Unit - 5
Unit - 5
KINDS OF GUARDIANS
MAINTENANCE.
Introduction :-
This act has significantly made many changes in the position and status of the
mother as the natural guardian.
It defines the word minor as a person who has not completed the age of
eighteen years.
Section 4(b):- Guardian means a person having the care of the person of a
minor, or of his property or of both his person and property and includes.
1. Natural guardian.
2. A guardian appointed by the will of the minor’s father or mother
3. A guardian appointed or declared by a court ; and
4. A person, empowered to act as such by or under any enactment relating
to any court of wards.
The karta in a joint Hindu family is the manager of all property belonging to
the family. The coparcenary interest of a minor is not his individual property.
If the minor is a member of joint family governed by the Mitakshara Law, the
father as Karta (manager ) is entitled to the management of the whole
coparcenary property including the minor’s interest therein, passes to the
eldest son as Karta.
The mother is not entitled to the custody of the undivided interest of her
minor son in the joint property, if any.
KINDS OF GUARDIAN
Section 4:- of the Act mention four kinds of guardians, these are:-
1. A natural guardian.
2. A guardian appointed by the will or the minor’s father or mothers
(testamentary guardian)
3. A guardian appointed or declared by a court, and
4. A person empowered to act as such by or under any enactment relating
to any court of wards.
Besides this, there are other types of guardians such as.
5. De facto guardian and
6. Ad hoc guardian.
NATURAL GUARDIAN.
MEANING OF NATURAL GUARDIAN.
Section 6:- of the Hindu minority and guardian ship act, runs as follows,
Among the Hindus, the father is the natural guardian of his children during
their minority and in the absence the mother during their minority. He may,
in exercise of his discretion as guardian entrust the custody and education of
his children to another, but the authority he thus confers is revocable
authority.
The powers of the father to act as a natural guardian do not come to an end
simply because the child is being looked after by his aunt and is living with
her.
The father is the natural guardian of the person and of the separate property
of his minor children.
Where the father was alive but had fallen out with the mother of the minor
daughter and was living separately for several years without taking any
interest in the affairs of the minor who was in the keeping and care of the
mother, it was held by the supreme court that in the peculiar circumstances,
the father should be treated non-existent and the mother could be considered
as the natural guardian of the minor’s person as well as property.
The Madras High Court has held that custody of a child below the age of five
years should be given to its mother and only in exceptional circumstances, the
father may claim the custody of that child.
In case of a illegitimate boy or girl the mother is the natural guardian, and in
absence of the mother the father will be the natural guardian.
Married girl.
DISABILITIES TO BE A GUARDIAN.
If the father voluntarily abandoned his parental rights and entrusted the
custody of the child to another person the court may not restore back the
custody of the child to the father if such a course is detrimental to the interest
of the child.
The Madras High court held that where father converted to Islam and married
a muslim girl, he creases to be natural guardian as a matter of legal right.
It would not be in the interest of child that such convert should be allowed to
continue as a natural guardian and exercise the power as such.
2. CIVIL DEATH:-
Any person who has completely and finally renounced the world by
becoming a hermit or an ascetic forfeits his right to continue as the natural
guardian of his minor child or wife.
3. MINORITY:-
A Minor shall be incompetent to act as guardian of the property of the
minor. So, in respect of the joint family property, even if the Karta is a
minor, such property is and remains under his protection.
4. AGAINST MINOR’S WELFARE:-
No person shall be entitled to the guardianship of the minor, if in the
opinion of the court his or her guardianship will not be for the welfare
of the minor.
A Hindu widow does not, by her remarriage, lose her preferential rights of
guardianship over her minor children by the deceased husband whether such
marriage is permitted by custom or not.
SECTION 8:-
1. The natural guardian of hindu minor has power, subject to the
powers provision of this section, to do all acts which are necessary or
reasonable and proper for the benefit of the minor or for the
realization, protection or benefit of the minor’s estate:- but the
guardian can in no case bind the minor by a personal covenant.
2. The natural guardian shall not, without the previous permission of
the court
a. Mortgage or charge or transfer by sale, gift, exchange or otherwise
any part of the immovable property of the minor, or
b. Lease any part of such property for a term exceeding 5 years of
for a term extending more than one year beyond the date on
which the minor will attain majority.
3. Any disposal of immovable property by a natural guardian, in
contravention of sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) is voidable at the
instance of the minor of any person claiming under him.
4. No court shall grant permission to the natural guardian to do any of
the acts mention in sub-section (2) except in case of necessity or for
an evident advantage to the minor.
5. The guardians and wards Act. 1890 shall be applicable.
6. Court means city civil court
NECESSARY OR REASONABLE AND PROPER ACTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF
THE MINOR.
A natural guardian has the power to place such restraint on the minor in
regard to his upbringing, education and health as may be necessary or
reasonable or proper for the benefit of the minor.
The Supreme court clearly laid down that, the natural guardian has been
empowered to do all such acts which are necessary for the welfare and benefit
of the child.
The Delhi High court has held that any contract executed by the guardian of
the minor can be specifically enforced by the minor or against the minor.
Under the law the natural guardian has been empowered to enter into the
contract.
If the contract is in the welfare of the minor, it will be binding and will be
enforceable.
FAMILY ARRANGEMENT:-
The natural guardian has the power to enter into family settlement on behalf
of the minor provided it is the nature of a bona fide compromise of doubtful
claims.
POWER OF ALIENATION:-
The natural guardian of a Hindu minor has power in the management of the
estate to sell or mortgage any part of the estate in case of necessity or for
benefit of the estate, provided the natural guardian has taken permission of th
court prior to such alienation.
Case law
The court held that a sale of minor’s property effected by his natural guardian
without obtaining the specific sanction of the court under section 8(2) is an
act which is prohibited by law and is, therefore invalid.
The natural guardian without the previous sanction of the court shall do no
transaction by sale, gift, exchange or otherwise of any part of the immovable
property of the minor and lease of any part of such property for a term
exceeding 5 years of for a term extending more than one year beyond the date
on which the minor will attain majority.
1. Necessity, or
2. An evident advantage to the minor.
TESTAMENTARY GUARDIAN
Are those guardians who are appointed by a will of the natural guardian,
entitled to act as a guardian for the minor. It becomes effective only after the
death of the testator.
Section 9
The powers are the same as of the natural guardian or testamentary guardian.
DE-FACTO GUARDIAN
According to section 11 of the Act the de facto guardian is not recognized and he
cannot deal with the property of a minor.
AD HOC GUARDIAN.
It means “for this purpose.” There must be some course of conduct in that
capacity, it implies some continuity of conduct, some management of the
property beyond the isolated act of alienation which is being challenged.
A guardian, who has been deprived of the custody of his ward, has the following
remedies open to him:-
1. Writ of habeas corpus within the original civil jurisdiction of a High court.
2. Application to a Magistrate under section 97 or sec 98 of the criminal
procedure code 1973.
3. Regular suit by guardian for custody of the ward.
4. Petition for the restoration of the custody of his ward under section 25 of
the guardians and wards act, 1890.
INTRODUCTION :-
Thus adoption is the transplantation of son from the family in which he is born, to
another family where he is given by the natural parents by way of gift. The
adopted son is then taken as being born in the new family and acquired rights,
duties, and status there only and his ties with the old family comes to an end.
1. The person adopting has the capacity and also the right to take in adoption.
2. The person giving in adoption has the capacity to do so;
3. The person adopted is capable of being taken in adoption.
4. The adoption is made in compliance with the other conditions mentioned in
the chapter.
Whether male or female they should have capacity and right to take a child in
adoption.
Case Law
The supreme court has laid down that the consent of wife either should be in
writing or reflected by positive act voluntarily and willingly done by her.
If the person is having 1 or more wives consent of all the wives is necessary.
Any female
Has the capacity to take a son or daughter in adoption. Consent of the husband is
necessary if husband is alive.
1. If the adoption is son , the father or mother should not have son, son’s son, or
son’s son’s son living (whether legitimate or adoption) living at the time of
adoption.
2. If the adoption is of a daughter , the father and mother must not have a Hindu
daughter or son’s Daughter (Whether legitimate blood relationship or by
adoption) living at the time of adoption.
