Yang2018 82
Yang2018 82
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2018.2870428, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
1
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2018.2870428, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
2
TABLE I
O PTIMIZED D IMENSIONS OF THE P ROPOSED A NTENNA
Parameter Lg Ws Lp Wp Lc Wf
40, 6, 20, 9, 10, 2,
Units (mm)
0.73λ 0.11λ 0.37λ 0.16λ 0.18λ 0.04λ
Parameter Ls Hf Hz Ha Hp Hc
4.4, 10, 6, 15, 9, 5.5,
Units (mm)
0.08λ 0.17λ 0.11λ 0.27λ 0.16λ 0.10λ
λ is the free space wavelength at the center frequency of 5.5 GHz.
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2018.2870428, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
3
Fig. 4. The simulated the performance of three type antennas (a) the reflection
coefficient (≤ -10 dB); (b) the 3 dB beam-widths in both H- and E-planes
(H-P. and E-P.).
Fig. 5. The radiation patterns of three types antennas in H- and E-plane at J 1 = J1 x (1)
5.5 GHz.
As shown in Fig. 6 (a), the vertical plates are added in the
in Fig. 3. The dimensions of the above antennas are consistent. Ant. 3. The current distribution on the antennas is changed.
The simulated results of three antennas, including S11 and The vertical and horizontal currents are produced on the
radiation patterns are shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5. Ant. 1 has antennas. In order to optimize the current distribution at the
only a pair of the classical magneto-electric dipole like [14], low frequencies, the six metal columns are placed below the
which is a conventional ME dipole antenna. A pair of the vertical walls at equal distances along the x-axis direction [22].
vertical plates is added in Ant. 2. The magneto-electric dipole Hence, the current on the Ant. 3 is given by
consists of the horizontal and vertical parts. The operating
band is broadened and it is the most important that the beam- J 1 = J1 x + J2 e j 4 z (2)
widths in E- and H- planes are broadened compared to the
where
Ant. 1 as shown in Fig. 5. In order to realize the stable πW p
radiation patterns and wider beam-width of the antenna in the 4=
cosθ (3)
λ
whole operating band, six metal columns are placed below
where J1 is the current density of the horizontal current on
the vertical walls at equal distances along the x-axis direction
conventional ME dipole antenna. J is the current density of
in Ant. 3. The wide band and wide beam-width ME dipole
the horizontal current and the vertical current of the proposed
antenna is achieved by changing some simple structures of
antenna. Hence, the vector potential is given by [23]
the general ME dipole antenna. However, S11 in the whole
operating band is degraded. Since the impedance matching e−jβr
∬
0
at high frequency band is affected by the metal columns. The A = −µ Je jβr ·r dS 0 (4)
4πr S
electric dipole performance is only improved, and the magneto
dipole performance is little affected. The radiates field is given by
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2018.2870428, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
4
Fig. 8. The electric field distributions of the Ant. 1 and Ant. 3 in the H- and
E-plane at 5.5GHz.
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2018.2870428, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
5
Fig. 9. The simulated the performance of the proposed antenna with the Fig. 11. The simulated the performance of the proposed antenna with the
variation of Wf (a) the reflection coefficient (≤ -10 dB) and gain; (b) the 3 variation of Hp (a) the reflection coefficient (≤ -10 dB) and gain; (b) the 3
dB beam-widths in both H- and E-planes. dB beam-widths in both H- and E-planes.
Fig. 10. The simulated the performance of the proposed antenna with the Fig. 12. The simulated the performance of the proposed antenna with the
variation of Ws (a) the reflection coefficient (≤ -10 dB) and gain; (b) the 3 variation of Hc (a) the reflection coefficient (≤ -10 dB) and gain; (b) the 3
dB beam-widths in both H- and E-planes. dB beam-widths in both H- and E-planes.
frequency band changes narrower. However, it is little function D. The height and radius of the metal columns (Hc and Rc)
