Competency Chart.
Level: Mgr. / Executive / Associate.
Name:
Designation:
Educational
Qualification:
Date of Joining:
Work Experience:
**Ratings are on a scale of 1 to 5, 1= Poor, 2 =Fair, 3 = Average, 4 = Good and
5 = Excellent being the Maximum Rating
Communication Skills:
Definition: Competency of communication is defined as the set of attributes required in
communicating ideas, thoughts, and feelings clearly and correctly using oral or written
means
Sl Behavioral Indicator Max Self Evaluator Remarks/Suggestions.
No. Rating Rating Rating
1 Fluency in Speaking. 5
2 Presentation skills. 5
3. Communicate Precisely 5
using simple words in
speech or writing.
Software Skills:
Sl Behavioral Indicator Max Self Evaluator Remarks/Suggestions
No. Rating Rating Rating
1 Tech 01 5
2 Tech 02 5
3 Tech 03 5
4 Tech 04 5
5 Tech 05 5
Technical Skills:
Sl Behavioral Indicator Max Self Evaluator Remarks/Suggestions
No. Rating Rating Rating
1 Approach to 5
2 Knowledge of 5
3 Knowledge of 5
4 Knowledge of 5
5 Knowledge of 5
6 Knowledge of 5
7 Knowledge of 5
8 Building Standards. 5
Creative Thinking:
Sl Behavioral Indicator Max Self Evaluator Remarks/Suggestions
No. Rating Rating Rating
1 Generation of ideas. 5
2 Originality of ideas. 5
3 Good in Implementing 5
ideas.
Achievement Orientation:
Definition: Attributes required in continuously seeking and achieving higher goals.
Sl Behavioral Indicator Max Self Evaluator Remarks/Suggestions
No. Rating Rating Rating
1 Accept Challenges. 5
2 Demonstrate 5
Initiative/Self Starter.
3 Ensuring of final and 5
complete delivery.
4 Honest/Ethical. 5
5 Strong Moral values. 5
6 Flexible/Adaptable. 5
7 Enthusiastic/Positive 5
attitude.
8 Accept Criticism and 5
Learn from mistakes.
9 Team work and 5
interpersonal effectiveness
Customer Orientation:
Sl Behavioral Indicator Max Self Evaluator Remarks/Suggestions
No. Rating Rating Rating
1 Awareness About 5
customers.
2 Awareness about customer 5
requirements.
3 Awareness about customer 5
processes.
4 Awareness about customer 5
complaints.
Guidelines:
Candidates to rate self, based on previous work experiences and professional
tenure.
Team leaders to rate the team members based on observational evidence
exhibited.
Indicators not applicable should be marked NA.
