Mid Notes F
Mid Notes F
Understanding Value:
Illustrating Willingness to Pay:
Effectiveness vs. Efficiency:
Strategy: Defining and Simplifying the Concept
Rapid Technological Diffusion and Its Implications
The Reality of Hyper-Competition
Understanding the Relationship Between Diffusion and Hyper-Competition
The Role of Ergonomics in Diffusion
Hyper-Competition and Ergonomics: The Role of Perpetual Innovation
M1 C1
Understanding Value:
The concept of "Value" is central to modern business and is often associated with economics,
where it initially relates to "utility." In simple terms, we often describe value as a ratio of
"Benefits over Cost." This balance between benefits and costs is what ultimately forms
value in business contexts.
But, let's clarify that value is not merely about benefits in a vacuum. Value in business hinges
on benefits that customers are actually willing to pay for. This willingness to pay reflects
the unique benefits offered by a product or service, which, if not met, leads to a lack of
customer demand and, consequently, no value.
Ultimately, the difference between products lies in the customer’s willingness to pay, not just
the generic benefits they provide.
In practice, this competitiveness requires constant assessment of customer needs and price
sensitivity. For instance, if a business enters a market without researching customers'
willingness to pay for specific benefits, it risks launching an irrelevant or overpriced
product, which leads to poor performance and possibly business failure.
Moving on, let's differentiate between "Effectiveness" and "Efficiency." These two terms are
often used interchangeably but have distinct implications in business:
1. Effectiveness refers to doing the right things. In business terms, it means choosing the
right problems to solve or the most relevant needs to address, which generate willingness
to pay. The essence of effectiveness is rooted in selecting options that directly align with
customer desires.
2. Efficiency focuses on doing things right, that is, performing tasks in a cost-effective and
streamlined way. Efficiency comes into play once you've identified the right
solutions—finding ways to deliver those solutions while minimizing costs and
maximizing productivity.
Effectiveness, therefore, must come before efficiency in value creation. Only once you’ve
chosen the right goals should you work on reducing costs to deliver these benefits as
efficiently as possible.
Consider the early operating systems market. When Microsoft introduced Windows, it wasn't
merely a matter of efficiency but effectiveness. The DOS operating system required
technical knowledge, whereas Windows offered a user-friendly interface, addressing a
real consumer need. Customers were willing to pay for this accessibility, which elevated
Windows' competitiveness. This effectiveness in addressing a unique problem allowed
Microsoft to dominate the market.
Let’s take a broader view and connect value creation with personal and ethical responsibility.
In life and business, our motives and the intent behind actions hold profound importance.
For instance, consider charitable actions; they can be driven by genuine desire or the
expectation of social praise. True value in such cases, as per many spiritual teachings, lies
in seeking intangible rewards rather than public recognition.
This notion extends to business as well. The value created by a business should align with
deeper goals—solving real problems and contributing positively to the customer’s life.
Superficial motives, like only seeking profit without contributing meaningful solutions,
rarely sustain long-term value and competitiveness.
In Summary:
- Value is the benefits over cost that customers are willing to pay for.
- Competitiveness arises when businesses align value with customer willingness to pay.
- Effectiveness is the priority in value creation, choosing solutions that resonate with
customer needs.
- Efficiency adds value by minimizing costs without compromising on essential benefits.
- True value creation resonates beyond transactional benefits, creating solutions that
contribute meaningfully to customers' lives.
These principles, when genuinely applied, guide businesses not only to success but also
towards a more purpose-driven approach to value creation.
M1 C2
The term "strategy" can seem complex, but at its core, it is about setting a clear path toward
an objective. Strategy provides a blueprint or roadmap for achieving a specific goal,
laying out each step and aligning resources effectively. Without a strategy, achieving
long-term success becomes challenging. Strategy management, therefore, is about
choosing and implementing a path that allows an organization to gain a competitive edge.
A competitive advantage is when a business has a unique edge over its rivals, which is
challenging for others to replicate. Achieving this requires understanding internal
strengths and differentiators, such as brand reputation, technological prowess, or cost
efficiencies. However, sustainable competitive advantage is about maintaining this edge
over time, which demands continuous innovation and adaptability.