for the gain and beam-width at different frequency in the
bandwidth. Fig. 12 shows simulation results for the reflection coeffi-
cient, gain, and the beam-width at different height of the metal
columns Hc ranging from 5.0 to 6.0 mm. It is significant that
C. The length of the vertical part of the plate(Hp) the reflection coefficient changes with the variation of Hc.
Fig. 11 shows simulation results for the reflection coeffi- The widest frequency band as well as widest beam-width is
cient, gain, and the beam-width at different distance of the obtained when Hc equals 5.5 mm, which is approximately
length of the vertical part of the plate Hp ranging from 8.0 input impedance matching. As can be seen, changing the
to 10.0 mm. It is not significant that the reflection coefficient values of Hc leads to mismatch input impedance and decrease
changes with the variation of Hp except for 10.0 mm. It is the frequency bandwidth. When the value of Hc changes lower,
significant that the gain changes when the parameter is 10.0 the input impedance is mismatching at low frequency band
mm. The vertical plates attach with the metal columns when and the impedance bandwidth moves to high frequencies. The
the value of Hp is 10.0 mm. The frequency band changes frequency band is decreased. When the vertical plates attach
narrowly. The gain is very low in the low frequency band and with the metal columns, the gain could change to very low
high in the high frequency band. Meanwhile, the beam-width in the low frequency band and high in the high frequency
of the antenna at different frequency makes narrower in H- band. However, it is little function for the beam-width at dif-
and E-planes in the bandwidth. As can be seen, changing the ferent frequency in the bandwidth. Otherwise, the impedance
values of Hp leads to decrease the beam-width at different bandwidth moves to high frequencies and the frequency band
frequency in H- and E-planes. The beam-width makes wider changes narrower when the value of Hc changes higher. The
at low frequency band in E-plane and narrower at high fre- beam-width in H- and E-planes changes narrower at different
quency band when the value of changes lower. The impedance frequency in the bandwidth.
bandwidth changes narrower a little at high frequency band. It Fig. 13 shows simulation results for the reflection coeffi-
is significant that the beam-width changes with the variation of cient, gain, and the beam-width at different height of the metal
Hp The widest frequency band as well as widest beam-width columns Rc ranging from 0.6 to 1.6 mm. It is significant
is obtained when Hp equals 9.0 mm, which is approximately that the reflection coefficient changes with the variation of
the whole impedance bandwidth. Rc. The widest frequency band as well as widest beam-width
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2018.2870428, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
6
Fig. 13. The simulated the performance of the proposed antenna with the Fig. 14. The simulated the performance of the proposed antenna with the
variation of Rc (a) the reflection coefficient (≤ -10 dB) and gain; (b) the 3 variation of Lc and the number of the metal columns (a) the reflection
dB beam-widths in both H- and E-planes. coefficient (≤ -10 dB) and gain; (b) the 3 dB beam-widths in both H- and
E-planes.
Fig. 15. The simulated the performance of the proposed antenna with the
E. The distance between the metal columns ( Lc ) and the variation of Lg (a) the reflection coefficient (≤-10 dB) and gain; (b) the 3 dB
number of the metal columns beam-widths in both H- and E-planes.
Fig. 14 shows simulation results for the reflection coeffi-
cient, gain, and the beam-width at different distance between impedance matching. As can be seen, changing the values
the metal columns Lc ranging from 5.0 to 20.0 mm and number of Lg leads to mismatch input impedance or decrease the
of the metal columns ranging from 2 to 5. It is not significant frequency bandwidth. When the value of Lg would change
that the gain changes with the variations of the distance and the lower, the input impedance weakens in low frequency band.
number except in the low frequency band. It is not significant When the value of Lg would change higher, the frequency
that the operating frequency bandwidth changes the variations bandwidth is reduced. Besides, it is a little function for the gain
of the distance and the number except for 20 mm and 2 and beam-width at higher frequencies in the bandwidth. The
metal columns. However, the input impedance matching in beam-width in H- and E-planes changes narrower at higher
the bandwidth is different. When the distance reduces or the frequencies in the bandwidth when the value of Lg changes
number increases, the input impedance matching in the low higher.
frequency band changes weakly. It is significant that the beam-
width at different frequency in the bandwidth changes the IV. A NTENNA M EASUREMENT
variations of the distance and the number. When the distance
To verify the proposed antenna’s performance, an antenna
reduces and the number increases, the beam-width in H- and
prototype was fabricated and measured. Fig. 16 shows a
E-planes changes wider. However, the beam-width in E-plane
photograph of the fabricated antenna prototype. The antenna
changes narrower in the middle and higher frequency bands
is verified in the microwave anechoic chamber, shown in Fig.
when the distance is 6.0 mm and 5.0 mm and the number is
17. In this section, we present the measured and simulated
3 and 5.
results of the antenna prototype at different frequencies in the
operating frequency band.
F. The size of the ground plane (Lg) Measured and simulated S11 , efficiency, directivity, and peak
Fig. 15 shows simulation results for the reflection coeffi- gain of the proposed antenna are in good agreement as shown
cient, gain, and the beam-width at different size of the ground in Fig. 18. Measured and simulated results are agreed basically
plane Lg ranging from 35 to 45 mm. It is significant that with slight discrepancies led by the fabrication tolerances and
the reflection coefficient changes with the variation of Lg. the approximate boundary conditions in the computational
The widest frequency band as well as widest beam-width is domain. The results show -10 dB impedance bandwidths of
obtained when Lg equals 40 mm, which is approximately input about 81.1% (3.3 – 7.8 GHz). Meanwhile, the peak gain of
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2018.2870428, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
7
Fig. 18. The simulated and measured S11 and peak gain of the antenna; the
simulated directivity and efficiency of the antenna.
