implementation this coming first
quarter of the school year 2024-2025 during my internship.
IV. ACTION RESEARCH METHODS
A. Participants/Other Sources of Data and Information
This study will be conducted to the grade 10 students of Villaba
National High School located at Cagnocot, Villaba, Leyte during the first
quarter of the school year 2024-2025. Specifically, the Grade 10 – Melon
students since this section shows a poor academic performance in
mathematics based on the low mean results of their numeracy test and this
observation was validated by my resource teacher and mathematics
coordinator during my classroom observation and participation in VNHS.
B. Data Gathering Methods
This study will use the quantitative research design, specifically the
experimental design utilizing the pretest and posttest methods. These
methods will be the appropriate methods in conducting this action research as
shown in the study of AbdulRaheem et al. (2017) which utilize the use of
pretest and posttest design in his study entitled “Effect of Peer Tutoring on
Students' Academic Performance in Economics”. However, this study will be
using peer tutoring in improving the poor academic performance of grade 10
students towards mathematics at VNHS.
Furthermore, the researcher will write a formal letter to Mrs. Sheina
Marie S. Macalla, the principal of VNHS asking permission to conduct this
action research. Subsequently, the approved letter will be submitted to the
adviser of grade 10 – Melon to formally inform that her advisory class will be
my participants.
After that, the participants will be inform by the researcher through the
use of informed consent which contain the explanation and purpose of the
study. The researcher will entertain questions if they have and let them sign
the consent voluntarily. Since the participants is already set, the conduct of
the pretest will be administered and the mean score of the pretest will be
computed.
Moreover, the implementation of peer tutoring will be implemented to
the participants in improving their poor academic performance in
mathematics. Additionally, the posttest will be conducted to the participants
right after the end of the implementation.
Finally, the creation of findings, conclusions and recommendations will
be made based on the data collected from pretest and posttest.
C. Data Analysis Plan
The data collected from pretest and posttest will be analyze by the
following statistical tools:
Mean. It will be used to determine the pretest and posttest mean score
of the students before and after the conduct of the study.
Standard Deviation. It will be used to determine the variation of
scores of the students during pretest and posttest.
Shapiro Wilk Test. It will be used to test of the normality of the scores
collected from the pretest and posttest. If the scores are normally distributed t
test will be used and if not, Mann Whitney Test will be used.
On Sample T-Test. It will be use if the scores collected from pretest
and posttest are normally distributed. This test will determined if there is
significance difference between the pretest and posttest scores of the
students.
Mann Whitney U Test. It will be use if the scores collected from
pretest and posttest are not normally distributed. This test will determined if
there is significance difference between the pretest and posttest scores of the
students.
V. ACTION RESEARCH WORK PLAN
This part presents the weekly target, activities and person involves in
conducting this action research.
Weekly
Activities Person Involves
Target
Week 1 1. Submission of Request Researcher, Cooperating
Letter to Conduct the Teacher, School
study. Head/Principal.
2. Signing of the Researcher, Participants and
participant consent. Cooperating Teacher
Researcher, Participants and
3. Conduct of Pretest Cooperating Teacher
4. Implementation of Peer Researcher and Participants
tutoring in improving the
Week 2-7 poor academic
performance of the
students in mathematics
5. Conduct of Posttest Researcher, Participants and
Cooperating Teacher
Week 8
Researcher and Student
6. Data Analysis Teacher Coordinator
7. Making of Results and Researcher and Student
Discussions Teacher Coordinator
Week 9
8. Making of Summary of Researcher and Student
Findings, Conclusions and Teacher Coordinator
Recommendations
9. Securing a clean copy Researcher
of my completed action
research.
Week 10
10. Plagiarism Test and Researcher and English
Human Editor Instructors/Professors
11. Final checking, Researcher and Student
Week 11 submission and soft Teacher Coordinator
bounding.
V. COST ESTIMATES
This part presents the estimated cost in conducting this study.
Activity/ Materials Materials Cost
1. Printing of Communication
letter, informed consent and 1 ream of bond paper Php 250.00
Pretest test questionnaire.
2. Implementation of the 1 box of Chalk Php 100.00
study 20 Manila Paper Php 300.00
20 Cartolina Php 150.00
1 ream bond paper Php 250.00
3. Making of Results and ½ Ream Bond paper Php 125.00
Discussion; Summary of Load/Computer Php 250.00
findings, Conclusions and Payment
Recommendations
4. Printing of Completed
Action Research for final
1 ream bond paper Php 250.00
checking, plagiarism test and
human editing.
5. Printing the clean copy for
1 ream bond paper Php 250.00
soft bounding
Total Estimated Cost 10,000.00
VI. PLAN FOR DISSEMINATION AND UTILIZATION
The study results and findings of this study will be shared with all
educators who experience the same problem being studied. It might help
them improve their teaching strategies in handling students, especially for
teachers handling the mathematics subject. Additionally, the results and
findings will be forwarded to the school where I conducted my study.
Furthermore, it will be published in online journals to help teachers in
our country and the mathematics community as a whole.
VII. REFERENCES
Mappadang, A., Khusaini, K., Sinaga, M., & Elizabeth, E. (2022). Academic
interest determines the academic performance of undergraduate
accounting students: Multinomial logit evidence. Cogent Business &
Management, 9(1). Retrieve form https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.20
22.2101326
Nawaz, A. & Rehman, Z.U. (2017). Strategy of peer tutoring and students’
success in mathematics: An analysis. Journal of Research and
Reflection in Education (1), 15-30.
Pitogo, Shallinie & Oco, Richard. (2023). Pupils' Numeracy Skills and
Mathematics Performance. 6. 333-340.
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Letter Request to Conduct The Study
Appendix B. Informed Consent
Appendix C. Pretest and Posttest Questionnaire