Take Levi Strauss, a company that has been selling jeans for over a century. Their edge
comes not only from high-quality products but from ongoing innovations in design and
customer engagement that keep the brand relevant despite numerous competitors.
Technological diffusion refers to how quickly new technologies spread and are adopted
across industries. In today’s business world, technological diffusion is rapid, which
means that businesses must constantly innovate to keep up with customer expectations
and avoid becoming obsolete.
In summary:
- *Value* is central to both human purpose and business success.
- A well-defined *strategy* serves as a roadmap to achieving specific goals.
- *Sustainable competitive advantage* requires unique strengths that are difficult to replicate.
- *Technological diffusion* today is fast-paced, leading to shorter payback periods and an
increased need for innovation.
- *Hyper-competition* characterizes the modern business landscape, with companies needing
to innovate faster than ever.
M1 C3
When discussing technology diffusion, we're looking at how rapidly new technology spreads
within a market. Now, if diffusion is swift—meaning people are quickly adopting new
tech—this fuels hyper-competition. Hyper-competition occurs as companies rapidly
innovate to outperform each other in a market saturated with fast technology adoption. A
high rate of diffusion, therefore, often leads to intense competition as businesses
continually strive to capture consumer attention with newer, better products. However, if
diffusion is slow, it implies consumers are hesitant, possibly due to a 'wait-and-see'
approach. In such cases, hyper-competition remains moderate since fewer companies
rush to release competing products.
Ergonomics plays a pivotal role as a deciding factor for diffusion. Ergonomics is about how
well a product fits human needs—comfort, usability, and accessibility. For a product to
diffuse widely, it must be ergonomically sound. A well-designed, comfortable chair or a
user-friendly smartphone sees faster diffusion because it meets physical and
psychological comfort requirements. Take the evolution of chairs: they vary globally in
design, but those that fit human dimensions comfortably are universally adopted, while
less ergonomic designs are quickly discarded. This concept extends across products; for
instance, smartwatches have garnered widespread acceptance due to their ergonomic
integration with human physical interaction, like measuring health metrics effortlessly.
Consider the development of personal devices. Initially, desktop computers were the primary
technology for digital work, but as ergonomics improved, we saw laptops, tablets, and
smartwatches emerge. Tablets didn’t replace laptops entirely, as the ergonomic needs for
professional work environments weren’t fully met by tablets. Here, ergonomics dictated
the rate of diffusion; tablets, though convenient, couldn’t fully cater to the ergonomic
needs for prolonged, productive work sessions.
In conclusion, the interplay of fast technology diffusion, hyper-competition, and the role of
ergonomics all highlight the importance of perpetual innovation. When diffusion
accelerates, companies face hyper-competition, pushing them to innovate continuously. A
product’s ergonomic design becomes a critical factor in its adoption and diffusion rate.
Finally, perpetual innovation remains a key strategy to stay ahead in the market, allowing
businesses to adapt to change rather than succumb to it. This framework serves as a
roadmap for companies navigating the complexities of 21st-century markets, where
change is not only inevitable but necessary for survival.
M1 C4
● Problem Misinterpretation: Often, problems stem from vague language or concepts that
aren’t fully understood by all involved parties. For instance, using broad terms like
“nature” or “sustainability” without specificity leads to differing interpretations, making
it harder to find solutions.
● Western Perspective Influence: Certain terms have been shaped by cultural biases. For
example, Western perspectives often promote ideals that may not align with other
worldviews, affecting our understanding of concepts like nature and sustainability.
● Human Exclusion in Nature Discussions: Discussions around nature sometimes exclude
humanity’s impact and role, despite humans being a significant part of the ecosystem.
Recognizing humanity's central role can bring clarity to sustainability discussions.
2. Human-Centric Creation
● Humanity is often the central element in creation. In fact, most of the world’s
technological and philosophical advancements hinge on human ingenuity. Thus,
excluding humans in discussions around nature or creation undermines the importance of
the human role.
● When examining statements about “creation” or “sustainability,” it’s essential to question
if humans have been appropriately factored in.