TABLE II
Fig. 16. The photograph of the antenna.
T HE HPBW WITH D IFFERENT F REQUENCIES IN THE BANDWIDTH
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2018.2870428, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
8
Fig. 19. The simulated and measured radiation patterns of the antenna at different frequencies.
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2018.2870428, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
9
TABLE III
C OMPARISON OF D IFFERENT ME D IPOLE A NTENNAS AND P ROPOSED A NTENNA
S11 <-10dB
Antenna Center freq. Dimension impedance HPBW/θ (deg) Peak gain Front-to-back
Ref.
type (GHz) (mm3 ) bandwidth with E-plane H-plane (dBi) ratio (dB)
beam-width
20.5×16× 49%
[26] slot antenna 10.5 107<θ<125 77<θ<85 6.5 10
10 (7.8~ 13.2)
Substrate integrated 20.5×16× 13.5%
[27] 45.4 123<θ<126 220<θ<227 5.2 16
antenna 10 (42.3~ 48.4)
13.0%
[6] Microstrip antenna 6.8 40×40×2.1 114<θ<120 118<θ<120 5.5 15
(6.3~ 7.2)
34.8%
[28] ME dipole 2.3 94×80×26 94<θ<104 94<θ<105 4.8 12
(1.9 ~ 2.7)
65.7%
[29] ME dipole 3.0 68×56×20 75<θ 65<θ 5.0 8
(2.0~ 4.0)
100×100× 41%
[18] ME dipole 3.1 78<θ<80 115<θ<130 6.3 23
42 (2.4~ 3.7)
112×112× 54%
[30] ME dipole 2.6 / / 9.4 20
20 (1.8~ 3.3)
130×130× 46%
[31] ME dipole 2.4 / / 9.4 22.8
21 (1.8~ 3.0)
81.1%
This work ME dipole 5.5 40×40×16 106<θ<217 83<θ<186 5.3 8.5
(3.3~ 7.8)
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2018.2870428, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
10
[5] S. T. Ko and J. H. Lee, “Hybrid zeroth-order resonance patch antenna [30] L. Ge and K. M. Luk, “A low-profile magneto-electric dipole antenna,”
with broad e-plane beamwidth,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 60, no. 4, pp.
Propagation, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 19–25, Jan. 2013. 1684–1689, Apr. 2012.
[6] Z.-S. Duan, S.-B. Qu, Y. Wu, and J.-Q. Zhang, “Wide bandwidth and [31] ——, “A magneto-electric dipole antenna with low-profile and simple
broad beamwidth microstrip patch antenna,” Electronics letters, vol. 45, structure,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 12,
no. 5, pp. 249–251, 2009. pp. 140–142, 2013.
[7] F. Zhang, F. S. Zhang, G. Zhao, C. Lin, and Y. C. Jiao, “A loaded
wideband linearly tapered slot antenna with broad beamwidth,” IEEE
Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 10, pp. 79–82, 2011.
[8] X. Chen, P. Y. Qin, Y. J. Guo, and G. Fu, “Low-profile and wide-
beamwidth dual-polarized distributed microstrip antenna,” IEEE Access,
vol. 5, pp. 2272–2280, 2017.
[9] S. Foo and B. Vassilakis, “Dielectric fortification for wide-beamwidth
patch arrays,” in Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Int.
Symp, Jul. 2008, pp. 1–4.
[10] S. T. Ko and J. H. Lee, “Aperture coupled metamaterial patch antenna
Guang-Wei Yang received the Master Degree in
with broad e-plane beamwidth for millimeter wave application,” in Proc.
Electronic Engineering in Northwestern Polytech-
IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Int. Symp. (APSURSI), Jul.
nial University in 2015. He is currently working
2013, pp. 1796–1797.
toward the Ph.D. degree in Electronic Engineering in
[11] S. Chattopadhyay, J. Y. Siddiqui, and D. Guha, “Rectangular microstrip
Northwestern polytechnical University. This author
patch on a composite dielectric substrate for high-gain wide-beam
became a Student Member of IEEE in 2015. His
radiation patterns,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation,
recent research interests include microstrip antennas,
vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 3325–3328, Oct. 2009.
wideband antennas, millimeter-wave antennas and
[12] Z. Ning Chen, W. Kian Toh, and X. Qing, “A microstrip patch antenna
arrays, circularly-polarized antennas, reconfigurable
with broadened beamwidth,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters,
antennas, base station antennas, phased antenna ar-
vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1885–1888, 2008.
ray and EM Periodic Structure.
[13] R. Patel and K. J. Han, “Utilization of higher-mode resonance in
broadening the e-plane hpbw of printed antenna for automotive radar
application,” in Proc. Int. Workshop Antenna Technology (iWAT), Mar.
