Sustainable Development
Sustainable development became a passion with the Brundtland Commission,
highlighting the need to have new ways to measure and assess progress
towards development in 1987.
a) What is Sustainable Development?
Sustainable development is a development approach that meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It balances three key pillars:
1. Economic Growth – Ensuring stable economies and job opportunities.
2. Social Inclusion – Promoting equity, healthcare, education, and human rights.
3. Environmental Protection – Conserving natural resources and reducing pollution.
The concept was officially defined by the Brundtland Commission in 1987, emphasizing the need for
long-term environmental and economic policies.
b) What is an Ecological Debt Day of a Year?
Ecological Debt Day, also known as Earth Overshoot Day, marks the date when humanity has consumed
more natural resources than the Earth can regenerate within that year. It highlights unsustainable resource
consumption.
Calculation Example:
In 2023, Earth Overshoot Day fell on August 2, meaning that for the rest of the year, humanity was using
ecological resources at a deficit, borrowing from future generations.
Example of Overshoot:
• The global biocapacity (nature’s ability to regenerate resources) is estimated at 1.6 Earths.
• However, humanity currently consumes resources as if we have 1.75 Earths available.
• This means we are exceeding the planet’s limits by 75%, leading to deforestation, overfishing,
and climate change.
Some countries reach their national overshoot day even earlier:
• USA: March
• European Union: May
• Sri Lanka: October
To push this date back, we need sustainable energy, reduced consumption, and better resource
management.
c) Three Processes for Sustainable Development
Sustainable development relies on key processes that ensure long-term balance between economic growth
and environmental conservation.
1. Renewable Energy Transition
o Shifting from fossil fuels to solar, wind, and hydro energy.
o Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate change.
o Example: Germany’s Energiewende policy for clean energy.
2. Circular Economy
o Encouraging recycling, reuse, and minimal waste.
o Designing products that can be repurposed instead of discarded.
o Example: Sweden’s recycling system, which turns waste into energy.
3. Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security
o Promoting organic farming, crop rotation, and reduced pesticide use.
o Encouraging plant-based diets to lower environmental impact.
o Example: The UN’s Agroecology Initiative to support sustainable farming.
These processes ensure long-term stability and resource conservation.
d) United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) – Five Examples
In 2015, the United Nations adopted the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to guide global
efforts toward sustainability.
Five Key SDGs:
1. Goal 1: No Poverty – Eradicate extreme poverty and provide basic needs.
2. Goal 2: Zero Hunger – Ensure food security and promote sustainable agriculture.
3. Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy – Promote renewable energy sources.
4. Goal 13: Climate Action – Reduce carbon emissions and combat global warming.
5. Goal 15: Life on Land – Protect forests, biodiversity, and ecosystems.
These goals are measurable and time-bound, aiming for completion by 2030.
e) Critiques on Sustainable Development Goals
Despite their importance, the SDGs face criticism for being overly ambitious and difficult to implement.
Two Main Critiques:
1. Lack of Accountability and Enforcement
o The SDGs rely on voluntary commitment from nations.
o There are no strict penalties for non-compliance.
o Example: Many countries still increase carbon emissions despite climate pledges.
2. Economic Growth vs. Environmental Protection
o Some SDGs (like industrial growth) conflict with sustainability goals.
o Encouraging economic expansion can lead to resource exploitation.
o Example: Expanding industries in developing nations often leads to deforestation and
pollution.
Despite these challenges, the SDGs remain a global roadmap for sustainable development.
Sustainable development can be defined as a commitment to meet the needs of
present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their
own needs.
a) What is Meant by "Needs of the Present" in the Definition of Sustainable Development?
The "needs of the present" in sustainable development refer to the essential requirements for people to
live a healthy, secure, and fulfilling life today without causing harm to future generations. These needs
can be categorized into:
1. Basic Human Needs
Every person requires fundamental resources to survive and thrive, including:
• Food and Water – Access to nutritious food and clean drinking water is a basic human right. Food
security must be ensured without overusing land and water resources.
• Healthcare – Proper medical care, vaccinations, and access to essential medicines improve quality
of life and longevity.
• Education – Education equips people with skills, knowledge, and opportunities for employment
and innovation.
2. Economic and Social Stability
Beyond survival, people need economic opportunities to improve their standard of living:
• Employment and Livelihoods – Fair wages and job security enable people to support themselves
and their families.
• Infrastructure and Technology – Roads, transportation, electricity, and internet access are
essential for modern life.