Part 2: The Role of Flexibility in Innovation and Business
● An analogy for flexibility can be seen in software systems. Each app (customization) on a
device represents a new feature or variation. However, without the “operating system”
(integration point), these apps are unusable. Thus, every customization requires a
foundational system to remain functional.
● Product Customization: Unilever offers a variety of products, from personal care to
cleaning supplies, tailored to meet regional preferences and consumer demands. For
example, a customized version of Dove may be available in different scents or
formulations based on the region.
● The apps (like Instagram, WhatsApp, or any other third-party applications) represent the
customizations or new features that users add to the device.
● The iOS operating system serves as the integration point, ensuring that these apps
work seamlessly on iPhones or iPads. The operating system manages resources such as
memory, processing power, and network access, enabling apps to function properly,
communicate with the device hardware, and access features like the camera or location
services.
● Flexibility must always be balanced by integration. Without a common integration point,
customization lacks usability and coherence.
Example: “To be the global leader in sustainable energy” is a vision that doesn’t describe
specific steps but motivates the organization towards an ambitious goal.
Example: “To empower every person and organization on the planet to achieve more” is a
mission that communicates Microsoft’s current purpose.
● Strategic Clarity: It’s essential to separate the two to maintain strategic clarity. Vision
drives the long-term ambition, while the mission provides a clear roadmap for achieving
it. Together, they form a cohesive direction for the organization.
● Flexibility within Boundaries: Although a vision can be broad, the mission helps limit
this flexibility, ensuring efforts align with organizational objectives without straying too
far from core competencies.
M1 C5
The Interplay Between Product Differentiation, Barriers to Entry, and Brand Loyalty
In business, competition arises between **existing firms** and **new entrants**. The
dynamics of competition are influenced by two critical factors: the **threat of new
entrants** and **barriers to entry**. The **threat of new entrants** indicates the
likelihood of new competitors entering the market, while **barriers to entry** refer to
the obstacles that make it challenging for new firms to break into the industry.
These concepts are inversely related: **the threat of new entrants** increases when barriers
to entry are low and decreases when barriers are high. For instance, industries that require
high capital investment or are subject to strict regulations have higher barriers to entry,
making the threat of new entrants lower.
Established firms often have the resources to offer a wide variety of products, which new
entrants may struggle to replicate. This requires significant capital, technology, and
experience. Therefore, it becomes a barrier to entry, as consumers are more likely to
choose from well-established brands with extensive product lines.
**Example**: **Toyota** offers a diverse range of vehicles, from budget-friendly to
luxury models. A new car manufacturer would struggle to match this variety, making it
difficult to compete.
New entrants, particularly those led by younger, more innovative teams, can introduce new
products that differentiate them from established firms. These companies may be more
agile and willing to take risks, leading to potential disruption in the market.
**Example**: **Tesla** revolutionized the automotive industry with its electric vehicles,
challenging traditional companies like **General Motors** and **Ford**. Tesla's
innovation in vehicle design and battery technology has allowed it to carve out a unique
position in the electric vehicle market.
**Brand loyalty** is one of the strongest barriers to entry for new firms. It refers to
consumers’ preference for a particular brand based on trust, past experiences, and
emotional connections. Overcoming brand loyalty is a significant challenge for new
entrants, as consumers are often reluctant to switch to unfamiliar brands, even if the new
entrant offers better pricing or features.
Example: Apple has cultivated strong brand loyalty through consistent innovation and
premium products. Its ecosystem of interconnected devices and services has created a
loyal customer base, acting as a powerful barrier to entry for new competitors in the
smartphone market.
Despite the challenges posed by barriers like product differentiation and brand loyalty, new
entrants can disrupt established markets by offering innovative products or services.
Smaller, more agile companies may be able to respond quickly to market changes,
leveraging innovation to overcome the barriers set by established firms.
Example: Netflix disrupted the video rental industry with its innovative streaming model. By
providing a user-friendly platform and a vast variety of content, Netflix displaced
traditional video rental stores like Blockbuster, showcasing how new entrants can
succeed through differentiation.
