1
Company Name : Performance Evaluation for Year 2011
Employee Name: EMP ID: Designation: Date of Joining: Evaluation Period: Appraisal Period:01/01/2011 31/12/2011 Department: Process Name: Immediate Supervisor: Manager: Department Head:
List below the essentials functions of the position, and/or projects for which the employee is evaluated:
Responsibility KRAs(Key Result Areas)
To be filled by Immediate Head/Reporting Manager A. Cooperation Comments:
B. Attendance and Punctuality Comments:
C. Initiative Comments:
2 D. Dependability Comments:
E. Attitude Comments:
F. Judgment Comments:
G. Organizational Skills Comments:
To be filled by Appraisee Discussion point
1. What do you like and dislike about working for this organisation?
Like -
Dislike-
2. What elements of your job do you like and dislike the most?
Like -
Dislike-
3. What do you consider to be your most important aims and tasks in the next year?
4. What action could be taken to improve your performance in your current position by you, your boss or by organization?
3 Rating Standards
The employee is not required to perform in a specific rating factor, and it cannot be measured. Work performance is inadequate and inferior to the standards of performance for the position. Performance at this level cannot be allowed to continue. Work performance does not consistently meet the standards of performance for the position. Serious efforts is needed to improve performance. Work performance consistently meets the standards of performance for the position Work performance consistently above the standards of performance for the position Work performance consistently superior to standards required for the job.
Technical Skills (Effectiveness with which the employee applies job knowledge and skill to job assignments)
N/ A0 U-1 IN -2 M E3 EE4 O5 RATING FACTORS Job Knowledge Comments
Analyzes Problems
Provide suggestions for work Improvement
Quality of Work (Manner in which the employee completes job assignments)
N/ A0 U 1 I N 2 M E 3 O 5
EE -4
RATING FACTORS Accuracy/Precision
Comments
Reliability
Responsiveness to Requests for Service
Follow-Through/Follow-Up
4
Amount of Work Completed Work Completed on Schedule
Interpersonal Skills (Effectiveness of employee's interactions with others and as a team participant)
N / A 0 I N 2 E E 4
U 1
ME -3
O5
RATING FACTORS With Co-workers With Supervisors With Other staffs and Managers
Comments
Communication skills (If applicable to the job)
N/ A0 U 1 I N 2 M E3 E E 4
O-5
RATING FACTORS Written Expression Oral Expression Share Information Willingly
Comments
Tact and Diplomacy
Voice and Accent (If required)
Approach to Work (Characteristics the employee demonstrate while performing job assignments)
N/ A0 U 1 I N -2 M E -3 E E4 O5
RATING FACTORS
Comments
5
Actively Seeks ways to Streamline Processes Open to new Ideas and Approaches Initiative
Planning and Organization Follows Instructions Attendance Discipline and Decorum Positive Attitude Honesty and Fairness
Unacceptable (0-1.0)
Improvement Needed (1.1-2.0)
Meets Expectations (2.1-3.0)
Exceeds Expectations (3.1-4.5)
Outstanding (4.6-5.0)
Work performance is inadequate and inferior to the standards of performance for the position. Performance at this level cannot be allowed to continue.
Work performance does not consistently meet the standards of performance for the position. Serious efforts are needed to improve performance.
Work performance consistently meets the standards of performance for the position.
Work performance consistently above the standards of performance for the position.
Work performance consistently superior to standards required for the job
Check in the box above describes the employee's overall performance rating.
Overall Performance Rating(Scale 0-5)
6
Technical Skills Quality of Work Interpersonal Skills
Communication Skills Approach To Work
Total
Supervisor's Comments (additional comments may be attached)
Manager's Comments/Reactions Employee Comments/Reactions
Dept Head Comments
Actions Plans/Training and development Goals
(If applicable, summarize any specific projects, performance objectives, or training and development for the next review period)
HR Manager Comments
Employee Signature:
Date:
I have read and discussed this evaluation with my supervisor and I understand its contents. My signature means been advised of my performance status and does not necessarily imply that I agree with either the appraisal or the contents.
Next Appraisal will be due on: June/December Supervisor Signature: Date: Manager's Signature: Date:
Dept Head Signature: Date:
Reviewer Signature: Date:
