KEMBAR78
Compare NP-Hard and NP-Complete Problems With Examples of Graph Problems Such As CDP and CNDP | PDF | Time Complexity | Graph Theory
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views2 pages

Compare NP-Hard and NP-Complete Problems With Examples of Graph Problems Such As CDP and CNDP

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views2 pages

Compare NP-Hard and NP-Complete Problems With Examples of Graph Problems Such As CDP and CNDP

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Compare NP-Hard and NP-Complete problems with examples of

graph problems such as CDP and CNDP.


In computational complexity theory, NP-Hard and NP-Complete problems are two
important classes of problems that deal with the difficulty of solving computational problems
efficiently.
1. NP-Hard Problems
 Definition: NP-Hard problems are as hard as the hardest problems in NP. However,
an NP-Hard problem does not necessarily have to be in NP itself. In other words, the
problem may not have a solution that can be verified in polynomial time, but solving
it would allow us to solve any problem in NP.
 Key Characteristics:
o If we had a polynomial-time algorithm to solve an NP-Hard problem, we
could solve all NP problems in polynomial time.
o NP-Hard problems are not necessarily decision problems (they can be
optimization problems).
o There is no requirement for a solution to be verifiable in polynomial time.
 Example 1: Clique Decision Problem (CDP)
The Clique Decision Problem asks whether a graph GGG contains a clique (a subset
of vertices where every pair is connected) of size kkk. Formally: "Given a graph GGG
and an integer kkk, does GGG have a clique of size kkk?"
o Why NP-Hard?: CDP is NP-Hard because finding the largest clique in a
graph is extremely difficult due to the combinatorial explosion in possibilities.
Moreover, if we could solve CDP in polynomial time, we could solve other NP
problems (such as 3-SAT) in polynomial time via reduction.
o Not in NP (Optimization Problem): While CDP can be posed as a decision
problem (yes/no), finding the maximum clique (Clique Problem) is not in NP
because we can't verify the maximality of a clique in polynomial time without
rechecking many possibilities. Thus, the problem of finding the largest clique
is NP-Hard, but not necessarily in NP.
2. NP-Complete Problems
 Definition: NP-Complete problems are a subset of NP problems that are both in NP
and NP-Hard. These are the hardest problems in NP in the sense that if any NP-
Complete problem can be solved in polynomial time, all problems in NP can be
solved in polynomial time.
 Key Characteristics:
o NP-Complete problems are decision problems.
o Any problem in NP can be reduced to an NP-Complete problem in polynomial
time.
o They are both verifiable in polynomial time and as hard as the hardest
problems in NP.
 Example 1: Chromatic Number Decision Problem (CNDP)
The Chromatic Number Decision Problem asks if a graph G can be colored using at
most k colors such that no two adjacent vertices share the same color. Formally:
"Given a graph G and an integer k, can G be colored with k or fewer colors?"
o Why NP-Complete?: CNDP is NP-Complete because:
1. It is in NP: Given a coloring of the graph, it can be verified in
polynomial time whether no two adjacent vertices share the same
color.
2. It is NP-Hard: Solving CNDP would help solve other NP problems
(like 3-SAT) by reduction. If we could decide whether a graph is k-
colorable in polynomial time, we could also solve any problem in NP.

You might also like