The competition between existing firms and new entrants is a continuous process in any
market. **Product differentiation and brand loyalty are powerful strategies used by
established firms to defend their market position. However, new entrants can overcome
these barriers through innovation and by offering unique products or services that
challenge the status quo.
The key for new entrants lies in understanding and navigating existing barriers, while
established firms must continuously innovate, maintain strong brand loyalty, and use
economies of scale to protect their market dominance.
Ultimately, the interplay of product differentiation, barriers to entry, and brand loyalty
determines the competitive dynamics in any market. Firms must navigate these factors
effectively to sustain their leadership and remain competitive in the long term.
M1 C8
The primary goal of analyzing the Five Forces Model by Michael Porter is to determine the
attractiveness of an industry. This assessment helps businesses decide whether to enter, stay in,
or exit an industry.
Example:
● The fast-food industry is moderately attractive due to low entry barriers but high rivalry
and buyer power (price sensitivity).
Bargaining power reflects a party's ability to influence terms in its favor during negotiations.
● Supplier Bargaining Power: Their ability to demand higher prices or favorable terms.
● Buyer Bargaining Power: Their ability to negotiate lower prices or better service.
Examples:
● Supplier Power: A luxury handbag manufacturer relies on specific leather from one
supplier, increasing supplier power due to scarcity.
● Buyer Power: Large retailers like Walmart dictate terms to suppliers due to their scale.
Ø Differentiation of inputs
Ø Individual buyers are not large customers of suppliers and there are
output
revenues
Ø Buyers can pose threat to integrate backward into the sellers’ industry
● Low Power Indicators:
Examples:
Conclusion
Understanding and leveraging bargaining power within industries is vital for strategic
decision-making. Whether it involves managing supplier relationships, addressing buyer
demands, or navigating new market entrants, recognizing the dynamics of bargaining power
ensures competitive advantage and sustainability. However, ethical use of power remains a
cornerstone for long-term success.
M1 C10
Threat of Substitutes
Substitutes refer to products or services from outside the industry that fulfill the same need or
purpose as the industry’s offerings. The presence of substitutes can cap the price a company can
charge, as customers can switch to an alternative.
Key Concepts
1. Nature of Substitutes: Substitutes aren’t competitors in the same industry but provide an
alternative to fulfill the same need.
○ Example: pathao vs uber vs cng are direct competitors in ride-hailing, but public
transit and biking are substitutes.
2. Dominant Substitutes: These substitutes outperform industry products by offering better
benefits or lower prices.
Criteria:
○ Lower price
○ Superior benefits
○ Both (a guaranteed dominant substitute) pathao
1. Switching Costs:
○ Definition: The balance between the substitute’s cost and the benefits it provides
compared to the existing product.
○ Example: Streaming services (like Netflix) outperform traditional cable TV by
offering diverse content at lower prices, posing a significant threat.
This refers to the intensity of competition among companies operating in the same industry.
Rivalry determines the profitability of the market as companies compete for customers through
price wars, advertising, innovation, and more.
1.
Key Factors:
○ Number of competitors
○ Industry growth rate
○ Product differentiation
○ Market share balance
2. Number of Competitors:
The life cycle of a product significantly impacts competition and growth opportunities.
1. Growth Stage:
Sources of Growth
Growth strategies determine how a company expands its market presence or increases revenue.
Competitive Dynamics
Competitive dynamics explain how companies respond to each other’s strategies in the market.
1. Intensity of Rivalry:
○ High in industries with slow growth, low product differentiation, or low switching
costs.
○ When ever fixed cost is high the rivalry is more because reaching the breakeven is
more difficult. The journey is so long thet it creates pressure for the organizations
in an effect the rivalry is more to sell one single unit.
○ Example: The retail grocery sector has high rivalry due to low differentiation and
frequent price cuts.
2. Impact of Switching Costs:
○ High switching costs can reduce rivalry since customers are less likely to leave.
○ Example: Enterprise software providers (e.g., SAP, Oracle) rely on high
switching costs to retain customers because switching involves retraining staff
and integrating new systems.
Practical Analysis
● Threat of Substitutes: Online retail faces threats from brick-and-mortar stores offering
an experiential advantage.
● Rivalry: High due to numerous players like Amazon, Walmart, and smaller niche stores.
