CT System User Guide
CT System User Guide
siemens-healthineers.com
Legend
Legend
Indicates a hint
Is used to provide information on how to avoid operating errors or informa‐
tion emphasizing important details
Indicates a prerequisite
Is used for a condition that has to be fulfilled before starting a particular oper‐
ation
Bold Is used to identify window titles, menu items, function names, buttons, and
keys, for example, the Save button
Is used for on-screen output of the system including code-related elements
or commands
Menu > Menu Item Is used for the navigation to a certain submenu entry
CAUTION
&$87,21
Used with the safety alert symbol, indicates a hazardous situation which, if
not avoided, could result in minor or moderate injury or material damage.
CAUTION consists of the following elements:
• Information about the nature of a hazardous situation
• Consequences of not avoiding a hazardous situation
• Methods of avoiding a hazardous situation
WARNING
:$51,1*
Indicates a hazardous situation which, if not avoided, could result in death or
serious injury.
WARNING consists of the following elements:
• Information about the nature of a hazardous situation
• Consequences of not avoiding a hazardous situation
• Methods of avoiding a hazardous situation
1 Introduction 6
1.1 Compatible systems 6
1.2 Applicability 7
1 Introduction
These instructions for use are in accordance with NEMA XR 28-2018.
• SOMATOM Definition AS
• SOMATOM Confidence
• SOMATOM Drive
• SOMATOM Force
• Biograph mCT
• Biograph Vision
1.2 Applicability
This document is valid only in conjunction with the Instructions for Use of the
corresponding SOMATOM CT system.
WARNING
Not observing the Instructions for Use and the safety information of the
medical device and the equipment!
◆ Always observe the Instructions for Use of the particular units used.
This includes the labels applied on the equipment as well as the
Instructions for Use documents.
◆ Always use this Instructions for Use document in conjunction with all
Instructions for Use documents provided.
◆ Follow the safety instructions and safety signs.
◆ For references purposes, store the Instructions for Use near
your workplace.
WARNING
2 Computed tomography
perfusion
The following information is in accordance with NEMA XR 28-2018,
Appendix A.
Such studies may be valuable for evaluating blood supply to neoplastic and
non-neoplastic tissue (including normal and ischemic tissue). In particular, CT
perfusion imaging allows the evaluation of cerebral ischemia or of the extent
of angiogenesis associated with a tumor.
CT perfusion should be performed only for a valid medical reason and with the
minimum radiation dose necessary to achieve an adequate exam.
Scan technique parameters (e.g., kV, mAs) for CT perfusion studies should be
set at values lower than those used for routine diagnostic scanning of the same
anatomical area.
It is essential that all users understand that CT perfusion images will be much
noisier than images of the same body region acquired for most other diagnostic
purposes and that this level of image quality is sufficient for the calculation of
perfusion parameters.
In all cases, the CT perfusion exam should have technique factors that are lower
than those used for the other components of the study (e.g. the non-contrast,
post-contrast and angiogram scans). Specific acquisition times for perfusion
exam depend on the post-processing algorithm used, but in all cases the
exam must be performed over a relatively long period of time (typically 40-50
seconds and potentially up to 3 minutes; consult model-specific user manual
and radiologist) in order to measure the time-dependent physiologic process of
blood flow through the brain.
Since the scan location is fixed, the same anatomy is irradiated repeatedly
during this scan time. Scan times are also affected by the concentration,
volume, and rate of delivery of the contrast agent.
The lenses of the eyes are more radiosensitive than the skin. Scanning through
the orbits should be avoided, if possible, by the use of patient positioning
and/or gantry tilting. Consult the medical physicist to ascertain appropriate
deterministic thresholds across the body.
Again, the image quality obtained should be noisier than most conventional
body CT scans as the post-processing algorithm is able to extract the needed
time attenuation information from the noisy data set. Respiratory motion
is an important consideration in body perfusion CT and methods to limit
diaphragmatic motion during the scan, or realign anatomic regions after
the scan using registration algorithms should be used to minimize errors
introduced from the movement of the tissue of interest during the course of the
perfusion scan.
In the rare event that a body perfusion scan would be performed in a pediatric
patient, sedation in small children may be required.
BodyPCT is the equivalent perfusion acquisition mode for lesions for the body,
when the highest temporal sampling is required.
