KEMBAR78
Written Assignment Unit 6 | PDF | Programme For International Student Assessment
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views5 pages

Written Assignment Unit 6

Uploaded by

xivicnickko
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views5 pages

Written Assignment Unit 6

Uploaded by

xivicnickko
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

1

Written Assignment Unit 6

University of the People

EDUC 5440- Assessment and Evaluation

Dr. Ismail Yuksel

December 4, 2024
2

Analysis of PISA Results and Their Impacts on the Philippines

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) administers the

Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), which evaluates students' reading,

math, and science skills at the age of 15. An important step in evaluating the Philippines'

educational system internationally was the country's participation in the 2018 PISA. However,

the findings also highlighted urgent issues and need for improvement in the Philippine

educational system.

Positive Impacts of PISA Results on the Philippines

1. Identification of Systemic Problems and Data-Driven Solutions the Philippines scored lower

than the global average in reading, math, and science in the 2018 PISA results, placing the

country last in the rankings. These findings serve as a wake-up call for those involved in

education, while also identifying possibilities for improvement. This data-driven approach

encourages the government to use evidence-based policies to close learning gaps. According to

the Department of Education (DepEd), the results prompted the launching of Sulong

EduKalidad, a program aimed at improving teacher quality, curriculum development, learning

environments, and assessment tools (DepEd, 2019).

2. International benchmarking allows the Philippines to compare its educational system to that of

other countries by participating in PISA. This comparison reveals best practices that can be

tailored to the local environment. Countries that consistently score high on PISA, such as

Singapore and Finland, place a heavy emphasis on early childhood education, teacher
3

preparation, and equitable resource distribution—areas that the Philippines may prioritize in

educational reform.

3. Policy Advocacy and Increased Funding as a result of the PISA results, which sparked

discussions about education among policymakers, educators, and the general public, the

government has pledged to increase funding for public education, with a focus on teacher

training and instructional materials, particularly in underserved areas. According to the Asian

Development Bank (2021), these conversations underline the importance of increasing education

investment.

Negative Impacts of PISA Results on the Philippines

1. International Perception of Educational Quality the Philippines' poor PISA scores could harm

the country's reputation for high-quality education abroad. The nation's ability to compete for

foreign investments may be hampered by this unfavorable perception, especially in sectors that

demand highly skilled workers. Employers may perceive Filipino graduates as less competent

compared to their counterparts from higher-ranking countries.

2. Psychological Effect on Students and Teachers: Students' and teachers' morale may

unintentionally suffer when PISA results are released. Their motivation may be impacted by

feelings of discouragement and inadequacy brought on by being classified as one of the lowest

performers. Such views can produce self-fulfilling prophecies, where low expectations result in

less effort and less success, according to educational psychology research (Dweck, 2006).
4

3. The risk of overemphasizing standardized testing as the only indicator of academic

achievement exists, even while PISA offers useful data. By concentrating just on test-related

material, teachers may engage in "teaching to the test," ignoring other facets of holistic education

including creativity, critical thinking, and socioemotional growth. Zhao's (2018) research

cautions against putting test scores ahead of developing well-rounded students.

4. Existing disparities in the Philippine educational system are also highlighted by the PISA

results. Rural and low-income schools typically perform worse than their urban counterparts,

which is a result of differences in access to technology, qualified teachers, and resources. If these

injustices are not addressed, societal inequality may worsen as the gap between rich and

underprivileged kids grows.

Conclusion

The Philippines faces both potential for significant improvements and systemic obstacles

as a result of the 2018 PISA findings. On the plus side, they have emphasized how urgent it is to

overcome educational shortcomings, encouraged policy advocacy, and offered standards for

progress. But it's also important to handle the negative effects, which can range from increased

disparities to a tarnished international reputation. The Philippines should take a balanced stance

going ahead, stressing equity and comprehensive education in addition to academic success. By

doing this, the nation can improve its educational system and give its young people a better

future.
5

References:

Asian Development Bank. (2021). Improving the quality of basic education in the Philippines.

Retrieved from https://www.adb.org

Department of Education (DepEd). (2019). DepEd launches Sulong EduKalidad to address

challenges in basic education. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph

Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

Zhao, Y. (2018). What works may hurt: Side effects in education. Teachers College Press.

You might also like