● Growth Potential: Companies can focus on increasing online penetration in rural areas
or introducing subscription models like Amazon Prime.
Would you like deeper insights into any specific topic or additional examples?
M1 C11
Understanding Complementers, Exit Barriers,
and Competitive Intensity
This lecture explores exit barriers, complementers, and their impact on competitive intensity
and market dynamics. We also examine the Five Forces Model and its proposed extension with
a sixth force: complementers.
High Strategic Stakes refers to situations in which companies have a lot to gain or lose in
a particular market or industry. These stakes arise when the strategic importance of an
industry, market, or operation is significant to a company’s long-term success,
profitability, or survival.
● Companies like Ford, General Motors, and Volkswagen face high strategic stakes
in transitioning to EVs.
● Why?
○ Massive investments in EV technology, battery production, and
infrastructure.
○ Governments and consumers are shifting away from fossil fuels, making
this transition critical for survival.
○ Failure to compete in the EV market could lead to a decline in relevance
and market share.
● For companies like Apple and Samsung, the smartphone market carries high
strategic stakes.
● Why?
○ Smartphones contribute significantly to their overall revenue.
○ Competitive pressure to introduce innovative features annually.
○ Success or failure in this segment affects their brand reputation and
customer loyalty.
1. Exit Barriers
Exit barriers are obstacles that make it difficult for businesses to leave an industry, even if they
are struggling. High exit barriers intensify competition because companies that would otherwise
exit are forced to remain and fight for market share.
1. Financial Constraints:
○ High fixed costs, such as equipment, real estate, or employee benefits (e.g.,
gratuity payments), create exit barriers. It becomes very costly.
Complementers are businesses or products that enhance the value of another company’s
offerings. They are distinct from suppliers and buyers in the Five Forces Model. Complementers
can be both opportunities and threats to existing businesses.
Definition of Complementers
● Complementers create products or services that add value when used alongside another
product.
○ Example: Printers (hardware) and ink cartridges (complementer).
Complementers as Opportunities
Complementers as Threats
Complementers may operate in entirely different industries but have overlapping customers.
Their behavior can influence the market dynamics significantly.
Supportive Complementers
Aggressive Complementers
● Complementers can become competitors if they diversify into the core business.
○ Example: A beverage company selling sugar as a complement to tea may later
start producing its own tea, becoming a direct competitor to tea brands.
The rivalry among competitors increases when companies face challenges such as high exit
barriers or aggressive complementers.
● High exit barriers force struggling companies to stay in the market, often engaging in
aggressive competition to survive.
● Example: Airlines with large, immovable investments (planes, airport leases) often
remain in operation despite financial losses, intensifying price wars.
5. Examples of Complementers
● Companies should identify and manage their relationships with complementers carefully,
leveraging opportunities while mitigating threats.
● Businesses facing high exit barriers should focus on innovation and cost optimization to
remain competitive.
● Understanding the dual nature of complementers allows firms to anticipate changes in
market dynamics and adapt accordingly.
M1 C12
The Five Forces Model helps businesses evaluate whether an industry is attractive
or unattractive, providing insights into profitability and competition. Here's how
each force impacts industry attractiveness:
a. Threat of New Entrants
● High Threat:
Industries with low barriers to entry allow new players to disrupt
markets, increasing competition.
○ Example: The online food delivery industry (e.g., Uber Eats,
DoorDash) has a high threat of new entrants because initial
investment requirements are low, making it less attractive.
● Low Threat: High capital requirements or regulatory hurdles limit new
entrants.
○ Example: The aerospace industry (e.g., Boeing, Airbus) is highly
attractive for incumbents due to the high costs of entering the market
and complex certifications.
● Suppliers are Large and Few in Number: Limited options give suppliers more control.
○ Example: Semiconductor suppliers like TSMC dominate chip production.
● Differentiation of Inputs: Unique inputs increase dependence on suppliers.
○ Example: Rare earth minerals critical for tech devices.
● No Suitable Substitutes: Lack of alternatives strengthens supplier power.
○ Example: Specialized medical equipment parts.
● Buyer Dispersion: Numerous small buyers dilute their bargaining power.