CASE LAW.
Section 9(1) prescribes the capacity of persons, who give the child in adoption to
another.
1.No person except the father or mother or the guardian of a child shall have the
capacity to give the child in adoption.
2. subject to the provisions of sub-sec 4 , the father, or the mother, if alive, shall
have equal right to give a son or daughter in adoption.
3. where both the father and mother are dead or have completely and finally
renounced the world, or have abandoned the child or have been declared by a
court of competent jurisdiction to be of unsound mind or where the parentage of
the child is not known, the guardian of a child may give the child in adoption with
the previous permission of the court to any person including the guardian himself.
4. before granting permission to a guardian, the court shall be satisfied that the
adoption will be for the welfare of the child.
Section 10:- No person shall be capable of being taken in adoption unless the
following conditions are fulfilled, namely,
i. He or she is a Hindu
ii. He or she has not already been adopted.
iii. He or she has not been married, unless there is a custom or
usage applicable to the parties which permits persons who are
married being taken in adoption.
iv. He or she has not completed the age of 15 yrs, unless there is a
custom or usage applicable to the parties which permits
persons who have completed the age of 15 yrs being taken in
adoption.
Case law
In this case a person who was adopted when he was above the age of 15 yrs
under custom which permitted the adoption claimed the property of his adoptive
father on the ground that since the adoptive father died intestate, he being the
adoptive child was entitled to his property.
Adoption was made through a registered adoption deed that stated that the
natural parents of the claimant aged 18 had given him in adoption in presence of
the elders to Anne Seetharamaiah who was issueless in accordance with the
Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956.
It also recited that the adoption was in accordance with the custom prevailing in
The court accepted the adoption as valid in view of the statutory exception made
in favour of custom to the contrary.
Provided that the performance of Datta Homam shall not be essential to the
validity of an adoption.
Case law
LAKSHMAN SINGH KOTHARI V/S SRIMATI RUP KUWAR [AIR 1961 SC 1378]
The supreme court held that under the Hindu law whether among the regenerate
caste or among shudras, there cannot be a valid adoption unless the adoptive
child is transferred from one family to another and that can be done only by the
ceremony of giving and taking.
The object of the corporal giving and receiving in adoption is to secure due
publicity.
DATTA HOMAM:-
Datta humam is not essential in the case of an adoption in the twice born classes
when the adopted son belongs to the same gotra as the adoptive father.
Datta Homan could be performed at any time after the physical act of giving and
taking.
Under the present law Datta Homam is not essential for an adoption made by any
class of Hindus, Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs.
SECTION 12:-
‘An adopted child shall be deemed to be the child of his or her adoptive father or
mother for all purposes with effect from the date of the adoption and from such
date all the ties of the child in the family of his or her birth shall be deemed to be
severed and replaced by those created by the adoption in the adoptive family.
Provided that-
a. The child cannot marry any person whom he or she could not have married
if he or she had continued in the family of his or her birth;
b. Any property which vested in the adopted child before the adoption shall
continue to vest in such person subject to the obligations, if any attaching
to the ownership of such property, including the obligation to maintain
relatives in the family of his or her birth;
c. The adopted child shall not divest any person of any estate which vested in
him or her before the adoption.
On a valid adoption child ceases to have any right or, be subjected to any
liability or disability as a member of the family of his birth, but the tie of blood
between him and the members of that family and the disabilities arising
therefrom continue, with the result than in spite of the adoption he or she cannot
marry any person from the natural family within the prohibited degrees.
Section 3(b) of the Hindu Adoption and maintenance Act, 1956 defines
maintenance includes-
i) In all cases, provision for food, clothing, residence, education and medical
attendance and treatment
ii) In the case of an unmarried daughter, also the reasonable expenses of and
incident to her marriage.
I. Wife.
II. Widowed daughter-in-law
III. Children and aged parents
IV. Dependants of the deceased:-
A. His or her father
B. His or her mother
C. His widow
D. His or her son, son of pre-deceased son, or son of a pre-deceased son
of a pre-deceased son.