• Social Justice and Equality – Gender equality, minority rights, and fair governance contribute to a
more inclusive society.
3. Environmental Sustainability in the Present
• Sustainable Resource Management – Water, forests, and minerals must be used responsibly to
avoid depletion.
• Renewable Energy Adoption – Solar, wind, and hydro energy help reduce dependence on fossil
fuels.
• Pollution Control – Reducing air, water, and land pollution ensures a healthier environment.
The goal is to meet these needs fairly and efficiently without excessive environmental damage.
b) What is Meant by "Without Compromising the Ability of Future Generations to Meet Their
Own Needs"?
This part of the definition emphasizes intergenerational responsibility, meaning that today's actions should
not create problems for people in the future. It is based on the idea that future generations deserve the
same opportunities and resources that we have today.
1. Resource Conservation
• Many natural resources are non-renewable or take centuries to regenerate.
• Overfishing, deforestation, and excessive mining reduce the availability of these resources for
future generations.
• Sustainable practices like reforestation, regulated fishing, and recycling can help prevent
shortages.
2. Climate Change Mitigation
• If we continue burning fossil fuels and emitting greenhouse gases, future generations will face
rising temperatures, extreme weather, and food shortages.
• Transitioning to clean energy sources and reducing emissions is necessary to protect the planet for
future populations.
3. Economic and Social Sustainability
• Governments must balance economic growth with environmental responsibility.
• Encouraging sustainable businesses, eco-friendly industries, and ethical consumption can support
future economies.
4. Ethical Responsibility
• Future generations cannot undo the environmental damage we cause today.
• We must take responsibility now by adopting sustainable policies and technologies.
By applying sustainable principles, we can ensure that future generations inherit a world that is livable,
prosperous, and environmentally stable.
c) Are We Drifting Towards a Sustainable Future or Not?
The answer to this question is complex because while progress is being made, significant challenges
remain.
1. Positive Steps Toward a Sustainable Future
Several global initiatives and advancements show that efforts toward sustainability are increasing:
Transition to Renewable Energy
• Countries like Denmark, Germany, and China are investing heavily in solar and wind energy.
• The use of electric vehicles (EVs) is rising, reducing dependence on fossil fuels.
Stronger Global Environmental Policies
• The Paris Climate Agreement aims to limit global warming.
• Many countries are banning single-use plastics and promoting recycling.
Sustainable Innovations
• Eco-friendly materials like biodegradable plastics and alternative proteins (plant-based meat, lab-
grown food) are reducing environmental impact.
Public Awareness and Activism
• Movements like Fridays for Future (led by Greta Thunberg) and global climate protests are
pushing governments to act.
2. Challenges Preventing a Fully Sustainable Future
Despite progress, there are still major threats to sustainability:
Climate Change Is Worsening
• Global temperatures continue to rise, causing droughts, wildfires, hurricanes, and melting ice
caps.
• Some countries still prioritize short-term economic gains over climate policies.
Overconsumption and Resource Depletion
• Deforestation in the Amazon, overfishing, and excessive mining are pushing ecosystems to
collapse.
• The world is consuming more resources than the Earth can regenerate.
Economic and Political Barriers
• Developing countries struggle to implement sustainability policies due to economic pressure.
• Many large corporations resist environmental regulations because they increase costs.
Social Inequality in Sustainability
• Richer countries are better equipped to adopt green technologies, while poorer nations struggle
with basic needs.
• Without global cooperation, sustainable development remains uneven.
Conclusion: Are We Moving Toward Sustainability?
• The world is taking steps in the right direction, but the pace is too slow, and some issues are still
worsening. If we increase global cooperation, enforce stricter environmental policies, and adopt
sustainable technologies faster, we have a chance of creating a truly sustainable future.
• However, if governments and corporations continue prioritizing short-term profits over long-term
survival, the world will struggle to provide for future generations.
• Thus, while progress is happening, we are not moving fast enough, and stronger actions are
needed.
Sustainable development is defined as “Meeting the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs”.
However, there are issues related to current development.
Sustainable Development and Current Issues
a) What Are the Main Issues of Current Development?
While development aims to improve living standards, it often comes with several sustainability
challenges. Some of the key issues in current development include:
Environmental Degradation
• Deforestation, air pollution, and water pollution due to rapid industrialization.
• Climate change caused by excessive greenhouse gas emissions.
• Loss of biodiversity due to habitat destruction and pollution.