○ Example: Local cafes buying coffee beans from large wholesalers.
● Critical Goods for Buyers’ Success: Suppliers provide essential inputs.
○ Example: Intel processors for PC manufacturers.
● High Input Cost Contribution: Suppliers’ inputs dominate buyers’ costs.
○ Example: Fuel costs for airlines.
● High Switching Costs: Dependence on a supplier makes change costly.
○ Example: ERP systems like SAP or Oracle.
● Proximity to Consumers: Suppliers have direct market access.
○ Example: Brand manufacturers selling directly to consumers online.
● Forward Integration Threat: Suppliers could become competitors.
○ Example: Suppliers launching private-label products in retail stores.
● High Supplier Power: When suppliers control critical resources, they can dictate
terms.
○ Example: De Beers has a strong hold over the diamond supply chain,
forcing jewelers to comply with its terms.
● Low Supplier Power: Businesses benefit when they have access to multiple
suppliers.
○ Example: In the fast-food industry, chains like McDonald’s benefit
from having diverse suppliers for potatoes, reducing dependence on
any single source.
1. Buyers are Large and Few in Number: Concentrated demand increases buyer power.
○ Example: Big-box retailers like Walmart pressuring suppliers.
2. Large Purchases: Buyers control significant market demand.
○ Example: Automakers purchasing steel in bulk.
3. Significant Portion of Supplier Revenue: Buyers influence suppliers’ earnings.
○ Example: Major smartphone companies for chipmakers.
4. Low Switching Costs: Buyers easily change suppliers.
○ Example: Consumers switching between internet service providers.
5. Backward Integration Threat: Buyers could become suppliers themselves.
○ Example: Supermarkets creating in-house brands to bypass suppliers.
● High Buyer Power: Buyers can demand lower prices or better quality, reducing
profitability.
○ Example: In the electronics market, large retailers like Walmart have
significant bargaining power over suppliers to lower costs.
● Low Buyer Power: Businesses benefit when buyers have limited options or
depend heavily on a product.
○ Example: Apple has low buyer power for its iPhone lineup due to
strong brand loyalty and product uniqueness.
d. Threat of Substitutes
● High Threat:
Substitutes provide alternatives, reducing demand for an
industry’s products.
○ Example: Streaming services like Netflix and Disney+ have replaced
traditional cable TV.
● Low Threat: When no viable substitutes exist, demand remains stable.
○ Example: Pharmaceutical drugs with patents have no immediate
substitutes, making them attractive markets.
e. Intensity of Rivalry
● High Rivalry:
Intense competition reduces profitability.
○ Example: The smartphone industry has fierce competition between
Samsung, Apple, and Xiaomi.
● Low Rivalry: Firms can enjoy stable profits in less competitive markets.
○ Example: The luxury watch industry (e.g., Rolex, Patek Philippe)
faces limited rivalry due to niche branding and high entry barriers.
2. Role of Complementors
Complementors are products or services that enhance the value of another product.
Examples of Complementors:
1. Airline Industry:
1. Restaurants in Malls: Brands like KFC, Pizza Hut, and Starbucks often coexist to
draw foot traffic.
2. Retailers in Commercial Districts: Gucci, Louis Vuitton, and Chanel cluster
in luxury shopping districts to target wealthy clientele.
1. Shared Audience
When competitors operate near each other, they can attract a larger audience
collectively, increasing visibility and drawing more potential customers to the
location or industry. This phenomenon is especially relevant in industries where
customers prefer to compare multiple options before making a decision.
Examples:
1. Shopping Malls:
○ Retail giants like Zara and H&M often situate stores in the same
shopping malls or streets.
○ Benefit: Customers who are shopping for fashion are likely to visit
multiple stores to compare prices, styles, and quality. By clustering,
these brands increase foot traffic, and every store benefits from the
shared audience.
2. Automobile Dealerships:
2. Benchmarking
By staying close to competitors, businesses can observe and analyze their rivals’
operations, pricing, and customer service strategies. This proximity allows
companies to respond quickly and effectively to market changes or competitor
actions.