NeuroPCTSeq and BodyPCTSeq are acquisition modes where the table does
not move, and a pause may be inserted. This method can be used to reduce
the dose as long as the temporal sampling rate remains adequate for the post
processing software to be used.
NeuroVPCT and BodyVPCT protocols use the Adaptive 4D Spiral, designed for
perfusion scanning and for extending the coverage of tissue which is obtained
beyond detector width. In both cases the temporal sampling rate is reduced
in comparison with continuous exposure modes where the table remains
stationary, and a pause may be inserted.
You must ensure that the sampling frequency remains adequate for the
post-processing software.
In Adaptive 4D Spiral mode, the scanner emits x-rays continuously while the
table continuously moves back and forth across the prescribed scan range. As
a result, the amount of anatomy that is imaged is increased.
The temporal sampling rate varies based on the acquisition mode selected and
can affect the total dose for the scan.
The following tables summarize the various scan modes that can be used for
acquisition of perfusion data on the respective system.
NeuroPCT 57.6 0.5 – 1.0 s Highest temporal sam‐ Can be used for acute
pling for 48 s stroke imaging.
Preferably scan at the level of
the basal ganglia in order to
include those vascular territo‐
ries frequently associated with
acute stroke.
Neuro‐ 57.6 Default 1.5 s Intermittent scanning Can be used for acute
PCTSeq for 48 s stroke imaging.
Cycle time can be var‐ Preferably scan at the level of
ied within the scan. the basal ganglia in order to
include those vascular territo‐
ries frequently associated with
acute stroke.
NeuroVPCT 114 – 224 1.5 s Largest coverage Whole brain dynamic imaging
in acute stroke for volumetric
analysis of core infarct, penum‐
bra, and status of collaterals.
BodyPCT 57.6 0.5 – 1.0 s Highest temporal sam‐ Good breath-hold is manda‐
pling for 48 s tory.
The volumetric scanning
BodyVPCT allows covering
whole organs or tumors, which
increases reproducibility in fol‐
low-up scenarios.
NeuroPCT 38.4 0.5 – 1.0 s Highest temporal sam‐ Can be used for acute
pling for 40 s stroke imaging.
Preferably scan at the level of
the basal ganglia in order to
include those vascular territo‐
ries frequently associated with
acute stroke.
Neuro‐ 38.4 Default 1.5 s Intermittent scanning Can be used for acute
PCTSeq for 40 s stroke imaging.
Cycle time can be var‐ Preferably scan at the level of
ied within the scan. the basal ganglia in order to
include those vascular territo‐
ries frequently associated with
acute stroke.
NeuroVPCT 100 Default 1.5 s Largest coverage Whole brain dynamic imaging
in acute stroke for volumetric
analysis of core infarct, penum‐
bra, and status of collaterals.
BodyPCT 38.4 0.5 – 1.0 s Highest temporal sam‐ Good breath-hold is manda‐
pling for 40 s tory.
The volumetric scanning
BodyVPCT allows covering
whole organs or tumors, which
increases reproducibility in fol‐
low-up scenarios.
BodyVPCT 100 – 150 Default 1.5 s Largest coverage Good breath-hold is manda‐
tory.
The volumetric scanning
BodyVPCT allows covering
whole organs or tumors, which
increases reproducibility in fol‐
low-up scenarios.
NeuroPCT 38.4 0.5 – 1.0 s Highest temporal sam‐ Can be used for acute
pling for 40 s stroke imaging.
Preferably scan at the level of
the basal ganglia in order to
include those vascular territo‐
ries frequently associated with
acute stroke.
Neuro‐ 38.4 Default 1.5 s Intermittent scanning Can be used for acute
PCTSeq for 40 s stroke imaging.
Cycle time can be var‐ Preferably scan at the level of
ied within the scan. the basal ganglia in order to
include those vascular territo‐
ries frequently associated with
acute stroke.
BodyPCT 38.4 0.5 – 1.0 s Highest temporal sam‐ Good breath-hold is manda‐
pling for 40 s tory.
The volumetric scanning
BodyVPCT allows covering
whole organs or tumors, which
increases reproducibility in fol‐
low-up scenarios.