Resource Depletion
• Overuse of non-renewable resources like fossil fuels and minerals.
• Water scarcity due to unsustainable agricultural and industrial practices.
• Excessive land use for urban expansion, reducing arable land for farming.
Economic Inequality
• Unequal distribution of wealth and resources, leading to poverty.
• Exploitation of labor in developing nations for cheap production.
• Lack of fair wages and job opportunities for marginalized groups.
Urbanization and Infrastructure Challenges
• Overcrowding and slums in rapidly growing cities.
• Poor waste management, causing pollution and health issues.
• Traffic congestion and inefficient transport systems.
Health and Social Issues
• Increase in lifestyle diseases due to unhealthy food habits.
• Lack of education and healthcare access in rural areas.
• Political instability and conflicts over resources.
Addressing these issues through sustainable policies and innovation is crucial for future development.
b) Name Two Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Two of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) introduced by the United Nations are:
1⃣ Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation
• Ensures safe drinking water and proper sanitation for everyone.
• Promotes efficient water use and pollution reduction.
2⃣ Goal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
• Aims to make cities inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable.
• Focuses on affordable housing, efficient transport, and clean energy use.
These goals work towards equitable and sustainable development worldwide.
c) Aspects to Consider in Developing a Sustainable Transport System in Sri Lanka
A sustainable transport system must balance economic growth, environmental protection, and social
well-being. Important factors include:
Efficient Public Transport
• Investing in buses, trains, and electric transport to reduce congestion.
• Improving affordability and accessibility for all citizens.
Eco-friendly Transportation
• Promoting electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid transportation.
• Encouraging solar-powered and biofuel-based transport.
Infrastructure Development
• Expanding rail networks to reduce road traffic.
• Improving cycling lanes and pedestrian pathways.
Traffic and Urban Planning
• Implementing smart traffic management to reduce congestion.
• Designing eco-friendly cities with better transport integration.
Policy and Regulation
• Introducing carbon taxes to discourage high-pollution vehicles.
• Enforcing strict emission controls on industries and vehicles.
Technology Integration
• Using smart transport systems for better connectivity.
• Promoting ride-sharing and carpooling services.
A sustainable transport system in Sri Lanka should prioritize green energy, efficiency, and accessibility
to support future development.
d) Advantages of Walking and Cycling as Sustainable Transport in Urban Cities (20 marks)
Walking and cycling are underutilized in Sri Lanka, but they offer multiple benefits, including:
Health Benefits
• Reduces obesity, heart disease, and diabetes.
• Improves mental well-being and fitness.
Environmental Benefits
• Produces zero carbon emissions, reducing air pollution.
• Lowers noise pollution and urban congestion.
Economic Benefits
• Saves money on fuel, transport fares, and vehicle maintenance.
• Encourages local businesses by increasing foot traffic.
Urban Development Benefits
• Reduces traffic congestion and need for parking spaces.
• Improves quality of life with greener, more walkable cities.
Social and Community Benefits
• Promotes social interactions and safer communities.
• Encourages inclusive mobility for all age groups.
By improving infrastructure and awareness, walking and cycling can become key sustainable
transport solutions in Sri Lanka.
Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals
a) What is meant by Agenda 2030?
Agenda 2030 is a comprehensive global plan adopted by all United Nations (UN) member states in
September 2015 to promote sustainable development worldwide. It consists of 17 Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 specific targets, aiming to transform the world by 2030. The
Agenda emphasizes a people-centered, planet-friendly, and prosperity-driven approach, ensuring that
no one is left behind.
The key objectives of Agenda 2030 include:
1. Ending poverty and hunger – Ensuring that every individual has access to basic necessities,
including food, clean water, and shelter.
2. Promoting good health and education – Providing quality healthcare and education for all,
regardless of socio-economic status.
3. Reducing inequalities – Addressing disparities related to gender, income, and opportunities
among different communities.
4. Encouraging economic growth and innovation – Promoting sustainable industrialization,
economic progress, and technological advancements.
5. Protecting the environment – Combating climate change, conserving natural resources, and
ensuring responsible consumption and production.
The Agenda acknowledges that achieving these goals requires global cooperation between governments,
businesses, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and individuals. It focuses on balancing three key
dimensions: economic development, social inclusion, and environmental protection.
b) How Many Sustainable Development Goals Are Introduced Under Agenda 2030
The UN introduced 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) under Agenda 2030. These goals
provide a comprehensive roadmap for addressing key global challenges, ensuring a balanced approach
to economic, social, and environmental progress.
