Luis Fernando
Mechanical Designer Engineer
Fillet Weld Strength
First verifications :
• Minimum weld size = 3/16 in. (1/4 in. provided, OK.)
1 3
𝑖𝑛 > 𝑖𝑛 ok!
4 16
Maximum fillet weld size
Luis Fernando
Mechanical Designer Engineer
• Maximum weld size = tmax – 1/16 in. = 3/8 in. – 1/16 in. = 5/16 in. (1/4 in. provided,
OK.)
3 1 1 3 1 5
𝑖𝑛 > 𝑖𝑛 𝑡𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛 = 𝑖𝑛 − = 𝑖𝑛
8 4 16 8 16 16
The minimum total length of a fillet weld
Since the longitudinal fillet weld length is not less than the transverse distance between
the welds (i.e., L is not less than b), the spacing between longitudinal fillet welds is
adequate. OK
𝐿 = 4x2=8
8(L)>4(𝑏) 𝑂𝐾!
Luis Fernando
Mechanical Designer Engineer
Matching Filler Metal
Firts verification ok!
Calculation
Luis Fernando
Mechanical Designer Engineer
Luis Fernando
Mechanical Designer Engineer
1 1
𝐷 = 𝑖𝑛 ∗ =4
4 16
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑡 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑑, 𝐿 = 4" ∗ 2 = 8"
𝜙𝑅𝑛 = 1.392 ∗ 𝐷 ∗ 𝐿 = 1.392 ∗ 4 ∗ 8 = 𝟒𝟒. 𝟓 𝒌𝒊𝒑𝒔 − 𝟏𝟗𝟕. 𝟗 𝒌𝑵 (𝑳𝑹𝑭𝑫)
𝑅𝑛
= 0.928 ∗ 𝐷 ∗ 𝐿 = 0.928 ∗ 4 ∗ 8 = 𝟐𝟗. 𝟕 𝒌𝒊𝒑𝒔 − 𝟏𝟑𝟐. 𝟏 𝒌𝑵 (𝑨𝑺𝑫)
Ω
Insight on Code Application:
When it comes to welding in structural projects, you have the flexibility to choose between
two widely accepted methods: LRFD (Load and Resistance Factor Design) and ASD
(Allowable Strength Design). Both methods are recognized by the AISC (American
Institute of Steel Construction) and can be used depending on your preference or the
specific requirements of the project.
LRFD (Load and Resistance Factor Design)
LRFD is a method that applies different safety factors to both the applied loads and the
material strength. In this approach, you calculate the nominal strength of the weld and
then adjust it with a resistance factor (ϕ) to obtain the design strength. LRFD is often
preferred for its ability to optimize material usage, leading to lighter and more efficient
designs.
ASD (Allowable Strength Design)
ASD, on the other hand, is a more traditional and conservative method. In this approach,
the nominal strength of the weld is divided by a safety factor (Ω) to determine the
allowable strength. This method is straightforward and easy to apply, making it a common
choice for those who prefer a more conservative approach, which tends to result in more
robust designs.
Which Method to Choose?
The selection of LRFD versus ASD depends on project requirements and personal
preferences. Both methods are valid and have their advantages. LRFD is ideal if you're
looking to optimize the design and save on material, while ASD might be more suitable if
your priority is simplicity and additional safety in the design.
Regardless of the method you choose, the key is to ensure that the weld meets the safety
and performance requirements of the project. The decision can be based on company
guidelines, project specifications, or even your own familiarity and comfort with one of the
methods.
Luis Fernando
Mechanical Designer Engineer
1- Reference site "sdcverifier"
Calculation example
Reference ANSI/AISC 360-22 and AWS D1. 1 - Structural Welding Code (Steel)
Example taken from the book: Structural Steel Design – A. Aghayere and J. Vigil