2015, pp. 330–332.
[14] K.-M. Luk and H. Wong, “A new wideband unidirectional antenna
element,” Int. J. Microw. Opt. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2006.
[15] H. Wong, K. M. Mak, and K. M. Luk, “Wideband shorted bowtie
patch antenna with electric dipole,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 2098–2101, Jul. 2008.
[16] K. He, S. X. Gong, and F. Gao, “A wideband dual-band magneto-electric
dipole antenna with improved feeding structure,” IEEE Antennas and Jian-Ying Li received the degrees of B.Sc. in
Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 13, pp. 1729–1732, 2014. Mathematics, and M.Eng.Sc. and Ph.D. both in
[17] S. W. Liao, Q. Xue, and J. H. Xu, “A differentially fed magneto-electric Electromagnetic Field and Microwave Technology
dipole antenna with a simple structure,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation from Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China,
Magazine, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 74–84, Oct. 2013. in 1986, and Xidian University, Xi’an, China, in
[18] Y. Li and K. M. Luk, “A linearly polarized magnetoelectric dipole 1992 and 1999, respectively. This author became a
with wide h-plane beamwidth,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Member of IEEE in 2015.
Propagation, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1830–1836, Apr. 2014. From 1992 to 1996, he worked at Xi’an Electronic
[19] L. Ge and K. M. Luk, “Beamwidth reconfigurable magneto-electric Engineering Research Institute, Xi’an, China as a
dipole antenna based on tunable strip grating reflector,” IEEE Access, Research Engineer. From 1999 to 2004, he was first
vol. 4, pp. 7039–7045, 2016. with the Department of Electrical and Computer
[20] ——, “Linearly polarized and dual-polarized magneto-electric dipole Engineering at the National University of Singapore (NUS) where he was a
antennas with reconfigurable beamwidth in the h-plane,” IEEE Transac- Postdoctoral Research Fellow and then with High Performance Computation
tions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 423–431, Feb. for Engineered Systems (HPCES) Programmer at the Singapore-MIT Alliance
2016. (SMA) where he was a Research Fellow. From2005 to 2010, he was with the
[21] G. Yang, J. Y. Li, D. Wei, S. Zhou, and J. Yang, “Broadening the beam- Temasek Laboratories, in the National University of Singapore (NUS) where
width of microstrip antenna by the induced vertical currents,” Antennas he was a research scientist. Since 2011 he has been with School of Electronic
Propagation IET Microwaves, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 190–194, 2018. and Information in Northwestern Polytechnial University. His current research
[22] A. Chlavin, “A new antenna feed having equal e -and h-plane patterns,” interests include the fast algorithms and its applications to radar cross sections,
Transactions of the IRE Professional Group on Antennas and Propaga- analysis and design of phased arrays, waveguide slot antennas, and microstrip
tion, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 113–119, Jul. 1954. antennas, and EM Periodic Structure.
[23] W. L. Stutzman and G. A. Thiele, Antenna theory and design. John
Wiley & Sons, 2012.
[24] K. Itoh and D. K. Cheng, “A novel slots-and-monopole antenna with
a steerable cardioid pattern,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and
Electronic Systems, vol. AES-8, no. 2, pp. 130–134, Mar. 1972.
[25] H. Ansys, “ver. 14.0 (2012), ansys,” Inc., Southpointe, vol. 275.
[26] D. Yang, X.-l. Liang, R.-h. Jin, and J.-p. Geng, “A broadband printed slot
antenna with wide e-plane beamwidth,” in Antennas and Propagation
Society International Symposium (APSURSI), 2014 IEEE. IEEE, 2014,
pp. 1600–1601. Jiang-Jun Yang received the degrees of B.S.c and
[27] Y. Zhang, Z. Xue, and W. Hong, “Planar substrate-integrated endfire M.S.c in Electronic Engineering in Northwestern
antenna with wide beamwidth for q-band applications,” IEEE Antennas Polytechnial University in 2014 and 2017 respec-
and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 16, pp. 1990–1993, 2017. tively. Currently he is working on Ph.D. degree
[28] W. Qiu, C. Chen, and W. Chen, “A broadband magnetoelectric dipole in Northwestern Polytechnial University. His re-
antenna with stable wide beamwidth,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas cent research interests include microstrip antennas,
and Propagation (APSURSI), Jun. 2016, pp. 1849–1850. broadband electrical small antenna, Characteristic
[29] G. Idayachandran and R. Nakkeeran, “Compact magneto-electric dipole mode analysis, and numerical computation electro-
antenna for LTE femtocell base stations,” Electronics Letters, vol. 52, magnetic.
no. 8, pp. 574–576, 2016.
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2018.2870428, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
11
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.