Each SDG has specific targets and indicators to measure progress and ensure accountability in
achieving sustainable development.
c) Name Two Sustainable Development Goals
Two of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are:
1⃣ Goal 3: Good Health and Well-being
• Ensures access to quality healthcare services for all.
• Reduces child mortality, maternal mortality, and the spread of infectious diseases.
2⃣ Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy
• Promotes access to affordable, reliable, and sustainable energy sources.
• Encourages the use of renewable energy to reduce carbon emissions.
These goals contribute to a healthier and more sustainable world.
d) What Will Happen If There Is Zero Hunger in the World?
If Zero Hunger (SDG 2) is achieved, the world will experience significant positive changes in multiple
areas, including health, economy, and social stability. Some key benefits include:
Better Public Health
• Malnutrition-related diseases such as stunted growth, anemia, and weakened immune systems
would decrease.
• Global life expectancy would increase due to improved nutrition.
• Healthier populations would lead to lower medical costs and stronger immune systems.
Stronger Economies
• A well-nourished population means higher productivity and economic growth.
• Farmers would earn better incomes, boosting rural economies.
• Reduced spending on hunger-related healthcare would free up resources for other essential
services.
Improved Education and Development
• Well-fed children perform better in school, leading to higher literacy rates.
• Education leads to better employment opportunities, reducing poverty cycles.
Less Social Conflict
• Hunger is a major cause of wars, migration, and social unrest.
• Eliminating hunger would create a more peaceful and stable society.
Sustainable Food Systems
• With improved agricultural practices, food production would be more sustainable.
• Less food waste and better food distribution would ensure equal access to nutrition.
EIA procedures
1) Mention the key steps of conducting an EIA using a floor chart and briefly describe the Scoping
process under EIA procedures.
An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a structured process used to evaluate the potential
environmental effects of a proposed project before it is approved. Below is a flowchart showing the key
steps in conducting an EIA:
Flowchart of EIA Process
1 Screening → Determines if a project requires an EIA based on its size, location, and impact.
2 Scoping → Identifies the key environmental issues and determines the study's boundaries.
3 Impact Assessment & Mitigation → Evaluates the potential environmental, social, and economic
impacts and proposes mitigation measures.
4 Public Consultation & Stakeholder Engagement → Engages with affected communities, NGOs, and
stakeholders to gather opinions and concerns.
5 EIA Report Preparation → Compiles findings, mitigation strategies, and monitoring plans into an EIA
report.
6 Review & Decision Making → Authorities review the EIA report and decide whether to approve,
modify, or reject the project.
7 Implementation & Monitoring → Ensures compliance with environmental management plans and
monitors long-term environmental impacts.
Brief Description of the Scoping Process under EIA Procedures
Scoping is a crucial step in the EIA process that helps determine the scope, depth, and focus of the
assessment. It ensures that only relevant environmental issues are studied, preventing unnecessary
delays and costs.
Key Steps in the Scoping Process
Identification of Key Issues
• Determines the potential environmental, social, and economic impacts of the project.
• Focuses on significant impacts, such as deforestation, pollution, habitat loss, and displacement of
communities.
Stakeholder Engagement
• Involves discussions with government agencies, local communities, environmental experts, and
NGOs.
• Helps incorporate public concerns into the EIA study.
Determining the Study Area & Methodology
• Defines the geographical boundaries of the study (e.g., local, regional, or national impacts).
• Identifies the data collection methods and assessment techniques to be used.
Baseline Data Collection
• Gathers existing environmental data to compare with potential impacts.
• Includes air quality, water quality, biodiversity, and socio-economic conditions.
Development of Terms of Reference (ToR)
• Establishes the scope, methods, and responsibilities for conducting the EIA.
• Specifies the types of reports, mitigation plans, and monitoring requirements.
Approval of Scoping Report
• The scoping report is submitted to regulatory authorities for review and approval.
• The project may proceed to the next EIA stage based on the scoping conclusions.
Importance of Scoping in EIA
• Ensures efficient use of resources by focusing on critical impacts.
• Reduces unnecessary studies, saving time and cost.
• Enhances transparency and public trust in environmental decision-making.
(c) Challenges for Conducting EIA in Sri Lanka
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) faces several challenges in Sri Lanka, making its
implementation less effective. Some of the key challenges include:
1 Weak Enforcement of Regulations – Although laws exist, implementation and monitoring are often
weak due to lack of enforcement mechanisms.