E. His or her unmarried daughters or the unmarried daughter of pre-
deceased son or unmarried daughter of a pre-deceased son of a pre-
deceased son.
F. His widowed daughter.
G. Widow of his son or a son of pre-deceased son.
H. His minor illegitimate son.
I. His unmarried illegitimate daughter.
MAINTENANCE OF WIFE:-
1. MAINTENANCE
2. SEPARATE RESIDENCE.
1. MAINTENANCE:-
It is a right of a wife for maintenance in an incidence of the status or
state of matrimony and a Hindu is under a legal obligation to
maintain his wife.
This right arises from the very existence of the relation between the
parties.
This maintenance is dependent on her living with him and discharging the duties
as wife.
The husband would not be absolved from his liability to maintain his wife simply
because he has ceased to be a Hindu.
The wife is not entitled to be maintained by the relatives of husband side unless
they have the possession of the property belonging to her husband.
The wife’s first duty to her husband is to submit herself obediently to his
authority and to remain under his roof and protection.
A wife is not entitled to separate residence from her husband, unless she proves
that by reasons of his misconduct or refusal to maintain her in his own place of
residence or other justifying cause, she is compelled to live apart from him.
According Section 18(2) (a) to (g) enumerates that the wife may live separately
from her husband without forfeiting her right to maintenance.
The grounds which will enable the wife to live separately claim maintenance from
the husband are as follows;
Section 24 of the Act deals with Maintenance Pendente lite during the
proceedings between a husband and wife.
Section 18(3):- When a wife not entitled to separate residence and maintenance.
Section 19:- she is entitled to be maintained by the father-in –law after the death
of her husband.
Provided if she is unable to maintain herself out of her own earnings or she has no
property of her own.
a. If she is able to maintain herself out of her own earnings or other property;
b. If she is able to obtain maintenance from the estate of her husband;
c. If she is able to obtain maintenance from the estate of her father;
d. If she is able to obtain maintenance from the estate of her mother;
e. If she is able to obtain maintenance from her son;
f. If she is able to obtain maintenance from her daughter;
g. If she is able to obtain maintenance from the estate of her son;
h. If she is able to obtain maintenance from the estate of her daughter;
i. If the father-in-law has no coparcenary property in his possession out of
which she has remarried;
j. If she has remarried;
k. If she has ceased to be Hindu by conversion to some other religion.
SECTION 20;-
1. A Hindu is bound, during his or her lifetime to maintain his or her legitimate
or illegitimate children and his or her aged or infirm parents.
2. A Legitimate or illegitimate child claim maintenance from his or her father
or mother so long as the child is a minor.
3. The obligation of a person to maintain his or her aged or infirm parent or a
daughter who is unmarried extends in so far as the parent or the unmarried
daughter, as the case may be, is unable to maintain himself or herself out
of his or her own earnings or other property.
I) ILLEGITIMATE SON:
Son whether legitimate of illegitimate and whether adopted or natural
born can claim maintenance from either of his parents till he attains
majority under the provisions of the Act.
DEPENDANTS :-
INTRODUCTION
“Dependants" means the following relatives of the deceased:
(iv) his or her son or the son of his predeceased son or the son of predeceased
son of his predeceased son, so long as he is a minor:
PROVIDED and to the extent that he is unable to obtain maintenance, in the case
of a grandson from his father's or mother's estate, and in the case of a great
grand-son, from the estate of his father or mother or father's father or father's
mother;
(v) his or her unmarried daughter, or the unmarried daughter of his predeceased
son or the unmarried daughter of a predeceased son of his predeceased son, so
long as she remains unmarried:
PROVIDED and to the extent that she is unable to obtain maintenance, in the case
of a grand-daughter from her father's or mother's estate and in the case of a
great-grand-daughter from the estate of her father or mother or father's father or
father's mother;
(c) from her father-in-law or his father or the estate of either of them;
(vii) any widow of his son or of a son of his predeceased son, so long as she does
not remarry:
PROVIDED and to the extent that she is unable to obtain maintenance from her
husband's estate, or from her son or daughter, if any, or his or her estate; or in
the case of a grandson's widow, also from her father-in-law's estate