NeuroPCT 38.4 0.5 – 1.0 s Highest temporal sam‐ Can be used for acute
pling for 40 s stroke imaging.
Preferably scan at the level of
the basal ganglia in order to
include those vascular territo‐
ries frequently associated with
acute stroke.
Neuro‐ 38.4 Default 1.5 s Intermittent scanning Can be used for acute
PCTSeq for 40 s stroke imaging.
Cycle time can be var‐ Preferably scan at the level of
ied within the scan. the basal ganglia in order to
include those vascular territo‐
ries frequently associated with
acute stroke.
NeuroPCT 19.2 0.5 – 1.0 s Highest temporal sam‐ Can be used for acute
pling for 40 s stroke imaging.
Preferably scan at the level of
the basal ganglia in order to
include those vascular territo‐
ries frequently associated with
acute stroke.
BodyPCT 19.2 0.5 – 1.0 s Highest temporal sam‐ Good breath-hold is manda‐
pling for 40 s tory.
The volumetric scanning
BodyVPCT allows covering
whole organs or tumors, which
increases reproducibility in fol‐
low-up scenarios.
Consult the applicable section of the user documentation manual for more
details on the effect of kV changes on CTDI.
Note that the effects of kV and mA or mAs on dose are multiplicative. For
example, a three-fold increase in dose that occurs from increasing kV combined
with a two-fold increase in dose from doubling the mA will result in a six-fold
increase in overall dose.
Factors that influence these doses include kV, mA, scan time,
perfusion acquisition type, and table movement, if any, during the
perfusion acquisitions.
As with patient dose, lower kV settings are recommended and should be used
as appropriate to achieve diagnostic image quality for perfusion evaluation
with respect to image noise based on body size, region scanned, and
scanner type.
In all cases, users should carefully refer to the Siemens reference perfusion
protocols within the scan protocol document under online instructions
for use to determine appropriate kV, mA, and scan times for typical
perfusion acquisitions.
For an overview of all relevant dose and imaging performance data for
your system, see “Dosimetry and imaging performance report” in the System
Owner Manual.
The acceptable noise level in CT perfusion is typically higher than that for
acquisitions routinely used in diagnostic imaging.
The acquisition duration for a stroke study must cover the time from prior to
the arrival of the contrast material bolus through the approach of the venous
signal to baseline. This duration is directly dependent on the volume of contrast
material injected, the rate of injection, and the patient’s cardiac output. If
contrast material volumes or injection rates change from exam to exam, the
scan duration will need to be adjusted accordingly.
The user should consult the perfusion post-processing software manual for
more detailed imaging and CT perfusion information.
Operators should pay close attention to the shape of the bolus, follow the
bolus with saline and utilize an injector capable of delivering the required
injection rates.
Special consideration should be given for children due to their smaller size.
As with all CT scanning, the CTDIvol value displayed on the operator console
should always be confirmed prior to the scan.
For CT perfusion without table motion, the value of CTDIvol tends to
overestimate the actual peak skin dose by approximately a factor of two (See
reference to Bauhs, below.). User manuals may contain an informative section
that describes means for conversion of the displayed CTDIvol or dose profile to
an estimated phantom peripheral dose, which may serve as an estimate for
peak skin dose.
Sites should have a QA program for oversight and review of any protocol
changes. As with other scan types, the CTDIvol for a CT perfusion acquisition is
recorded in both the DICOM screen capture and the DICOM CT dose structured
report and should be used for QA follow up for all scanning.
All the reference protocols provided within the software of this system,
including those for CT perfusion, are included in the applications protocol
document supplied with the system. This document provides a concise
description of each scanning series with the protocol, reference technique
factors, and dose information for each.
These approaches are designed to adjust the x-ray output of the system
according to the x-ray attenuation presented by a patient’s anatomy. For
example, the patient’s weight or body mass index (BMI) may be used as a guide
to set a fixed mAs for the acquisition. Alternatively, some measure of patient
thickness or girth, such as anterior-posterior (AP) thickness, lateral width, or
patient circumference can be used as a basis to choose an appropriate fixed
mAs value, i.e., a value that yields an image adequate for diagnosis with a
patient dose as low as reasonably achievable.