2 Lengthy Approval Processes – The EIA approval process can take a long time, leading to delays in
project implementation.
3 Lack of Public Awareness & Participation – Many local communities lack awareness of EIA
procedures and do not actively participate, leading to weak stakeholder engagement.
4 Influence of Political & Business Interests – Some large projects receive political influence to bypass
environmental concerns, affecting the credibility of EIAs.
5 Limited Technical & Financial Resources – Government agencies often lack sufficient expertise and
funding to conduct thorough environmental assessments.
6 Weak Post-EIA Monitoring – Even if an EIA is approved, many projects fail to follow mitigation
measures, as there is little follow-up monitoring.
7 Climate Change & Emerging Environmental Issues – The current EIA framework may not
adequately address new environmental challenges, such as climate change impacts and biodiversity
loss.
Addressing these challenges requires stronger policies, better enforcement, and active public
participation to ensure sustainable development in Sri Lanka.
(d) Key Benefits of Conducting Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) provides several advantages over traditional EIA by
evaluating environmental impacts at a broader policy and planning level.
1. Early Identification of Environmental Issues
• SEA allows governments and organizations to identify environmental risks before major
projects begin, reducing future negative impacts.
2. Supports Sustainable Development
• Ensures that policies, plans, and programs align with sustainability goals by balancing
economic, social, and environmental factors.
3. Helps in Policy-Level Decision-Making
• Unlike EIA, which is project-specific, SEA evaluates broader development strategies, helping
to create eco-friendly policies.
4. Improves Public Participation & Transparency
• SEA involves stakeholders and communities in the decision-making process, ensuring better
acceptance and social responsibility.
5. Reduces Project-Level Conflicts
• By addressing environmental concerns early, SEA prevents legal disputes and delays at the
project level.
6. Strengthens Climate Change Adaptation
• SEA integrates climate resilience strategies into development plans, helping countries prepare
for environmental changes.
SEA is a powerful tool that enhances decision-making by ensuring that environmental sustainability is
integrated into long-term policies and development planning.
(e) Key Steps of Conducting Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
The SEA process consists of several key steps to assess and integrate environmental considerations
into policy and planning.
1 Screening – Determines whether SEA is required for a specific policy or development plan.
2 Scoping – Identifies key environmental issues and the scope of the assessment.
3 Baseline Data Collection – Gathers existing environmental and socio-economic data.
4 Impact Assessment & Evaluation – Analyzes potential environmental, social, and economic
impacts of proposed policies.
5 Stakeholder Consultation – Involves government agencies, NGOs, and the public in reviewing
potential impacts and solutions.
6 Development of Alternatives – Identifies and compares alternative development strategies to
minimize negative effects.
7 Preparation of SEA Report – Summarizes findings, recommendations, and mitigation measures.
8 Review & Approval – Government authorities review the SEA report and make necessary revisions.
9 Implementation & Monitoring – Ensures that the recommendations of the SEA report are followed
and adjusted as needed.
SEA is a proactive approach that helps integrate environmental concerns into the earliest stages of
decision-making, ensuring long-term sustainability.
Environmental Aesthetics
a) Definition of ‘Composition’ in Aesthetics:
In aesthetics, ‘composition’ refers to the arrangement or organization of elements within a given
environment or artwork to create a cohesive whole that evokes a particular sensory or emotional
experience. It is essentially the deliberate combination of different parts or components in such a way that
they contribute to an overall aesthetic effect. These elements might include colors, forms, shapes,
textures, and spatial relationships in visual art, or sounds and rhythms in music.
Composition in environmental aesthetics refers to how various aspects of the environment are organized
and interact visually, creating a unified or balanced aesthetic experience. The arrangement of natural or
man-made elements in an environment, such as landscapes, architecture, and urban spaces, is considered a
form of composition. The harmony between nature and human interventions, or even the contrast between
them, influences how a place is perceived and experienced by individuals.
b) Fundamental Characteristics of a Composition:
i. Unity: Unity refers to the sense of coherence or harmony in a composition where all the elements work
together to create a single, unified whole. In environmental aesthetics, unity can be achieved when the
different components of the environment—whether natural or built—appear to belong together, forming a
seamless and consistent visual experience. Unity creates a sense of stability and completeness in the
viewer’s perception. An example of unity might be a park with uniform pathways, consistent plant
species, and coordinated building designs that complement the surroundings without disrupting the visual
flow.
ii. Balance: Balance in aesthetics refers to the equal distribution of visual weight within a composition. A
balanced environment is one where the visual elements are arranged in a way that feels stable and
proportionate. There are two types of balance:
• Symmetrical balance where elements are mirrored on either side of an axis (e.g., a balanced
garden layout with symmetrical planting or a city plaza with symmetrical architectural features).
