KEMBAR78
Kolubara Resettlement PSI Report | PDF | Justice | Crime & Violence
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views2 pages

Kolubara Resettlement PSI Report

Uploaded by

mkrh7ybrpd
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views2 pages

Kolubara Resettlement PSI Report

Uploaded by

mkrh7ybrpd
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Problem-solving Completion Report Summary

October 2017

The Project Complaint Mechanism (PCM) received two Complaints raising concerns about
resettlement processes connected with the EPS Restructuring and EPS Kolubara Environmental
Improvement Projects in Serbia 1. One complaint was submitted by the Centre for Ecology and
Sustainable Development (CEKOR) representing five households in "Kolonia" settlement in Vreoci
which are being resettled due to the expansion of the Kolubara mine 2. A second Complaint was
received from another resident of Vreoci, Mr Nebojsa Mitrovic, who is also being resettled due to
the expansion of the Kolubara mine 3.
The Complainants have requested that a Problem-solving Initiative (PSI) be undertaken by the
PCM. In a written response to the first and the second Complaints, EBRD Management indicated
support for a Problem-solving Initiative undertaken by the PCM. The Eligibility Assessment Report
for a Problem-solving Initiative (PSI), released in August 2017, concluded that both Complaints
are eligible and satisfy the criteria for a PSI in accordance with the PCM Rules of Procedure (PCM
RP), specifically paragraphs 24-26 and 28-29.
In accordance with the PCM RP, the PCM has reviewed the Complaints together following
consultation with the Complainants, given that the substance of the Complaints is reasonably
related. The President of the Bank accepted the recommendation of the Eligibility Assessors for a
PSI and on September 1st 2017,PCM Expert Constantin-Adi Gavrilă was appointed to undertake
the assignment. Given the need for culturally meaningful co-facilitation and coordination with
parties and other stakeholders on the ground, the PCM Expert worked with Ana Toskić, a local
mediator licenced by the Serbian Ministry of Justice that joined the PCM team for the PSI.
Considering the urgent need for constructive engagement the PCM team conducted the PSI from
September 1st to September 25th 2017. The PSI was successful in helping the parties open the
door to communication and understanding, which allowed them to exchange views and key
information related to Kolubara open mine pit operations, safety of people and buildings,
voluntary resettlement and fair compensation. The parties reached informed agreements where
needed regarding temporary resettlement, updated investments inventory of the households and
agreed that the compensation for the expropriated households will be determined by the
domestic courts, as prescribed by the Serbian legislation.
Essentially, the PSI has helped the parties unblock the situation by allowing the company to
advance operations, while successfully addressing the community members’ need to establish
formal ownership and to prove their arguments regarding fair compensation in the domestic
courts, without the pressure of the risk physical endangerment connected with a forceful eviction
process. This was agreed to be achieved by voluntary temporary resettlement of the four families
living in the “Kolonia”, Vreoci, located in the proximal direction that the mine is advancing to.
Although all community members were interested in resolving all the issues related to
resettlement, including the financial compensation for their households, the company was not
prepared to make decisions here commenting that (a) the community members will need to
establish ownership legally first; (b) some community members don’t own the land, but only the

1 Project Summary Document for EPS RestructuringProjectRestructuring Project, available at


http://www.ebrd.com/work-with-us/projects/psd/eps-restructuring.html.
2 Complaint Number 2017/03, available at http://www.ebrd.com/work-with-us/project-finance/project-

complaint-mechanism/pcm-register.html and annexed to this report.


3 Complaint Number 2017/04, available at http://www.ebrd.com/work-with-us/project-finance/project-

complaint-mechanism/pcm-register.html and annexed to this report.


buildings; (c) legal proceedings are pending and need to be finalized in order for the Company to
have a legal basis to pay compensations.
The Zivanovic (one of the five families involved in the first complaint) and Mitrovic families,
indicated that they will not resettle before the completion of the legal proceedings and have
expressed interest in receiving formal insurances that, in the meantime, the members of their
families are physically safe and will not be forcefully evicted. Both families have received
compensation for part of their households and are interested in finalizing the compensation
process. While acknowledging that the Kolubara mine will not advance directly in the direction of
their households and the company is interested in voluntary and peaceful resettlement, the
company representatives were not prepared to make formal commitments.
The process was designed by the PCM team in consultation with the parties and it was agreed by
the parties during the first joint meeting by signing Framework Agreements for PSI. Each
community member that attended PSI have met the company twice in joint meeting. Before the
second joint meeting, the PCM team had extensive bilateral meetings with all the parties to
explore individual and joint interests. As a result, agreements were signed with four families at
the second joint meeting.
The PCM Expert appreciates that the PSI stimulated a constructive dialogue platform that, if
maintained and improved, should assist the parties in engaging directly with the outstanding
expropriation issues over time.
The PCM Expert recognises that further efforts are unlikely to establish more progress around the
unresolved issues raised in the complaint. As per the PCM Rules of Procedure, paragraph 37, the
PCM Expert therefore concludes, “no further progress towards resolution of the dispute is
possible”. Consequently, the PCM Expert considers the Problem-solving Initiative completed, but
identifies the need for follow-up monitoring and reporting by the PCM Officer that is also
encouraged to seek feedback from the parties regarding PSI.

You might also like