First, as they produce a fixed mAs value, they do not adjust for differences
in body-region thickness and associated variation in x-ray attenuation along
the patient length and/or around the patient circumference. Second, the use
of weight, thickness or circumference is an incomplete surrogate for x-ray
attenuation, which is one of the most relevant physical parameters affecting
image quality and which depends on the elemental composition and density
of human tissue as well as on its shape and thickness.
Automatic Exposure Control (AEC), on the other hand, is designed to adjust the
scanner radiation output to meet a desired, pre-set level of image quality/noise
criterion by empirically assessing the patient’s attenuation and automatically
modulating the mA accordingly. AEC can provide a desired level of image
quality/noise at a lower patient dose than would be possible with a fixed
scanner radiation output.
Larger patients typically require scanning at a higher mAs than the mAs used
for smaller patients.
Even though AEC is used, before scanning the operator must still select scan
parameters, including AEC parameters, which provide a desired image noise/
quality criterion.
When bismuth or other shields are considered for use in the planned scanned
range, consult the system user manual for specific information. Additional
information about the proper use of bismuth shields can be found in the “AAPM
Position Statement on the Use of Bismuth Shielding for the Purpose of Dose
Reduction in CT scanning”, available at aapm.org.
When AEC is available, if users do not understand the relationship between AEC
parameters, image noise, and dose, AEC should not be used.
Also, if the patient cannot be centered in the scanner, AEC is not recommended
because the attenuation calculations used for AEC are designed with the
assumption that the patient is centered in the gantry.
Use of AEC does not always result in dose reduction, especially when compared
to a fixed mA/mAs protocol. For example, when providing the desired image
noise/quality criterion setting for a large patient, AEC might appropriately
increase the scanner radiation output as compared to that for an average-
sized patient.
For most examinations of average-sized or small patients, and for the same
image noise/quality criterion settings, AEC use will result in the same or lower
CTDIvol as that of a fixed mA/mAs protocol. (However, a larger patient would
appropriately require more fixed mA than for a smaller patient.)
Improper patient centering can result in an exposure that is either too high
or too low to achieve the desired image noise/quality criterion.
Note that proper patient centering can be more challenging for smaller
pediatric patients, and so special care should be taken.
In contrast, asking for higher image noise/lower image quality criterion (e.g.
decreasing the ‘Quality ref. mAs’ value) will result in less dose to the patient.
Smaller patients and less attenuating body regions may result in a lower
scanner radiation output.
While AEC can be an effective dose-reduction tool for pediatric patients, special
care should be taken with this patient group.
For such protocols, operators must take extra care when setting manual mAs
or AEC parameters to achieve the desired level of image noise/quality criterion.
For example, in perfusion scanning, the image noise can often be much
higher (yielding a lower dose) than for routine diagnostic scanning of the
same region because the primary application of perfusion-scan data is for
quantitative analysis and characterization of perfusion parameters rather than
for diagnostic visualization.
Predicted CTDIvol and DLP values are displayed on the scanner’s dose display on
the user interface prior to confirmation of settings for scanning.
After scanning, the values are updated to reflect the average of the actual
mAs values used in the scan and are displayed on the user interface as well as
recorded in the DICOM radiation dose structured report.
3.3 Summary
AEC is a versatile and powerful tool designed to tailor the scanner’s radiation
output to each patient based on the patient’s size, age, shape and attenuation
and the user’s requested level of image noise/quality criterion.
However, AEC settings must be chosen with the same care used to choose
all other parameters that affect radiation dose to the patient. Before the scan
parameters are confirmed, careful attention must be paid to CTDIvol and DLP
displayed on the user interface; scanner radiation output associated with the
prescribed protocol must be checked and confirmed prior to scanning.
Used properly, AEC is a key technology to help ensure that the appropriate
radiation dose is used for every patient.
Table Feed (mm/rot)* Table feed per 360 degree rotation of the x-ray
tube (helical scan mode)
• For an overview of all relevant dose and imaging performance data for your
system, see “Dosimetry and imaging performance report” in the System
Owner Manual.
• Using the Scan Protocol Assistant on your system, you can have all scan
protocols listed in an overview window. You can also export this scan
protocol list.
Published by Siemens Healthcare GmbH / Print No. C2-SW.640.06.02.24 / © Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 2019 - 2023
Date of first issue: 2019-05 / Revision date: 2023-03