• Asymmetrical balance, where elements of differing sizes or characteristics are distributed in
such a way that they still achieve visual stability (e.g., a larger building on one side of a street
balanced by smaller elements like trees or sculptures on the other side).
iii. Harmony & Contrast:
• Harmony in a composition refers to the pleasing arrangement of elements that work well
together. In environmental aesthetics, this could be the blending of natural and built elements that
complement each other, creating a sense of peace and order. For instance, the uniformity of colors
in a forest or the consistent architectural style of buildings within a neighborhood creates
harmony.
• Contrast refers to the juxtaposition of different elements to create visual interest or emphasis.
Contrast can occur in various forms, such as light vs. dark, organic vs. geometric shapes, or rough
textures vs. smooth ones. For example, a modern glass skyscraper contrasting with older stone
buildings in an urban cityscape creates a visual dynamic that draws attention and adds complexity
to the scene.
iv. Rhythm: Rhythm in composition refers to the pattern and repetition of elements in a way that guides
the viewer’s eye through the composition. Just as rhythm in music involves a regular pulse or beat, visual
rhythm is created through repeating elements such as shapes, colors, lines, or forms. In an environmental
context, rhythm might manifest in the repetition of architectural features along a street or the alternating
pattern of trees in a park. This repetition creates a sense of movement or flow within the environment,
providing a dynamic and engaging visual experience.
c) i. Aesthetic Description of a Familiar Place:
Let’s consider the Royal Botanic Gardens in Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, as the selected location.
The visual environment of the Royal Botanic Gardens is a harmonious composition of natural and
cultivated elements. The gardens feature vast green lawns, a variety of indigenous and exotic trees, and
meticulously planned flower beds. The unity of the space is evident in the consistent landscape design,
where diverse plant species are arranged in a manner that feels both natural and curated. The well-
maintained paths and carefully placed benches add to the sense of continuity throughout the gardens.
The balance in the composition is achieved through symmetrical pathways that divide the park into
various sections, while the irregularity of the tree placements creates an asymmetrical visual balance,
offering interest and variety. The architecture of the buildings within the park, such as the main entrance
and the orchid house, is tastefully integrated into the natural surroundings, ensuring no visual overwhelm.
In terms of harmony and contrast, the gardens balance the vibrant colors of flowers with the serene
greens of the grass and foliage. The diversity of plant species, from tall trees to low-lying flowers,
provides a rich contrast in terms of height and texture but is unified by the overall theme of nature. The
rhythm in the gardens is created through the repetitive pattern of flower beds, trees, and the rhythmic
placement of walkways. The interplay of shadow and light on the lawns also adds a dynamic rhythm as
the day progresses, with shifting light enhancing the visual flow.
Overall, the composition of the Royal Botanic Gardens is one that blends nature with human design in a
manner that is visually pleasing and cohesive.
ii. Visual Pollution and Its Impact on the Aesthetics of the Place:
Visual pollution can significantly degrade the aesthetic quality of a place, particularly when it involves the
introduction of elements that disrupt the natural composition of the environment. In the case of the Royal
Botanic Gardens, new additions such as large billboards, unsightly buildings, or excessive signage could
disrupt the visual harmony of the area.
Imagine a scenario where billboards advertising products or events are placed within view of the lush
gardens, interrupting the natural flow of the landscape. These billboards, with their bright colors and text,
would contrast sharply with the serene green space, creating a jarring effect that undermines the peaceful
atmosphere of the garden. The visual balance of the gardens would be disturbed, as the natural patterns of
plant life and design would be overshadowed by the artificial, attention-grabbing elements.
In addition, poorly designed structures—such as modern buildings or facilities that don’t align with the
traditional or natural aesthetics of the park—could introduce visual clutter, making the space feel
congested and chaotic. The rhythm of the landscape would be interrupted, as the once continuous flow of
natural elements would be broken by unnatural, rigid structures.