Examples:
○ Firms like Google, Apple, and Meta are all headquartered close to
each other.
○ Benefit: This proximity enables rapid benchmarking of innovations,
hiring trends, and strategic pivots.
2. Food Markets:
○ At a food market, stalls selling similar products are often placed next
to each other. Vendors can observe competitors' pricing strategies,
product offerings, and promotions to adjust their approach
accordingly.
○ Benefit: Sellers can stay competitive in real-time by tweaking their
pricing or adding new products.
3. Gas Stations:
● Quick Response:
Businesses can adapt immediately to rivals' promotions or
product launches.
○ Example: If Burger King introduces a limited-time offer, nearby
McDonald’s can quickly introduce a counter-promotion.
● Improved Offerings: Benchmarking customer service, menu items, or store
layouts helps businesses refine their operations.
○ Example: Observing the success of healthier menu options at
Subway might prompt competitors like Taco Bell to introduce their
own health-focused items.
Summary
1.
M1 C13
unattractive
Attractive
1. Industry Attractiveness
The Five Forces Model by Michael Porter is used to analyze the competitive
forces in an industry. Its ultimate goal is to determine whether an industry is
attractive or unattractive based on several factors. These factors include the
power of suppliers, buyers, threats of substitutes, intensity of rivalry, and barriers
to entry.
Key Concepts:
Key Benefits:
Examples:
● Automobile Industry:
○ Lexus, Infiniti, and Acura emerged to fill gaps in luxury car markets.
● EV Market:
○ Tesla entered a niche where traditional manufacturers had no strong
presence, capitalizing on the lack of EV infrastructure.
Key Features:
● First-Mover Advantage: The first to capture a new market space.
● Lack of Competition: Operate in areas with minimal competitors.
● Customer Attraction: Attract customers unsatisfied with current options.
Examples:
4. Complementary Products
Complementary products support the sales of a primary product but can also pose a
potential competitive threat when they move into the primary market.
Categories:
1. Supportive Complementers:
○ Products like Microsoft operating systems and Intel processors
support each other without direct competition.
2. Aggressive Complementers:
○ Companies like Apple create ecosystems (e.g., iPhones, AirPods,
MacBooks) to dominate complementary spaces, preventing others
from entering.
Example:
Key Concepts:
Examples:
On Competition:
● "You don’t have to be the best, but you do have to be better than the rest." –
Jim Collins
External Environment
On Understanding Context:
● "When the winds of change blow, some people build walls, others build
windmills." – Chinese Proverb
● "Change is the only constant." – Heraclitus
● "The best way to predict the future is to create it." – Peter Drucker
● "Opportunities multiply as they are seized." – Sun Tzu
● "It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent,
but the one most responsive to change." – Charles Darwin
Technology Diffusion & Hyper-Competition
● "Success is never final. Failure is never fatal. It's courage that counts." –
John Wooden
● "If you really want something, you'll find a way. If not, you'll find an
excuse." – Jim Rohn
● "You get what you negotiate, not what you deserve." – Chester L. Karrass
● "Great companies are built by people who never stop thinking about
improving their bargaining power." – Charlie Munger
Threat of Substitutes:
Competitive Rivalry:
● "You don't have to blow out the other person's candle to make yours shine."
– Bernard M. Baruch
● "Competition brings out the best in products and the worst in people." –
David Sarnoff
Core Competencies & Industry Attractiveness
● "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and
leave a trail." – Ralph Waldo Emerson
● "The secret of change is to focus all your energy not on fighting the old, but
on building the new." – Socrates
● "A vision without action is merely a dream. Action without vision just
passes the time. Vision with action can change the world." – Joel A. Barker
● "To be successful, you have to have your heart in your business, and your
business in your heart." – Thomas Watson Sr.
● "Collaboration is the essence of life. The wind, bees, and flowers work
together to spread the pollen." – Amit Ray
● "If people believe they share values with a company, they will stay loyal to
the brand." – Howard Schultz
● "The blue ocean is uncharted waters, free from the intense competition of the
red ocean." – W. Chan Kim
This streamlined list categorizes famous quotes by topics for easy reference and
impactful usage. Let me know if further adjustments are needed!