In conclusion, the aesthetics of the Royal Botanic Gardens, which are based on unity, balance, harmony,
and rhythm, could be severely compromised if visual pollution is allowed to invade. Elements like
billboards, mismatched buildings, and excessive signage would create a stark contrast to the natural
environment, diminishing the overall beauty and sensory experience that the garden provides.
c) Essay on Visual Pollution: (Same as Above)
Selected Context: Urban City (Example: Colombo, Sri Lanka)
In the urban city of Colombo, Sri Lanka, the aesthetic composition of the environment used to be one
where traditional architecture, green spaces, and coastal views created a harmonious atmosphere. The city
was a blend of historical buildings with distinct architectural styles, alongside natural features like the
Beira Lake and surrounding greenery. This composition of elements created a balanced and unified urban
landscape, with the calm of the water and the lushness of the parks adding to the rhythm of daily life.
However, in recent years, the visual quality of Colombo has been degraded due to various forms of visual
pollution. One of the major contributors to this degradation has been the proliferation of billboards.
Large, brightly colored billboards have been erected along the streets, advertising products and services,
often blocking views of important landmarks and obscuring natural vistas. These advertisements, with
their bold graphics and text, create a stark contrast to the more subdued tones of the surrounding buildings
and greenery, disrupting the harmony of the environment.
In addition to billboards, new high-rise structures have altered the skyline of the city. While some
buildings are modern and well-designed, others seem out of place, not aligning with the traditional
architectural style of the city. This has led to an imbalance in the visual composition, with new structures
dominating the cityscape and overshadowing the older, more intricate designs. The once balanced skyline
now feels disjointed, with some areas appearing overly dense or chaotic due to these rapid, uncoordinated
developments.
Furthermore, unplanned street furniture—such as poorly designed street signs, plastic waste bins, and
unnecessary barriers—have been added to the streets without much thought to their integration into the
overall design. These elements disrupt the natural flow and rhythm of the urban space, leading to a
cluttered and chaotic visual environment.
The introduction of excessive lighting in some commercial areas also contributes to visual pollution.
Neon lights and floodlights that are overly bright and not in harmony with the surrounding areas have
created an environment where artificial light dominates the natural nightscapes, negatively impacting the
aesthetics of the city after dark.
In conclusion, the once harmonious and unified aesthetic of Colombo has been compromised by these
additions. The natural and historical elements of the environment have been overshadowed by visually
disruptive elements that do not contribute to the overall composition of the space. This visual pollution
has degraded the city’s aesthetic quality, leading to an environment that feels less cohesive and more
fragmented.
Ways to Develop Without Degrading Aesthetics:
To develop the city without degrading its aesthetics, careful consideration must be given to preserving the
harmony and balance of the environment. Some measures that could be taken include:
• Restricting billboard sizes and ensuring that advertisements are designed to complement the
surrounding environment rather than overwhelm it. For example, using smaller, more subtle
signage that blends with the architectural and natural features of the city would help maintain
visual harmony.
• Promoting architectural guidelines that encourage new buildings to align with the existing
urban fabric. By focusing on designs that complement historical buildings and blend with the
surrounding landscape, the city can grow without losing its aesthetic unity.
• Creating green spaces within urban areas where commercial developments are concentrated.
Parks, trees, and gardens can help maintain the rhythm and balance of the cityscape while
providing a visual respite from the built environment.
• Regulating lighting to prevent excessive and harsh artificial light in public spaces, allowing for
the natural beauty of the city to be appreciated during nighttime.
By taking these measures, Colombo can continue to develop while preserving the aesthetic composition
of its environment, reducing the impact of visual pollution.
Health impacts of mobile phone technology
a) Possible Health Impacts of Mobile Phone Technology:
Mobile phone technology, while offering numerous benefits in terms of communication and convenience,
has raised concerns regarding its potential health impacts. These concerns primarily stem from the
exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) emitted by mobile phones. Some of the
possible health impacts of mobile phone technology include:
1. Radiation Exposure and Cancer Risk: Mobile phones emit non-ionizing radiation, and there
have been ongoing debates about the link between this radiation and an increased risk of cancer,
especially brain cancer. The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified RF-EMF as a
possible carcinogen (Group 2B), indicating that there may be an increased risk of cancer,
particularly glioma and acoustic neuroma, though conclusive evidence is still lacking.
2. Impact on Brain Function: Some studies suggest that prolonged mobile phone use may affect
brain activity. Research has shown that RF-EMF exposure might alter brain wave patterns,
potentially leading to disruptions in cognitive function, sleep patterns, or even memory problems.
However, the effects appear to be short-term and reversible, though long-term effects are still
under study.
3. Impact on Sleep: Exposure to the radiation emitted by mobile phones, especially before bedtime,
has been associated with disrupted sleep patterns. RF-EMF exposure may affect melatonin
levels, a hormone that regulates sleep, potentially leading to sleep disturbances and insomnia.
4. Increased Stress and Fatigue: Some studies have suggested that prolonged mobile phone use
might increase stress levels and cause fatigue. This is partly due to the constant engagement with
notifications, calls, and messages, which can lead to psychological stress. The radiation itself is
unlikely to cause stress, but the behavioral aspects of mobile phone use may play a role.
5. Effects on Heart Health: While the research is inconclusive, some studies have explored
whether mobile phone use may have an impact on the heart, especially in terms of increased
heart rate or changes in blood pressure. However, no significant direct link has been proven.
6. Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS): Some individuals report experiencing symptoms like
headaches, dizziness, fatigue, and skin irritation when exposed to mobile phones or other wireless
devices. This condition, referred to as electromagnetic hypersensitivity, is controversial, as it is
not widely recognized as a medical condition, and studies have not shown a direct connection
between symptoms and RF-EMF exposure.
b) Why It Is Not Easy for the General Public to Know the Exact Health Impacts of Mobile Phone
Technology:
1. Lack of Conclusive Research: One of the main reasons it is difficult for the general public to
understand the health impacts of mobile phone technology is the lack of conclusive scientific
evidence. While numerous studies have been conducted, the results are often inconclusive,
inconsistent, or contradictory. Some studies show possible links between mobile phone use and
health issues, while others find no significant effects. This makes it hard to establish clear,
universally accepted conclusions.
2. Evolving Technology: Mobile phone technology is rapidly evolving, with new models, features,
and functionalities being introduced frequently. Older studies may not be relevant to newer
devices, as changes in technology (such as the introduction of 5G networks) may alter the way
phones emit radiation or interact with the human body. This constant evolution complicates
efforts to track long-term health impacts accurately.
3. Challenges in Measuring Radiation Exposure: The radiation emitted by mobile phones is non-
ionizing, meaning it doesn’t have enough energy to directly damage DNA or cells. However,
measuring the exact amount of exposure and its effects on the body is challenging. The effects of
mobile phone radiation depend on various factors such as signal strength, duration of exposure,
frequency, and the individual’s proximity to the device, all of which are difficult to quantify in a
way that the general public can easily understand.
4. Varying Individual Sensitivities: Different individuals may have different levels of sensitivity to
mobile phone radiation, and it can be influenced by factors like age, pre-existing health
conditions, and lifestyle. This variability makes it difficult to create generalized guidelines that
apply to everyone. For example, some people may experience health issues from mobile phone
use, while others may not.
5. Industry Influence: The mobile phone industry is a multi-billion-dollar sector with substantial
influence. There are concerns that industry-funded studies might downplay or dismiss the
potential risks associated with mobile phones. This can create a conflict of interest, making it
harder for the general public to trust the findings or feel confident about the potential health risks.
6. Public Perception and Media Representation: The media often sensationalizes scientific
studies, leading to confusion and conflicting messages about the health risks of mobile phones.
This inconsistency in media reporting can contribute to public uncertainty about the issue. Often,
studies that indicate potential risks are exaggerated or misinterpreted, while studies that find no
evidence of harm are downplayed.
7. Long-term Effects Are Not Fully Known: The long-term health effects of mobile phone use are
still largely unknown, as mobile phones have only been widely used for a few decades. The
effects may only become apparent after prolonged exposure over many years, making it difficult
for scientists and the public to know the risks now. There is a time lag between the introduction of
new technologies and the identification of long-term health effects.
8. Regulatory Uncertainty: Different countries have different regulations and safety standards
when it comes to mobile phone radiation. In some regions, mobile phones are subject to stricter
guidelines regarding radiation emissions, while in others, standards may be more relaxed. This
variation adds to the confusion, as the general public may not know which regulations or safety
limits apply to their devices and whether they are sufficient to protect their health.
Conclusion:
The health impacts of mobile phone technology remain a subject of ongoing research, with mixed results
and a range of factors complicating the determination of exact risks. The rapid pace of technological
development, evolving devices, and limited conclusive research make it difficult for the general public to
fully understand and assess the health implications of mobile phone use.